Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Eric Brooman-EMD Sellout? (No offence intended)

6129 views
84 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, September 15, 2005 4:55 AM
Dave!

I was yanking your chain as well, guy! If the Utah Belt were mine, I'd have a couple of Alco rebuilds as "run thru" power from one of the railroads that owns them today.

Earlier this year in Tampa, my jaw fell open when a trio of locomotives, running light, cruised by my train watching spot. First two were CSX, the 3rd was an Alco RS something! It was completely white. I assumed that it was probably being transferred to an industry or musuem somewhere in Florida. Yes, Alcos still live!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 6:18 AM
I can't stand the SD9, love the SD40, and adore the AC4400. [bow][bow][bow][bow][bow][bow][bow][bow]
Maybe he likes the look like I do. Why aren't all you guys who are complaining driving old cars, redone of course?????[}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)][}:)] If my model where to try to be economically viable, then It would have to serve my dinner[:P][:P][:P][:P][:P][:P][:P][:P][:P][:P]

Hi Peter, yep, the GTO was made in Australia, but we call it the Monaro. But the Clubsport Rules the Streets
(Sorry guys[#offtopic][#dots][sigh][censored][(-D][(-D][(-D][(-D][2c][oops]Got carried away. DD
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, September 15, 2005 6:20 AM
SD9: High Nose: Big Boxy Brute with style..
SD9: Low Nose: Yuck Ugly!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 7:15 AM
Now HERE'S one ugly chop-nose Geep![;)]

http://www.railroadforums.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=30002
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by GrayLoess

Now HERE'S one ugly chop-nose Geep![;)]

http://www.railroadforums.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=30002


I guess they will go potty behind a bush [;)]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: australia
  • 329 posts
Posted by peterjenkinson1956 on Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:33 AM
dannydd yep the mighty monaro lives.. allways a holden man... checked out erics articles in my folder and he was (is) a big influence on the way i model...peter
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Good ol' USA
  • 9,640 posts
Posted by AntonioFP45 on Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:28 AM
GrayLoess,

Wow! I'll never call the BL2 ugly again after seeing this monstrosity! Just when I thought locomotives couldn't get uglier, yipes! Looks like a mutated switcher awaiting prey!

"I like my Pullman Standards & Budds in Stainless Steel flavors, thank you!"

 


  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Stayton, OR
  • 523 posts
Posted by jeffshultz on Sunday, September 18, 2005 11:14 PM
I wonder... what does Eric do with the locomotives he retires off the Utah Belt? Something tells me those were fine running SD9s.... and I know they looked excellent.
Jeff Shultz From 2x8 to single car garage, the W&P is expanding! Willamette & Pacific - Oregon Electric Branch
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Monday, September 19, 2005 8:47 AM
Jeff,

Excellent question which got me thinking. I wonder if the toughest thing faced by Eric is the retirement of his "outdated" engines. That takes a level of intestinal fortitude that I don't think I have. Of course I also wonder if . . . when no one's looking . . . .Eric takes those SD9's for a quick spin around the layout.[:D]
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 19, 2005 10:15 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jeffshultz

I wonder... what does Eric do with the locomotives he retires off the Utah Belt? Something tells me those were fine running SD9s.... and I know they looked excellent.


For the longest time he rebuilt them into something else. Eric for years was known for having the latest and greatest EMD model of this or that long before even the RPP people could get the shell out.. When he retired a locomotive (Often when it's mechinism wore out to the point it needed rebuilt) It was often the basis for being kitbashed into something else. In the first article I ever read on the Utah Belt, it said all his SD 40-2s and SD45-2s Got kitbashed into SD50s and SD60s with F45s kicking in the nose for some SD60Ms. That also demonstrates economy of materials because very little gets wasted in the process, and just goes to show how talented Eric is. It also gives me confidence that I can kitbash a few of my P2K SD60s into SDP45s (If Eric went from SD45 to SD60 why can't I go backwards?)

James.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 19, 2005 10:35 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Jeff,

Excellent question which got me thinking. I wonder if the toughest thing faced by Eric is the retirement of his "outdated" engines. That takes a level of intestinal fortitude that I don't think I have. Of course I also wonder if . . . when no one's looking . . . .Eric takes those SD9's for a quick spin around the layout.[:D]


You know Dave, he may have some Alco's he runs, but he probably shuts all the curtains, bolts and locks the door and then pulls those engines out from under a secret location. Then when done running them hides them and opens everything back up and never breaths a word [8D] We will never know...
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Monday, September 19, 2005 11:37 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jeffshultz

I wonder... what does Eric do with the locomotives he retires off the Utah Belt? Something tells me those were fine running SD9s.... and I know they looked excellent.

I'll be happy to take them, as I'm in need of good first generation luggers. My address is 5555.......
I never retire good locos. When they're out of era, I run special sessions with different eras for them.
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Rhode Island
  • 2,216 posts
Posted by davekelly on Monday, September 19, 2005 4:55 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Jeff,

Excellent question which got me thinking. I wonder if the toughest thing faced by Eric is the retirement of his "outdated" engines. That takes a level of intestinal fortitude that I don't think I have. Of course I also wonder if . . . when no one's looking . . . .Eric takes those SD9's for a quick spin around the layout.[:D]


You know Dave, he may have some Alco's he runs, but he probably shuts all the curtains, bolts and locks the door and then pulls those engines out from under a secret location. Then when done running them hides them and opens everything back up and never breaths a word [8D] We will never know...


I knew that Brooman guy was OK!!!!!
If you ain't having fun, you're not doing it right and if you are having fun, don't let anyone tell you you're doing it wrong.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

QUOTE: Originally posted by davekelly

Jeff,

Excellent question which got me thinking. I wonder if the toughest thing faced by Eric is the retirement of his "outdated" engines. That takes a level of intestinal fortitude that I don't think I have. Of course I also wonder if . . . when no one's looking . . . .Eric takes those SD9's for a quick spin around the layout.[:D]


You know Dave, he may have some Alco's he runs, but he probably shuts all the curtains, bolts and locks the door and then pulls those engines out from under a secret location. Then when done running them hides them and opens everything back up and never breaths a word [8D] We will never know...


I knew that Brooman guy was OK!!!!!


You guys are probably right. The AC4400 thing is just a front! He isn't a sellout, he's just keeping that stuff in the closet! (In all senses of the word)
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 2:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

Back on topic, since he went with GE do you think he is using the GE repair program or doing the repairs in-house,


If you read the article you know the answer.
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 8:12 PM
he said in the december 03 MR that his fleet will be all EMD for the forseeable future but like he said he wants to keep up with the prototype and thought it was time to follow the lead and buy a fleet of GE's to keep the look of the truely modern feel of the UB and have a mix of EMDs and GEs.... but he must be able to fit a couple of ALCOs in somehow maybe a power shortage and resurrect a couple of C 630s or 28s hehe

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 9:17 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ebriley

QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

Back on topic, since he went with GE do you think he is using the GE repair program or doing the repairs in-house,


If you read the article you know the answer.


ebriley

Someone pointed that out earlier, and I believe I stood corrected then, but hey, I will do it again, I read it, but must have forgotten that part. Thanks for reminding me again...[B)]
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 9:43 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

QUOTE: Originally posted by ebriley

QUOTE: Originally posted by dthurman

Back on topic, since he went with GE do you think he is using the GE repair program or doing the repairs in-house,


If you read the article you know the answer.


ebriley
Someone pointed that out earlier, and I believe I stood corrected then, but hey, I will do it again, I read it, but must have forgotten that part. Thanks for reminding me again...[B)]

That's the problem with long topics.
Trainboy

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:57 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by james saunders

he said in the december 03 MR that his fleet will be all EMD for the forseeable future but like he said he wants to keep up with the prototype and thought it was time to follow the lead and buy a fleet of GE's to keep the look of the truely modern feel of the UB and have a mix of EMDs and GEs.... but he must be able to fit a couple of ALCOs in somehow maybe a power shortage and resurrect a couple of C 630s or 28s hehe

Hee hee...

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 9, 2005 10:29 PM
No way he can be a sellout. Eric is an original and I rate his Utah Belt as #1 well ahead of the V&O. Not only does he have a complete story surrounding his freelanced prototype but he continually updates it--even when it means disposing of his favorite locomotives to be kitbashed into new models. I give him kudos both for his concept and his willingness to follow through with it. Something I bet few other people would be willing to do (including myself).

Eric Brooman is the main reason I subsrcibe to MR. I've been a big fan of the UB ever since discovering some old back issues of RMC from the early '80s featuring the UB. While the days of the SD40-2s, yellow cabooses and F units was my favorite period on the UB, I'm always interested in seeing what he will do next. Although I was surprised by his GE move, I understand and respect it fully. Especially because he provided ample support for it in his latest article.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:19 AM
msamas, my theory is that he really liked the Kato AC4400s, and couldn't pass them up. My new theory, anyways.
Matthew

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Oklahoma
  • 241 posts
Posted by ouengr on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:42 PM
I wonder... Will he model the all too common aftermath of the GE blowtorches?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:03 PM
I'm shocked to find out that Brooman is still a cab control guy, I figured all the "Big names" have moved onto DCC.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • 293 posts
Posted by Newyorkcentralfan on Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:39 AM
grande man wrote:
<br />
<br />"I like them all and don't understand the GE hatred. Would someone please explain it to me. "
<br />
<br />The crews on the prototype didn't like them because their performance was inferior to emds.
<br />
<br />There were design features particularly in control thatwere very quirky and made life more difficult for the crews. They were designed by people who didn't know what it was like to run trains.
<br />
<br />If you can get a hold of it try reading the Ed King article, 'Up the creek in a leaky Uboat' in the #17 Mar/Apr 1999 of Vintage Rails. It explains everything.
<br />
<br />Also, a lot of people didn't like GEs because they basically killed of ALCO.
<br />
<br />
<br />
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Thursday, October 13, 2005 10:52 AM
Especially on BC Rail. There is no question that it was the C40-8Ms that took out the M630s and M630Ws, also the M420s. Stupid GE.
Matthew

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!