Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Spot Checking Voltage Along the Mainlines

6399 views
117 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Monday, November 9, 2020 7:45 PM

2 40' sections with the booster in the middle is always going to be better than a single 80' long section with the booster at one end. 40 feet of wire will have half the losses of 80 feet of wire. 

 If you use an absolute maximum bus length of 50' - with 2 booster, you could run 200 linear feet of layout with no bus line more than 50'. Maximum coverage with minimum bus length. Always bet practice.

                                         --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 5:03 PM

RR_Mel

Did you try a couple of different locomotives to compare to your RS1? 

Not yet. My two RRampMeters are wired in-line to the two boosters so I ordered a third RRampMeter to use portably along the layout with an 1156 bulb attached.

That will make testing so much easier and more accurate than manually connecting the 1156 bulb to the rails for each measurement and using an AC voltmeter. I hope to get the RRampMeter in a few days to continue the testing with a variety of locomotives.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, November 9, 2020 4:18 PM

Did you try a couple of different locomotives to compare to your RS1?
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 3:57 PM

T

RR_Mel

I wouldn’t worry about a ¼ volt drop.  I run dual mode DC or DCC and everything works great.

Thanks, Mel.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, November 9, 2020 2:27 PM

Rich

I really don’t know, from my experience a ¼ volt isn’t enough to worry about.  My layout mainline is only 120’ total (HO scale twice-around) and when I first tried rewiring my layout from DC to DCC (2006) I followed the DCC gurus way of buss wiring and I wasn’t happy with the results.

My DC layout was wired for DC block control and the DCC buss wiring really screwed everything up.  After several months of trying to adapt to DCC buss wiring I ripped everything out and rewired it back to my original DC block wiring.  I use #20 AWG bell wire homeruns from each block to my control panel, longest run is about 15’ and at 1½ amps (two locomotives full load on my 3½% grades) the voltage drop is .15 volts.

I ended up hooking my DCC controller to my DC block wiring and I’ve never had any problems, my blocks average 8'.

I wouldn’t worry about a ¼ volt drop.  I run dual mode DC or DCC and everything works great.

The only difference is your NCE voltage is lower than my Prodigy.
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 1:37 PM

gregc
 

can't see that it will make a difference if the ends of the bus where the booster connects are just a few feet apart on the track.

i think it would make a big difference is the booster connects to opposite ends of the track.

greg, not sure I understand that second sentence?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 1:36 PM

RR_Mel

That would be better, that would decrease you loss to about .45 volts max.  And remember your test was at 2 amps so normal running only about .25 volts loss improvement.  

Mel, which would be better?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Monday, November 9, 2020 12:46 PM

richhotrain
Essentially, the booster sits at the top of the U-shape bus.

can't see that it will make a difference if the ends of the bus where the booster connects are just a few feet apart on the track.

i think it would make a big difference is the booster connects to opposite ends of the track

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Monday, November 9, 2020 12:46 PM

That would be better, that would decrease you loss to about .45 volts max.  And remember your test was at 2 amps so normal running only about .25 volts loss improvement.  
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 12:16 PM

One area of my layout is powered by a pair of bus wires running in a U-shape under the mainline tracks with a total length of 80'. Essentially, the booster sits at the top of the U-shape bus. Would it make any difference if I powered both ends of the U-shaped bus versus breaking the U-shaped bus in half so that one 80' bus becomes two 40' busses?

The following diagram illustrates this arrangement with the black line representing the 80' length of mainline track, and the red lines representing the bus wires feeding from the booster. The black circle at the bottom of the diagram represents the proposed break in the bus wires to convert an 80' run into two 40' runs.

U-shape-Booster.jpg

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Monday, November 9, 2020 9:21 AM

RR_Mel

I checked the web for the DB5 and the manual says there is a switch on the P514 Power Supply for 12 or 13.8 volts.  Is it in the 13.8 volt position? 

Yes it is. Sorry for the belated response, Mel.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2017
  • From: Southern Florida Gulf Coast
  • 18,255 posts
Posted by SeeYou190 on Sunday, November 8, 2020 11:27 AM

richhotrain

 

 
RR_Mel

I would watch your RRampmeter, if the voltage goes up (current goes down) with loss of speed that’s an indication of more resistance between the locomotive and track power.  If the current goes up (voltage goes down) as the locomotive slows that is more load applied by the locomotive.

 

 

Wow, that is extremely helpful. Thanks again, Mel.

 

Rich

 

That is a great tip... I am going to need to keep that one in mind for future use.

-Kevin

Living the dream.

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 1,206 posts
Posted by mfm37 on Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:45 AM

When we were testing voltage drop on NTRAK modules to develop a revised wiring and connector spec we used a pair of 8 ohm/ 10 watt resistors connected in parallel. This works out to 4 ohms resitance. 3 amp load with our 12 volt boosters, measurements were taken first at the booster terminals using the resistor combo and a RRampmeter. Additional measurements were taken at each module joint which works out to about 6 feet of bus wire and 4 feet of track. I also repeated those measurements with my own DVM and readings were the same. At 80 feet voltage was down to about 9 volts using 12 ga cable and Anderson Powerpoles at each connection. We settled on a reasonable maximum one way bus length of 35 - 40 feet to avoid too much voltage drop. Fixed layouts will probably fare better as the construction and wiring will be in a controlled environment and not subject to a broad range of construction abilities.

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:32 AM

RR_Mel

I would watch your RRampmeter, if the voltage goes up (current goes down) with loss of speed that’s an indication of more resistance between the locomotive and track power.  If the current goes up (voltage goes down) as the locomotive slows that is more load applied by the locomotive.


Wow, that is extremely helpful. Thanks again, Mel.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Sunday, November 8, 2020 10:04 AM

 

I have a Rob Paisley DCC ammeter in my control panel using a LCD digital meter for current and a LCD DC volt meter both tweaked to be accurate on either DC or DCC mode.  I run dual mode on my layout and always keep my eye on the meters when operating.  

The current increases as my locomotives clime my 3½% grades and decrease when going down hill.

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Sunday, November 8, 2020 9:26 AM

I would watch your RRampmeter, if the voltage goes up (current goes down) with loss of speed that’s an indication of more resistance between the locomotive and track power.  If the current goes up (voltage goes down) as the locomotive slows that is more load applied by the locomotive.
 

Mel


 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 8, 2020 7:49 AM

RR_Mel

Your layout wiring is well within DCC operating specs.

That being the case, is it the Atlas RS-1 loco motor or gearing that is slowing the loco down rather than voltage drop?

This coming week, I am going to test a number of my locos, diesel and steam, to see if the slow down is real or perceived. I will note specific points on the layout, if any, where a number of locos may appear to be slowing down and then speeding up again. My recollection from prior testing on my new layout is that there were a few such spots.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Sunday, November 8, 2020 7:26 AM

Rich

Remember your testing was done at two amps and the normal load from a running train should be well under one amp so the actual voltage loss at 80’ would be around .25 volts.

With your locomotive (train) running the voltage at 80’ would be close to what your RRampmeter measures minus .25 or .30 volts.  An older Athearn BB with the original motor would draw close to 1 amp so the voltage loss would be a bit higher, around .45 volts.

Your layout wiring is well within DCC operating specs.
 


Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 8, 2020 6:31 AM

I just went downstairs to the layout to measure voltages without load directly at the two boosters.

Using a digital voltmeter, I get the following readings:

PH-Pro - 14.31v

DB5 - 14.03v

The boosters are wired (14 gauge solid copper) directly into RRampMeters Here are those readings which are probably more accurate for DCC than the digital voltmeter.

PH-Pro - 13.9v

DB5 - 13.6v

 

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 8, 2020 6:25 AM

gregc
 
richhotrain
How much voltage drop can occur across the mainline track before locomotive slowdowns visibly (and electrically) begin to occur? 

none, if a decoder uses BEMF to measure speed and the track voltage is sufficient to provide the necessary voltage to the motor. 

if there is no BEMF, the decoder provides voltage for a percent of time proportional to the requested speed and the loco voltage/speed will be proportional to the track voltage even when going slower, ... but the track voltage will also be inversely proportional to the current being draw.    so there will be a bigger effect when drawing more current.

i thought you said earlier that you noticed the loco slowing down, so the decoder in that loco probably doesn't have BEMF 

Good question, greg. The loco in question has an older DASR decoder which does not support BEMF.

The reason that I started this thread was because I was testing passenger car performance for possible derailments. To keep testing simple, I just started using an Atlas RS-1 loco with a DASR decoder to pull the passenger car consists. So, the loco slowdowns may be specific to just this particular loco.

But I started this thread to learn more about how to test voltage under load at specific points on the layout. So, the replies to this thread have helped greatly to understand the voltage measuring process.

What I need to do now is to run various locomotives and locomotive consists up and down the mainlines to see if there are noticeable slowdowns at specific points with a number of locomotives. My recollection from earlier testing is that there are a few specific points on the manlines where locos in general slow down a bit before resuming expected speeds.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Sunday, November 8, 2020 5:32 AM

richhotrain
How much voltage drop can occur across the mainline track before locomotive slowdowns visibly (and electrically) begin to occur?

none, if a decoder uses BEMF to measure speed and the track voltage is sufficient to provide the necessary voltage to the motor.    this implies that if higher speed and voltage are required, there's a point where the decoder cannot provide enough voltage and the loco is slower than desired

if there is no BEMF, the decoder provides voltage for a percent of time proportional to the requested speed and the loco voltage/speed will be proportional to the track voltage even when going slower, ... but the track voltage will also be inversely proportional to the current being draw.    so there will be a bigger effect when drawing more current.

i thought you said earlier that you noticed the loco slowing down, so the decoder in that loco probably doesn't have BEMF

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Sunday, November 8, 2020 5:14 AM

RR_Mel

The loss in your buss and track is only off ¼ volt from calculated losses.  The starting voltage is too low as compared to my Prodigy.

RR_Mel

I checked the web for the DB5 and the manual says there is a switch on the P514 Power Supply for 12 or 13.8 volts.  Is it in the 13.8 volt position?

My two boosters are the NCE PH-Pro Command Station booster and the NCE DB5. I have previously adjusted the voltages to match, but that was on my old layout. I will re-check these voltages and also review which power districts are on which booster.

But, let me ask this question. How much voltage drop can occur across the mainline track before locomotive slowdowns visibly (and electrically) begin to occur?

Take, for example, the readings that I reported yesterday. The voltage drops that occurred over an 80' stretch of track reduced the voltage from 12.21 volts to 11.45 volts. Is that 0.76 voltage drop enough to adversely affect locomotive performance?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, November 7, 2020 6:13 PM

I checked the web for the DB5 and the manual says there is a switch on the P514 Power Supply for 12 or 13.8 volts.  Is it in the 13.8 volt position?
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:46 PM

The loss in your buss and track is only off ¼ volt from calculated losses.  The starting voltage is too low as compared to my Prodigy.
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:39 PM

RR_Mel

Can you switch boosters or power it from the master to see if the voltage is higher.  

Yes, the way in which my overall "control center" (boosters and PSX units in one cabinet) is set up, switching boosters should be relatively easy. I will do it tomorrow and report back with results after I re-measure voltage under load at the drops. Time for dinner.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:30 PM

The voltages are low but close enough between measurements to be usable.  My Prodigy runs 14.6 volts with a 2 amp load.

Can you switch boosters or power it from the master to see if the voltage is higher.  I think your track and buss wiring is within limits and should be OK.
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, November 7, 2020 5:19 PM

I wound up taking 13 readings, about one every 6'.

Here are the readings from east to west over about 80'.

1 12.21
2 12.14
3 12.09
4 12.04
5 11.95
6 11.86
7 11.84
8 11.78
9 11.77
10 11.73
11 11.63
12 11.54
13 11.45

Some interval readings are greater or lesser than perhaps expected, but I think that is because some feeders are closer than 3' to each other but on separate sections of flextrack. The voltage drop seems to be, on average, about 0.06 volts for every 6' of track.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:51 PM

It should be about .015 to .02 volts per 3' difference. At 80' the voltage should be around 12.25 to 12.35 volts.
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:37 PM

RR_Mel

Yes, acording to your post 12.78 is your reference voltage. 

OK, give me a few minutes so I can measure voltage under load at each drop along the east 80', approximately 27 points at 3' intervals.

Rich

 

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:34 PM

Yes, acording to your post 12.78 is your reference voltage.
 

Mel



 
My Model Railroad   
http://melvineperry.blogspot.com/
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!