Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
73
Replies — 13033 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 20 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004
Forums
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004
Posted by
PRRK4s1361
on
Wed, Oct 27 2004 6:52 AM
I voted for #1 this time though, as everyone else is stating, it was a very tough choice. At first I thought #2 because of the action it shows but the more I looked at #1 the more I liked the background and sky, Keep up the good work guys.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 27 2004 4:29 PM
i voted for #2 because it was a sharper picture
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
railfan619
on
Wed, Oct 27 2004 5:11 PM
I had to vote for number 1 because I grew up near UP tracks and even The Old CN&W tracks I Think UP has bigger and better engines Than any other RailRoad
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
fish1467
on
Wed, Oct 27 2004 5:43 PM
Photo one; the sky really contrasts well with yellow locomotives.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Oct 27 2004 8:19 PM
As much as I hate GEs, I had to got with #1 this week. Its a wonderful photo, we've all seen those old photos of a UP freight traversing the open prarie, with the tall prarie grass, this shot almost seems like a new age version of that idea. Great job! Also some very dramatic lighting.
Here is a recent photo of mine, of the RailCruise America dinner train . . . . . .
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Oct 28 2004 2:04 PM
I remember when Seaboard Airline Railroad, now CSX, had tracks one mile from my house for the local. In the afternoon, when I came home from work, the local would be wobbling down the line at slow speed to the next drop off/pick up. [:(]
This picture reminds me of those days. [:D]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
081440
on
Thu, Oct 28 2004 7:17 PM
#1 Is one of the best pictures I've seen in a long time. I love the fact that there is no train behind the engines. It lets me think of what the engines will do next, head home, or set out to pick up train or some cars. #1 also has an incredible undistubed backround. [:)]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Thu, Oct 28 2004 7:30 PM
Seems like the people who voted for #1 all comment on the sky.
That's what stood out for me right away. The way the clouds and
engines glow .Very moody.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
fuzzybroken
on
Sun, Oct 31 2004 1:34 PM
I voted for #2. UP's AC's just don't do it for me, especially with no freight cars behind 'em. (Now a SD90MAC would be another story...)
Actually, the second picture looks a lot like the train I shot this morning -- Action Red on the point, Candy Apple Red trailing -- but mine had a loooooong train behind it!!! It sure is impressive how good some of those Action Red units
still
look!!!
-Mark
http://www.geocities.com/fuzzybroken
-Fuzzy
Fuzzy World 3
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
jimmac230
on
Sun, Oct 31 2004 2:37 PM
I voted for #1, either they were power moving or going to assist another train, Union Pacific is not in the habit of moving locomotives without a train attached to it. #2 appears to be a standard photo.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Tue, Nov 2 2004 5:57 AM
I to had to go with the working crowd. UP looks like it was posing for this shot.[^]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
railman
on
Tue, Nov 2 2004 10:20 AM
I did vote #2...though the UP shot was nice...the engines seemed so blanche. By that I mean we see them everywhere...the faceless, new engine. Photo itself was great....but Number 2 had more character.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Sun, Nov 7 2004 12:42 AM
#2 displays railroading doing what it gets paid to do....move freight.
#1 displays what you don't want to have happen....power moving with no revenue behind it.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
kolechovski
on
Fri, Nov 19 2004 12:07 PM
Both were really nice. I loved the contrast, the big engines with no train, and the angle of the sun. I voted for number 2. Why? Although 2 doesn't have the dramatic lighting, you can see the haze of the exhaust, the smaller, beautiful units versus those big lugs I'm too used to seeing these days, and a full train in tow on what looks like a hot summer day.
edit-I will guess that number 1 is Mike's, as it is a heavy mood shot; number 2 is Erik's, as it is a fancy general shot.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 18: October 25, 2004