Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Is it a steam thing?

2414 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canada, eh!
  • 737 posts
Posted by Isambard on Thursday, September 1, 2005 8:21 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jacon12

Being completely electric illiterate, let me ask you guys this. Is there a way, perhaps with a meter of some sort, that you can place the 'probes' of the meter to different areas of the track and see if there are bad voltage drops? That sure would answer one part of the equation and if it wasn't a voltage drop you could go on looking for another answer.
JaRRell



To check track voltage I use a Sperry multimeter, set on DC setting for DC power and on AC setting for DCC power. You will get an approximate reading when measuring DCC, around 12-15 volts depending on your meter and the O/HO/N gauge setting on your DCC Command Station/Booster, if there is one. You can find multimeters in the electrical section of big box hardwares or in places like Radio Shack.

[:)]

Isambard

Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at  isambard5935.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 8:20 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite

QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite

QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

Jarrell
Check and see if the engine is powered half on frame and half on tender(wire between tender and engine)my new mike is that way and I'am looking at putting wripers on the left side of the engine and removeing the tender power all togethor.I'am running D.C. right now so don't have a big problem , but if I go DCC then I might.[^][8D]

JIM

Jim--rather than remove your tender pickup, I'd suggest you replace the Mantua tender wheels with appropriate NWSL nickel-silver wheels. THEN install Tomar track wipers on both locomotive AND tender--it's easy to do with a drill and tap--and you'll be amazed at what a smooth runner you end up with. I'm in the process of converting all of my older brass and metal steamers to Tomar wipers, and the difference in running quality is just amazing!
Tom [:p]


Tom I'am with you but there is'nt a whole lot of space between the drivers and the frame,I'am looking at this real hard,tender no problem,re-build on the list of things to do.
I've got every thing I need for It.If you do a mantua mike let me know please??
Thanks
JIM

Jim--though I've had a Mantua Mike, it's been a long time ago. However, believe it or not, there's plenty of space between the wheels to install a Tomar. I've installed them on brass imports that not only have closer wheel spacing, but brake-shoe castings to boot, and the Tomar's will 'float' just fine. With the Mantua, I'd suggest you mount it between the first and second drivers (I'm assuming that your middle two drivers are 'blind', as most Mantua Mikes are) using a drill and tap on the frame cover. The phospour bronze 'slide' on the Tomar is very flexible, and will adjust itself against the wheel treads while you're running the loco. Beleive me, they're made to fit almost ANY wheel spacing. But I DEFINITELY suggest replacing those Mantua tender wheels--they're brass, and brass collects track crud like crazy. Even just replacing the tender wheels with appropriately sized nickel-silver will improve your pickup about 50%.
Tom [:)]

Ok I tackled it today on the engine,more space than I throught at first glance,but used the rear driver and blind,works fine can run with out the tender at the present,the wheel swap on the tender is my next project,This engine has cast three axle trucks,not sure how to change them out,but I'll get it,I have some old passenger truck wheels that will work.
Thanks for all the help
Jim
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:17 PM
Jarrell,

I doubt it is not the loco. These babies shouldn't have any pick up problems. Steam has problems when the tender and drivers pick up from different rails and the wheel base is short. This is common in old brass and plastic models. Bli Has all wheel pick up and I believe the tender picks up both sides. A 2-6-6-2 is so large that it shouldn't be beaching itself on a turnout. The wheel bases should extend through an un powered frog to proivide power. Larger steam like this is far less finicky about power pick up than say a 2-8-0 or 0-8-0 would be in the same situation. One thing big locos don't like is tight radius turnouts. Even though a loco this large can go through switches this small, it doesn't mean it is a good idea. I would go with no 5 or larger.

Dnwitty has the right idea. Is this a power routing switch?? If it is, you may have to jumper the points to the stock rails depending on how the switch is wired. I would try feeding the switch power from the point side with some feeders. Solder the joints leading to and from the switch and lastly (Other may disagree with this) maybe get some higher quality switches. Walthers/Shinohara, Micro Engineering, Peco all come to mind.

I sure by now you have probably solved it. Let us know...

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • 2,844 posts
Posted by dinwitty on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:54 PM
get youself a voltmeter and make sure the power is going thruout the turnout.

The point rails may be dependent on contact on the main rail to maintain conductivity, which is a bad thing. If it loses contact, no power. The club I was in custom made turnouts and this was never a problem, and all rail turnouts/frogs.

for the engine, I have the BLI 2-6-6-4, as most issues with steamers can pickup one side of the rail on the engine and the other side with the tender.

One issue with most steamers is getting power pickup, and with a lot of mass produced steamers, the wheels are rigid. If the rails are warped, and always happens on the model and the prototype, some wheels will lose rail contact. Make sure the rear trailing truck makes current pickup and maybe the pilot also.

I have taken wire wrap wire and soldered to the various connections on locos to solidify connections, giving just enough wire length for rotation/turning.
If the curve on the turnout is too tight, you might get binding and the forces might raise the wheels off the rail.

The prototype steamers had equalized wheels, meaning they can travel over rough track.
Usually brass lokies have sprung drivers, and should have excellent pickup all the time.
Why I sometimes would prefer a brass lokie over others.
My rivarossi berkshire I sprung its drivers because of pickup problems, and get better tracking.

The 2-6-6-4 is better suited on #6 or higher turnouts.
Its a mainline engine, not a switcher. The diesels wont always have the issues like the steamers, but 6 wheel trucks or larger will show the same issues as the steamers (note DD-40)

But the key is to make sure the track is in great and level condition, the prototype has more issues trying to stay level, but the model doesnt...save for expansion/contraction.


  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:32 PM
That sounds like a really god idea, GDS. I wonder if Randy could chime in and tell us (educate us) more on the subject.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:03 PM
Jason, some locomotives are just plain picky. I found this tip on another site. A 2200 uF 25 volt electrolytic capacitor installed between the decoder, and it's power connections will solve the problem, if nothing else does. It acts like a small "battery" storing enough electricty just long enough to keep the locomotive running over small gaps in electrical current and dirt on the track.
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jacon12

Being completely electric illiterate, let me ask you guys this. Is there a way, perhaps with a meter of some sort, that you can place the 'probes' of the meter to different areas of the track and see if there are bad voltage drops? That sure would answer one part of the equation and if it wasn't a voltage drop you could go on looking for another answer.
JaRRell



Just a volt meter, put the probes on the outside of the rail as the loco rolls by measure the volts.

I'm with Randy on the Class A huge number of wheels all picking up power. My Class J 4-8-4 including tender is longer than my SD40-2.

My turntable is unpowered so far, put the front drivers on the powered track and it pulls away.

Ken.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 1:25 PM
I have seen my BLI's get mean and onery on a straight section of snap track from time to time. Amazing.

You can push a desiel thru just about anything. I have memories of track that had height differences of close to a half inch and gauge problems that are noticeable to the naked eye. Yet the desiel would roar thru it without a problem.

I think Spacemouse has the right idea. You can pick over your track until it is "FLAWLESS" before putting that fine high strung steamer on it.

I rather have perfect track and run anything at any speed than just temporary track in my humble opinion.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 4,648 posts
Posted by jacon12 on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:59 AM
Being completely electric illiterate, let me ask you guys this. Is there a way, perhaps with a meter of some sort, that you can place the 'probes' of the meter to different areas of the track and see if there are bad voltage drops? That sure would answer one part of the equation and if it wasn't a voltage drop you could go on looking for another answer.
JaRRell
 HO Scale DCC Modeler of 1950, give or take 30 years.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:50 AM
Also as a general PS: Don't want to start a war or anything, but every time I hear a complaint about a BLI steamer acting erratically, it's always on a DCC-powered layout. I'm strictly DC, and the only problem I've ever had with a BLI loco was a loose tender/loco connector (easily fixed, BTW). However I'm beginning to wonder, having read all of the threads, if perhaps a DC/DCC compatible loco might not have more than a few 'conversion' bugs built in--just a question. Any thought s on this?
Tom [?]
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:41 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite

QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

Jarrell
Check and see if the engine is powered half on frame and half on tender(wire between tender and engine)my new mike is that way and I'am looking at putting wripers on the left side of the engine and removeing the tender power all togethor.I'am running D.C. right now so don't have a big problem , but if I go DCC then I might.[^][8D]

JIM

Jim--rather than remove your tender pickup, I'd suggest you replace the Mantua tender wheels with appropriate NWSL nickel-silver wheels. THEN install Tomar track wipers on both locomotive AND tender--it's easy to do with a drill and tap--and you'll be amazed at what a smooth runner you end up with. I'm in the process of converting all of my older brass and metal steamers to Tomar wipers, and the difference in running quality is just amazing!
Tom [:p]


Tom I'am with you but there is'nt a whole lot of space between the drivers and the frame,I'am looking at this real hard,tender no problem,re-build on the list of things to do.
I've got every thing I need for It.If you do a mantua mike let me know please??
Thanks
JIM

Jim--though I've had a Mantua Mike, it's been a long time ago. However, believe it or not, there's plenty of space between the wheels to install a Tomar. I've installed them on brass imports that not only have closer wheel spacing, but brake-shoe castings to boot, and the Tomar's will 'float' just fine. With the Mantua, I'd suggest you mount it between the first and second drivers (I'm assuming that your middle two drivers are 'blind', as most Mantua Mikes are) using a drill and tap on the frame cover. The phospour bronze 'slide' on the Tomar is very flexible, and will adjust itself against the wheel treads while you're running the loco. Beleive me, they're made to fit almost ANY wheel spacing. But I DEFINITELY suggest replacing those Mantua tender wheels--they're brass, and brass collects track crud like crazy. Even just replacing the tender wheels with appropriately sized nickel-silver will improve your pickup about 50%.
Tom [:)]
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Virginia
  • 356 posts
Posted by knewsom on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:35 AM
I have the Class A as well, and it does not have any problems going through my Atlas number 4 turnouts. I do remember that when I first purchased it, I had some problems with it hesitating, but once it was properly lubed these problems went away. Since the BLI requires a lot of electrical power to handle the decoder, it probably has to do with the voltage drop in the track. It may be that once you get your feeders and bus in place this issue will go away.
Thanks, Kevin
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:24 AM
I'm REALLY suprised that a loco the size of the Class A with that many wheels would POSSIBLY have a pickup issue of unpowered frogs. There's plenty of wheels that are NOT over the frog. It COULD be a pickup issue, but a mechanical one in which the pickups aren't in contact, or a wire is broken. When everything is working correctly, the pickup area on that 2-6-6-4 is HUGE. Stalling over unpowered frogs is usually left to short wheelbase things like 0-4-0's and diesels with only 4 wheel pickup.
It could be binding up, although the M1a makes it through #4's with no problem, and definitely ok through #6's - at any speed from a crawl to ludicrous speed, no hesitation, no derailments. And it's even ATLAS track (OMG, the model train police are gonna get me, I dared use Atlas track!).

--Randy

Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 9:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by twhite

QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

Jarrell
Check and see if the engine is powered half on frame and half on tender(wire between tender and engine)my new mike is that way and I'am looking at putting wripers on the left side of the engine and removeing the tender power all togethor.I'am running D.C. right now so don't have a big problem , but if I go DCC then I might.[^][8D]

JIM

Jim--rather than remove your tender pickup, I'd suggest you replace the Mantua tender wheels with appropriate NWSL nickel-silver wheels. THEN install Tomar track wipers on both locomotive AND tender--it's easy to do with a drill and tap--and you'll be amazed at what a smooth runner you end up with. I'm in the process of converting all of my older brass and metal steamers to Tomar wipers, and the difference in running quality is just amazing!
Tom [:p]


Tom I'am with you but there is'nt a whole lot of space between the drivers and the frame,I'am looking at this real hard,tender no problem,re-build on the list of things to do.
I've got every thing I need for It.If you do a mantua mike let me know please??
Thanks
JIM
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
  • 1,169 posts
Posted by Adelie on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 7:57 AM
Hi Jarrell,

Your original post implies that the BLI makes it through some of the turnouts okay, and I assume they are all Atlas with insulated frogs. If that is the case, Chip's and Tom's statements about not discounting the impact of temporary connections might be right on. As always with troubleshooting, eliminate the 10-cent part before your replace the $10 (or worse) part. In this case, the 10-cent parts would be the track connections.

That said, I think an Atlas #4 is a bit tight for something the size of a 2-6-6-4. I don't have the numbers in front of me, but a #5 would add something around 6 or 8 inches to the closure radius, which could make a world of difference here. If you are using all sectional track, a #5 will require some flex track to connect the diverging track to the rest of the empire (angle is different than an Atlas 4, I'm sure).

Back in my HO days, I certainly had more of these sorts of problems with steam than diesel, and I think it is due to the way they pickup power. That seemed to stop when I switched from Atlas with insulated frogs to Shinohara (Lambert at the time).

- Mark

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 7:51 AM
Soldered connections and feeders will make a big difference. I've been disconnecting and re-connecting track in one part of my layout while I do scenery below some bridges, and paint the bridges themselves. At one point I had a stalling problem just like yours, but with every locomotive I tried. When I looked closely, I had completely missed one rail joiner in one of my hasty assembly jobs.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 7:33 AM
I think the answer was just given "I'm using an Atlas #4". Number 4's are hard on steamers because of the long rigid frame. As Dave pointed out, what happens is the narrow track raises the wheels and then you have a derailment. I use #5's and 6's and have no trouble with steamers from 0-6-0T (Mantua) to a 2-8-8-2 (Proto). Ninety percent of my locos are steam, but when I do find a problem it's usually with the track and not the loco.
  • Member since
    November 2002
  • From: US
  • 4,648 posts
Posted by jacon12 on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 7:17 AM
I should have mentioned the layout is dcc. I've cleaned track until it shines like a new nickel. I've used a bright boy and a track cleaning car, but the bright boy does the better job. The turnouts are all Atlas #4 I cleaned the locos wheels using the 'Goo Gone on a paper towel laid on the track and holding the loco on it while powering it up' method. I cleaned the copper contacts on the tender bottom. I appreciate all the suggestions of things to check and I'll do that today. I'm leaning toward an electric problem rather than a mechanical one, but who knows. It will also do it on a particular stretch of straight track if it's speed is not hight enough. If the speed IS high enough I notice it will sorta do a very quick hesitation thing at that spot, but keep going.
I guess I should be surprised that it runs at all considering the only power going to the track is the two wires coming off the Digitrax Zephyr and no other feeder wires. That, and none of the rail joiners are soldered. You know, when you think about it... the diesels do have a long wheel base, even the little GP-9 so I suspect that the diesels front wheels will go across the points in the turnout where the dead area is and the rear ones are still on live rail, whereas the steamer doesn't do that.
Anyway, I'm just thinking out loud here.
I appreciate the suggestions!
Kinda sorta makes me want to get out of the steamer business (I only have the one) and go all diesels, the longer the better.. [:)]
Jarrell
 HO Scale DCC Modeler of 1950, give or take 30 years.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:36 AM
When was the last time you cleaned your wheels? I've got a Bowser PCC car that stalls whenever the wheels get dirty. The problem usually starts on turnouts, and then progresses to almost anywhere. For some reason, the Bowser wheels need to be cleaned far more often than any of the other powered machines.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 5:59 AM
I misread the question at first. Jarrell, you are running DCC right?

I have a decoderized 4-4-0 that acted I think similarily. When the track was DC it would run across one turnout and just as it left the turnout, it would sometimes reverse directions when going slow. Now that I've gone DCC it will hesitate or stall in the same place.

At the club, we have several places where the track current reverses directions. Sometimes the locos will hesitate when the cross-over is made. That is how the 4-4-0 acts.

I haven't fixed it on my layout because it's not a huge issue, but somehow there seems to be a reversal of current when this loco goes through that turnout. It only happens when it is leaving the turnout having entered the from the straight side of the frog end.

I'm not sure if that helps.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Chateau-Richer, QC (CANADA)
  • 833 posts
Posted by chateauricher on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 1:33 AM
I think Tom (twhite) is correct. You probably will need to use turnouts with powered frogs.

Steam locomotives — especially N-scale — often have very short wheel bases (compared to modern diesels) so crossing even the fairly short gap created by an unpowered frog can cause the engine to stop. Seeing that when you pu***he locomotive forward, it works again suggests that it is indeed a frog power problem.

To be on the safe side, you could check out all the other suggestions offered here; but I suspect you'll have to convert to powered frog turnouts.

Timothy The gods must love stupid people; they sure made a lot. The only insanity I suffer from is yours. Some people are so stupid, only surgery can get an idea in their heads.
IslandView Railroads On our trains, the service is surpassed only by the view !
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Ohio
  • 1,615 posts
Posted by Virginian on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:58 AM
I agree with the suggestion to check the wiring harness connection to the engine. One of mine has this issue every once in a while. I keep forgetting to tie it.
What could have happened.... did.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by oleirish

Jarrell
Check and see if the engine is powered half on frame and half on tender(wire between tender and engine)my new mike is that way and I'am looking at putting wripers on the left side of the engine and removeing the tender power all togethor.I'am running D.C. right now so don't have a big problem , but if I go DCC then I might.[^][8D]

JIM

Jim--rather than remove your tender pickup, I'd suggest you replace the Mantua tender wheels with appropriate NWSL nickel-silver wheels. THEN install Tomar track wipers on both locomotive AND tender--it's easy to do with a drill and tap--and you'll be amazed at what a smooth runner you end up with. I'm in the process of converting all of my older brass and metal steamers to Tomar wipers, and the difference in running quality is just amazing!
Tom [:p]
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Carmichael, CA
  • 8,055 posts
Posted by twhite on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:24 AM
Are your turnout frogs powered or un-powered? Also, what's the type of turnout you're using--a #4 is going to be a tight fit for a 2-6-6-4, though a #5 seems to work just fine. I use #5 yard and #6 main for my turnouts, and my BLI doesn't have a problem with any of them. But I use Sinohara and Peco turnouts, with live frogs. An insulated frog like Atlas, might be the problem there, I've known all kinds of steam locomotives hit them and refuse to move. Also, check your track connectors around the turnouts, some of them might have become loose. If so, tighten them with needle-nose pliers. BLI's are VERY picky about loose track connectors.
Tom [:D]
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:09 AM
Check the wire harness between loco and tender. I use a thin file or a small, long screwdriver to press the connector into its socket on both sides to ensure that it is fully seated.

Also, check to see that the pickups are seated on their contact points...very carefully (they are like glass!). Check for lint and crud. Use a magnifying glass to inspect the points and frogs for obstructions.

Also, the idea of inspecting the loco and tender for low-hanging piping or whatever that might foul the tracks and frog is a good one.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:40 PM
I agree with Chip. I think it's a steam thing, too. Steamers are high strung. They are "high society" so to speak. An old diesel will run on just about anything. Steamers are sophisticated. They require the very best. I am mooning all the junky diesels out there. LOL
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Rimrock, Arizona
  • 11,251 posts
Posted by SpaceMouse on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:31 PM
I'm going to disagree with the crowd and say it is a steam thing. At our club the diesels get around pretty easily but the steamers--all of them, all makes and model--have problems. This is because we are in a humid basement and the tracks moves all over the place. The diesels have no problem.

AT home I run only steamers and I have worked the track and worked it and worked it so that all the steamers run just fine. The diesels are much easier to please. When you get your track nailed down you can hit the joints and turnouts and with files and make it smooth as a baby's behind and your steamers will glide like they were meant to. But don't expect miracles from temporary track.

Chip

Building the Rock Ridge Railroad with the slowest construction crew west of the Pecos.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: oregon
  • 885 posts
Posted by oleirish on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:14 PM
Switch frogs to shallow maybe????
JIM
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Christchurch New Zealand
  • 1,525 posts
Posted by NZRMac on Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:47 PM
My BLI has electrical pickup on all the drivers and the tender wheels, so it's unusual I would think to be an electrical problem.

Ken.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!