Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Turnout woes..

2501 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Jones County, Georgia
  • 1,293 posts
Posted by GearDrivenSteam on Friday, August 25, 2006 1:23 PM

 jfugate wrote:
Make sense?

Sorta, I guess. I am running DCC, and I will be running short 4 wheel critters. My longest locos will be Shays and Climaxes. I've read extensively on Alan Gartner's web site and from the looks of it, all I need to do will be to insulate the frog rails......that and not approach the turnout the wrong way. LOL. I'll just have to be careful, I guess.

It is enough that Jesus died and that he died for me.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Friday, August 25, 2006 2:40 PM

 jfugate wrote:

Gear:

The big downside of an electrofrog turnout (or any live frog turnout) is you will get a short if you approach from the frog end when the points are thrown the wrong way.

With an insulfrog turnout (once it's properly insulated as we've shown), you can run through one from the frog end with the points thrown the wrong way and you just go on the ground like on the prototype. Notice, no shorts!

Make sense?

Joe

I'm sorry to disagree with you.  I don't see a train derailing on a turnout thrown against it as more advantageous than a train stopping (without derailing!) due to a short as it spans the gap near the frog of a turnout thrown against it.  Throwing the turnout to the correct position and having the current limiter or circuit breaker auto-reset is much easier on both me and the equipment than rerailing the rolling stock and throwing the turnout to the correct position while I'm doing the rerailing.

And if one is using your system of subdistricts with current limiters - the shutdown due to the short becomes more limited.  I would certainly want other trains operating in the vicinity of or using the same turnout shut down while I was rerailing anyway, so having the current limiter or circuit breaker do it for me is another advantage.

Add in the additional "live" rail surface for power pickup (regardless of wheelbase or pickup system) - I can't see the downside for correctly wired live frogs.  That last phrase is really the only benefit I know of to dead frogs - easier wiring and no frog polarity contacts required.  But I'm willing to be corrected if I'm missing something in my analysis.

yours in preferring to keep my frogs alive :-)

Fred Wright

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Friday, August 25, 2006 3:16 PM
Fred:

Generally speaking, anything that causes a short on a DCC layout is a bad thing, and live frog turnouts, to be reliable, need more moving parts than a dead frog turnout.

I started out using live frog turnouts on my layout but it just became easier to use dead frog turnouts because I didn't have to mess around adding contacts and running wires to the frog. Plus the constant shorts from people running live frog turnouts the wrong way were annoying when you are trying to run a smooth prototypical operating session.

This all becomes part of the whole notion of "eliminate model railroading thoughts" during a prototypically based op session. The prototype doesn't get a short and suddenly stop if they approach a turnout with it thrown against them. Every time you get a short, you're reminded this is a model you're running and the illusion is broken. The illusion is maintained with dead frog turnouts.

I was curious about how I evolved from live frog to dead frog turnouts so I happened to ask Gary Siegel, owner of a large and beautifully scenicked L&N layout (covered in MR circa 1996) at the 2004 convention in Seattle what he did. He told me he started out using live frog turnouts but found dead frog turnouts worked just about as well and they were less work to install. He prefers dead frog turnouts today.

Ahah! So there was a bit of evidence to show what I suspected -- on a large diesel era DCC layout, going with dead frog turnouts will work well and they're easier to install and maintain. Gary's experience matched my own.

But like many things in the hobby, it comes down to personal preference, and what you model. If I was modeling totally in the steam era or had a logging line with lots of short wheelbase geared locos, I'd probably go with live frogs for loco reliability and to eliminate any chance of stalls at a turnout. But if you're on the fence and want to know what's easier to install and maintain, it's dead frog turnouts.

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: Colorado
  • 4,075 posts
Posted by fwright on Friday, August 25, 2006 3:28 PM

Joe

Appreciate your answers.  I like to make reasoned choices.  I would agree that for any size layout running diesels or large steam with plenty of power pickups that dead frogs make operation, installation, and maintenance simpler - and those issues have higher relative importance for larger layouts.  My point was that the issue of shorts at the frog rail gaps of live frogs vs derailing at the points is somewhat of a red herring - neither is desirable!  Yet I hear this reason cited as why one should not use live frogs all the time.  I'm now satisfied that we both have good reasons for making the choices we are making.  Thanks again for taking the time to educate me.

Fred W

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Friday, August 25, 2006 3:35 PM
Fred:

Many approaches in the hobby come down to a series of trade-offs and I've found once you understand people's priorities, seemingly opposite methods of doing things make perfect sense for them. Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Friday, August 25, 2006 3:35 PM
 modelmaker51 wrote:

 take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half .

I did say "grind each rail" in my original post. Smile [:)]

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, August 25, 2006 3:57 PM

Yup, you sure did.

 

-Crandell

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: S.E. Adirondacks, NY
  • 3,246 posts
Posted by modelmaker51 on Friday, August 25, 2006 5:13 PM
For me, it's just more practical to use dead frog turnouts, I/we only run diesels, I have never had a problem with them stalling on turnouts, so why bother with all the extra wiring and time? (12x23 layout w/60+ turnouts). I have plenty of other things to do on the layout than to spend time doing things that offer no benefit to the operation of the layout.

Jay 

C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1 

Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Friday, August 25, 2006 7:21 PM

Exactly, and Joe's very point.  When I realized that I could get even my little Heritage 0-6-0 across every single DCC-friendly turnout on my layout, handbuilt or otherwise, I was only too happy to apply my time elsewhere.

As I said elsewhere, if you don't like the gap resulting from your best effort with a cut-off disk, get a jeweler's saw.  You will have to look closely to see them gaps!

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 4,648 posts
Posted by jacon12 on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:15 AM
 selector wrote:

Exactly, and Joe's very point.  When I realized that I could get even my little Heritage 0-6-0 across every single DCC-friendly turnout on my layout, handbuilt or otherwise, I was only too happy to apply my time elsewhere.

As I said elsewhere, if you don't like the gap resulting from your best effort with a cut-off disk, get a jeweler's saw.  You will have to look closely to see them gaps!

Where in the world would one purchase a jewelers saw.  Evidently it's a very specialized too and Home Depot probably doesn't have them...  Big Smile [:D]

Thanks for the suggestion, Selector!

Jarrell

 HO Scale DCC Modeler of 1950, give or take 30 years.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 4,648 posts
Posted by jacon12 on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 9:55 AM

 selector wrote:
Modelmaker, I used a very thin diamond-studded wheel, and it still created a 1.5mm gap, despite my best efforts.  I think that is too thick by about .7 mm; it looks terrible.  The jeweller's file is amazing, although very delicate.  It is what Tim Warris of Fast Tracks recommends for gapping his frogs. Just like his jigs, and spline roadbed, once you have done them, there is no going back. 

Selector, how are you able to get the jewelers file down where you need it and it be 'level', if you know what I mean, with the tracks?  I did the nail polish trick and while it fixed the problem it only lasted about 10 passes of a locomotive.  The turnouts, there are two of them, are on a passenger train double ended siding and the siding is wired so I wouldn't have to add the jumpers mentioned earlier because it's already powered.  They're large radius Pecos (I think they equal a number 6 in Atlas turnouts), and I just knew they'd be the last turnouts to give me a problem.  I think what I'm getting is called experience..  Smile [:)]

JaRRell

 HO Scale DCC Modeler of 1950, give or take 30 years.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:38 AM

JaRRel, unfortunatley, you must remove the turnouts, clamp them on their sides, and insert the saw blade between the ties, clamp the very fragile blade into the U-frame of the saw, and then commence to saw.  No other way.  Remember, I did all this under instruction from the Fast-Tracks organization for the handlaid turnouts that I was building.  The saw will do what you need of it, but you can't saw the frog rails in place.  You must remove the turnout and place it in a vice....carefully.

If you go this way, and I feel strongly that you should, when you start the sawing motion against the rails, my experience was to push the saw away from me, using my thumbnail as a guide for the blade, for about 10-15 strokes until the blade had created a sufficiently deep groove that you could commence the back-and forth action.  Thereafter, it goes quickly, although you must be careful not to let the blade fall into the next rail when it finishes the cut, or you'll have to replace the blade.

It is a bit finicky, but you get the hang of it really fast, and then it's like anything else about the hobby...yer on yer way.

Gaps?  What gaps?  I don't see no stinkin' gaps! Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 4,648 posts
Posted by jacon12 on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:14 PM
 selector wrote:

JaRRel, unfortunatley, you must remove the turnouts, clamp them on their sides, and insert the saw blade between the ties, clamp the very fragile blade into the U-frame of the saw, and then commence to saw.  No other way.  Remember, I did all this under instruction from the Fast-Tracks organization for the handlaid turnouts that I was building.  The saw will do what you need of it, but you can't saw the frog rails in place.  You must remove the turnout and place it in a vice....carefully.

If you go this way, and I feel strongly that you should, when you start the sawing motion against the rails, my experience was to push the saw away from me, using my thumbnail as a guide for the blade, for about 10-15 strokes until the blade had created a sufficiently deep groove that you could commence the back-and forth action.  Thereafter, it goes quickly, although you must be careful not to let the blade fall into the next rail when it finishes the cut, or you'll have to replace the blade.

It is a bit finicky, but you get the hang of it really fast, and then it's like anything else about the hobby...yer on yer way.

Gaps?  What gaps?  I don't see no stinkin' gaps! Big Smile [:D]

Ouch!... remove the turnouts!  I now wish I hadn't but I did.. solder the turnouts in place.  Would've made removing them soooo much easier.  Oh well, maybe I can try another method, like grinding down the insides of the two rails.

Thanks Crandell!

JaRRell

 HO Scale DCC Modeler of 1950, give or take 30 years.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:33 PM
A jeweler's saw also takes a light touch ... I don't know how many blades I've broken because I applied too much pressure while trying to saw something.

Truly a very precise instrument, but also definitely a workbench tool, not a layout room tool. Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: CANADA
  • 2,292 posts
Posted by ereimer on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:53 PM
jeweler's saws are available online here ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/jewelry_making_supply_tools/saw_blades_frames.html

what many non-jewelers don't know is that you're supposed to lubricate the blade with beeswax ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1447
it helps a lot with reducing broken blades

disclaimer: not only am i not an employee of jewelerysupply.com , i've never ordered from them or dealt with them in any other way
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:11 PM

 ereimer wrote:
jeweler's saws are available online here ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/jewelry_making_supply_tools/saw_blades_frames.html

what many non-jewelers don't know is that you're supposed to lubricate the blade with beeswax ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1447
it helps a lot with reducing broken blades

disclaimer: not only am i not an employee of jewelerysupply.com , i've never ordered from them or dealt with them in any other way

Tsk!   Now you tell me....Black Eye [B)]

Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 544 posts
Posted by ProtoWeathering on Tuesday, August 29, 2006 4:23 PM
An extremely well done tutorial on building custom turnouts and a tutorial on cutting the frogs using the jewelers saw is in the first video listed on this web page. It can be run with Windows Media player, through Power Point or just about any other media viewing device.

Copy and paste the url below in your browser.

http://centralfloridashops.fast-tracks.net/documents.php

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!