QUOTE: Originally posted by 1shado1 QUOTE: Originally posted by DrummingTrainfan Here in Nebraska there is a fight to get light rail between Omaha and Lincoln. The naysayers are saying that there wouldn't be enough riders, but there is a projected "beltway" to go around the city that we supposedly need. If we build the light rail it at least has the chance to recoup costs...the highway can't do that unless they charge tolls or something. Plus, the light rail will put less exhuast in the atmosphere. There was heated discussion about a light rail system being built here in Milwaukee. We already have city buses (with low ridership) that travel virtually ANYWHERE in the city, and other buses that regularly travel between cities. It makes no sense to build a light rail system with limited access points/routes. A waste of taxpayer money for a system that would be under utilized. And due to operating expenses, the money would NEVER be recouped anyway. You're dreaming if you think it ever would. Name ONE city where light rail has been cost-effective. The difference between the beltway and the light rail system is that the beltway would probably get SIGNIFICANT usage. Light rail would end up being a white elephant. Of course many railfans are unable to be objective. They see choo-choo, and automatically think "oh goody". Wake up and smell the coffee.[:D] Jeff
QUOTE: Originally posted by DrummingTrainfan Here in Nebraska there is a fight to get light rail between Omaha and Lincoln. The naysayers are saying that there wouldn't be enough riders, but there is a projected "beltway" to go around the city that we supposedly need. If we build the light rail it at least has the chance to recoup costs...the highway can't do that unless they charge tolls or something. Plus, the light rail will put less exhuast in the atmosphere.
QUOTE: Originally posted by 1shado1 Are you still looking to support the proposed rail project? I hope so. Are there any other backers to the plan?
QUOTE: Really? Because you know ALL the facts of the proposed rail line? Or simply because you are a rail fan? Just because it is a choo-choo, and you are a fan, that doesn't automatically mean that the proposed plan is a good idea (or a bad one, for that matter). People blindly supporting such projects is just as silly as people blindly bashing them.[:D] Jeff
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I'm pro-rail all the way! That is something...The thing that really gets me is the woman saying that she would include you in her lawsuit. I guess she didn't realize how stupid she sounds there. Just because you build a model of the to use as a representation doesn't mean that you are truely influencing anyone. If anything, you are helping them make a better informed decision because they have something to look at. Unless she got a real good lawyer, or the judge isn't the sharpest lightbulb in the Pop-Tart box, I don't see how it would fly. And because you did it voluntarily backs you up more; you are in no way affiliated with the town. They are probably complain now. They now have to pay out the butt for gas, when they could have easily commuted on the train. Tisk tisk tisk. Do you have any pictures of the diorama? You should have seen the diorama TrainFreak409. It included everything I could think of that I felt people would have questions about. The train itself was on an elivated right of way with openings in it every so often to allow cattle to cross over from pasture to pasture and for farmers to get their tractors and equipment through. There was an overpass going over the tracks for automobiles. I even included a little town with kids playing in a park. The woman that threatened to include me in the law suit said that I made it all look oh so simple as if it would fit right in and be accepted by everyone-except her... She was a real witch. One guy even told me that he thought about taking his foot and kicking the display off its pedistal, but was afraid that he might go to jail for it, which was his only reason for not doing so. Tracklayer You sure you weren't at the Dome in New Orleans, sounds like about the same fantical (sp) reaction. Are you still looking to support the proposed rail project? I hope so. Are there any other backers to the plan? I'm always supportive of new and better ways of doing things, but I really don't want to see anyone lose their homes and/or properties in the process... If they had planned on putting the train up on an elivated system that would have been say 25 feet in the air, and business could have go on as usual, then that might have been okay, but the plan was to cut straight across what ever lay in its path... The whole thing finally came to a dead end, and was scrapped altogether. A while back, there was talk of using existing rail lines to run commuter trains from down town Houston out to the surrounding rural areas to help cut down on the city traffic problem, but I haven't heard anything about it since then. Tracklayer
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I'm pro-rail all the way! That is something...The thing that really gets me is the woman saying that she would include you in her lawsuit. I guess she didn't realize how stupid she sounds there. Just because you build a model of the to use as a representation doesn't mean that you are truely influencing anyone. If anything, you are helping them make a better informed decision because they have something to look at. Unless she got a real good lawyer, or the judge isn't the sharpest lightbulb in the Pop-Tart box, I don't see how it would fly. And because you did it voluntarily backs you up more; you are in no way affiliated with the town. They are probably complain now. They now have to pay out the butt for gas, when they could have easily commuted on the train. Tisk tisk tisk. Do you have any pictures of the diorama? You should have seen the diorama TrainFreak409. It included everything I could think of that I felt people would have questions about. The train itself was on an elivated right of way with openings in it every so often to allow cattle to cross over from pasture to pasture and for farmers to get their tractors and equipment through. There was an overpass going over the tracks for automobiles. I even included a little town with kids playing in a park. The woman that threatened to include me in the law suit said that I made it all look oh so simple as if it would fit right in and be accepted by everyone-except her... She was a real witch. One guy even told me that he thought about taking his foot and kicking the display off its pedistal, but was afraid that he might go to jail for it, which was his only reason for not doing so. Tracklayer You sure you weren't at the Dome in New Orleans, sounds like about the same fantical (sp) reaction. Are you still looking to support the proposed rail project? I hope so. Are there any other backers to the plan?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I'm pro-rail all the way! That is something...The thing that really gets me is the woman saying that she would include you in her lawsuit. I guess she didn't realize how stupid she sounds there. Just because you build a model of the to use as a representation doesn't mean that you are truely influencing anyone. If anything, you are helping them make a better informed decision because they have something to look at. Unless she got a real good lawyer, or the judge isn't the sharpest lightbulb in the Pop-Tart box, I don't see how it would fly. And because you did it voluntarily backs you up more; you are in no way affiliated with the town. They are probably complain now. They now have to pay out the butt for gas, when they could have easily commuted on the train. Tisk tisk tisk. Do you have any pictures of the diorama? You should have seen the diorama TrainFreak409. It included everything I could think of that I felt people would have questions about. The train itself was on an elivated right of way with openings in it every so often to allow cattle to cross over from pasture to pasture and for farmers to get their tractors and equipment through. There was an overpass going over the tracks for automobiles. I even included a little town with kids playing in a park. The woman that threatened to include me in the law suit said that I made it all look oh so simple as if it would fit right in and be accepted by everyone-except her... She was a real witch. One guy even told me that he thought about taking his foot and kicking the display off its pedistal, but was afraid that he might go to jail for it, which was his only reason for not doing so. Tracklayer
QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I'm pro-rail all the way! That is something...The thing that really gets me is the woman saying that she would include you in her lawsuit. I guess she didn't realize how stupid she sounds there. Just because you build a model of the to use as a representation doesn't mean that you are truely influencing anyone. If anything, you are helping them make a better informed decision because they have something to look at. Unless she got a real good lawyer, or the judge isn't the sharpest lightbulb in the Pop-Tart box, I don't see how it would fly. And because you did it voluntarily backs you up more; you are in no way affiliated with the town. They are probably complain now. They now have to pay out the butt for gas, when they could have easily commuted on the train. Tisk tisk tisk. Do you have any pictures of the diorama?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Darth Santa Fe Next thing you know people will be running at UP and BNSF trains with torches, pitchforks and other dangerous tools.[:0] All it takes is one person to start a mob. Defying the good of the community? A passenger train would HELP the community, not go against it. It would give people another way to be transported to where they want to go. That's like starting a McDonald's and being picketed out for some stupid reason about going against the community.[B)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 QUOTE: Originally posted by csmith9474 The ROW would have been about 1/2 mile from my house. I believe the ROW was supposed to be 200 ft wide or something like that. I grew up in a rural area and the agricultural was up in arms about loosing acreage and accessibility to their fields. The railroad museum that I volunteered at did score a HO TGV set from that group. Really cool, but the traction tires dry rotted. What is the ROW? Was that the proposed train service? I would love to see the diorama Tracklayer. So you don't have a scanner or anything? Jeesh, get with the 21st century.[:p] I have an All-in-One printer/scanner/copier, $90 from Staples.[8D]
QUOTE: Originally posted by csmith9474 The ROW would have been about 1/2 mile from my house. I believe the ROW was supposed to be 200 ft wide or something like that. I grew up in a rural area and the agricultural was up in arms about loosing acreage and accessibility to their fields. The railroad museum that I volunteered at did score a HO TGV set from that group. Really cool, but the traction tires dry rotted.
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer picket the store and see to it that he lost his job for taking up sides with the train organization and defying the good of the community
_________________________________________________________________
Scott - Dispatcher, Norfolk Southern
QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I would love to see the diorama Tracklayer. So you don't have a scanner or anything? Jeesh, get with the 21st century.[:p] I have an All-in-One printer/scanner/copier, $90 from Staples.[8D] Jee***rainFreak409. You send me the $90.00 and I'll go buy the All-in-One printer/scanner/copier from Staples so you can see the pictures of the diorama... Otherwise, you'll just have to do like we did "back in the old days" and use your imagination. Tracklayer Well, as you can see, from SB Locomotives, my imagination is pretty strong. It's not like I don't use it. It's hard to imagine anything when one knows little information on it. I have been imagining what it would look like, although I think it is nothing close to what the real thing would be. My imagination is quite active thank you. I enjoy using it and being as creative as possible. I may be over reacting, use an emoticon next time, those are the only emotions we can show on this forum. With your comment, I interpret that as you saying that I have lack of imagination, thus comparing me with the stereotypical teenager, which always rubs me the wrong way. I really hope you are joking with your comment, as I was with mine. I've blown off my steam...[V]
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tracklayer QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I would love to see the diorama Tracklayer. So you don't have a scanner or anything? Jeesh, get with the 21st century.[:p] I have an All-in-One printer/scanner/copier, $90 from Staples.[8D] Jee***rainFreak409. You send me the $90.00 and I'll go buy the All-in-One printer/scanner/copier from Staples so you can see the pictures of the diorama... Otherwise, you'll just have to do like we did "back in the old days" and use your imagination. Tracklayer
QUOTE: Originally posted by TrainFreak409 I would love to see the diorama Tracklayer. So you don't have a scanner or anything? Jeesh, get with the 21st century.[:p] I have an All-in-One printer/scanner/copier, $90 from Staples.[8D]
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44 Wow, some people are really anti train![:O] I never knew that some people could be so violent towards someting as nice as a well modeled diorama. Some people are just crazy, eh? trainboy
Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296
Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/