Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

U.P. disrespecting United States Flag?

26126 views
61 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Peoria IL
  • 490 posts
U.P. disrespecting United States Flag?
Posted by cspmo on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:49 AM
Is U.P. disrespecting the United States flag by placing it's likeness on the side of their locomotives? There is a quote from rules governing the U.S. Flag.
ยง176. Respect for flag
"(i) The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown. "
If you want to read more here is the link.
http://www.usflag.org/uscode36.html
Brian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:40 AM
For once, I'm actually *gasp*[:0]NOT going to bash UP.

I don't have a problem with it - I like seeing Old Glory anywhere, as long as it's not being treated disrespectfully, which is not the case here. I don't consider UP using the flag on their engines any different than when BN and WC slapped flag decals on their locos during Gulf War I, putting the flag on fire engines, NFL helmets, people wearing flag pins on their lapels, or putting flags on their cars...looks kinda good to me.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Peoria IL
  • 490 posts
Posted by cspmo on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:09 AM
The difference is that U.P. is using it for advertisment by putting Building America behind it.
Brian
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 4:52 AM
They apply that same "Building America" slogan to lots of rolling stock that has no flag anywhere on it. The Stars and Stripes on the locos is just an additional adornment...I don't get where you think this is being used as "advertising" - just because of it's proximity to the slogan on the hood? Would you still feel that way if the slogan was located on the cab instead, away from the flag?

Even if it were being used by UP for advertising purposes, which in my opinion it is not, I would find that far, far less offensive than some of the things that are passed off as "art" incorporating the flag.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:05 AM
I'm with GrayLoess on this one.

I'm very frustrated with a lot of the "anti-American" attitudes that have become prevalent in our society and in fact, poisoning the minds of our youth.

I'm very happy that UP locomotives are wearing the old "Stars and Stripes". Advertising? How? If anything UP has actually been turning away customers.

Some of you might remember that just over a decade Santa Fe Super Fleet FP45s were also wearing American Flag logos, though much smaller. Don't recall reading of any complaints.

Sooner or later UP bean counters may advise management that the flag decals are getting too expensive to maintain or replace.

So before the flags go "Bye-Bye", let's enjoy them while we can.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:43 AM
As a Veteran of this country having served in a War as some of those on this site have, I would rather see old glory flown on a locomotive then burned by (in my opinion) some idiot in a protest.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
  • 1,169 posts
Posted by Adelie on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:51 AM
If the flag is still on those locomotives in 30 years, and they are sitting in a scrap yard somewhere with the flag getting covered with grafitti, then let me know. I have not exactly been thrilled with UPs policies, but I fail to see the problem with this one.

- Mark

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 180 posts
Posted by tsasala on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:31 AM
As a veteran, you fought to give that idiot the right to burn whatever he/she wants. You don't have to agree with it, but you have to support his/her right to do it. That fundamental premise is what this country was built on.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Collegeville. PA
  • 210 posts
Posted by Mark300 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:50 AM
Advertising......UP's use is more for a display than anything else. You are not being asked to buy anything.

UP's use of the flag is an image or a likeness. It's NOT an actual flag. The statute only covers real honest to goodness flags.

If we can all remember our history, Union Pacific was allowed for decades to use the 'Union Shield' or 'National Shield' complete with stars and veritcal stripes (Kind'a like the US Highway sign shape). It was the US Military's up thru the Civil War. I believe they stopped using it in the military after the Civil War and we came up with other forms of national Identity for the Spanish American and the 2 World Wars.

No one has ever really challenged UP's use of the national shield and it has become part of UP's corporate persona. I guess since they were heavily Land-granted by the US government and steam locomotives were pervasive, no one could ever have imagined corporate logos used as displays....complete with images of eagles, flags or whatever on those 'new' fangled diesels.

I have no problem with UP's display......unless they claim license to OUR flag.....then that is worth fighting for.

My [2c]

Mark
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:55 AM
Looks good to me.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:05 AM
I don't see it as advertising, but as a statement that UP is a patriotic American company. They may have many faults, but this isn't one of them.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:11 AM
How about truck lines that display the American flag? How about other corporations that use a U.S flag logo?
Sorry cspmo,I see this as yet another childish attack on the UP.[V]

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:28 AM
Oh no, not this again. Just go to the trains forum and bump the thread over there that goes into this. And also, I am in a military family. Both me and my and my wife are Air Force and are commited to serve this Nation and to protect the rights of anyone that wants to display the Flag proudly (or burn it as mentioned above[V][:(!]). I believe the Union Pacific's desire to display the Flag on the side of their locomotives exhibits their faith, confidence, and pride in this great Nation. I see everyday disgusting reminders of people whom truly have no respect for Old Glory, such as the tattered remainders of a Flag clipped to car windows, or flags left out in the darkness without illumination to remind us that even at night She stands vigil over us all.
Smitty
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:39 AM
I agree with all that have stood up for the UP's choosing to place the American Flag on their locomotives. The last posting especially put it succinctly; "... yet another childish attack#8230;#8221; While the UP has enacted some controversial attempts to have people pay for the use of the logo #8211; I personally don#8217;t give a darn, because I don#8217;t model it #8211; I don#8217;t feel they have gone beyond the bounds of prevailing corporate greed. They print the flag on tee-shirts, etc.; especially after 9-11-01!!! So please get off your high horse and nitpick about something worth nitpicking about. Gheesh![?]

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • 1,138 posts
Posted by MidlandPacific on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 9:41 AM
QUOTE: It was the US Military's up thru the Civil War. I believe they stopped using it in the military after the Civil War and we came up with other forms of national Identity for the Spanish American and the 2 World Wars.


Well, it's still on official seals, unit flags, and the cap badges of West Point cadets, so I wouldn't write it off just yet!

http://mprailway.blogspot.com

"The first transition era - wood to steel!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:01 AM
In my opinion things like freedom and liberty should be sacred, but no inanimate object should ever be held as sacred.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:03 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by polizi

... I would rather see old glory flown on a locomotive then burned by (in my opinion) some idiot in a protest.


One of the best comments I've ever seen on this forum!! [tup] Thank you, polizi! [:D]
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: NW Central IND.
  • 326 posts
Posted by easyaces on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:27 AM
Whats the Beef? Looks to me that everywhere you go nowadays, you'll see a flag stuck on everything from locos, trucks ,cars, etc. . I'm a Veteran(21yrs USAF) also, and though I don't like seeing the flag burned by some anti-american nut either(and quite frankly, I'd like to shoot 'em!) It seems old glory has become a re-symbalization of the US and like it or not, we're going to see it used a lot in ways that alot of people may not agree with, less we wind up(god forbid) collapsing like the old Soviet Union.
MR&L(Muncie,Rochester&Lafayette)"Serving the Hoosier Triangle" "If you lost it in the Hoosier Triangle, We probably shipped it " !!
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: BELLEVILLE. ILLINOIS
  • 32 posts
Posted by UPFEF on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:19 AM
In 1953, about two weeks before the first Chevy Corvettes were to be released to the market, the crossed flag emblem identified with the vette included a United States Flag. Chevy was forced to remove this emblem from there cars.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:25 AM
This discussion is silly. The answer is clearly NO.
Move on to important matters?
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:33 AM
Liberty is important. The rights we share and fight for as Americans are important. Even the symbolism is important. A couple of days after September 11th, we should never forget that.

On the other hand, this thread has reached the point where it's not really about trains anymore, hasn't it?

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:35 AM
No problem here. I think it looks great on UP engines. As long as the flag is used in a respectful way to show national pride, I'm okay with it.

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:36 AM
I have absolutely no problem with UP displaying the American flag on the sides of its locomotives. I DO have a problem if said locomotive hasn't seen a washing facility in two or three years and the flag is filthy. Just a personal opinion, mind you, but if you're going to display a national emblem, at least try and keep it clean!
Tom
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Southeast Texas
  • 2,392 posts
Posted by Tracklayer on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:50 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Shermanhill1

This discussion is silly. The answer is clearly NO.
Move on to important matters?


What's silly about it Shermanhill1?. It's a topic like any other, and has to do with a train issue. Who died and made you judge of what's to be talked about on this forum anyway ?...

Tracklayer
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:06 PM
What would you think if UP had put a crescent and single star on the side of their locos?

Answer: you'd think it was ***ed unpatriotic of them. So, the crescent is unpatriotic (but still a flag), but the flag on your locos is advertising? Convenient...and biased.

At least that 'advertising' gives you the right to express your bias without fear of reprisal. [;)]
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Collegeville. PA
  • 210 posts
Posted by Mark300 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:31 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by rripperger

QUOTE: It was the US Military's up thru the Civil War. I believe they stopped using it in the military after the Civil War and we came up with other forms of national Identity for the Spanish American and the 2 World Wars.


Well, it's still on official seals, unit flags, and the cap badges of West Point cadets, so I wouldn't write it off just yet!


rriperger......

Thanks, I forgot about West Point!

Mark
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:43 PM
There are a lot of rules there!
And I quote:" The flag should not be draped over the hood, top, sides, or back of a vehicle or of a railroad train or a boat" Does that include decals?
QUOTE: Originally posted by TA462

Being a Canadian I see it as the UP being proud to be American. There is nothing cooler looking to me then seeing a UP AC4400CW with the American flag on its side. The Canadian Pacific also has the American Flag on its side together with the Canadian flag. I like that paint scheme also because it shows Canada's support of the US and how both country's work together.

They discontinued that 8 years ago. It was in effect for 5(?) years. Why? Because Americans didn't like seeing only half the flag? Canadians hated to have their symbol seen with an American symbol?
Who knows? All I know is that they have returned to their roots with the beaver.
trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • 1,138 posts
Posted by MidlandPacific on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 12:46 PM
QUOTE: What would you think if UP had put a crescent and single star on the side of their locos?

Answer: you'd think it was ***ed unpatriotic of them.


Well, my friend, I can give you one worse than the UP doing it - see below. This is not a fabrication.

http://www.steynonline.com/index2.cfm?edit_id=21

http://mprailway.blogspot.com

"The first transition era - wood to steel!"

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:35 PM
Why would the UP put the Turkish flag on their engines?
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:14 PM
Or any flag, for that matter. However, for the purposes of illustration, I chose one with an overt islamic symbol in order to elicit the response of outrage...if it ever SHOULD elicit a sense of outrage. I suppose I could have asked if a Star of David would have raised the ire of onlookers or railfans, or detractors, of UP.

My point, in case I have failed to make it, is that we look at things through an emotional filter that imparts aspects in our conclusions that are often not based on fact or reality. The American flag on the sides of UP locos is just that...a quintessential American symbol. The same would be true of a Star of David, but that symbol would have seemed odd, out of place, and distinctly incendiary perhaps, more-so if it had been the crescent. One would ask of another, "Why is that UP loco flying the X flag? That's wrong!", and it would NOT have been considered a form of advertising, in the commercial sense. So, back to the original question: why take YOUR flag as a form of advertising?

My two bits.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!