chefjavier wrote: Once again, CSX
Once again, CSX
Looks like someone has it out for CSX. Need some facts before blaming a company that didn't even occur on its rails. And for the record, it happened on the NS
http://www.youtube.com/user/pavabo
http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulvbox
Tom
COAST LINE FOREVER
It is better to dwell in the corner of a roof than to share a house with a contentious woman! (Solomon)
A contentious woman is like a constant dripping! (Solomon)
That security video is wild....I wasnt aware it was that violent an impact.
http://www.trainfoamers.com/phorum2/read.php?10,29111
My train videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/karldotcom
Straight from amtrak's site (bold emphasis is mine):
Train 371, the Pere Marquette - Service Disruption Near Chicago
November 30, 2007 7:30 pm CDT
Amtrak is working with the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and other agencies following a collision involving Amtrak Train 371, the Pere Marquette, of Friday, November 30, with a Norfolk Southern (NS) freight train on NS tracks south of Chicago.
There were 187 passengers and six employees on board the Amtrak train. Most passengers and crew members were unhurt and were later transported to Amtrak Chicago Union Station and on to their destinations. Amtrak will work through the weekend, if needed, to care for affected passengers and employees. Two Amtrak employees were among the most seriously injured.
Amtrak service has resumed over this route between Chicago and points east, including Michigan, subject to some delays in the affected area. The only significant service disruption on Saturday, December 1, is the operation of Train 371, which will be represented by chartered motorcoaches for the full route south and west from Grand Rapids to Chicago.
Passengers should call 800-USA-RAIL or visit Amtrak.com for specific information and train status updates.
This information is correct as of the date and time above and will be updated as needed.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
karldotcom wrote: That security video is wild....I wasnt aware it was that violent an impact.http://www.trainfoamers.com/phorum2/read.php?10,29111
Too bad you have to be a member to access it.
try:
http://www.rfdi.info/amtrak.wmv
I saw that on the news when I got home last night, it was really strange for me watching it because Friday I finished my First Responder training for work and the last thing we went over in class was MCIs (Multiple-Casualty Incidents) and the Triage system and im standing there watching TV like "Holy crap I know what there doing!"
It could have been alot worse, Im glad it wasnt
Dutchrailnut wrote: try:http://www.rfdi.info/amtrak.wmv
This link worked for me...it may just be my perception from the video, but the Chicago Tribune reproted this morning that the Amtrak train was doing max 15 mph when he went into emergency and it seemed to be doing more than 15 in the video, perhaps it was just the poor nature of the video or something.
eolafan wrote: Dutchrailnut wrote: try:http://www.rfdi.info/amtrak.wmvThis link worked for me...it may just be my perception from the video, but the Chicago Tribune reproted this morning that the Amtrak train was doing max 15 mph when he went into emergency and it seemed to be doing more than 15 in the video, perhaps it was just the poor nature of the video or something.
I also watch the video this morning and I notice the blind spot from the left train. It may be going 15mph in a slighty curve yard but because,the train were moving each side it may even see it coming to last moment. I guest this a mistake of the dispacther. Does anyone have another opinion?
chefjavier wrote: eolafan wrote: Dutchrailnut wrote: try:http://www.rfdi.info/amtrak.wmvThis link worked for me...it may just be my perception from the video, but the Chicago Tribune reproted this morning that the Amtrak train was doing max 15 mph when he went into emergency and it seemed to be doing more than 15 in the video, perhaps it was just the poor nature of the video or something.I also watch the video this morning and I notice the blind spot from the left train. It may be going 15mph in a slighty curve yard but because,the train were moving each side it may even see it coming to last moment. I guest this a mistake of the dispacther. Does anyone have another opinion?
You can throw all the opinions and trash you want out here, 1st off it was a NS train not a csx train that this amtrak train ran into, 2nd if I remeber right it was CN trackage. No the NS train was not backing up it was stopped. I wont go into detail about other factors such as amtraks speeding, signals and other things . just wait til the investigation is done,
First, I just want to say how amazing that it is to have video of this - and so soon.
Based on what I've seen and heard/read it looks like the NS Dispatcher crossed the Amtrak passenger train over from one track to the next with instructions to follow the freight train that it hit at restricted speed. I'm guessing at this point that both the NS dispatcher and the Amtrak train crew were expecting the freight train to have restarted and proceed sooner than it did. This could be a classic case of the Amtrak engineer "riding the yellows" (expecting the red stop signal to change to yellow restricted at the very moment that they pass the signal aspect except that the signal stays red and it's too late to stop). The television news coverage shows a bunch of empty tracks and you wonder why the engineer didn't see the train ahead. The security camera video shows a much better perspective of an active rail yard with a t least three different moving trains. The Amtrak train came around the slight left hand turn and couldn't see the stopped freight train ahead until it was too late because of traffic on other tracks that blinded their view. The security video could prove to be incriminating for the Amtrak engineer and assistant engineer.
I was impressed with the amount of damage done to the underside of the engine and that the fuel tanks/diesel fuel didn't catch on fire (reports say they did leak, but didn't rupture). Also, the three passenger cars remained upright and any damage looks minor. With the exception of the train crews injuries, most of the injured weren't seriously hurt.
CC
When one receives a restricting signal, one proceeds prepared to stop. It's all on the crews' shoulders. One never knows what one might encounter on a restricting signal and one must operate accordingly.
wabash1 wrote: chefjavier wrote: eolafan wrote: Dutchrailnut wrote: try:http://www.rfdi.info/amtrak.wmvThis link worked for me...it may just be my perception from the video, but the Chicago Tribune reproted this morning that the Amtrak train was doing max 15 mph when he went into emergency and it seemed to be doing more than 15 in the video, perhaps it was just the poor nature of the video or something.I also watch the video this morning and I notice the blind spot from the left train. It may be going 15mph in a slighty curve yard but because,the train were moving each side it may even see it coming to last moment. I guest this a mistake of the dispacther. Does anyone have another opinion? You can throw all the opinions and trash you want out here, 1st off it was a NS train not a csx train that this amtrak train ran into, 2nd if I remeber right it was CN trackage. No the NS train was not backing up it was stopped. I wont go into detail about other factors such as amtraks speeding, signals and other things . just wait til the investigation is done, You should check your information before posting on the forum.
You should check your information before posting on the forum.
Looking at the video and the clock on the screen, it took about 5 seconds for the entire train to enter the picture. The length of 3 Superliners and a P42 is 325 feet which means that the train was moving at a speed of 65 feet per second, 3900 feet per minute or about 44.3 MPH.
If I have it right, that compares to the guess of the passenger who said 15 to 20 MPH. I am not too surprised at the difference. Unless a person had experience checking speeds, the perspective from the upper level of a Superliner is is going to cause the perceived speed to be less than the actual speed.
"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics
jeaton wrote: Looking at the video and the clock on the screen, it took about 5 seconds for the entire train to enter the picture. The length of 3 Superliners and a P42 is 325 feet which means that the train was moving at a speed of 65 feet per second, 3900 feet per minute or about 44.3 MPH.If I have it right, that compares to the guess of the passenger who said 15 to 20 MPH. I am not too surprised at the difference. Unless a person had experience checking speeds, the perspective from the upper level of a Superliner is is going to cause the perceived speed to be less than the actual speed.
Not to burst your bubble but I think you may be going to aggresive with the speed.
Just heard on the news that the train loco was so damaged they might not be able to recober the black box.
Chico
OldBNfan wrote:Local news here in Kalamazoo reported..., that the train was headed directly into the sunlight (potentially obstructing their forward view).
The train was heading directly north.
That's very good detective work, jeaton. I read it as 6 seconds for the Amtrak train to travel its length before the collision. I agree with your figure of 325 feet. Therefore, I deduce an average of 37 mph while the train was moving for the camera. If it were braking, then it would have been travelling faster than 37 mph when it first entered the field of view.
www.CurtRenz.com
Centaur wrote: jeaton wrote: Looking at the video and the clock on the screen, it took about 5 seconds for the entire train to enter the picture. The length of 3 Superliners and a P42 is 325 feet which means that the train was moving at a speed of 65 feet per second, 3900 feet per minute or about 44.3 MPH.If I have it right, that compares to the guess of the passenger who said 15 to 20 MPH. I am not too surprised at the difference. Unless a person had experience checking speeds, the perspective from the upper level of a Superliner is is going to cause the perceived speed to be less than the actual speed.That's very good detective work, jeaton. I read it as 6 seconds for the Amtrak train to travel its length before the collision. I'm not an expert, so I'll accept your figure for the length of the train. Therefore, I deduce an average of 37 mph while the train was moving for the camera. If it were braking, then it would have been travelling faster than 37 mph when it first entered the field of view.
That's very good detective work, jeaton. I read it as 6 seconds for the Amtrak train to travel its length before the collision. I'm not an expert, so I'll accept your figure for the length of the train. Therefore, I deduce an average of 37 mph while the train was moving for the camera. If it were braking, then it would have been travelling faster than 37 mph when it first entered the field of view.
Where do you get your calculations.. Keep in mind you have emergency breaking active.
chefjavier wrote: Centaur wrote: jeaton wrote: Looking at the video and the clock on the screen, it took about 5 seconds for the entire train to enter the picture. The length of 3 Superliners and a P42 is 325 feet which means that the train was moving at a speed of 65 feet per second, 3900 feet per minute or about 44.3 MPH.If I have it right, that compares to the guess of the passenger who said 15 to 20 MPH. I am not too surprised at the difference. Unless a person had experience checking speeds, the perspective from the upper level of a Superliner is is going to cause the perceived speed to be less than the actual speed.That's very good detective work, jeaton. I read it as 6 seconds for the Amtrak train to travel its length before the collision. I'm not an expert, so I'll accept your figure for the length of the train. Therefore, I deduce an average of 37 mph while the train was moving for the camera. If it were braking, then it would have been travelling faster than 37 mph when it first entered the field of view. Where do you get your calculations.. Keep in mind you have emergency breaking active.
As I previously stated, chefjavier, my figure is an estimate of the average speed while the train was moving in front of the camera. As I also said, if the train were braking it would have been travelling faster than that average when it first it entered the field of view. Naturally, that implies that if it were indeed braking, it would have been moving slower than that average immediately before the collision. The question is whether it was proper for the train to have been moving around 37 mph at any time while in that rail yard.
The 325 ft length given by jeaton appears accurate. The three passenger cars are each 85 ft and the engine is 70 ft. I suppose some more length could be added between cars, but that would not change the estimated speed by much. Of course, my reading of 6 seconds is imprecise, but it's close enough to get a ballpark estimate of the average speed.
325 ft / 6 sec x 3600 sec/hr / 5280 ft/mi = 37 mi/hr
Dutchrailnut wrote:not according the passengers, no braking was felt till just before crash.
There was contradictory testimony from witnesses on that matter. Some reported braking and some did not.
Centaur wrote: chefjavier wrote: Centaur wrote: jeaton wrote: Looking at the video and the clock on the screen, it took about 5 seconds for the entire train to enter the picture. The length of 3 Superliners and a P42 is 325 feet which means that the train was moving at a speed of 65 feet per second, 3900 feet per minute or about 44.3 MPH.If I have it right, that compares to the guess of the passenger who said 15 to 20 MPH. I am not too surprised at the difference. Unless a person had experience checking speeds, the perspective from the upper level of a Superliner is is going to cause the perceived speed to be less than the actual speed.That's very good detective work, jeaton. I read it as 6 seconds for the Amtrak train to travel its length before the collision. I'm not an expert, so I'll accept your figure for the length of the train. Therefore, I deduce an average of 37 mph while the train was moving for the camera. If it were braking, then it would have been travelling faster than 37 mph when it first entered the field of view. Where do you get your calculations.. Keep in mind you have emergency breaking active. As I previously stated, chefjavier, my figure is an estimate of the average speed while the train was moving in front of the camera. As I also said, if the train were braking it would have been travelling faster than that average when it first it entered the field of view. Naturally, that implies that if it were indeed braking, it would have been moving slower than that average immediately before the collision. The question is whether it was proper for the train to have been moving around 37 mph at any time while in that rail yard. The 325 ft length given by jeaton appears accurate. The three passenger cars are each 85 ft and the engine is 70 ft. I suppose some more length could be added between cars, but that would not change the estimated speed by much. Of course, my reading of 6 seconds is imprecise, but it's close enough to get a ballpark estimate of the average speed.325 ft / 6 sec x 3600 sec/hr / 5280 ft/mi = 37 mi/hr
You got your facts straight but we need to wait for the NTSB to tell us what inspired those crucial seconds before impact. Do you think Amtrak locomotives have cameras install in their cab?
Centaur wrote: Dutchrailnut wrote:not according the passengers, no braking was felt till just before crash.There was contradictory testimony from witnesses on that matter. Some reported braking and some did not.
As a fairly frequent rider on Superliners, I can understand that passengers might give mixed reports on the question of braking. The sound made by applied brakes is isolated, so it mostly depends on a person's sensitivity to decceleration.
Since it is still an educated guess, I am OK with 6 seconds on the elapsed time. It just gives us an idea of the speed and of course, doesn't answer why the train was moving at that speed. If the black box doesn't have it, the NTSB collision specialists will probably be able to figure it from the damage.
Jay
WLS Channel 7 ABC Television in Chicago had an update report on its late evening news broadcast (around 11 p.m. Saturday following the Missouri v Oklahoma football game). NTSB spokesman was shown stating that the Amtrak engineer has confirmed 40 mph speed going into the slight curve, then applying full emergency and impacting at 33-35 mph. So, if signal and/or dispatcher instruction was for "restricted" speed, wouldn't this be a plain violation, possibly on account of a mistake in signal recognition confusing Restricting (R/Y) for an Approach (Y/R)?
"The Amtrak train's engineer told investigators that after he switched tracks as instructed by a dispatcher, he accelerated to 40 mph; when he saw the freight train, he applied his brakes and hit the stationary train at between 33-35 mph, Sumwalt said. It took 9 seconds from the moment the engineer hit the brakes and the collision with the freight train, the NTSB official said."
***
"The Chicago Tribune reported Saturday that a dispatcher in Michigan told the Amtrak train to slow down, prepare to switch tracks and proceed with caution as it approached Chicago's Union Station. The train's crew did as it was told, but still slammed into the freight train about a mile later. The Amtrak train applied its emergency brakes as it approached the freight train, but wasn't able to stop before the impact, the newspaper said."
Source: http://cbs2chicago.com/local/amtrak.crash.investigation.2.600105.html
So, do we know what the signal (at 63rd Street?) was actually displaying and if the dispatcher used the word "proceed with caution" as reported, does that mean "restricted" or "approach?"
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.