wjstix wrote: MerrilyWeRollAlong wrote:According to the Walthers website and MTH's website, MTH will be coming out with their verison of the Southern Pacific Daylight trains. It looks like SP modelers will have plenty of choices when it comes to modeling Trains 98/99 between BLI/PCM, Athearns and now MTH. I do personally do love the train and it's nice to see it being made/sold for a semi-affordable price but is there really a huge market to warrent 3 manufactures producing the same train? It's as if the SP Daylight has become to HO-scale passenger cars what the F-units has become to HO-scale locomotive. I would think that the manufacturers would want to offer something different as oppose to going head to head with each other over a niche train. Only 3?? Couple years ago there were 40 different UP Challengers available IIRC!! That's apparently how model railroading works, the manufacturers get together and all decide to make identical models and issue them at the same time. Why make a Northern Pacific Challenger when you can be the 41st manufacturer to make a UP one?? Heaven forbid you make a model of something no one else makes (no matter how many people want to buy one!).
MerrilyWeRollAlong wrote:According to the Walthers website and MTH's website, MTH will be coming out with their verison of the Southern Pacific Daylight trains. It looks like SP modelers will have plenty of choices when it comes to modeling Trains 98/99 between BLI/PCM, Athearns and now MTH. I do personally do love the train and it's nice to see it being made/sold for a semi-affordable price but is there really a huge market to warrent 3 manufactures producing the same train? It's as if the SP Daylight has become to HO-scale passenger cars what the F-units has become to HO-scale locomotive. I would think that the manufacturers would want to offer something different as oppose to going head to head with each other over a niche train.
Only 3?? Couple years ago there were 40 different UP Challengers available IIRC!! That's apparently how model railroading works, the manufacturers get together and all decide to make identical models and issue them at the same time. Why make a Northern Pacific Challenger when you can be the 41st manufacturer to make a UP one?? Heaven forbid you make a model of something no one else makes (no matter how many people want to buy one!).
40 Different UP Challengers? Are you serious or is this an exaggeration?
CAZEPHYR wrote: My thought is that since three companies are importing variations of the same train, I will wait for the big blow out sales. That will probably happen when the third and last company to get the cars to market finds the market is saturated.There will be great deals for those who wait.
My thought is that since three companies are importing variations of the same train, I will wait for the big blow out sales. That will probably happen when the third and last company to get the cars to market finds the market is saturated.
There will be great deals for those who wait.
The three upcoming Daylight trains shouldn't, hopefully, be all duplicates. Even assuming they all model the Coast Daylight train, there were significant variations. The biggest differences were between the pre- and post-1946 trains which are very apparent to even sophomoric students of the SP. Anyone considering buying these models might best be aware of the differences.
Personally, I'd be happier if heavyweight SP models were to be produced. I understand, however, the marketing appeal is probably much higher for the colorful Daylight scheme.
Mark
twhite wrote: Doug--I can only go by what I remember, and I could be wrong, but to my knowledge, the only 'Daylight' heavyweights I remember on the SP were the head-end cars used on the San Joaquin. SP did paint some of their heavyweights in the so-called 'Overland' two-tone gray, however, used on the LARK and the CASCADE during the war years and after.
Doug--
I can only go by what I remember, and I could be wrong, but to my knowledge, the only 'Daylight' heavyweights I remember on the SP were the head-end cars used on the San Joaquin. SP did paint some of their heavyweights in the so-called 'Overland' two-tone gray, however, used on the LARK and the CASCADE during the war years and after.
My memory is similar, but I do know that in addition to heavyweight head-end cars on the San Joaquin Daylight, there were heavyweight dining cars (while coffee-shop cars were lightweights). The San Joaquin Daylight was the "third sister" of the Coastal, Shasta, and San Joaquin siblings. Thus, the SJD operated older and less desirable cars compared to its sisters.
Hi Again Tom,
The link that LCR gave showed mainly headend cars, with a few diners and combines, but didn't show any kind of sleepers or coaches.
Thanks Again,
Doug
May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails
Tom
Tom View my layout photos! http://s299.photobucket.com/albums/mm310/TWhite-014/Rio%20Grande%20Yuba%20River%20Sub One can NEVER have too many Articulateds!
Thanks Guys, Looking at the link that LCR provided, it appears that there were quite a few headend cars, some Diners and and Combines, in Daylight collors. The Sleepers and Coaches, evidently are just a Fantasy scheme that, seems to have never been, but that is fairly common in tthis Hobby, regardless of Scale anyway. They are still GREAT LOOKING cars, that I will still enjoy running, but my curiosity has at least been answered.
While they may not be "Prototypically Correct" they do still LOOK right, and 97% of the people viewing them wouldn't know that they never existed. I will still ENJOY them as a "something that should have been" and was on my raillroad. After all that is what the Hobby is all about, to HAVE FUN.
Thanks Again Guys, I Appreciate the Information,
Doug, the SP did paint some of the heavyweights in to the Daylight scheme. I recommend looking at the SP color guide to freight and passenger cars for information on what cars were painted.
Charlie
MP 53 on the BNSF Topeka Sub
challenger3980 wrote: Does anyone know if SP had any Heavyweights painted in the Daylight colors? I have a set of Scale sized Lionel Heavyweights in Daylight paint, Full interiors with Passengers and lighting, Beautiful cars, and they do LOOK GREAT behind my GS-4. I was just wondering if there ever was any Heavyweights painted in that scheme, wouldn't stop me from running them, I'm just curious. Thanks for any Info, Doug
Does anyone know if SP had any Heavyweights painted in the Daylight colors? I have a set of Scale sized Lionel Heavyweights in Daylight paint, Full interiors with Passengers and lighting, Beautiful cars, and they do LOOK GREAT behind my GS-4. I was just wondering if there ever was any Heavyweights painted in that scheme, wouldn't stop me from running them, I'm just curious.
Thanks for any Info,
Charlie--
Thanks for the information. I know when I rode the SJ "Dayight" several times back in 1961 between Lathrop and Los Angeles, it was a 3/4 dome, and earlier, when I rode the "Overland", it seemed to be a full dome. Either way, it was quite an experience--especially over Donner Pass. WOW!
I always remember someone asking me why SP never really 'touted' the scenery on their Donner Pass line, and remarking to them that until the earlie 'fifties, a lot of the really great views were covered by showsheds. But by the late 'fifties and early 'sixties, it was a ride that REALLY rivalled WP's Feather River Route (and it wasnt at the bottom of a canyon, either, LOL!).
Morgan49 wrote: twhite wrote: Morgan--Those SP 3/4 dome cars occasionally showed up on the "Overland Limited" in the late 1950's. I remember riding on one from Truckee to Sacramento on the "Overland" around 1959. I don't know how many SP constructed (I think it was four), but they traveled the system more than one would think. From what I understand they were used between Oakland and Sparks on the train, since it had a daylight Sierra crossing. Tom They had 7 dome cars. 3600-3606 There were slightly different floor plans for some of them. 3600 was one of a kind.
twhite wrote: Morgan--Those SP 3/4 dome cars occasionally showed up on the "Overland Limited" in the late 1950's. I remember riding on one from Truckee to Sacramento on the "Overland" around 1959. I don't know how many SP constructed (I think it was four), but they traveled the system more than one would think. From what I understand they were used between Oakland and Sparks on the train, since it had a daylight Sierra crossing. Tom
Morgan--
Those SP 3/4 dome cars occasionally showed up on the "Overland Limited" in the late 1950's. I remember riding on one from Truckee to Sacramento on the "Overland" around 1959. I don't know how many SP constructed (I think it was four), but they traveled the system more than one would think. From what I understand they were used between Oakland and Sparks on the train, since it had a daylight Sierra crossing.
They had 7 dome cars. 3600-3606 There were slightly different floor plans for some of them. 3600 was one of a kind.
SP 3600 was a 3/4 low profile dome while 3601-3606 were low profile full domes. Soho imported the 3601-3606 domes while The Coach Yard released all versions of SP's domes. I have a model of Coach Yard's 3600 dome. Beautiful model.
twhite wrote:Morgan--Those SP 3/4 dome cars occasionally showed up on the "Overland Limited" in the late 1950's. I remember riding on one from Truckee to Sacramento on the "Overland" around 1959. I don't know how many SP constructed (I think it was four), but they traveled the system more than one would think. From what I understand they were used between Oakland and Sparks on the train, since it had a daylight Sierra crossing. Tom
1970-1980?
Daylight cars were not gone yet. A few were running untill the mid-late 70's although not in daylight colors. Amtrak used quite a few SP daylight cars repainted Amtrak untill the late 70's.In 1989 I rode in a 37 articulated chair car on the california western tourist train as well. There is a good book on SP daytime coast passenger trains with photos of the cars @ different periods ot their life and little bits of their history. It also shows something most SP people clame didn't happen, A dome car on the coast daylight. Of course it was the 3/4 dome of the san Jaquin and not the type most trains had.
Since the time period here is the 1970-80 time frame the Daylight trains were gone. I do have a set of three Alco PA-PB-PA units in the grey and red so I will be getting the Athearn cars in the later paint scheme to go with the Walthers cars I have. The train is based on the "Cascade" in the early 1960's so there is going to be Pullmans. Hopefully someone will make the Espee's unique Dome/Louge cars.
The Shasta Daylight had a seperate pool of equipment when first on the road but later just about anything could be found in the consist except Pullmans. The last couple of years the Shasta Daylight only ran in the summer and was a short train. Usually a baggage car Dome Lounge Automat and three or four coaches. The Shasta Daylight came off in September 1966.
I really don't care I have my SP daylighter all ready with 5 cars
Its all I need. Its one of my excurtion trains anyways.
4x8 are fun too!!! RussellRail
You will also need to decide when you are modeling the daylight. By the time the GS-4 came out it was between 16 and 20 cars long . Often using a combo of 39 and 41 cars . Before they were sent off to the San Jaquin the 37 cars were used for one or the other and were often mixed in to increase train lenthg. Better off getting RKW's book on the train and picking a time.
Standard 77 foot chair cars didn't get much use on the original daylights most were built for other trains usually 1 or 2 were used while the rest of the chair cars were articulated sets.
Thats my 2 cents
The atheran cars will be the 37 cars as they appeared later in life (deskirted) not as they were built. They might be producing some of the aditional 38 cars as well.
The 37 set did not have a tripple unit dinner/kitchen/coffe car . That was an add on in 38 due to congestion. BLI/PCM are doing 2 versions of the same cars. Neither is doing the 39 set which was similar to the 41 cars. The main difference between the 37/38/39/and 41 cars is the trucks. They looked similar but are not the same. The other difference is the 39/41 cars had a bagage elevator to speed loading and keep station stops to 5 minutes or less. There are other smaller differences as well such as interior color schemes and bathroom placement. Plans and schematics were available some time ago in the series of books regarding pullman standard plans. Ufortunately no one is making the cars I would like (as built 37 or 39 cars) . Supposedly there is some debate on who will produce the cars in the correct colors. That is tough since the paints available back then faded quickly so many photos make the paint look lighter and less saturated than they are. Supposedly dupont made the original and still creates it for the restored cars and engine as well.
Of course your layout lighting will significantly effect how these cars look . If the match original cars they will only look correct in the lighting used to color match.
Actually the Athearn Car is now scheduled for September and BLI/PCM moved their models up to November 08.
I only hope that this time the schedule will hold - I'm really looking forward to these models and have pre-ordered the PCM Daylight (both trains).
I do know that Athearn is producing the 1937 Daylight while BLI/PCF and MTH are producing the 1941 versions. Athearn will be the first to have a car from their version of the Daylight out first. A 48 seat chair car is due out in Aug 08 painted for general service (coach green) Lark (two tone gray) and latter scheme of stainless with tomato stripe. Remember with the Daylight, two standard chair cars were swapped with two T&NO chair cars from the Sunbeam. So you will need to be very careful on modeling the Daylight.
SP's Starlight, an over-night coach train between LA and San Francisco), also carried Daylight cars (articulated chair cars, coffee shop, lounge, parlor/observation) beginning in 1949. (I had a suspicion I left out a Daylight train from my earlier post.) The Morning Daylight drew the newest and best cars, the San Joaquin Daylight held second priority following discontinuance of the Noon Daylight, and the Starlight operated with what was left. The Shasta Daylight had its own equipment pool.
Thanks for filling in some Daylight details, Beaver.
The Beaver, now that was an interesting train too.
The Beaver was a 'heavyweight' train of coaches and tourist sleepers that ran from Oakland to Portland, but did not have thru cars to Seattle.
The 1946 SP Equipment circular lists the The Beaver, Train #13/14, consisting of baggage-express, coach, 4 chair cars, diner, lounge, and 4 16-section tourist sleepers.
Mark, fan of secondary and tertiary SP passenger trains
Quite correct Mark, the Daylight logo was also in transtion to a simplified ball and wings design(except for the painters at the Sacramento shops who refused to adopt the new style). Overkill? I think not, come over to S scale where the dominate theme among the S scale manfactures continues to be that there were no railroads west of the Ohio River. To each his own, enjoy the diversity.
Dave
Modeling the mighty SP 3/16 to the foot..
Supplement: Tom, regardless of when the cars were built, I believe the relettering to "Southern Pacific" on all passengers cars was completed within a couple of years of the end of WWII. The new lettering was adopted in 1946, and it would seem that the premier trains would have the highest priority for revision. I'd like to hear from anyone who has contrary information.
twhite wrote: Mark--Even though I grew up in SP territory (Donner Pass), I pretty much defer to you on your knowledge of the passenger trains. So my question is--was the post-WWII San Joaquin Daylight largely made up of the ORIGINAL pre-war Coast Daylight cars (with the addition of the home-made 3/4 dome car, of course) or did SP order cars specifically for the train? I've always been a little confused on that issue. I know that one company is promising the pre-WWII Coast Daylight and another is promising a post-WWII version. Of course, logically, neither would ever see service on my Yuba River Sub, even though I give SP trackage rights, but I'd be kind of leaning toward the San Joaquin consist, since I have a couple of MT's that could certainly use a passenger train. Just curious.Tom
Mark--
Even though I grew up in SP territory (Donner Pass), I pretty much defer to you on your knowledge of the passenger trains. So my question is--was the post-WWII San Joaquin Daylight largely made up of the ORIGINAL pre-war Coast Daylight cars (with the addition of the home-made 3/4 dome car, of course) or did SP order cars specifically for the train? I've always been a little confused on that issue. I know that one company is promising the pre-WWII Coast Daylight and another is promising a post-WWII version. Of course, logically, neither would ever see service on my Yuba River Sub, even though I give SP trackage rights, but I'd be kind of leaning toward the San Joaquin consist, since I have a couple of MT's that could certainly use a passenger train.
Just curious.
Tom, I can't say off-hand. Here is a site with some sample consists of the San Joaquin Daylight: http://espee.railfan.net/san-joaquin.html Is this enough for you to begin research? I have SPH&TS's book on SP coaches, so I can pursue this further if you are unable.
twhite wrote:Frankly, I'm not holding my breath that ANY of them will have a "Daylight" train soon, or if at all.
Frankly, I'm not holding my breath that ANY of them will have a "Daylight" train soon, or if at all.
If I'm not mistaken the MTH GS4 is already shipping. As far as the passenger cars, it would only make good business sense to produce them soon.
Best!