EJE818 wrote:Dale, right now stack trains only use the EJ&E from Eola to Joliet, and those are all BNSF. I'm not exacly sure on the clearances on the line but they must be at least high enough at least from Eola to Joliet for stacks, if not further then that. Murphy, before the SD38-2s and GP38-2s came along EJ&E had engines from EMD, Baldwin, and ALCO. They even had baldwin sharks very briefly. Ever since, they have been all EMD from the SD38-2s onward. An excellent site to check would be www.ejearchive.com for any information on EJ&E engines, past and present.
The stack trains primarily from BNSF Eola, but they have several manifest and auto trains from UP and manifest from CN.
New York St in Aurora crosses the "J" on a bridge - no problems with clearance as the bridge is rather new (@15-17 years old). Rt. 34 can't really be classified as an obstruction... It's a grade level crossing. Just a pain for motorists as train traffic continues to increase.
CC
CSSHEGEWISCH wrote: EJ&E's road fleet around 1948 was the centercabs and some RS2's. Not surprisingly, they also had a fair collection of switchers from Baldwin, Alco and EMD, including some Winton-powered switchers and High Hoods.
EJ&E's road fleet around 1948 was the centercabs and some RS2's. Not surprisingly, they also had a fair collection of switchers from Baldwin, Alco and EMD, including some Winton-powered switchers and High Hoods.
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
It looks like Baldwin and Alco diesels had something in common. Their respective prime movers may not have been that great, but their electrical systems and traction motors supplied by Westinghouse (Baldwin) and GE (Alco) were top notch.
The J reengined their Baldwin center cabs with EMD prime movers but kept the unit's Westinghouse traction motors (I'm guessing), to increase their reliability between times in the shop, while maintaining the lugging ability of each locomotive. Did the J reengine any of their Alco or Baldwin switchers?
There's an article in today's (12/22/08) Wall Street Journal about the political forces active in the EJ&E acquisition.
eastside There's an article in today's (12/22/08) Wall Street Journal about the political forces active in the EJ&E acquisition.
It's titled "Routing the Rails Through the Suburbs - Canadian National Plan to Avoid Inner-City Freight Bottleneck Triggers Protests", by Alex Roth, page A-5, cols. 1- 6. The text occupies the entire page length of col. 1, but only about 2 inches of cols. 2 - 4. Cols. 5 -6 are a poor quality - hard to discern (in my opinion) graphic of the rail line as a heavy line overlaid on a mosaic of the greater Chicago area, where the 4 "shadings" differentiate between the 1999 Median Household Incomes.
If you've been following this thread, I think there's nothing much new here, other than that some of the politicians from the inner-urban areas apparently support the proposed acqusition - at least verbally - to get the rail traffic out of their neighborhoods. As the late. great Trains Editor David P. Morgan once wrote that one of his Army officers told him, "Morgan, it all depends on whose ox is being gored . . . ".
- Paul North.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.