Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Woefully inadequate!

6420 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Woefully inadequate!
Posted by selector on Monday, April 12, 2010 2:09 PM

My small layout is woefully inadequate.  I found this video of a single Challenger, good old 3985, charging up a grade with 143 freight cars, I think all doublestacks, and it appears to be doing all of 50 mph, maybe more.

Where would I find room to trail 143 doublestacks?

I wonder what the guys in the diesel were thinking..Mischief

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhgHrDbN4EU

-Crandell

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Seattle, Washington
  • 1,082 posts
Posted by IVRW on Monday, April 12, 2010 2:21 PM
A steam locomotive with double stacks?!?! I agree, woefully inadequate!

~G4

19 Years old, modeling the Cowlitz, Chehalis, and Cascade Railroad of Western Washington in 1927 in 6X6 feet.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Monday, April 12, 2010 2:42 PM

One-hundred-and-forty-three?  I can't count that high.

Mark

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Monday, April 12, 2010 3:05 PM

selector

I wonder what the guys in the diesel were thinking..Mischief

"Well, at least we've got air conditioning." Sigh

Mark

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 3,312 posts
Posted by locoi1sa on Monday, April 12, 2010 3:46 PM

 So that's how they get the 420 miles on 1 gallon of diesel for 1 ton of freight!  The commercial doesn't mention coal or bunker oil and water use. Wink

  I say bring them all back and tell the oil companies off for good! Its just too bad this country could not build anything like it again. Sad

    Pete

 I pray every day I break even, Cause I can really use the money!

 I started with nothing and still have most of it left!

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 356 posts
Posted by Silver Pilot on Monday, April 12, 2010 3:54 PM

Nice thought, but I think these were/are oil burners.

Google is good! Yahoo is my friend.
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 356 posts
Posted by Silver Pilot on Monday, April 12, 2010 3:57 PM

One thing I'd like to point out to our steam-aholics - notice that there is no thick, black smoke.  A well fired steam locomotive (coal or oil) once under way will produce very little smoke and the smoke it does produce should be pale and light in color.  It's evidence of a good fire and efficient burn of the fuel.

Google is good! Yahoo is my friend.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Monday, April 12, 2010 4:09 PM

Silver Pilot

Nice thought, but I think these were/are oil burners.

They were originally built as coal burners and converted later. When #3985 was resurrected, she was a coal burner. After providing a good workout for several fire departments with her cinder throwing shenanigans, she was converted to oil.

I happened to be in Salt Lake City in 1982 for one of #3985's trips as a coal burner. She set a number of fires between SLC and Provo. 

Andre

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • 802 posts
Posted by rjake4454 on Monday, April 12, 2010 4:39 PM

Silver Pilot

One thing I'd like to point out to our steam-aholics - notice that there is no thick, black smoke.  A well fired steam locomotive (coal or oil) once under way will produce very little smoke and the smoke it does produce should be pale and light in color.  It's evidence of a good fire and efficient burn of the fuel.

So I guess this means Broadway's smoke units are realistic after all. Mischief

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, April 12, 2010 4:42 PM

I'm not sure you diesel-holics are getting the message here.  Maybe this'll help. Whistling

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9alWb5KI5Uo

Slide the time indicator over to the 2 minute and 30 second mark.  Make sure your speakers are on, and turn them up a bit.  Enjoy a Challenger towing two modern diesels on full set-up all over the Cheyenne yard.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Monday, April 12, 2010 4:51 PM

If you ever want to see a steam locomotive belch a towering cloud of midnight-black exhaust, just catch your favorite oilburner when the fireman decides it's time to sand the flues.

Even the crummy coal burned by the JNR could never compete in that league!

(And now you know why I won't even consider adding smoke units to my steam locos.)

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Texas
  • 2,934 posts
Posted by C&O Fan on Monday, April 12, 2010 5:31 PM

Yada Yada Yada

Check out the 614 at 80 MPH

That's cookin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rmKYGEicP4&NR=1

TerryinTexas

See my Web Site Here

http://conewriversubdivision.yolasite.com/

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Chamberlain, ME
  • 5,084 posts
Posted by G Paine on Monday, April 12, 2010 5:50 PM

selector
it appears to be doing all of 50 mph

The video notes indicate 35 MPH, still very impressive.

As far as your layout being inadequate, another recent thread discussing the space needed for true prototype modeling said something like 'start with a blimp hanger'... LaughWink

George In Midcoast Maine, 'bout halfway up the Rockland branch 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Maryville IL
  • 9,577 posts
Posted by cudaken on Monday, April 12, 2010 6:04 PM

 Seen the video before but thanks for posting again Crandell. 

I wonder what the engineer thought when he saw the Challenger coming around the bend? I would think something like What the fill in the blank! 0

I wounder how hard it was working pulling that drag?

            Cuda Ken

 

I hate Rust

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Northeast
  • 746 posts
Posted by GraniteRailroader on Monday, April 12, 2010 6:55 PM

Probably something along the lines of "What a waste of money...We've got guys laid off and they (COMPANY OFFICIALS) are show-boating around in a steam locomotive"

This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, April 12, 2010 7:07 PM

selector

My small layout is woefully inadequate.  I found this video of a single Challenger, good old 3985, charging up a grade with 143 freight cars, I think all doublestacks, and it appears to be doing all of 50 mph, maybe more.

Where would I find room to trail 143 doublestacks?

I wonder what the guys in the diesel were thinking..Mischief

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhgHrDbN4EU

-Crandell

 

Obviously you thought too small when you built your layout.  Time to add an addition or two onto your house (ala Howard Zane).  After all, if your Challenger isn't pulling at least 100 double stacks you're just not a model railroader.Disapprove

Be glad you're not in G. 

Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh


Paul

If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, April 12, 2010 7:28 PM

GraniteRailroader

 

Probably something along the lines of "What a waste of money...We've got guys laid off and they are show-boating around in a steam locomotive"

Right-o!!   They should lay off the guys in the Challenger instead. Banged Head

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Northeast
  • 746 posts
Posted by GraniteRailroader on Monday, April 12, 2010 7:59 PM

 Selector, you know that's not where I'm going with that Mischief

But when talking about what the rail guy's would actually say, that's pretty darn accurate. I'd say most of my co-workers don't see the same joy and benefit of the railroad as a hobby as well as employment. To them, seeing a steam locomotive on an active diesel freight line is exactly what I said - a waste of money. 

This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Monday, April 12, 2010 8:33 PM

GraniteRailroader

 Selector, you know that's not where I'm going with that Mischief

But when talking about what the rail guy's would actually say, that's pretty darn accurate.

There's something to be said for company image, history, and paying tribute to your past and your elders.

These programs do a lot for a company's image.  I was never a UP fan, but these programs has led to more respect for them from me.

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • 356 posts
Posted by Silver Pilot on Monday, April 12, 2010 8:33 PM

Another nice video, and notice, no huge plumes of dark black smoke.  A properly fired steam loco doesn't produce huge amounts of black smoke when running at track speed.

I remember hearing O.Winston Link speak years ago when his book Steam Steel & Stars was first issued.  He talked about how he had to get the firemen on the locomotives in the pictures to produce thick white smoke so it show up in the night shots he took.  Black smoke wouldn't show at night and typically there was very little smoke unless the fire release a bunch of water/steam into the exhaust.  He pointed out that a good fireman could control the amount and color of the smoke.  It was an interesting lecture.

Google is good! Yahoo is my friend.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: California & Maine
  • 3,848 posts
Posted by andrechapelon on Monday, April 12, 2010 9:21 PM

GraniteRailroader

 Selector, you know that's not where I'm going with that Mischief

But when talking about what the rail guy's would actually say, that's pretty darn accurate. I'd say most of my co-workers don't see the same joy and benefit of the railroad as a hobby as well as employment. To them, seeing a steam locomotive on an active diesel freight line is exactly what I said - a waste of money. 

I don't want to rain on your parade, but that particular use of #3985 was made at the request of the shipper, APL. They paid for it, so it wasn't a waste of UP's money. Given that a single nominally 5500 HP steam locomotive was used on a train normally assigned three 4,000 HP diesel units, I think it's a pretty impressive show. APL got its money's worth.

Andre

 

It's really kind of hard to support your local hobby shop when the nearest hobby shop that's worth the name is a 150 mile roundtrip.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, April 12, 2010 10:16 PM

GraniteRailroader
 Selector, you know that's not where I'm going with that Mischief

Yeah, I know. Laugh  Truth is, you're probably right.

-Crandell

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: New Zealand
  • 44 posts
Posted by pall on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:45 AM

yahoo nice youtube clip, and the train has a caboose too.

Paul

Bring back the F,s
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:37 AM

Crandell,

The next time you post a video of my layout without my permission, I will have to contact the Forum Administrator!

In any event, I am disappointed that no one complimented my scenery or ballasting efforts.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:42 AM

cudaken

I wonder what the engineer thought when he saw the Challenger coming around the bend? I would think something like What the fill in the blank! 0

 Cuda Ken 
 

 

Probably the same thing we thought when we saw the 765 when I was working on the C&O under the CSX banner-nothing other then watch for the blankety,blank crazies taking pictures.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Chamberlain, ME
  • 5,084 posts
Posted by G Paine on Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:26 AM

C&O Fan

Yada Yada Yada

Check out the 614 at 80 MPH

That's cookin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rmKYGEicP4&NR=1 

Want to race?? Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh Laugh

This is 2 ft gage 0-4-0T SD Warren #1 at work at the paper mill in Westbrook, ME, date unknown. 3 of these little locos were built by Baldwin for the paper mill around 1895, #1 and #2 still exist and are owned by the Boothbay Railway Village; #2 is being restored to operating condition by the museum

George In Midcoast Maine, 'bout halfway up the Rockland branch 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:01 AM

Is it my imagination or did the diesel fail to dim its headlights for the Challenger? 

Back when the Southern RR had 4501 in steam I can recall an editorial by David P Morgan blasting the Chicago & North Western for just deadheading the engine back to Chicago (after it pulled the circus train in Milwaukee) rather than putting some actual revenue cars behind it.  His point is that it was available horsepower and a full crew. 

Dave Nelson

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!