Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Best HO Vehicles?

16256 views
36 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bettendorf Iowa
  • 2,173 posts
Posted by Driline on Friday, January 23, 2009 6:39 AM

loathar

BEHOLD! The grail of 1/87 vehicals...
http://www.1-87vehicles.org/

And a wealth of tips and tricks.
http://www.87thscale.info/Tips%20&%20Tricks.htm

The new athearn offerings look fantastic. The semi trailers have fantastic detail.

 

I"ve been there. That site is awesome. There are guys there that scratchbuild their vehicles that take 2 months to build. One guy wants to start an HO trainlayout, but he knows he's too much of a rivet counter and would never get it off the ground, so he won't even start it. He only builds HO scale vehicles, because he knows he can complete them in his lifetime Laugh

Heres the guys link. His name is Joe Enriquez

http://public.fotki.com/eex-joe/1945-mack-fcsw/

 

Modeling the Davenport Rock Island & Northwestern 1995 in HO
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Central Illinois
  • 806 posts
Posted by ICRR1964 on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:01 AM

 I have always liked the Classic Metal Works, they have come along ways since their beginning. The ere I work in is the early 1950's through the mid 1960's

I do have some really old kits, can't remember what make they were, but I just built them and never detailed them until the past few years. I have a couple of the Model Power units, but I took them and reworked them a bit to make them look more the part. 

There are quite a few manufactures of the HO vehicles out there. Which is the best? Everyone does have their opinion, to each his own. Some MR's pockets are deeper than others, so the matter of "best" or "cheap" falls in two different directions. 

As Loather stated, Athearn has some really nice looking items they are coming out with, have not bought any yet, but plan on it.

Yes I'm 46 years old, own my own home, have a full time job, my wife likes trains, and have names for all my engines. Thought everyone had names for their engines.Big Smile 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,481 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:07 AM

Walthers puts one or two different Jordan kits on sale every month.  I'm patient, and Scottish, so I just thumb through the monthly flier and e-mail my LHS when I see one I want.  (Many shops participate in the Walthers sales, so I get the sale price and pay no shipping charges.)

I agree with the idea that vehicles are important.  Most visitors to your layout don't know an SD-40 from a Cuisinart, but they will recognize a 67 T-Bird or a VW Microbus.  Much more than the trains, autos (and old advertising posters and billboards) set the timeframe of your layout.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Central Illinois
  • 806 posts
Posted by ICRR1964 on Friday, January 23, 2009 7:09 AM

WOW! this was from that site that Diline posted. 

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • From: Utah
  • 1,315 posts
Posted by shayfan84325 on Friday, January 23, 2009 9:16 AM

ICRR1964

WOW! this was from that site that Diline posted. 

The website is worth a look.  There are sequence photos of the construction of this truck.

The model was based on a kit from this outfit:

http://www.donmillsmodels.com/vehicles/1-87/index.htm

Their website is worth a look, too.  They sell both kits and parts.

Phil,
I'm not a rocket scientist; they are my students.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: The mystic shores of Lake Eerie
  • 1,329 posts
Posted by Autobus Prime on Friday, January 23, 2009 10:01 AM

Folks:

That's a beautiful truck.  The 1/87 vehicle hobby is interesting - I especially like the models of the earlier stuff that you don't see often.

Still, I think I can play devil's advocate for a bit.  I feel that our requirements are different.  Generally, we're using our autos to give an impression.  It's like movie set building.  To really do this great truck justice, it would have to be surrounded by comparably fine detail.  The pavement stains would have to be dead-on, and weeds would have to be modeled with individual etched leaves.  There'd be coke cans. 

It would be awesome to see that done, of course, but then there would be another problem.  It's impossible to truly appreciate the quality of this truck model, except in a photo.  I have decent eyesight, and I did a little check with a small toy auto.  It's impossible to focus as closely as needed to see the truck as it looks in the photo.  In fact, even with some squinting, the best I would expect would be comparable to "A", below:

(My monitor is 1024 x 768)

At normal viewing distances, on an eye level layout, it would appear as in "B", and quickly become even smaller as it receded into the background.

Please understand that I am not disparaging this model.  It's wonderful.  In fact, given the magnifying effect of the camera, it would be a great idea to have a handful of fine-quality vehicles on hand to use in close-up photography...but a working model railroad that is more often operated or observed in person really can't take advantage of such detail.  This is one of those camera vs. eye situations - which do we intend to model for?  If it's the eye, we might as well save some money.

I guess I harp on economy a lot, but I still remember being a whippersnapper with big dreams, and thinking I would never be a Real Modeler if I didn't have all the be$t $tuff.  I always felt a little guilty for using Hot Wheels cars.  Then I saw a local model railroad that had a lot of them in use, and I realized that, while not perfect, they worked well in building an overall impression.  This brought a sort of liberation, as it were, and I'm hoping I might help out today's newbies a bit in that way.

 

 Currently president of: a slowly upgrading trainset fleet o'doom.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Central Illinois
  • 806 posts
Posted by ICRR1964 on Friday, January 23, 2009 11:14 AM

 Oh that's ok, I don't have anything like this on my layout, I just posted the picture, because it was really an amazing piece of work. Personally, I would not put that much effort into a truck like this. As you stated though, it is only so big, and in or around a street, road, and parking lot at a 3 to 4 foot distance, you would not be able to see all the fine details this truck has. But is is a nice piece of work though

I for one do have to where my glasses when I'm working with something small, as far as the prospective of building and detailing a model like this? Well thats a whole other story. Everyone has a opinion on what is cheap, what is best. I for one would like to build something like this truck. Big question is, can I or am I able to build a truck with this much detail? Maybe! But also maybe not? 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!