-Fritz Milhaupt, Publications Editor, Pere Marquette Historical Society, Inc.http://www.pmhistsoc.org
"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"
Modeling BNSF and Milwaukee Road in SW Wisconsin
Jim Murray The San Juan Southern RR
QUOTE: Originally posted by orsonroy I could care less about route control, signalling, automation, or computer interfaces, but I can't get a starter set that'll crank out 10-20 amps.
QUOTE: Originally posted by jrbernier I have noticed that several folks talk about the expense of converting all of their engine 'fleet' to DCC(97 engines, etc...) 10 years ago I had over 100 engines, now I have under 30. The reason is not financial(like lost my job, divorce, etc...). I got into DCC about 10 years ago and started converting the engines I really needed to run my railroad. The plan was to convert ALL my engines. What I realized was that a lot of those other engines hardly ever get run(even in DC). The plan then changed to build more display cases to view them. Eventually, I started selling off the older engines that were not detailed as well, or there were newer/better models available(Athearn vs P2K). I now have 23 DCC equipped engines(3 with sound), and the rest are mainly display models and have no decoders. Since I only really need 11 engines to 'run' the railroad, a lot of the DCC engines are in the display case as well. I suspect a lot of folks have engines they 'just had to buy', but never run them or even take them out of the box. A lot of older 'brass' would need a lot of gearbox/motor work just to get them to run on good DC, let alone adding a decoder! I have 3 brass engines left in my collection, and really have no to plans to convert them(2 are half painted, one is still in natural brass). DCC has made me think about what I really 'need' for my layout, and I have more fun running trains. For example, I used to use two GP9's on road freights, mainly because a single GP9 could not pull the 'hill' with a full road freight. Now I use a single GP9 and have a 'helper' engine at the bottom of the grade. The helper operation is so simple; never could do it very well with DC cab control. Jim Bernier
DANOC&O lives on!!! Visit my railfan community site: http://www.crtraincrew.com
Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon
QUOTE: Originally posted by tatans dcc,dcc.dcc. What is dcc?? am I missing something? you mean to tell me I have a layout that actually runs without dcc, how can this be? what is the next expensive gimmick thay you MUST have? is the next wave of electronic "stuff" (in the next 3 months) going to antiquate dcc. I've got to get back to scratchbuild my $1.25 yard sale tank car and take my mind off 5 pages of dcc.
QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45 I remember reading about the CTC-16 in MRR back in the 80s with Dr. Richard Kamm and MRR Staffer Keith Gutierezz (is Keith still around?).
QUOTE: Originally posted by jfugate QUOTE: Originally posted by AntonioFP45 I remember reading about the CTC-16 in MRR back in the 80s with Dr. Richard Kamm and MRR Staffer Keith Gutierezz (is Keith still around?). Antonio: What planet have you been on? Keith G. is the brains behind CVP, RailCommand, and EasyDCC. See: http://www.cvpusa.com ... Hey guy! Hmmmmm..I've been on the messed up planet Earth in the 21st century where: [1] UP, MTH, QSI, and Lionel either sue or get sued [2] HO & N scale locomotives are sold as "Limited Runs" [3] Where many modelers and railfans think graffitti on freight cars is cool ! Man! Wish I could "time warp" back. Seriously, I haven't kept up with who's who in model railroading as I had stopped subscribing to MRR about 1993. I started again in 2003. I'm very glad that Keith is still contributing. I still remember the picture of him in a MRR magazine holding a microfphone against the engine compartment of an idling Union Pacific SD40-2 as he was involved in advancing the sound technology for modeling. Is Dr. Kamn still around? Thanks for the heads up! "I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!" Reply jfugate Member sinceJanuary 2002 From: Portland, OR 3,119 posts Posted by jfugate on Monday, August 16, 2004 3:01 PM QUOTE: Seriously, I haven't kept up with who's who in model railroading as I had stopped subscribing to MRR about 1993. I started again in 2003. I'm very glad that Keith is still contributing. I still remember the picture of him in a MRR magazine holding a microfphone against the engine compartment of an idling Union Pacific SD40-2 as he was involved in advancing the sound technology for modeling. Is Dr. Kamn still around? Thanks for the heads up! Antonio: Being a happy EasyDCC owner, I keep up with Keith's whereabouts. I've even gotten some emails from him in answer to some technical question about EasyDCC. It's always impressive to get a personal email from the designer ... glad to provide the info. *Soapbox time* P.S. Your 21st Century list sounds like some sort of nightmare. While it may be true that you legally can go after people for infringement, it seems to have been understood in the hobby that goodwill and open standards were for the greater good than a few measely dollars. Until now, that is. More and more, business today is becoming: make money and use people -- rather use money and help people with some product or service. *End of soapbox* Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon Reply easyaces Member sinceFebruary 2001 From: NW Central IND. 326 posts Posted by easyaces on Monday, August 16, 2004 4:58 PM Although DCC sounds good ,and I had the opportunity to see it in action, I think I'll stick to using a dual throttle MRC power control for right now on my layout. It gives plenty of power as I need it and still run any loco I want without worrying about some dang chip in a loco screwing up . MR&L(Muncie,Rochester&Lafayette)"Serving the Hoosier Triangle" "If you lost it in the Hoosier Triangle, We probably shipped it " !! Reply jfugate Member sinceJanuary 2002 From: Portland, OR 3,119 posts Posted by jfugate on Monday, August 16, 2004 5:03 PM Easy: There is something to be said about simple, true enough. Still, I am amazed that every time I go down and turn on the layout, dial up a loco number and it just works over and over with very few issues. For all the complexities, DCC works *very well*, in my experience. Joe Fugate Modeling the 1980s SP Siskiyou Line in southern Oregon Reply robengland Member sinceFebruary 2003 From: New Zealand 462 posts Posted by robengland on Monday, December 6, 2004 2:56 PM Last night I stopped a sound effects-equipped Mikado and its train, left it quietly huffing and ticking (the pump), pulled a diesel switcher up to the back of the same train, pulled off the caboose, turned off the red flasher on the rear of the caboose remotely, backed up, threw the turnout remotely, pulled forward with the Mikado which huffed and hissed back into life, ran the diesel and caboose forward into the parallel track at the same time.... and did all that from one handheld wireless controller controlling the two locos, the caboose lighting, the turnouts... When I first built the layout I made the grade too steep on the dip in the loop round the back and a train got stuck in the bottom of the dip, wheel spinning in either direction. SO I stopped it while I sent a helper round to give it a shove. I adjusted the speed of both locos to get a nice smooth push up the hill... try doing all that with anything but DCC. It's awesome. Rob Proud owner of the a website sharing my model railroading experiences, ideas and resources. Reply mikebonellisr Member sinceJune 2003 From: US 641 posts Posted by mikebonellisr on Monday, December 6, 2004 3:18 PM Since I installed DCC about 1995,I've had no problems at all with the system[s]..I upgraded from a digitrax big boy to a chief .It's a great way to run trains 'even if you have one loco and a small switching layout.Sound makes it even better along with the finer control of a programable decoder.To me it's like going from a B&W TV that you had to get up and change the channel to a color,remote,plasma screen TV. Reply 12345 Subscriber & Member Login Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more! Login Register Users Online There are no community member online Search the Community ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Model Railroader Newsletter See all Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox! Sign up
Antonio: What planet have you been on? Keith G. is the brains behind CVP, RailCommand, and EasyDCC. See: http://www.cvpusa.com ...
QUOTE: Seriously, I haven't kept up with who's who in model railroading as I had stopped subscribing to MRR about 1993. I started again in 2003. I'm very glad that Keith is still contributing. I still remember the picture of him in a MRR magazine holding a microfphone against the engine compartment of an idling Union Pacific SD40-2 as he was involved in advancing the sound technology for modeling. Is Dr. Kamn still around? Thanks for the heads up!