Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

The "DCC WAVE" has it influenced your model railroading?

15210 views
126 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 14, 2004 6:53 PM
Eventually I would like to get into it. But for right now I'm still using the old DC method. Though I love operating my trains, most of my enjoyment comes from the construction side of the hobbie, the contructing of the mountains, canyons, water, buildings, sidewalks, roads etc. I find it very relaxing.

Georgia Boy
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Friday, May 14, 2004 2:07 PM
Hello Deanbrunnet,

Click on this:

www.LitchfieldStation.com/s/i/ho/hods/hods.html

Decoder prices are listed. Very reasonable. [:)][:D][8D]

By the way, consider updating your profile and filling in the "Bio" and "Hobbies" categories. This will help modelers in the future respond better to you if they have an idea of your interests and age group.[;)][4:-)][C):-)][tup]

Hope this helps, Amigo!


"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, May 14, 2004 12:29 PM
I am running a bigboy and a y6 mallet
is there any one who can tell me a place
an inexspensive decoader for them.
I love whatm dcc dose it is quite neat.
who has agood but easy sytem.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:58 PM
I'll probably go dcc wireless, if I get more space for a bigger layout. Right now my 11x18' layout doesn't need it and I'd rather spend the $$$ on some more locos and buildings.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: New Zealand
  • 462 posts
Posted by robengland on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:29 PM
Why do several responses here say the Zephyr won't scale? That's what boosters are for. I'm not aware of any constraint on scaling up the Zephyr
Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 11, 2004 4:30 PM
Where are you at DOUG?
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 342 posts
Posted by randybc2003 on Friday, May 7, 2004 4:20 PM
YES. I find that in planning layout, I am THINKING like a RR engineer. (trackwork, not loco - although that is comming.)
Existing layout is DC, but I have a "DCC Cab". Local club - DCC. Digitrax decoders work either DC or DCC. Also, DC locos can work on Digitrax DCC. I can MU/Helper my consists, and control my Rotary Snow Plow along with my (pushing) steamer.
Slowly converting all locos to DCC. Remoter and gear as necessary.
Once you've tried it, you won't go back.
Randy
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: SE Michigan
  • 922 posts
Posted by fmilhaupt on Friday, May 7, 2004 1:51 PM
To quote a buddy of mine, "I'd go back to Baker couplers before I'd give up command control."

My friends and I like to run timetable and train order-- there's enough to think about just running the train and handling paperwork that having to concern ourselves with power-routing controls would seriously detract from the experience.

I really dislike doing wiring work on the layout. But, I've found that I quite enjoy installing decoders and don't mind engineering the lighting arrangements (all three of the roads I model used Gyralights...). For this reason, DCC has been a good fit for me.

-Fritz Milhaupt, Publications Editor, Pere Marquette Historical Society, Inc.
http://www.pmhistsoc.org

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 6, 2004 7:55 AM
I'm contemplating buying one of the new Bachmann DCC setups when they come out - it'll be able to address 9 DCC locos, 1 analog loco, and will be able to work with other systems as a slave controller unit later on. Decoders will be very cheap by the sounds of it, as will the control unit, though it's all still fully DCC compatible.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 6, 2004 7:02 AM
im gonna begin building a 4x8 HO layout hopefully by the end of summer. Im also wanting it to be some thing to be able to just relax and watch trains go by, then switch one or two cars then let the train run some more.

theres not really room to have more than 1 train running on a 4x8 layout, so for that reason, im not gonna invest into DCC unless i see Bachmanns E-Z command at my hobby shop. In my opinion that would be the only DCC system worth it for my layout, since they will be selling it, along with a engine that has a decoder in it.

but for only one engine, or maybe even two engines in the future. DCC wont be worth it.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, May 6, 2004 6:35 AM
Roger,

What type of older locos do you have? If they're equipped with open frame motors, there are plenty of low-amp replacement motors available for O, HO, and N scales now. Several of my units are over 20 years old but I will remotor them, one unit at a time as my budget allows.

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Anderson Indiana
  • 1,301 posts
Posted by rogerhensley on Friday, April 9, 2004 7:01 AM
I have a 'mature' layout with a number of older locos that are not DCC friendly. I have no inention of changing as I will not scrap the equipment that I have in operation.

Now, that said, I highly recommend DCC for anyone just starting or beginning a new layout. There is so much more that can be done with DCC that DC is no longer a good option for new layouts.

Roger Hensley
= ECI Railroad - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/eci/eci_new.html =
= Railroads of Madison County - http://madisonrails.railfan.net/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 342 posts
Posted by randybc2003 on Thursday, April 8, 2004 7:44 PM
I rember the ASTRACK system of the early '60's, and thought "how prototypical". Trouble was, : expensive, dificult to understand (i thought), BIG (it seemed nothing short of O would swollow it), and somewhat limited. (only 16 channels, etc. I was out of the hobby (more or less) in the early '80's when CTC-16 was published. When I saw DCC, for HO and N yet, I thought: "Now I can run helpers, Snowplows, and switching manuvers prototype fashion."
I bought the Digitrax Chief. Several reasons:
Localy available. Several hobby shops supported it.
Local Experience: Three clubs in the area; two used IT. (the third still may use DC Blocks - I Think)
Seemed to be the most flexable. One thing Computers taught me. Get the biggest, strongest, most powerful you can afford. It will be obsolete shortly. Also, you may not think the "bells and whistles" are important, but you will get accostemed to them.
Two Knobs. I now push my rotary snow plow around with my big steamer. They both have decoders, and I can control both of them at the same time. I have other plans for another rotary and steamer cooking in the back of my mind.
I joined one of the clubs, and regularrly operate my locos and rolling stock on DCC. One of these days I am going to MU something.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, April 8, 2004 7:19 PM
MaineCentral229,

If this helps, quality brand DCC decoders can be purchased from Litchfield Station and Tony's Trains in the $20 range. Prices have really come down in the last 2 years!

I'll be pursuing TCS decoders myself.

[:D][8D][:)][8)][swg][tup]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 8, 2004 5:30 PM
sorry, but at present, DCC is just too rich for my wallet. Maybe if the prices start to decrease (LOL) I will buy one , but if I figured right, it would cost me around $450 to get a system, and the decoders[:0][wow]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 8, 2004 2:09 AM
Other than all the benefits of DCC over DC mentioned by everyone thus far, what is tipping me 'off the fence' into DCC is my wife who said that " being able to operate a locomotive (as opposed to controlling a layout throwing toggles, not being able to operate helpers realistically or switching yards, etc.,) would get her involved in 'working on the railroad' with me and not just a spectator when I dragged her down to the basement to watch the trains go around. . .I've been away from the hobby for approx 10 yrs and have been without a layout for much longer than that. Now I understand just how Rip Van Winkle felt when he woke up from his 20 yr nap. Boy has the hobby evolved! I am in the planning stages now (already started framing RR room in basement) for a 24 X 32 point to point , single track main bridge route w/ a branch line and quarries as online industry set in the late '40s. I plan on having at least one hidden staging yard and two interchanges. I don't care at this point about sound, although that is more a matter of finances. Probably only 2 or 3 trains will be operated at same time, though helpers and double heading will be common practice. Hopefully DCC will follow the trends of most consumer electronics in that as capability increases, prices decrease. It's good that there seems to be a fairly well defined industry standard supported by the NMRA. I for one do not need or want a super sophisticated DCC system and am hoping that in a year or so when I'm at the stage where I'll be able to run some trains, there will be some basic, but capable systems that meet my needs, or even some low mileage pre-owned systems available for sale (or barter, since I have a woodworking business and make hardwood display cases, model railroad benchwork and just about anything else out of wood - sorry about the 'shameless' plug). Any recommendations on a particular system that would meet my needs, as well as a decent book that "de-mistifies" DCC for non-techies types, would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Nevada
  • 825 posts
Posted by NevinW on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 5:04 PM
I switched to DCC last year and will never go back to DC. I would leave the hobby and go fly model airplanes first. DCC finally makes a locomotive behave like a real one. The ability to run more than one engine on the same track and double head them with any jerryrigged set-ups like cut off switches has made running trains a real pleasure. With the new Lenz decoders with the ability to run through dirty track, I think we will finally what we have always wanted- freedom to run an engine like a real engine. The sound systems are just an added bonus. - Nevin
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Portland, OR
  • 3,119 posts
Posted by jfugate on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 3:15 PM
If you are at all serious about operation, wireless DCC is a dream come true. I use wireless EasyDCC on my Siskiyou Line and my op crew loves it!

Been using DCC since 1993 and haven't looked back. There are some considerations with using DCC, especially on a larger layout, that make your life simpler. Will be covering those in a clinic at the National in Seattle this July.

Or if you can't make the clinic, will be publishing this material and more in a series of videos ... see: http://model-train-videos.com .

One tidbit you can find on my web site for making your DCC layout more "short resistant" is here: http://siskiyou.railfan.net/wiring.html

Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: PtTownsendWA
  • 1,445 posts
Posted by johncolley on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 1:08 PM
My initial experiences with DCC are on a friend's layout. The first operating session I was able to approach an inbound to pull a block off for switching while he came onto the other end of the A/D track to remove the crummy and pull it to the cabin track. Try that with analog! Yes, I am hoarding my pocket change to get DCC! I have a pair of BLI e-7's that are great on my 14 car Empire Builder! At the same time I am going to convert some of my existing freight equipment. I have a 4 unit Stewart FT that is first on my list. I model Great Northern circa 1947. Sound is the way of the future. johncolley Port Townsend, WA
jc5729
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Alabama
  • 1,077 posts
Posted by cjcrescent on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 1:03 PM
I was brought into DCC kicking and screaming. My club voted to go DCC several years ago. I viewed the cost of converting all my locomotives as prohibitive. Never mind the cost of a base station, controller (throttle, hand held etc) as well as "learning" a new method to wire a layout. As an incentive to get the business my LHS held a sale for the club and any system could be bought at his cost. So since the club was using Digitrax, I got the Empire Builder. I also got as much reading material on DCC as I could. I did find that I have a knack for installing decoders and found out that if you follow the wiring principles for wiring a conventional layout that is NOT using a common rail scheme, the wiring rules are really no different from conventional wiring. The cost has certainly been coming down and now I think that BASED on what I want to do with my layout, it is cheaper than conventional DC. Plus given the flexibility of control I can now concentrate on improving the operations and not upkeep. I now run the trains and not the layout.

Carey

Keep it between the Rails

Alabama Central Homepage

Nara member #128

NMRA &SER Life member

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • 760 posts
Posted by Roadtrp on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 12:19 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by LuthierTom

With a 4x8 2-track HO layout, I just haven't felt the need to get into DCC. Maybe someday, maybe not. I'm one of these people who just finds sitting back in an easy chair and watching the trains go round and round very relaxing and a good way to unwind after a hard day's work. Sorta like an aquarium but without the fuss, mess, dead fish and constant cleaning! [swg][|)][zzz]


Me too. [:)]

The thought of a formal "operating session" with dispatching and rules and timetables etc. gives me the willies. I do enough thinking at work. At home I just want to have fun playing with my trains. [:p]

And you are absolutely right about watching your trains to unwind after work. Even my 27 year-old son remarked how relaxing it was to watch my trains run the first time he saw them.

Now, to get back to the original topic... I don't think I'll be doing DCC anytime soon. The size and lack of complexity of my layout just doesn't justify it.

[:)]
-Jerry
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 11:39 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45

Orsonroy,
Wouldn't the Digitrax Empire Builder meet your needs, even though it does have a couple of extra "bells & whistles" options?


Antonio,

That's the system I've got on order right now, with IR receivers for the mainline crews (yards and interchanges can be tethered for the time being). The problem that I have with DCC systems is that I really don't need more than about 1/2 of what the Digitrax system has to offer. And since I work with electronics on a daily basis (we build 'em here at work) I know that the more bells & whistles you've got, the more things there are to go wrong. My preferred system would have been the Atlas Master system beefed up to three power districts, and maybe a wireless system of some sort. Unfortunately, the ATlas system sends 19 amps to the rails instead of the NMRA RP of 17 amps, and neither Soundtraxx nor QSI sound systems work well with Atlas. In addition, the designed wireless throttle system for the Atlas system is the Lenz XPA, which uses a cordless phone. I don't like that solution to wireless control. Frankly, a Zephyr with a few extra throttles and a bigger power supply would have worked too, but you can't really do that with that Digitrax system.

I don't need most of what DCC has to offer. I like the fact that DCC eliminates block wiring (not blocks), and that you can run multiple trains more flexibly than with block control. I also like sound. I have absolutely no need for stationary decoders, signalling, back EMF, route control, computer interfaces, automation, speed tables, dispatching, etc. I just won't use them on my new system, but I would have liked to have the option of buying a more bare bones system that had more track power output.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,642 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 10:49 AM
Orsonroy,
Wouldn't the Digitrax Empire Builder meet your needs, even though it does have a couple of extra "bells & whistles" options?


Snake,

I know what you mean as the layout I will be building won't be large either. It would be about the size of your layout, though folded dogbone style.

What I like about DCC's opportunities is that with the type of layout I'm planning; two trains max would run on the mainline but I could:


[1] Perform local switching at the industries, while carefully avoiding collisions.
[2] Switch locomotives around at the locomotive shop service facility as they fuel up.
[3] Have (sound equipped) locomotives standing by with diesel engines idling at the
engine servicing facility awaiting the next assigments. Headlights or rule 17 lights
would be on. Now that's way too cool!

For me these features add tremendously to the flavor, atmosphere and realism of the railroad that makes it so believable. [C=:-)] So even a 4x6 layout could benefit from DCC!

[:)][:D][tup][swg]

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 91 posts
Posted by LuthierTom on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 9:39 AM
With a 4x8 2-track HO layout, I just haven't felt the need to get into DCC. Maybe someday, maybe not. I'm one of these people who just finds sitting back in an easy chair and watching the trains go round and round very relaxing and a good way to unwind after a hard day's work. Sorta like an aquarium but without the fuss, mess, dead fish and constant cleaning! [swg][|)][zzz]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 9:39 AM
I am in process of building a 5'x13' HO layout where I will be the only operator and never run more than 2 trains. There just ain't enough room on a 5x13 for more than 1 freight and 1 passenger train.

When I started planning the layout a year ago I had it broken into blocks and planned to go DC. I am a electronics hobbist and decided to build some circuits that would enhance the central train control (CTC) panel and turnout switching. After reading the "hype" on DCC I priced out the total cost of building my layout DC with electronic enhancements vs an inexpensive DCC system. The Digitrax Zephyr at $169 was cheaper than the cost of the toggle switches and electronic parts which would have cost me about $200. So about 6 mos ago I decided to go DCC and have been saving my nickels and dimes to buy the Zephyr when the time comes to start operations.

However, now that I am ready to start wiring the layout I have come to realize that the switch machines will need to be either DCC controlled or toggle switch controlled. DCC static decoders cost more than toggles but toggles put me back to a CTC panel. Whether I use DCC or toggles to switch turnouts I still need to take action and do the switching. Yes, the switching could be done with a computer controlled DCC layout but can't see buying another computer to have near the layout. Besides if it were computer controlled, what would I do, sit and watch the train go 'round and 'round? The only benefit of DCC that I see at this time would be that I wouldn't need to throw the cab control toggle when I throw the turnout toggle. A DCC system would however reduce finger fatigue by 50%. [:D]

DCCer's please don't stone me, I know there is more to DCC than eliminating a few toggle switches. I am still on the DC or DCC fence. I will need to fall off the fence soon or my layout progress will come to a halt.

After re-reading this reply, maybe DC would be the way to go for a small, one person layout. "Help, I'm falling and I can't..."

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Elgin, IL
  • 3,677 posts
Posted by orsonroy on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 9:22 AM
I've been toying with the idea of switching to DCC for various reasons, but it took the sound issue to tip the balance. I've had the opportunity to operate on all-sound equipped layouts a few times over the past year, and I recently bought one of the BLI heavy Mikes. Considering I'm a steam nut, sound is almost a must. Steam without any sound is pretty boring, now that I've got two engines with it (yes, the BLI engine impressed me enough that I bought a second one, and I don't really need ANY USRA heavies!). Now sound is a must for virtually my entire fleet. In fact, I'll be purging my steam fleet in order to pay for a few sound decoders! Too bad we can't effectively scale down the smoke and steam that goes along with a steam engine....

Starting a new layout from scratch also affected my choice to go DCC. My new layout features a 225' mainline with three major roads and several interchange roads, all feeding into one very large yard. Adding up the costs of multiblock controls (al least seven cabs) and the complexity of blocking and wiring a large engine terminal made me realize that DCC would price out about the same and give me fewer headaches. Adding the sound equation made DCC basically the only choice for me! I now have a Digitrax Empire builder on order (IR equipped).

DCC isn't a magical cure-all however. Frankly, I'm sorta miffed at the lack of choices for DCC sets. You basically have started sets that have very limited operability (MRC), starter sets that won't work well for all DCC applications (Atlas), starter sets that won't power a large layout (Zephry), or mid to high range systems that offer too much for most midlevel users. I want to run lots of trains on a large layout, with the option of sound functions. I could care less about route control, signalling, automation, or computer interfaces, but I can't get a starter set that'll crank out 10-20 amps.

Ray Breyer

Modeling the NKP's Peoria Division, circa 1943

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 8:58 AM
keeping with DC now, when I complete my new layout, might consider putting DCC in
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Central Or
  • 318 posts
Posted by sparkingbolt on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 5:52 AM
I have a nice DC layout , don't have immediate plans to change. I'm not a stick in the mud, DCC has it's appeal. I'm keeping the option open, but have many other priorities. Dan
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 1:38 AM
Went with Digitrax DCC in 1999 and have enjoyed the flexibility over block control. I consider it well worth evey dollar I spent, but I only had 5 locos to euip with decoders at the time. Can understand the reluctance of those with 20 locos to convert $wise. Would never consider going back to block control.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 1:31 AM
DCC??

Yes. I am building a new layout and already have the system and several locos equipped with decoders, three with sound. After operating sessions at several DCC layouts, I became a big fan off DCC. No more "Who has my block?". Another cool thing is to have helper locos with two separate operators running their engines independently. Also cool to blow the whistle , turn on the bell etc. with a wireless throttle.

While I love DCC there is one layout in the area that is truly a masterpiece that is still DC. I jump at the chance to run there and always have a great time doing so. I think there is room for both.

Guy

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!