Monster locomotive

[Anonymous]

What about Pennsy's "Big Liz"? Like the HC1 she pulled the couplers right out of her test train, a bit too powerful for early 1900s draft gear, but she proved it was possible to build mainline power for an electric railroad. She was a steeple cab loco, side rod driven. Definately scary looking.
Another popular Pennsy (and Southern) loco is the Baldwin Centipede. The LHS has one in O or S scale behind the counter. Won't run on my HO gauge tracks, though![:D]
Eric

[Anonymous]

What about Pennsy's "Big Liz"? Like the HC1 she pulled the couplers right out of her test train, a bit too powerful for early 1900s draft gear, but she proved it was possible to build mainline power for an electric railroad. She was a steeple cab loco, side rod driven. Definately scary looking.
Another popular Pennsy (and Southern) loco is the Baldwin Centipede. The LHS has one in O or S scale behind the counter. Won't run on my HO gauge tracks, though![:D]
Eric

[AltonFan]

Kansas City Southern 2-10-4, equipped to burn coal. In N scale, of course.

[AltonFan]

Kansas City Southern 2-10-4, equipped to burn coal. In N scale, of course.

[AggroJones]

Southern Pacific AC-7 through 12. Their uniqueness is impressive.

DM&IR's M-4 is also nice. It reminds me of a cross between the Allegheny and BigBoy.

[AggroJones]

Southern Pacific AC-7 through 12. Their uniqueness is impressive.

DM&IR's M-4 is also nice. It reminds me of a cross between the Allegheny and BigBoy.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ctucker1

I'm not modeling any of those railroads nor do I have any particular reason to flop out a big locomotive just for the heck of it. If size is the criteria for this poll, I wonder why the Big Boy didn't make the list and the fairly small GG1 did?

I was wondering that too. Stupid little GG1............. taking the BB's spot.....[V][V][:(!][|(][soapbox][tdn] (no offense to GG1 lovers, I like 'em too)

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ctucker1

I'm not modeling any of those railroads nor do I have any particular reason to flop out a big locomotive just for the heck of it. If size is the criteria for this poll, I wonder why the Big Boy didn't make the list and the fairly small GG1 did?

I was wondering that too. Stupid little GG1............. taking the BB's spot.....[V][V][:(!][|(][soapbox][tdn] (no offense to GG1 lovers, I like 'em too)

[NevinW]

No B&O, or Western Maryland? Then sorry I am not interested at this time in any of those. I have a thing for the UP so if I ever changed model railroads I would be interested in UP articulateds and turbines. I don't see building a new railroad soon. - Nevin

[NevinW]

No B&O, or Western Maryland? Then sorry I am not interested at this time in any of those. I have a thing for the UP so if I ever changed model railroads I would be interested in UP articulateds and turbines. I don't see building a new railroad soon. - Nevin

[lupo]

The UP big blow,
I prefer affordable plastic, but a new brass - OVERLAND ? maybe . . . if my birthday, Sinterklaas (spanish dude handing out gifts in holland) and Santa Claus team up ??

[lupo]

The UP big blow,
I prefer affordable plastic, but a new brass - OVERLAND ? maybe . . . if my birthday, Sinterklaas (spanish dude handing out gifts in holland) and Santa Claus team up ??

[CP5415]

None of the above. Even though I do want a Milwaukee locomotive someday, an electric locomotive just doesn't work for me.
If I had only US locomotives to choose from it would have to be a D&H 4-6-6-4.
The "monster" locomotives I do want, which won't work on my layout due to one tight curve i have, is a CP 4-6-4, 4-8-4 or a 2-10-4 all in the Maroon livery complete with matching heavyweight passenger cars.

Gordon

[CP5415]

None of the above. Even though I do want a Milwaukee locomotive someday, an electric locomotive just doesn't work for me.
If I had only US locomotives to choose from it would have to be a D&H 4-6-6-4.
The "monster" locomotives I do want, which won't work on my layout due to one tight curve i have, is a CP 4-6-4, 4-8-4 or a 2-10-4 all in the Maroon livery complete with matching heavyweight passenger cars.

Gordon

[Anonymous]

Put me in the 'none of the above' column. I have a 'smallish' HO layout with 24 inch radius curves modeling the preWWI era. All this 'monster'' motive power isn't appropriate for me. I would like to see a nice Atlantic (4-4-2) with a Harriman tender.

Randy

PS: As a Californian, I thought 'Canada" was a suburb of Detriot where they still had funny accents?

R ;)

[Anonymous]

Put me in the 'none of the above' column. I have a 'smallish' HO layout with 24 inch radius curves modeling the preWWI era. All this 'monster'' motive power isn't appropriate for me. I would like to see a nice Atlantic (4-4-2) with a Harriman tender.

Randy

PS: As a Californian, I thought 'Canada" was a suburb of Detriot where they still had funny accents?

R ;)

[Anonymous]

my vote would be the sd70m with flared radiators!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

my vote would be the sd70m with flared radiators!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

How about Fairbanks Mores H16-44 "TRAINMASTER"
Not the longest but tallest and probaly ranked 2nd in power[:0][:0][:0]
What a beast. [:(!][:(!][:(!][8D][:D]

[Anonymous]

How about Fairbanks Mores H16-44 "TRAINMASTER"
Not the longest but tallest and probaly ranked 2nd in power[:0][:0][:0]
What a beast. [:(!][:(!][:(!][8D][:D]

[Anonymous]

Definitly the Erie's Triplexes P-1 2-8-8-8-2 (5014-5016), name the "MATT H. SHAY" was the behemith of the bunch, in my opinion. It was only mildy successful because the boiler was so huge and improper cylinder dimensions for compounding; it lacked adequate reserves of fuel (coal & water) to make it a contender. However it was used by the Erie RR in the Helper service. Built in 1914 - to - 1916; there were four built.

OH, joseph2 the N&W, who were the owners of the EL. As far as I know, were never considered purchasing more huge steam. They saw the dimming light in favor of the practicle use of diesels. It would he been nice to see the Trilex resurected, but it would have required a major design overhaul and the RR's then didn't have the capital for such an unprofitable venture. The very though of seeing a steam locomotive on the EL makes my stomach go into spasms.

-Colin

[Anonymous]

Definitly the Erie's Triplexes P-1 2-8-8-8-2 (5014-5016), name the "MATT H. SHAY" was the behemith of the bunch, in my opinion. It was only mildy successful because the boiler was so huge and improper cylinder dimensions for compounding; it lacked adequate reserves of fuel (coal & water) to make it a contender. However it was used by the Erie RR in the Helper service. Built in 1914 - to - 1916; there were four built.

OH, joseph2 the N&W, who were the owners of the EL. As far as I know, were never considered purchasing more huge steam. They saw the dimming light in favor of the practicle use of diesels. It would he been nice to see the Trilex resurected, but it would have required a major design overhaul and the RR's then didn't have the capital for such an unprofitable venture. The very though of seeing a steam locomotive on the EL makes my stomach go into spasms.

-Colin

[CG9602]

:) already got some of the "monster" locos that I've been dreaming about since childhood . . .assembling the Garrats is proving to be quite the learning experience. Things i might be interested in, woud also have to include the C855, and the 8500-class turbines. One mor ething: has anyone ever come across an HO scale version of the CNW 4-8-4 Northerns? Or, will I have to modify something else in order to have one of those?

[CG9602]

:) already got some of the "monster" locos that I've been dreaming about since childhood . . .assembling the Garrats is proving to be quite the learning experience. Things i might be interested in, woud also have to include the C855, and the 8500-class turbines. One mor ething: has anyone ever come across an HO scale version of the CNW 4-8-4 Northerns? Or, will I have to modify something else in order to have one of those?

[CP5415]

None of the above. The biggest locomotive I would want to buy would be a 3100 series
4-8-4 in Canadian Pacific livery of course.

[CP5415]

None of the above. The biggest locomotive I would want to buy would be a 3100 series
4-8-4 in Canadian Pacific livery of course.

[Anonymous]

There are several of those locos on that list that I like, I model in N scale and we don't have a quality DD40X available yet and that engine came out in 1969!. I would really like the Super Turbine in N scale,but at $850.00 plus for brass, it is very expensive. I did buy 1, but I would like to have 2 or 3. For some reason or another Eric only lets you vote for 1 locomotive!
gene

[Anonymous]

There are several of those locos on that list that I like, I model in N scale and we don't have a quality DD40X available yet and that engine came out in 1969!. I would really like the Super Turbine in N scale,but at $850.00 plus for brass, it is very expensive. I did buy 1, but I would like to have 2 or 3. For some reason or another Eric only lets you vote for 1 locomotive!
gene

[ddechamp71]

QUOTE: Originally posted by bryan9664

Santa Fe's 2-10-2's
It's a BIGUN!!!

I do agree. For me in Z scale, in spite of what I've written above.......

[ddechamp71]

QUOTE: Originally posted by bryan9664

Santa Fe's 2-10-2's
It's a BIGUN!!!

I do agree. For me in Z scale, in spite of what I've written above.......

[ddechamp71]

QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

Which "monster" locomotive would you most like to buy? Share your opinion below.

For me, my dream: a Z scale SP Cab-Forward, for my Z scale Tehachapi Pass layout (in spite of the fact my favorite era is spring 1997, just after both SP/UP and ATSF/BN mergers).

[ddechamp71]

QUOTE: Originally posted by Bergie

Which "monster" locomotive would you most like to buy? Share your opinion below.

For me, my dream: a Z scale SP Cab-Forward, for my Z scale Tehachapi Pass layout (in spite of the fact my favorite era is spring 1997, just after both SP/UP and ATSF/BN mergers).

[Anonymous]

since i run only deisels my vote would have to be for the dd40x
the bachmen dd40x shell is perfect just strip it repaint it and put it on a athern drive

[Anonymous]

since i run only deisels my vote would have to be for the dd40x
the bachmen dd40x shell is perfect just strip it repaint it and put it on a athern drive

[perrylamb]

I already own a half-dozen SD90MAC's and another half-dozen SD70 series locomotives. "Monster" locomotives are a way of life in today's railroading. However, I am waiting patiently for one of the new Challengers to come out. It will be a great addition for my railroad's excursion fleet currently consisting of an S-4 4-8-4, a 2-6-2 and a pair of ATSF E8s.

Perry B Lamb
Utah Colorado & Western Railroad

[perrylamb]

I already own a half-dozen SD90MAC's and another half-dozen SD70 series locomotives. "Monster" locomotives are a way of life in today's railroading. However, I am waiting patiently for one of the new Challengers to come out. It will be a great addition for my railroad's excursion fleet currently consisting of an S-4 4-8-4, a 2-6-2 and a pair of ATSF E8s.

Perry B Lamb
Utah Colorado & Western Railroad

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I like big locomotives but the railroad I model (Southern) did not have articulated steam in the region I model. I have no reason to buy a model that doesn't fit my intended railroad. Now, if I were a collector and just wanted to stick it on a shelf -- then I'd probably choose an N&W class A or a C&O 2-6-6-6.

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I like big locomotives but the railroad I model (Southern) did not have articulated steam in the region I model. I have no reason to buy a model that doesn't fit my intended railroad. Now, if I were a collector and just wanted to stick it on a shelf -- then I'd probably choose an N&W class A or a C&O 2-6-6-6.

[ubbogus2]

I agree. A 'write in or 'other' should have been provided. For myself, a Great Northern W-1 would be nice.

John

[ubbogus2]

I agree. A 'write in or 'other' should have been provided. For myself, a Great Northern W-1 would be nice.

John

[Anonymous]

I vote for the UP 8500 Hp turbine. In plastic. The Brass on in N scale is too expensive.

[Anonymous]

I vote for the UP 8500 Hp turbine. In plastic. The Brass on in N scale is too expensive.

[Anonymous]

What about the Matt H. Shay, Triplexes ( P-1 2-8-8-8-2 ) [:0][:0] from the Erie RR. Three were built (#s 5014-5016). Yeah these locomotives were very impracticle[:(], but they were built and they were used in service; all be it limited.

Source: "The Erie Railroad Story", published by D. Carleton Railbooks. [:)]

[Anonymous]

What about the Matt H. Shay, Triplexes ( P-1 2-8-8-8-2 ) [:0][:0] from the Erie RR. Three were built (#s 5014-5016). Yeah these locomotives were very impracticle[:(], but they were built and they were used in service; all be it limited.

Source: "The Erie Railroad Story", published by D. Carleton Railbooks. [:)]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

A Hobby Circle advertises a Bachmann Spectrum DD40x in HO scale. The web link is as follows ...

http://ahobbycircle.com/bachmann1.html

I hope that this works for you.

Bob

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

A Hobby Circle advertises a Bachmann Spectrum DD40x in HO scale. The web link is as follows ...

http://ahobbycircle.com/bachmann1.html

I hope that this works for you.

Bob

[Anonymous]

Never cared much about Monster Locomotive biggest one I seen to date is the SD-70 road name CSX. The ones you have in your poll was before my time.

[Anonymous]

Never cared much about Monster Locomotive biggest one I seen to date is the SD-70 road name CSX. The ones you have in your poll was before my time.

[Anonymous]

I got to go with the Little Joe. I have one in brass, but its...not good. So a good one in plastic would be VERY useful

[Anonymous]

I got to go with the Little Joe. I have one in brass, but its...not good. So a good one in plastic would be VERY useful

[Anonymous]

You are missing an option.

NONE

Help steer the manufacturers AWAY from monster locos, or risk representing the half-million+ income earners only.

I'll be VERY happy if Lionel goes under due to the new Challenger, Athearn as well.

[Anonymous]

You are missing an option.

NONE

Help steer the manufacturers AWAY from monster locos, or risk representing the half-million+ income earners only.

I'll be VERY happy if Lionel goes under due to the new Challenger, Athearn as well.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn's model is a DD40. Bachmann made aDD40X in the 1980's that is toy-like.I see them for saleCHEAP at most train shows. you could repower it and detail it into a convincing model.
Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn's model is a DD40. Bachmann made aDD40X in the 1980's that is toy-like.I see them for saleCHEAP at most train shows. you could repower it and detail it into a convincing model.
Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

Santa Fe's 2-10-2's
It's a BIGUN!!!

[Anonymous]

Santa Fe's 2-10-2's
It's a BIGUN!!!

[Anonymous]

I would like to see any of the Great Northern electrics,a Y or W class in Empire Builder colors.Monsters!

[Anonymous]

I would like to see any of the Great Northern electrics,a Y or W class in Empire Builder colors.Monsters!

[ralphb]

while I chose the GG1, I also like the J1 and, maybe Ql, which were big, powerful earthshakers. Then there's also the lone HC1 which littered Horseshoe Curve with broken couplers and car parts because the trains it handled were more than the cars could take. Pennsy Power was real!

[ralphb]

while I chose the GG1, I also like the J1 and, maybe Ql, which were big, powerful earthshakers. Then there's also the lone HC1 which littered Horseshoe Curve with broken couplers and car parts because the trains it handled were more than the cars could take. Pennsy Power was real!

[gwrly]

I agree with the Canadians, we need more locos and rolling stock from the "True North".

Bob.
Australia

[gwrly]

I agree with the Canadians, we need more locos and rolling stock from the "True North".

Bob.
Australia

[Anonymous]

The GG1 is a classic loco that repersents the power and strenght of the pennsy.

[Anonymous]

The GG1 is a classic loco that repersents the power and strenght of the pennsy.

[Anonymous]

I put my 2 cents in for the Challenger,but really would want a SD 70M.In N scale of course.

[Anonymous]

I put my 2 cents in for the Challenger,but really would want a SD 70M.In N scale of course.

[lucas4449]

i would prefer a dd35. sp and up had them

[lucas4449]

i would prefer a dd35. sp and up had them

[Anonymous]

Sorry guys, none of the above also. I am a B&O fan. As you probably would guess, either EL3 - 5 or EM1 would be the locos of choice. One could also make a case for S1a's. (for those not of the "domer" persuasion, 2-8-8-0, 2-8-8-4, and 2-10-2)
paul m

[Anonymous]

Sorry guys, none of the above also. I am a B&O fan. As you probably would guess, either EL3 - 5 or EM1 would be the locos of choice. One could also make a case for S1a's. (for those not of the "domer" persuasion, 2-8-8-0, 2-8-8-4, and 2-10-2)
paul m

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

This wasn't meant to be a multiple choice examination - merely a poll. Obviously, if there were as many categories as there were railroads, fallen flags or current, there wouldn't be any chance to figure out where to vote.

I don't see where you were not (or were compelled) to vote for any of the ones offered. Seems to me that you were content in pointing a finger instead of adding your own category. I'm sure the editors wouldn't be so high-handed as to say your choice was outside the boundaries of the poll.

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by ndbprr

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

This wasn't meant to be a multiple choice examination - merely a poll. Obviously, if there were as many categories as there were railroads, fallen flags or current, there wouldn't be any chance to figure out where to vote.

I don't see where you were not (or were compelled) to vote for any of the ones offered. Seems to me that you were content in pointing a finger instead of adding your own category. I'm sure the editors wouldn't be so high-handed as to say your choice was outside the boundaries of the poll.

[ralphb]

I voted for the GG1 of which I have two in N scale, but I go ape when I see a J1. The Jays may be too big for my layout, but should be at home on my NTrak club's layout which has better curves.
An M1 may not be as much of a monster, but I woudn't mind one of them too.

[ralphb]

I voted for the GG1 of which I have two in N scale, but I go ape when I see a J1. The Jays may be too big for my layout, but should be at home on my NTrak club's layout which has better curves.
An M1 may not be as much of a monster, but I woudn't mind one of them too.

[ndbprr]

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

[ndbprr]

Your Polls do the hobby a severe injustice. By not allowing people to vote for what they want you can conclude that there is a demand for a product that doesn't exist. Marketing polls are extremely complex to avoid leading the consumer. At least put an "Other" category in them.

[the-big-blow]

From what I am told both BNSF and UP are doing licensing on using their name.

[the-big-blow]

From what I am told both BNSF and UP are doing licensing on using their name.

[Anonymous]

Why buy anything with a UP logo? I say boycott UP models until UP backs off on their ridiculous licensing demands! That might apply to the fallen flags as well.

[Anonymous]

Why buy anything with a UP logo? I say boycott UP models until UP backs off on their ridiculous licensing demands! That might apply to the fallen flags as well.

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I would like to see QUALITY 4-4-0's and 2-6-0's. A non-UP Challenger would be nice. In the last two years we got a high quality 2-8-8-2 and 2-6-6-6 in HO with a promise of a 2-6-6-2 within a year. The big locos have been coming but there is much to be desired at the low end of the spectrum.

[Anonymous]

None of the above. I would like to see QUALITY 4-4-0's and 2-6-0's. A non-UP Challenger would be nice. In the last two years we got a high quality 2-8-8-2 and 2-6-6-6 in HO with a promise of a 2-6-6-2 within a year. The big locos have been coming but there is much to be desired at the low end of the spectrum.

[ellisjamesrobertson]

I'd go for a GN artic and/or a CP Selkirk - both have been done in brass but a good plastic one would be great.

Ellis

Worcester. Eng.

[ellisjamesrobertson]

I'd go for a GN artic and/or a CP Selkirk - both have been done in brass but a good plastic one would be great.

Ellis

Worcester. Eng.

[Anonymous]

Not really large...but how about the other "Kruass Maffie" (spelling) the hood unit in Ho? Yes I know there was a brass version, but come on, not all of us can afford the brass...........Blank or with a road name.......oh also that runs well......

[Anonymous]

Not really large...but how about the other "Kruass Maffie" (spelling) the hood unit in Ho? Yes I know there was a brass version, but come on, not all of us can afford the brass...........Blank or with a road name.......oh also that runs well......

[jimmac230]

Definiately Challenger. been up close with Union Pacific #3985 and was simply in total awe of the locomotive. Have also been close to Centennial #6936 also was impressed with it too. Will possibly be purchasing one of each of them when possible in the future when layout gets made.

[jimmac230]

Definiately Challenger. been up close with Union Pacific #3985 and was simply in total awe of the locomotive. Have also been close to Centennial #6936 also was impressed with it too. Will possibly be purchasing one of each of them when possible in the future when layout gets made.

[mrvidman]

The W1. Great Northern's largest electrics. A pair would be perfect!

[mrvidman]

The W1. Great Northern's largest electrics. A pair would be perfect!

[Anonymous]

Bachmann Spectrum has the most accurate DD40AX HO scale in plastic. Athearn's model is closer to a DD35A. all it needs is 2 small cooling fans to replace 2 of the large ones[:D]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

Bachmann Spectrum has the most accurate DD40AX HO scale in plastic. Athearn's model is closer to a DD35A. all it needs is 2 small cooling fans to replace 2 of the large ones[:D]

QUOTE: Originally posted by JonathanSD45

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

The GG-1 was probably selected because it was birthed during the era of steam and was still in service when steam was all but gone. [:D] I'd vote for Pennsy's T1 even though only 2 or 3 were built at the end of the steam era.

[Anonymous]

The GG-1 was probably selected because it was birthed during the era of steam and was still in service when steam was all but gone. [:D] I'd vote for Pennsy's T1 even though only 2 or 3 were built at the end of the steam era.

[Anonymous]

I would change my vote to the BIG BOY locomotive, because I think they look cool

[Anonymous]

I would change my vote to the BIG BOY locomotive, because I think they look cool

[trailerkeith]

What about some nicely (and reasonably priced) n scale cab forwards, centipedes, and a NYC box cab electric?

[trailerkeith]

What about some nicely (and reasonably priced) n scale cab forwards, centipedes, and a NYC box cab electric?

[Anonymous]

The big engines are nice to look at and great to watch as they run, but how many have layouts big enough to properly justify having the big monster engines? I would rather see the manufacturers produce good quality (Broadway Limited type) smaller engines such as 2-6-2, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 with sound, DCC, etc. Makes more sense to have small, good quality steam engines for the majority of the layouts which don't have room for the monsters.

[Anonymous]

The big engines are nice to look at and great to watch as they run, but how many have layouts big enough to properly justify having the big monster engines? I would rather see the manufacturers produce good quality (Broadway Limited type) smaller engines such as 2-6-2, 2-6-0, 2-8-0 with sound, DCC, etc. Makes more sense to have small, good quality steam engines for the majority of the layouts which don't have room for the monsters.

[Martin4]

In the Monster class, I already run one UP SD90MAC (I would like a couple more !) and a DD40 is in the paint shop. I am not a steam fan but I consideer the yet-to-come Genesis Challenger as aMuseum feauture or an Excursion train puller.

Martin
Québec City

[Martin4]

In the Monster class, I already run one UP SD90MAC (I would like a couple more !) and a DD40 is in the paint shop. I am not a steam fan but I consideer the yet-to-come Genesis Challenger as aMuseum feauture or an Excursion train puller.

Martin
Québec City

[Anonymous]

Actually, if I was to buy a "Monster" loco, it would be a cab forward to pull all my reefers.
And I would only run it on a club layout with big curve radii-my home minrad is 25".

[Anonymous]

Actually, if I was to buy a "Monster" loco, it would be a cab forward to pull all my reefers.
And I would only run it on a club layout with big curve radii-my home minrad is 25".

[Anonymous]

• Reply
• Edit

[Anonymous]

• Reply
• Edit

[Anonymous]

[personally,I like large artic. loco,s and don1t understand what was kept and what was left out! the allegany was a loco like none other. I`m personally coing narrow gauge HOn3[:D][:D]

[Anonymous]

[personally,I like large artic. loco,s and don1t understand what was kept and what was left out! the allegany was a loco like none other. I`m personally coing narrow gauge HOn3[:D][:D]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

QUOTE: Originally posted by aerocoupe

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

Athearn makes one.[:D]

[Anonymous]

Really none of the locos on your poll...... You should include a blank on all your polls for write-in's. I agree with others that the Canadian, fans are too often left out.
USRA locos in CN & CP paint schemes????!!! give me break! The few that were on GT and GTW and did make it north were few and far between. How about a CN Mountain or Northern; or one of the zillion CP D-4's/ D-10's . Not even one simple shake the box plastic van (or better in plastic). Even the all-weather loco cab conversion kits are getting hard to find....
The manufacturers that sometimes do put out half-way good models have gotten my money.
Why do ads for limited run Canadian models appear in MR long after they have been sold out ?

[Anonymous]

Really none of the locos on your poll...... You should include a blank on all your polls for write-in's. I agree with others that the Canadian, fans are too often left out.
USRA locos in CN & CP paint schemes????!!! give me break! The few that were on GT and GTW and did make it north were few and far between. How about a CN Mountain or Northern; or one of the zillion CP D-4's/ D-10's . Not even one simple shake the box plastic van (or better in plastic). Even the all-weather loco cab conversion kits are getting hard to find....
The manufacturers that sometimes do put out half-way good models have gotten my money.
Why do ads for limited run Canadian models appear in MR long after they have been sold out ?

[Anonymous]

A Pennsy T1 in N scale would be nice, I voted for the GG! cuz the one I have is too light to pull more than 3 cars and is not very DCC friendly.....Ed

[Anonymous]

A Pennsy T1 in N scale would be nice, I voted for the GG! cuz the one I have is too light to pull more than 3 cars and is not very DCC friendly.....Ed

[Anonymous]

well how about the great northern R class 2-8-8-2 or its monster electric used in the cascade tunnel number 5018 a b-d-d-b what a monster engine but beatiful in its way.

[Anonymous]

well how about the great northern R class 2-8-8-2 or its monster electric used in the cascade tunnel number 5018 a b-d-d-b what a monster engine but beatiful in its way.

[Anonymous]

None of the above.--since i model the DL&W (loosely) the biggest loco they had were 4-8-4s, but the branch I model could never handle them

[Anonymous]

None of the above.--since i model the DL&W (loosely) the biggest loco they had were 4-8-4s, but the branch I model could never handle them

[joseph2]

The N&W considered buying 25 more Jawn Henries,and in the late 1960's the N&W controlled the Erie Lackawanna;so how about a Jawn Henry painted in Erie Lackawanna colors ?!

[joseph2]

The N&W considered buying 25 more Jawn Henries,and in the late 1960's the N&W controlled the Erie Lackawanna;so how about a Jawn Henry painted in Erie Lackawanna colors ?!

[Anonymous]

I wonder about the GG1 myself. I voted cenntenial. Just because it seems to be the only thing that is still considered good.

[Anonymous]

I wonder about the GG1 myself. I voted cenntenial. Just because it seems to be the only thing that is still considered good.

[Anonymous]

I'm not modeling any of those railroads nor do I have any particular reason to flop out a big locomotive just for the heck of it. If size is the criteria for this poll, I wonder why the Big Boy didn't make the list and the fairly small GG1 did?

[Anonymous]

I'm not modeling any of those railroads nor do I have any particular reason to flop out a big locomotive just for the heck of it. If size is the criteria for this poll, I wonder why the Big Boy didn't make the list and the fairly small GG1 did?

[BRAKIE]

Sorry none of the above..I would go with the C&O Allegheny,the 2-6-6-6.this was by no means a small locomotive..

[BRAKIE]

Sorry none of the above..I would go with the C&O Allegheny,the 2-6-6-6.this was by no means a small locomotive..

[Anonymous]

Another great one that I wish some one would make in plastic rather than brass, is UPs TURBINE NUM 1 AND 2, these were steamlined steam turbines and really interesting.

[Anonymous]

Another great one that I wish some one would make in plastic rather than brass, is UPs TURBINE NUM 1 AND 2, these were steamlined steam turbines and really interesting.

[ThatNScaleGuy]

I guess it would be none of the above. I don't see a C & O 2-6-6-6 Allegeheny listed anywhere. In N-Scale that is. Steam power is what I want. GOOD running steam power at that! It can be done .

[ThatNScaleGuy]

I guess it would be none of the above. I don't see a C & O 2-6-6-6 Allegeheny listed anywhere. In N-Scale that is. Steam power is what I want. GOOD running steam power at that! It can be done .

[Anonymous]

None of the above!

I would like a good qualitiy 4-4-0, and maybe a 4-8-4, and those would be the LAST steamers I would buy (having the 2-8-0 and 2-8-2 already in my road name, which is NOT given above!).

Is the steamer market approaching saturation ????

- Bill

[Anonymous]

None of the above!

I would like a good qualitiy 4-4-0, and maybe a 4-8-4, and those would be the LAST steamers I would buy (having the 2-8-0 and 2-8-2 already in my road name, which is NOT given above!).

Is the steamer market approaching saturation ????

- Bill

[Anonymous]

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

[Anonymous]

Does anyone still sell the DD40x in HO scale?

[Anonymous]

I voted for the Jawn Henry but would have rather seen the C&O steam turbine. Same idea as the N&W - just the C&O made it look good too!

[Anonymous]

I voted for the Jawn Henry but would have rather seen the C&O steam turbine. Same idea as the N&W - just the C&O made it look good too!

[the-big-blow]

A 3 UNIT SUPER TURBINE!!! Each unit of three no longer than a SD40-2 so it could negotiate curves nicely.

[the-big-blow]

A 3 UNIT SUPER TURBINE!!! Each unit of three no longer than a SD40-2 so it could negotiate curves nicely.

[Anonymous]

ALCo C855. Ugly but big. I found one once but had s severe lack of funds to make the buy.

[Anonymous]

ALCo C855. Ugly but big. I found one once but had s severe lack of funds to make the buy.

[Anonymous]

I've gotta agree with rsn48!
Too many times you folks down south forget that in Canada we have 2 huge class 1 railroads - Canadian National and Canadian Pacific. Both railroads use large motive power, and have trackage in the US.
HEY! WE'RE HERE!

[Anonymous]

I've gotta agree with rsn48!
Too many times you folks down south forget that in Canada we have 2 huge class 1 railroads - Canadian National and Canadian Pacific. Both railroads use large motive power, and have trackage in the US.
HEY! WE'RE HERE!

[bluepuma]

I would change my vote to Jawn Henry from GG1. I already have my N scale monster loco, the Kato SD70 A/A is about as big as I can stand on 11' curves. I skipped the SD80/SD90 cause it is too long.

Mainly, I just want F7A/B sets in SP Black Widow paint with both lights and a RS1 or similar for my Los Angeles area line.

[bluepuma]

I would change my vote to Jawn Henry from GG1. I already have my N scale monster loco, the Kato SD70 A/A is about as big as I can stand on 11' curves. I skipped the SD80/SD90 cause it is too long.

Mainly, I just want F7A/B sets in SP Black Widow paint with both lights and a RS1 or similar for my Los Angeles area line.

[Anonymous]

This is an attempt to train "Trains" staff. The largest country in your subscriptions other than the States is Canada. So when you post polls wanting to know what passenger trains you want, make sure you have Canadian content (The Canadian would be the obvious inclusion). Remember the forum although American in location is international in flavour.

So in the interest of training, did Canada have articulates?

And would you include the "Selkirk" as a mononster engine?

Don't cha hate homework!

[Anonymous]

This is an attempt to train "Trains" staff. The largest country in your subscriptions other than the States is Canada. So when you post polls wanting to know what passenger trains you want, make sure you have Canadian content (The Canadian would be the obvious inclusion). Remember the forum although American in location is international in flavour.

So in the interest of training, did Canada have articulates?

And would you include the "Selkirk" as a mononster engine?

Don't cha hate homework!

[Bergie]

Which "monster" locomotive would you most like to buy? Share your opinion below.