ereimer wrote:jeweler's saws are available online here ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/jewelry_making_supply_tools/saw_blades_frames.htmlwhat many non-jewelers don't know is that you're supposed to lubricate the blade with beeswax ... http://www.jewelrysupply.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=1447it helps a lot with reducing broken bladesdisclaimer: not only am i not an employee of jewelerysupply.com , i've never ordered from them or dealt with them in any other way
Tsk! Now you tell me....
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
selector wrote: JaRRel, unfortunatley, you must remove the turnouts, clamp them on their sides, and insert the saw blade between the ties, clamp the very fragile blade into the U-frame of the saw, and then commence to saw. No other way. Remember, I did all this under instruction from the Fast-Tracks organization for the handlaid turnouts that I was building. The saw will do what you need of it, but you can't saw the frog rails in place. You must remove the turnout and place it in a vice....carefully. If you go this way, and I feel strongly that you should, when you start the sawing motion against the rails, my experience was to push the saw away from me, using my thumbnail as a guide for the blade, for about 10-15 strokes until the blade had created a sufficiently deep groove that you could commence the back-and forth action. Thereafter, it goes quickly, although you must be careful not to let the blade fall into the next rail when it finishes the cut, or you'll have to replace the blade. It is a bit finicky, but you get the hang of it really fast, and then it's like anything else about the hobby...yer on yer way. Gaps? What gaps? I don't see no stinkin' gaps!
JaRRel, unfortunatley, you must remove the turnouts, clamp them on their sides, and insert the saw blade between the ties, clamp the very fragile blade into the U-frame of the saw, and then commence to saw. No other way. Remember, I did all this under instruction from the Fast-Tracks organization for the handlaid turnouts that I was building. The saw will do what you need of it, but you can't saw the frog rails in place. You must remove the turnout and place it in a vice....carefully.
If you go this way, and I feel strongly that you should, when you start the sawing motion against the rails, my experience was to push the saw away from me, using my thumbnail as a guide for the blade, for about 10-15 strokes until the blade had created a sufficiently deep groove that you could commence the back-and forth action. Thereafter, it goes quickly, although you must be careful not to let the blade fall into the next rail when it finishes the cut, or you'll have to replace the blade.
It is a bit finicky, but you get the hang of it really fast, and then it's like anything else about the hobby...yer on yer way.
Gaps? What gaps? I don't see no stinkin' gaps!
Ouch!... remove the turnouts! I now wish I hadn't but I did.. solder the turnouts in place. Would've made removing them soooo much easier. Oh well, maybe I can try another method, like grinding down the insides of the two rails.
Thanks Crandell!
JaRRell
selector wrote:Modelmaker, I used a very thin diamond-studded wheel, and it still created a 1.5mm gap, despite my best efforts. I think that is too thick by about .7 mm; it looks terrible. The jeweller's file is amazing, although very delicate. It is what Tim Warris of Fast Tracks recommends for gapping his frogs. Just like his jigs, and spline roadbed, once you have done them, there is no going back.
Selector, how are you able to get the jewelers file down where you need it and it be 'level', if you know what I mean, with the tracks? I did the nail polish trick and while it fixed the problem it only lasted about 10 passes of a locomotive. The turnouts, there are two of them, are on a passenger train double ended siding and the siding is wired so I wouldn't have to add the jumpers mentioned earlier because it's already powered. They're large radius Pecos (I think they equal a number 6 in Atlas turnouts), and I just knew they'd be the last turnouts to give me a problem. I think what I'm getting is called experience..
selector wrote: Exactly, and Joe's very point. When I realized that I could get even my little Heritage 0-6-0 across every single DCC-friendly turnout on my layout, handbuilt or otherwise, I was only too happy to apply my time elsewhere. As I said elsewhere, if you don't like the gap resulting from your best effort with a cut-off disk, get a jeweler's saw. You will have to look closely to see them gaps!
Exactly, and Joe's very point. When I realized that I could get even my little Heritage 0-6-0 across every single DCC-friendly turnout on my layout, handbuilt or otherwise, I was only too happy to apply my time elsewhere.
As I said elsewhere, if you don't like the gap resulting from your best effort with a cut-off disk, get a jeweler's saw. You will have to look closely to see them gaps!
Where in the world would one purchase a jewelers saw. Evidently it's a very specialized too and Home Depot probably doesn't have them...
Thanks for the suggestion, Selector!
Jarrell
Jay
C-415 Build: https://imageshack.com/a/tShC/1
Other builds: https://imageshack.com/my/albums
Yup, you sure did.
-Crandell
modelmaker51 wrote: take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half .
take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half .
I did say "grind each rail" in my original post.
Joe
Appreciate your answers. I like to make reasoned choices. I would agree that for any size layout running diesels or large steam with plenty of power pickups that dead frogs make operation, installation, and maintenance simpler - and those issues have higher relative importance for larger layouts. My point was that the issue of shorts at the frog rail gaps of live frogs vs derailing at the points is somewhat of a red herring - neither is desirable! Yet I hear this reason cited as why one should not use live frogs all the time. I'm now satisfied that we both have good reasons for making the choices we are making. Thanks again for taking the time to educate me.
Fred W
jfugate wrote:Gear:The big downside of an electrofrog turnout (or any live frog turnout) is you will get a short if you approach from the frog end when the points are thrown the wrong way.With an insulfrog turnout (once it's properly insulated as we've shown), you can run through one from the frog end with the points thrown the wrong way and you just go on the ground like on the prototype. Notice, no shorts! Make sense?
I'm sorry to disagree with you. I don't see a train derailing on a turnout thrown against it as more advantageous than a train stopping (without derailing!) due to a short as it spans the gap near the frog of a turnout thrown against it. Throwing the turnout to the correct position and having the current limiter or circuit breaker auto-reset is much easier on both me and the equipment than rerailing the rolling stock and throwing the turnout to the correct position while I'm doing the rerailing.
And if one is using your system of subdistricts with current limiters - the shutdown due to the short becomes more limited. I would certainly want other trains operating in the vicinity of or using the same turnout shut down while I was rerailing anyway, so having the current limiter or circuit breaker do it for me is another advantage.
Add in the additional "live" rail surface for power pickup (regardless of wheelbase or pickup system) - I can't see the downside for correctly wired live frogs. That last phrase is really the only benefit I know of to dead frogs - easier wiring and no frog polarity contacts required. But I'm willing to be corrected if I'm missing something in my analysis.
yours in preferring to keep my frogs alive :-)
Fred Wright
jfugate wrote:Make sense?
Sorta, I guess. I am running DCC, and I will be running short 4 wheel critters. My longest locos will be Shays and Climaxes. I've read extensively on Alan Gartner's web site and from the looks of it, all I need to do will be to insulate the frog rails......that and not approach the turnout the wrong way. LOL. I'll just have to be careful, I guess.
I certainly appreciate the advice from Jay, Joe and Selector in this thread, and I hope that there will be a lot of other people reading this, I know there must be more than 'just a few' people to have had this problem. Jay, thanks for the additional information on the plumbers putty also.
NOW! All I gotta do is get up the nerve to do a little grindin'. Oh, I will practice on an old Atlas turnout, it's the only thing I have. I have a Dremmel so I gotta figure out what attachment I have that'll get down between those rails and NOT grind in places I don't want to grind. 1/16th inch deep... whew!.. are my nerves that steady..
jfugate wrote:I think you want to split the difference and grind both rails equally, ja.
Oops, I missed that. Yes, I should have realized that JaRRel might have thought that only the one rail needed the adjustment. Since the wheels are bridging both anyway, then you want the high ridge that the rails ride on, regardless of their path through the turnouts, to be separated by the gouge you are creating. so, for symmetry, and to create the wide gap you need, grind both rails a bit.
Good catch, Joe.
Thanks for pitching in guys, Selector and Joe both have it right. However I would suggest using some JB Kwick (by JB Weld - Ace hardware carries both) or some plumber's Epoxy putty to fill in the "gouge/divot" and then the razor blade to trim and shape. It's less messy, and you don't risk getting super glue in places you don't want it and a side benefit is that the epoxy is gray and doesn't need touching up to hide it. (I also use the plumbers epoxy putty to fill isolation gaps, it gets hard as a rock and again it's gray so no touch up needed).
You could "practice " on an old brass Atlas switch to get the "feel" of it. Only grind for 2-3 seconds at a time on low to medium speed so the rails don't heat up too much and deform the plastic point of the frog. An Optivisor helps a lot to see what you're doing. Actually, the optivisor has been one of the best tool investments ever, it did so much to improve my accuracy and neatness.
GearDrivenSteam wrote:Well what about with the electro frog? Would the insulated joiners on the frog rails eliminate the need for any cutting? Thanks.
claycts wrote:Joe, are you cutting with a Dremel or a Razor Saw? I have no peco but your diagram helped on a Walthers 3 way. Another new trick for this old dog!!
I have no peco but your diagram helped on a Walthers 3 way.
Another new trick for this old dog!!
Joe, are you cutting with a Dremel or a Razor Saw?
That's it, JaRRel. You can appeciate that this will take some thinking, a steady hand, and some decent equipment, but you have it exactly right. Do a narrow gouge first and verify for about four trails. If you get no shorts, that is likely to be the 90% solution. If you still get the very odd one, you can always widen the gouge perimeter by another 10 thousandths..ish. How you'd get that fine a grind is beyond me.
modelmaker51 wrote: modelmaker51 wrote: My solution is more permanent, take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half its thickness for a distance of about 3/8". Fill the groove created with epoxy and even it with the railhead when hardened. Be careful, you're only grinding enough away so that the wheel treads don't touch both rails as they pass through the frog. You don't need to go any deeper than about 1/16th of an inch. My method is much simpler. You don't have any gaps to fill or jumpers to solder. No flying pieces of rail either. You basically just grind out a little 3/8th in. long divot (about 1/16" deep) between the rails. Just check to see when the wheel tread no longer touches the other rail. Selctor: What are you using for a cut-off disc? Is it one those big fibreglass re-enforced discs? They are indeed way to big. I'm talking about the quarter-sized 1.5mm thick cut-off discs and I think Joe is as well, they only make a about a 2mm gap.
modelmaker51 wrote: My solution is more permanent, take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half its thickness for a distance of about 3/8". Fill the groove created with epoxy and even it with the railhead when hardened. Be careful, you're only grinding enough away so that the wheel treads don't touch both rails as they pass through the frog. You don't need to go any deeper than about 1/16th of an inch.
My solution is more permanent, take a dremel with a cutoff disc and grind each rail head to thin it from the inside by about half its thickness for a distance of about 3/8". Fill the groove created with epoxy and even it with the railhead when hardened. Be careful, you're only grinding enough away so that the wheel treads don't touch both rails as they pass through the frog. You don't need to go any deeper than about 1/16th of an inch.
My method is much simpler. You don't have any gaps to fill or jumpers to solder. No flying pieces of rail either. You basically just grind out a little 3/8th in. long divot (about 1/16" deep) between the rails. Just check to see when the wheel tread no longer touches the other rail.
Selctor: What are you using for a cut-off disc? Is it one those big fibreglass re-enforced discs? They are indeed way to big. I'm talking about the quarter-sized 1.5mm thick cut-off discs and I think Joe is as well, they only make a about a 2mm gap.
Jay, thanks for the suggestions. If I understand you, you're saying to grind out an area that is in red in rail #1 in the below picture? Do you do anything to rails 2,3, and 4?
Selector and Joe, I really appeciate your suggestions!