Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Eric Brooman-EMD Sellout? (No offence intended)

6130 views
84 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Eric Brooman-EMD Sellout? (No offence intended)
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Monday, September 12, 2005 9:55 AM
I have always admired Eric Brooman's Utah Belt railway, with it's all EMD stronghold.
But now he's bought GE AC4400CWs, and I consider him a bit of a sell-out. Granted, it's his free-lance railroad, and he can do what he wants with it, but what do you guys think about it?
trainboy
Again-No offence to Eric

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, September 12, 2005 10:01 AM
I think it's his RR, he can do what he wants with it.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 10:15 AM
His explanation for the purchase in the current MR is concise and logical. I think Eric is a top notch modeler who uses a "thinking man's" approach to the hobby. I also think the Utah Belt is Eric's railroad and if he wants to start running horse drawn carriages on it he can!
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, September 12, 2005 10:26 AM
Why in the world would this make him a sellout?!

(Sorry, but I've always hated that term!)

If Eric is imitating the real world (which seems to be the case) then he's doing what most of the Class 1s are doing.........leaning heavily towards GE!

Railroads look at locomotives as investment capital. Reliability, duty availabilty, cost-to-operate ratios, maintenance cycle costs, component life expectency, reliability, etc. EMD is viewed as having the higher quality, however, GE's seem to be more readily available, parts are much easier to obtain, and of course the units are cheaper. EMD being sold by GM after being part of it for 80 years sure didn't do much for its image either. Eric may be thinking along these lines, just like the prototype railroads.

Years back, Amtrak's diesel fleet was over 90% EMD. The F40PH was king. EMD was receiving accolades for the reliability of that tough warhorse. Well............it's no longer the case is it?? That warhorse that we grew accustomed to has been put out to pasture and those GE Boxcab "P somethings" now command the varnish.

In essence, that's business. Eric's got the idea. [:D][;)]




"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,328 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:16 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

Why in the world would this make him a sellout?!

(Sorry, but I've always hated that term!)

If Eric is imitating the real world (which seems to be the case) then he's doing what most of the Class 1s are doing.........leaning heavily towards GE!

Railroads look at locomotives as investment capital. Reliability, duty availabilty, cost-to-operate ratios, maintenance cycle costs, component life expectency, reliability, etc. EMD is viewed as having the higher quality, however, GE's seem to be more readily available, parts are much easier to obtain, and of course the units are cheaper. EMD being sold by GM after being part of it for 80 years sure didn't do much for its image either. Eric may be thinking along these lines, just like the prototype railroads.

Years back, Amtrak's diesel fleet was over 90% EMD. The F40PH was king. EMD was receiving accolades for the reliability of that tough warhorse. Well............it's no longer the case is it?? That warhorse that we grew accustomed to has been put out to pasture and those GE Boxcab "P somethings" now command the varnish.

In essence, that's business. Eric's got the idea. [:D][;)]







[#ditto], and Antonio gets 10/10. If the company were a reality, and running with the benefit of invested dollars, the shareholders would/should darned well expect the CEO and Board to buy the most cost effective tractors for the type of work they will do. I that is resurrecting old 0-6-0's, then that's what the company does.

We all have our pet locos and manufacturers, but others may disagree with your criteria for selecting them in the first place. There-in lies the rub.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:22 AM
I guess that you are all right. I apologise for criticizing. I am just very ani-GE. I think that the AC4400 and Dash 8 and 9 are some of the ugliest locomotives around.
my freelance railroad is still all EMD, with another 100 SD70ACe on order (With modofied cabs to make 'em less ugly)
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:44 AM
I like them all and don't understand the GE hatred. Would someone please explain it to me.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Monday, September 12, 2005 11:58 AM
Maybe we are all so used to EMD, and GE is intruding?
Or maybe we think of GE as replacing our favorite locomotives? (Dash8-40CMs replaced M630s on BC Rail)
I don't like the sound, compared to EMD.
trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:05 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44

Maybe we are all so used to EMD, and GE is intruding?
Or maybe we think of GE as replacing our favorite locomotives? (Dash8-40CMs replaced M630s on BC Rail)
I don't like the sound, compared to EMD.
trainboy



Sounds like a Ford vs Chevy thing... Well, we all have our favs. Nothing wrong with that.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:06 PM
I really am impressed by Eric Brooman. He has carefully thought out the equipment on his railroad and when I read about it it is like I'm reading about a real life entity.

I do wish however, he could come up with a way to justify replacing his locomotives with rebuilt Alco's. Now that would be cool!!
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:09 PM
Good grief. This is a hobby. Some of you folks are taking this wayyyyyy too seriously.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Northeast Ohio Snow Belt, USA
  • 247 posts
Posted by GRAMRR on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:20 PM
The Utah Belt is modeled as a living, breathing real railroad as are many of the model railroads that we greatly admire. As time marches on, motive power is upgraded, railroad structures get torn down and new ones built, rolling stock evolves into new designs, just as the real world. I love it!! My railroad will probably always be stuck in the time warp of the 1950's but I was a train loving teenager then and have fond memories of the time. But - I do love the model railroads that change with the times.

Chuck

Grand River & Monongah Railroad and subsidiary Monongah Railway

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:48 PM
He should have gone GE years ago, as the real railroads did.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44

I guess that you are all right. I apologise for criticizing. I am just very ani-GE. I think that the AC4400 and Dash 8 and 9 are some of the ugliest locomotives around.
my freelance railroad is still all EMD, with another 100 SD70ACe on order (With modofied cabs to make 'em less ugly)
Trainboy


Well you can rest assured that the C&HV will remain a EMD strong hold as will the other short lines/terminal roads owned and operated by CDB Industries..The reasoning is simple..The upper management was not impress with the GE test results.[:D]

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, September 12, 2005 12:59 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man

I like them all and don't understand the GE hatred. Would someone please explain it to me.


Because we REALLY like ALCOs, and GE hosed them by getting intot he business themselves. Alco used GE electrical components. And GE's prime mover isn't just a little bit similar to later Alcos.

Actually I think the 70ACe is pretty darn ugly. All that exposed piping and wiring might make for easy servicing, which is certainly a critical selling point, but it does nothing for the looks.

On the other hand, railroads seem to be reluctant to invest in new things - which makes me wonder why they are going for the new GEs, that's a totally different new prime mover in there to meet the new EPA requirements, whereas EMD managed to accomplish it using what is basically the same diesel engne as previous models. Or maybe that's why I see GE ads on all the news channels - maybe they AREN'T selling as well as previous GE models, for that same reason.

I just avoid the problem - I model the 50's [:D][:D][:D]

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:03 PM
BWilcox,

Agreed. It is a hobby, but these types of threads can be fun because so many different viewpoints can be expressed and debated without anyone being totally right or wrong.


"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:05 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by bwilcox

Good grief. This is a hobby. Some of you folks are taking this wayyyyyy too seriously.


Isn't that what Eric is doing? Taking his engine power requirements as a company, that to me is more serious then a bunch of us guys/girls half heartedly raking him over the coals. Many of what I see posted is more a poke in fun then a serious demand. Let's have fun, joke and stop derailments and dead frog power loss.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:06 PM
He can run what he want's on his stuff. If he gets a wild hair and wants to motorize a bunch of turds and run them, he can do that, too.


QUOTE: Originally posted by trainboyH16-44

I have always admired Eric Brooman's Utah Belt railway, with it's all EMD stronghold.
But now he's bought GE AC4400CWs, and I consider him a bit of a sell-out. Granted, it's his free-lance railroad, and he can do what he wants with it, but what do you guys think about it?
trainboy
Again-No offence to Eric
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:07 PM
Hmmmm. Maybe GE bought a controlling interest in the Utah Belt and strong armed management into the purchase thus putting the financial interests of corporations ahead of the railfan. Or maybe they would have purchased new EMD units but those darn dishonest lawyers threatened to sue. Or perhaps the Utah Belt is protesting Walther's purchase of Life-Like and the impending collapse of the model railroad hobby and of course the related reason that Bachmann is junk. Oh I know. The Utah Belt did purchase EMD units, but Eric used Photoshop to make us think they are GE units.

Have I hit all the hot threads yet?

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

In any event - Eric Brooman continues to do a fine job with his layout.
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:08 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by On30Shay
If he gets a wild hair and wants to motorize a bunch of turds and run them, he can do that, too.





I wonder if Digitrax will do a sound decoder...[:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Have I hit all the hot threads yet?


NO, you left out that because of the spectacular Garden Railroad shots by Marty, we are all now second guessing our investments. I would think UB will see the brute force of SD45's moving ton's/ounces of snow and start buying up all the Hustle Muscle he can find.
  • Member since
    May 2002
  • From: Oliver B.C. Wine Capitol of Canada
  • 415 posts
Posted by tommyr on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:15 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by grande man

QUOTE: Originally posted by On30Shay
If he gets a wild hair and wants to motorize a bunch of turds and run them, he can do that, too.





I wonder if Digitrax will do a sound decoder...[:D]

If they do the sound would probably be crappy[xx(]
Tom

Tom

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 1,054 posts
Posted by grandeman on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by tommyr


If they do the sound would probably be crappy[xx(]



Most likely. We won't get into naming the proposed downloadable wav files of various prototypes. [;)] Gee, this thread really went down the toilet.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: NW PA
  • 303 posts
Posted by areibel on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:52 PM
Originally posted by On30Shay

He can run what he want's on his stuff. If he gets a wild hair and wants to motorize a bunch of turds and run them, he can do that, too.




I wonder what couplers that would take??
Kadee #2's??
Cambridge Springs- Halfway from New York to Chicago on the Erie Lackawanna!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 1:53 PM
Ok this was good for a laugh.

James
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • 11 posts
Posted by nibbler on Monday, September 12, 2005 2:19 PM
Well just have to horn in here. Publication of Eric Brooman's layout was the inspiration for me to finaly design my own. While I cannot compare my work to Mr. Brooman's I feel I'm doing a decent job with certain simularities to his, namely the six staging loops. I've always admired his craftsmanship in building locomotives for his road, and I feel sometimes a change is necessary to keep interest at a high level.
So updating to GE models is a step that will contribute to the interest. I can only hope that when he tires of the GE's he will do as I did and kitbash some ALCO's out of them.
Now that's a much better idea than running Oh! Whatever!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 2:35 PM
Antonio & Dave (and anyone else who has properly deemed me as grumpy....),

You both make good points. I suppose there's no harm to the "debate" as long as it doesn't get personal and ugly...and I've seen that happen over lesser issues. And, yes, Eric is taking his railroad seriously, to a point. He's devised a well though-out concept and is sticking to it.....but I haven't seen him raise an eyebrow because I switch my intermodal yard with a B&M S1.

I suppose I'm getting just as serious even replying to all this. But in these days of devastation on the Gulf coast, government corruption and incompetance, the challenges of being the husband and father my family deserves and just keeping my house and keyboard rig functioning, Eric's choice of motive power seems a silly thing to debate. [soapbox]

Besides, SD70ACe's are ugly as sin......[;)]
  • Member since
    March 2011
  • 544 posts
Posted by ProtoWeathering on Monday, September 12, 2005 2:42 PM
QUOTE: I wonder if Digitrax will do a sound decoder...


I heard they tried, and it really stunk...
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 2:48 PM
Back on topic, since he went with GE do you think he is using the GE repair program or doing the repairs in-house, isn't that another reason many RR's have gone to GE? On my RR we buy used EMD's but buy new GE's since they are the better runners, though we did get stuck with those monster SD80MAC's that NS got on the Conrail buy [banghead], talk about fuel hogs and keeping them running, my shop people staged a 1 day walkout on that deal. I now know better.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Southern California
  • 743 posts
Posted by brothaslide on Monday, September 12, 2005 2:50 PM
I don't know what Mr. Brooman would be selling out to? When you "sell out", you are compromising your values and convictions. Perhaps Mr. Brooman thought the GE units looked really cool and decided to model them.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!