Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
54
Replies — 12741 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 37: August 22, 2005
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 37: August 22, 2005
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 12:53 AM
I voted for Mike. I miss shooting the Oil Cans on Tehachapi Loop !
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 1:29 AM
I voted for Erik, IC over CP anyday.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
udohaubmann
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 2:26 AM
Hi,
Difficult vote again - I chose Mike. Great train shown in full length, and interesting lighting. But I have to admit ErikĀ“s shot is great too - also good for a win!
Udo
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
aussiecsx
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 5:14 AM
Text
Text
TextMike, Great shot of this train to capture the full length of a train thats relativly long is quite rare. I live in the Hunter Valley region of New South Wales AUSTRALIA where we run coal trains of up to 108 cars and i can only think of a few spots that i could get a shot of the whole train well done top marks.
Regards
Greg
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jimmac230
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 7:05 AM
I preferred Erik's over Mike's CP photo. Now if Mike had went with the UP's heritage unit, He would have gotten the vote hands down. Just kidding.... Both photos are great. I'm a firm believer of keeping a camera around just in case of those unusual situations where the train may have something unique or different with it and catch it on the fly.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
PRRK4s1361
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 7:14 AM
You blew it Eric...if you had used the first shot of the IC units (going away) it would have been a very difficult decision but since you went with the 'in-your-face' look, that did it. I went with Mike's; very clean lines, no clutter detracting from the subject. Still, keep up the great work, guys.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
DICKK
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 7:16 AM
I voted for mike. Even though it looked like a giant millipede, it caught my eye more than the other.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 7:57 AM
TWO PEAS IN THE SAME POD! MIKE'S PHOTO BEING SLIGHTLY MORE INTERESTING DUE TO THE LINEAR PERFECTION OF THE TRAIN AND R.O.W. BLUELANTERN
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
dknelson
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 7:58 AM
If Bergie's is the Alpha, does that make Mike's the Omega?
Let's all take shots of sulpher trains! Last one in's a rotten egg!
Dave Nelson
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
FrankStratton
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 8:52 AM
I had to vote for Mike's shot, a whole (75) car train of oil cans and a single locomotive would seem to be a rather rare sight. A well framed shot too.
On the other hand I hope that someone got some rooster shots of those IC units. It is hard to believe that one would see (3) fallen flag Illinois Central units together like that in 2005. Both of Eric's shots seem to be missing something, almost like he wasn't in the right spot, too close to the rails maybe. Those rare IC units needed more of a broadside shot to do them justice.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
tmcc man
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 9:30 AM
i went with mikes photo becuase he fit the entire train into the photo. The train looks really cool especially since one loco is pulling it all.
Colin
from prr.railfan.net
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
shawnbecher
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 10:05 AM
While seeing the IC units together is great, the photo iteslf has too much white space (the sky). I liked Mike's photo better because there is more color to it even if the nose of the loco is in the shadows. I have taken many shots like that myself.
Shawn - MP 116 CP Watertown Sub
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
sporegonfan
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 10:06 AM
I will admit it was a difficult choice this week. But I went with Erik's because I like the brighter colors in it. However, it probably would have been a better shot if taken a little more from the left: show that all three locomotives are IC. In this shot, it's hard to tell.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
mandelswamp
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 11:01 AM
Erik and Mike, you provided another tough choice. Mike, I tend to favor the Canadian railroads and I liked the fact that your shot captures that long line of tank cars. However, as you mentioned yourself, the locomotive is in shadows so that subtracted from the photo. I decided to vote for Erik's picture because I felt it truly captured the train's snaking progress from siding to main and was therefore the slightly better picture.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kolechovski
on
Tue, Aug 23 2005 2:42 PM
I like Mike's photo, but Erik's seemed far more visually appealing to me. It was also at a unique angle, and showed some less common locos and had better lighting.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 37: August 22, 2005