I got new pics of my SP GP40 # 9725 up.
ive been modifieing a cheap dummy locomotive that Readers Digest gave to people.
Army National Guard E3MOS 91BI have multiple scales nowZ, N, HO, O, and G.
I did more work on the Geep yesterday....She now has a plow a fuel tank (finally sheesh ) and a horn.....i will upload more pics soon.....camera decided to stop working otherwise they'd be up now
nscaler711 wrote:I got new pics of my SP GP40 # 9725 up.ive been modifieing a cheap dummy locomotive that Readers Digest gave to people.
Wow it looks pretty good considering what you started with. I have the same set and was wondering if I could ever use it. I figured it would just be used for a weathering dummy. Please keep us posted on your progress, I'd like to see what you can do with it.
That geep looks perty good, correct me if I am wrong, but aint that a High Speed Metal Products GP38?
Lionel collector, stuck in an N scaler's modelling space.
to tell you the truth RR Redneck i dont know wether to call it a GP38 or GP40. and it is a High Speed loco #418
But what i do know is my model is almost completly finnished....other than the fact it needs Lights, and a pair of handrails (front, back porches)
ill post pics As Soon As Possible.
Its a Gp35
link herehttp://www.visi.com/~spookshow/gp28.html
WOO HOO PICS ARE UPLOADED!!!
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1217.jpg
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1225.jpg
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1219.jpg
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1222.jpg
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1224.jpg
http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa303/nscaler711/106_1220.jpg
pcarrell wrote:Well, I've been working on the backdrop this week. I've enlisted the help of my son to hang it. Here's what we have so far. The dark places are wet putty to cover seams and staples.
Lookin' good, Philip. It's good to have an extra pair of hands around, isn't it?
Blue Flamer.
Thanks Blue Flamer, Jay! It's coming along......slowly!
NS2591 wrote:Phillip that Code 55 looks great. Only thing I don't like about mine is that I have to replace all the wheels on my Rolling stock.
I look at it as a necessary evil. It helps that a lot of stuff comes with lo pro's already now-a-days.
I know it's too late for this information, but Micro Engineering code 55 can handle the deeper flanges. The tie clamps that hold the rails are much smaller than those on the Atlas code 55.
A second advantage to the ME track, is that it can be gotten pre-weathered. I used their code 70 pre-weathered track on my layout and it saved alot of time and bad fumes in the train room.
mls1621 wrote: NS2591 wrote:Phillip that Code 55 looks great. Only thing I don't like about mine is that I have to replace all the wheels on my Rolling stock. I know it's too late for this information, but Micro Engineering code 55 can handle the deeper flanges. The tie clamps that hold the rails are much smaller than those on the Atlas code 55.A second advantage to the ME track, is that it can be gotten pre-weathered. I used their code 70 pre-weathered track on my layout and it saved alot of time and bad fumes in the train room.
Yeah, I looked at that. I even bought some of the unweathered code 70 and the unweathered code 55 bridge track.
The weathered stuff you have to scrape the weathering off of the ends to get a good solder joint, and so it has to be reweathered in those places. On top of that, since my rails are used for many different things and are in many different states of repair, I'll need to weather all of them differently anyways. To top that off, ME code 55 only has #6 turnouts and it is expensive and tough to find sometimes.
On the other hand, Atlas code 55 has lots of turnouts and crossings, and it's reasonably priced and readily available. My rolling stock either already is RP25 compliant or is easy enough to convert.
I'll still use the ME code 55 bridge track as it's great.
The rest of the ME stuff is great, but that was the way I reasoned through it.
Your setup looks awesome though. If I'd have seen that I may have gone the other way!
pcarrell wrote: mls1621 wrote: NS2591 wrote:Phillip that Code 55 looks great. Only thing I don't like about mine is that I have to replace all the wheels on my Rolling stock. I know it's too late for this information, but Micro Engineering code 55 can handle the deeper flanges. The tie clamps that hold the rails are much smaller than those on the Atlas code 55.A second advantage to the ME track, is that it can be gotten pre-weathered. I used their code 70 pre-weathered track on my layout and it saved alot of time and bad fumes in the train room.Yeah, I looked at that. I even bought some of the unweathered code 70 and the unweathered code 55 bridge track. The weathered stuff you have to scrape the weathering off of the ends to get a good solder joint, and so it has to be reweathered in those places. On top of that, since my rails are used for many different things and are in many different states of repair, I'll need to weather all of them differently anyways. To top that off, ME code 55 only has #6 turnouts and it is expensive and tough to find sometimes. On the other hand, Atlas code 55 has lots of turnouts and crossings, and it's reasonably priced and readily available. My rolling stock either already is RP25 compliant or is easy enough to convert.I'll still use the ME code 55 bridge track as it's great.The rest of the ME stuff is great, but that was the way I reasoned through it.Your setup looks awesome though. If I'd have seen that I may have gone the other way!
I will never use Micro Engineering track. I've tried the ME Track in HO, Any times I had problems it was always on ME track. The HO MRR Club I'm in is attempting to replace all of the ME track becuase it causes problems. Another reason why I won't use anything but Atlas track is everything else is overpriced. I have a hard time Justifying (In any scale except O and G) 7 dollars for 3 feet of track. the N scale club I'm in we don't usually have problems and I belive a majority of the track there is Atlas and Peco. I've heard good things about Peco. and I do like their switches, But its still too much for the track
As far as the wheels go. I usually get Low-Pros on my new cars, but I have bought a few older cars that didn't have low-pros. I guess I just got used to the standards in HO.
Philip, that's a nice looking layout. Keep us posted on your progress.
Stan.
THE SOUTHERN SERVES THE SOUTH.
From the far, far reaches of the wild, wild west I am: rtpoteet
Hey, RT, I'm still recovering from the shock...!
It's not just a GG1, either... It's the entire Broadway Limited!
Although I'd been piecing together some of the cars from the 1950's consist (B60b, PS10-6, Mountain View, etc.), I figured some would have to be foobies or very painful kitbashes (such as the twin diner/kitchen dormatory carset).
But now, whether I pull it with a matched set of E7s or the GG1 (running off the invisible catenary that didn't exist on the Middle Division), I know I'll have the right consist.
Modeling the Rio Grande Southern First District circa 1938-1946 in HOn3.
Well my pet project, The PB&J- the railroad I am doing for a family project book, is underway... I finsihed the final track plan last night and if all goes well getting the Christmas villages off my train table then I will be able to begin surface prep and laying roadbed on the late summer class break next week...
What I wanted from the railroad was simple... and the purists will hate me for it no doubt, but I've always said, learn all you can about your interests and pursue them in your own way...
I wanted a yard that I could use not only to store rolling stock and engines, but if I got in the rare mood where I actually wanted to switch it by the (slightly modified 1:160) book, then I could do so, and if I want to close switches and run two trains on east/West and just watch them snake through the landscape I could... or open the crossover and let one train traverse the neatly hidden figure eight configuration I could.
I have small children, (all girls) and their interest is watching the trains, and they like to run the lionel Santa Fe Special I have set up for them, both are afraid of the n scale trains and shouldn't be... So the project in my book, is actually a series of projects.... to teach the different aspects of the hobby (outside the hum drum oval).
Their little friends marvel at the trains, and one child who is exceedingly good at one of those train video games, gets excited because the model trains bring something to him that he can't get from his game... he can touch them and it then becomes real...
I am off to finish Christmas villages so that I can get this show on the (rail) road.
Dave Vollmer wrote: Hey, RT, I'm still recovering from the shock...!It's not just a GG1, either... It's the entire Broadway Limited! Although I'd been piecing together some of the cars from the 1950's consist (B60b, PS10-6, Mountain View, etc.), I figured some would have to be foobies or very painful kitbashes (such as the twin diner/kitchen dormatory carset).But now, whether I pull it with a matched set of E7s or the GG1 (running off the invisible catenary that didn't exist on the Middle Division), I know I'll have the right consist.
RT,
From the National Train Show:
Otherwise it's an elaborate hoax.
Two dealers I know had known this was coming but had to keep it under wraps.
I also wouldn't expect Kato to update their website on a weekend.
Don't have a cow, man. Kato isn't like con-cor or Bachmann to produce vaporware.
However, it appears the GS4 & Daylight may appear in Nov-Dec this year & the GG1-Broadway may appear 6 months later, or in time for the 2008 NTS/NSC shows. This is from attendees at the NTS. There are pictures on other Forums. This will give Dave some time to save some $$ or work some OT between now & then. THis would account for the reason both models were not announced to dealers in the same press release. I see no reason to preorder a train model more than 6 months in advance.
In the meantime, check out what the Zscalers can do with the Hallmark AFT Ornaments. With a little work to correct the trucks/couplers, it is possible to make a very nice heavyweight train.
Wdlgln005 wrote:This will give Dave some time to . . . . . . . . . . work some OT between now & then.
Before.....
After.....
And a Neat Photo of my AMTK P42.....
R. T. POTEET wrote:Dave, the flyer you post is the one that I saw in a photo over on atlas; Kato used to supply flyers with this format to hobby shops ten fifteen years ago. Sorry, but I learned that the date printed at the top has about as much significance as a campaign promise. I have yet to meet the manufacturer who is always above the vapor and, unfortunately, that holds true for Kato! Wdlgln005 wrote:This will give Dave some time to . . . . . . . . . . work some OT between now & then.Obviously, Wdlgln005, you have your tongue-in-cheek when you make this statement because it has got to be one of the funniest that has appeared in this or any forum in a long, long, long time. All you former or current members of the Armed Forces tell Wdlgln005 the going rate Uncle Sugar pays for OT!!!; I should be rich!!!!Dave, how much money did you get for your last OT????
Yeah, the Air Force pays lots of overtime.... right? Since I'm on duty 24/7, what would overtime be?
RT, feel free to be as pessimistic as you want. But I've got a lot more faith in Kato than some other companies (can you say PCM???). We'll just wait and see, I guess...
Dave Vollmer wrote: R. T. POTEET wrote:Dave, the flyer you post is the one that I saw in a photo over on atlas; Kato used to supply flyers with this format to hobby shops ten fifteen years ago. Sorry, but I learned that the date printed at the top has about as much significance as a campaign promise. I have yet to meet the manufacturer who is always above the vapor and, unfortunately, that holds true for Kato! Wdlgln005 wrote:This will give Dave some time to . . . . . . . . . . work some OT between now & then.Obviously, Wdlgln005, you have your tongue-in-cheek when you make this statement because it has got to be one of the funniest that has appeared in this or any forum in a long, long, long time. All you former or current members of the Armed Forces tell Wdlgln005 the going rate Uncle Sugar pays for OT!!!; I should be rich!!!!Dave, how much money did you get for your last OT????Yeah, the Air Force pays lots of overtime.... right? Since I'm on duty 24/7, what would overtime be?RT, feel free to be as pessimistic as you want. But I've got a lot more faith in Kato than some other companies (can you say PCM???). We'll just wait and see, I guess...
R.T. POTEET,Lets not go through what you and I went through earlier this year, remeber our little brawl? ;)Again. But with different people.So if we may, can we please get back to N-scale (although it is about N-scale but ya'll catch my drift)
Sorry to say that.
And yes PCM cannot do any thing right when it comes to planning for a new item.
Althogh i think Kato has taken my and other peoples request for a GG-1, I kinda would like to see it in Brunswick Green with 5 gold Feathered Stripes along the sides.