Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Second Request for DCC Programming Help

4902 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Second Request for DCC Programming Help
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 PM

As I said in my last request I need help programming my DCC decoders, well I’m back but this time I’m ready.
 
I’ll refresh where I’m at.
 
My custom BB Athearn SD40-2 frames re-motored with Mashima motors and sporting Cary E7 cast metal bodies (2½ pounds each) are gutless on DCC!  They have more than enough power operating on a standard MRC 2500 Tech II Power Pack on 12 volts DC using the DCC to DC bypass adapter in the locomotives, as they say “they will pull the paint off the walls” on 12 volts DC.  I have been told by several of you that my problem is incorrect programming.
 
I have purchased the MRC computer interface and loaded the current JMRI software.  My computer is an HP3500 PRO 3.3gb processor 16gb RAM and I’m running Windows 10 PRO.
 
My DCC controller is a MRC Prodigy Advance² 15-16 volts @ 3.5 amps.  Both of my E7s have new MRC 1730 Sound Decoders installed.
 
I have the JMRI software loaded and talking to my Prodigy Controller and the Controller is communicating with the decoders.
 
I also downloaded the MRC software and it works . . . .   The MRC program isn’t easy to manipulate and their operational instructions are terrible.
 
All of my locomotives run fine on DC.  At this point I need to add I have the same problem with decoders from several manufactures, no power.  I’ve never changed the CVs, all my decoders are at factory default.  I have several brands of decoders and all are gutless with the exception of two MRC 1630s and one Soundtraxx TSU 1000 836105 installed in re-motored Rivarossi Cab Forwards.  I have three MRC1730, two Digitrax DH123 & DH126 and one TCS WOW-101 that are gutless.
   
I need some expert help to program my decoders for as Tim Allen said on Home Improvement “More Power”.  I’m asking for some expert help from the forum gurus.
 
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 

I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,877 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, February 26, 2016 10:18 PM

Please define "no power".

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Friday, February 26, 2016 10:35 PM

RR_Mel
My DCC controller is a MRC Prodigy Advance² 15-16 volts @ 3.5 amps.

Is that the manufacturer's spec or did you measure it somewhere on the layout?

Have you ever checked to see how much voltage the MRC puts on the rails? This can be tricky to measure completely accurately without a specific DCC meter, but a multimeter set to AC volts should give you a rough idea if you are getting what you should from the booster.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, February 26, 2016 10:37 PM

maxman

Please define "no power".

 

I have a 3½% grade and they barely pull 10 passenger cars up the grade on DCC.  If I hold he first car behind the two E7s the locomotives wheels won’t slip on DCC max throttle on level track.  Running on DC they would pull 50 cars.  I can’t get wheel slip on DCC at max throttle but I get wheel slip at about 60% throttle on DC.  They are gutless on DCC but have more than enough power on DC.  
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, February 26, 2016 10:43 PM

cuyama

Have you ever checked to see how much voltage the MRC puts on the rails? This can be tricky to measure completely accurately without a specific DCC meter, but a multimeter set to AC volts should give you a rough idea.

 

Peak to peak on my Techtronic Scope is very close to 16 volts and the square wave is what I would expect, slight rounding, very little slope.
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Friday, February 26, 2016 11:01 PM

Seems like that should be enough, if the voltage holds up under load.

I've never seen a problem like yours on the NCE and Digitrax layouts around here, hopefully one of the more knowledgeable folks on the forum can help you find some programming adjustments that make a difference.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 8,877 posts
Posted by maxman on Friday, February 26, 2016 11:01 PM

Have you ever measured what the output is from the 2500?

Is it a Tech ii  LocoMotion 2500?  And are these the instructions: http://www.modelrectifier.com/resources/dc-ac/Tech%202%202500%20AF130.pdf ?

If so, those instructions say that the output is 20 volts DC, no load.  I don't know what the loaded output would be, but if that voltage is greater than whatever voltage the motors get from the decoder then naturally the motors will run faster on DC.

Another question...have you ever taken your locos to someone else's place to see how they operate there?

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, February 26, 2016 11:19 PM

I always check my power source under load, the Prodigy measures just under 16 volts peak to peak with both E7s at max and I get wheel slip using my 2500 on my E7s at 10.3 volts.  The 2500 will go to 13.5 volts with a 900 ma load (automotive bulb load).  These measurements were made at my workbench but I have also checked the voltages on my mainline.  Samo samo.  I get the same results on my mainline track as I do at my workbench.
 
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 PM

I had never checked my 2500 no load until your request, it measured 18.1 no load and using a 1157 bulb as a load it measures 12.46 volts (Max) at 2.13 amps using my Fluke 179.  The 2500 probably did better 20 years ago, it’s as old as I feel . . . . worn out.
 
 Edit:  No I haven't tried to run my locomotives on another layout, I'm somewhat of a loaner and I don't have a model railroader close where I could do that.
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:52 AM

I have everything setup on my workbench so it very easy to do any type of testing.  I have breakout connectors on everything.  I’ve got my Tektronix 454 scope (it’s old as dirt but it still works like brand new), Fluke 179 and a Simpson 360 for those that don’t trust digital meters, four variable voltage regulated 0-20 VDC power supplies, one Motorola TEK-23 2 amp, one BK dual 5 amp and one BK 15 amp.
 
I also have the MRC 2500, MRC 7000 and a MRC Sound Master 210 12 volt power packs.
 
My workbench is next to my computer workstation so it’s super easy to do testing.
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, February 27, 2016 6:42 AM

cuyama
Have you ever checked to see how much voltage the MRC puts on the rails?

If you want to compare the DC throttle output voltage to DCC, don't you want to measure the voltage across the motor leads from the decoder, not the track voltage?

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 9:41 AM

gregc

 

 
cuyama
Have you ever checked to see how much voltage the MRC puts on the rails?

 

If you want to compare the DC throttle output voltage to DCC, don't you want to measure the voltage across the motor leads from the decoder, not the track voltage?

 

That’s what I’m set up to do but which CVs do I change and where do I start.
 
I have a sack full of Harbor Freight Multimeters and I have confirmed their calibration with my Fluke 179, they’re all within .1 to .2 on both voltage and current.
 
For ease of doing this I made custom test leads for my HF multimeters.  I can monitor voltage and current on both locomotives simultaneously running one on Dc and the other on DCC.
 
I started to make a graph of speed vs voltage on my mainline but that didn’t do well.  I can come that close just eyeballing the flywheels.
 
I do know that I get wheel slip at 10.3 volts on the motor with the locomotive at full weight with the metal shell on the frame.  That being said would 11 volts measured on the motor be the goal on DCC?
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Bedford, MA, USA
  • 21,483 posts
Posted by MisterBeasley on Saturday, February 27, 2016 9:53 AM

What are the current ratings for the decoder and the motors?  It may be that the decoder is limiting the current, and the motor wants more.  Try measuring the current in DC.

How does a single engine run in DCC?  If it seems fine, then you may not have enough power (volts x amps) for two of them.

It takes an iron man to play with a toy iron horse. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • From: Chicago area
  • 335 posts
Posted by Arto on Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:20 AM

I've had similar DCC issues, still a newbie, but maybe my newbie two cents might be worth something.

"To Me", it sounds like the decoders are set to a lower level limiting voltage and/or current. One of more Configuration Variables are probably controlling that.

I just started using JMRI Decoder Pro. Decoder Pro seems to be a good place to start if you want to make changing CV easy and understandable.

Here's an issue I recently ran into and how I had to solve it:

The first few locos I programmed were all Broadway Limited, some Paragon2, some Blueline. All were programmed with new addresses on the mainline.

Next up were a pair of Athearn Genesis DCC ready in which I installed Tsunami factory OEM decoders and had to custom install a speaker/baffle/enclosure. The Soundtraxx Tsunami decoders wouldn't program on the mainline. Soundtraxx has that capability locked out to protect me from myself. So, how to unlock the decoder? I tried programming it on the programming track. No Luck. The outputs from the Digitrax DSC100 Command Station/Booster don't put out enough power to program (at least) some SOUND decoders such as Tsunami. So I had to buy a booster (Soundtraxx PTB-100) for the DCS100 booster. Then I was able to program the Tsunami decoder, on the programming track.

So, maybe, what you need to do is use JMRI Decoder Pro to make it easier to "see" what the settings are on your decoders, and make the changes. And you might need a booster for the booster to get enough power to the proramming track to actually program the decoders.

But like I said, I'm a DCC newbie, so take this with a grain of salt. There are so many nuances to this DCC thing, it's driving me nuts, actually. And I'm anything but technophobic. But this has been like "One Giant Leap For Modeler Railroaders", and the rest has been like stepping back 25 years in the computer world.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:24 AM

I agree with MisterBeasley's diagnosis.

Can you get an ammeter between the decoder and the motor, having the engine on a test stand or even let the drivers slip on a test track, then see the current draw.

Perhaps measure the voltage output of the decoder at the same time?

I don't think it is anything related to programming. Remember, that tiny decoder and its micro-sized output transistor is taking the place of the bulk of that MRC powerpack.

Good Luck, Ed

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:51 AM

MisterBeasley
What are the current ratings for the decoder and the motors?  It may be that the decoder is limiting the current, and the motor wants more.  Try measuring the current in DC.

you don't need to go thru the trouble of disconnecting a motor lead to measure current.   A measurement of voltage across the motor at max speed compared to the track voltage should indicate if the decoder is  limiting voltage or current.   The only way the decoder has to limit current is to limit voltage (Ohms law).

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern CA Bay Area
  • 4,387 posts
Posted by cuyama on Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:57 AM

gregc

 

 
cuyama
Have you ever checked to see how much voltage the MRC puts on the rails?

 

If you want to compare the DC throttle output voltage to DCC, don't you want to measure the voltage across the motor leads from the decoder, not the track voltage?

Some DCC systems have put less voltage on the rails than one would expect. If the voltage isn't there on the rails in the first place, the decoder can't turn it into DC to drive the motor. An Internet search suggested that this has been an issue with some MRC systems in the past.

But yes, once it's determined that there's enough DCC voltage on the rails, the next step would be to look at the otuputs of the individual problem decoders and/or adjust CVs as necessary to create a higher top voltage.

Since I haven't seen evidence of Mel's problem on any of the NCE, Digitrax, or Lenz DCC layouts with which I'm familiar, I was first looking for something that might be specific to his gear.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:16 AM

MisterBeasley

What are the current ratings for the decoder and the motors?  It may be that the decoder is limiting the current, and the motor wants more.  Try measuring the current in DC.

How does a single engine run in DCC?  If it seems fine, then you may not have enough power (volts x amps) for two of them.

 

Most of my decoders are rated at 1½ amps a couple are rated at 1 amp.  The MRC1730 that I’m working now on are 1½ amp.  The Mashima motors draw 1.23 amps locked rotor at 12 volts DC.  At 12 volts I estimate the scale speed would be well above 125 MPH.  A comfortable 50 MPH cruise on level track occurs at 6.1 volts at 96ma.  Wheel slip is at 10.3 volts at 437ma.
 
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:23 AM

Arto

 

So, maybe, what you need to do is use JMRI Decoder Pro to make it easier to "see" what the settings are on your decoders, and make the changes. And you might need a booster for the booster to get enough power to the proramming track to actually program the decoders.

 

 

I am geared up to program using JMRI.  At this point I’m starting out with both decoders at factory default settings.  Earlier on I found out that JMRI would not reset all CVs back to factory default, I had to use the Prodigy controller to get them back to default.
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:26 AM

gmpullman

I agree with MisterBeasley's diagnosis.

Can you get an ammeter between the decoder and the motor, having the engine on a test stand or even let the drivers slip on a test track, then see the current draw.

Perhaps measure the voltage output of the decoder at the same time?

I don't think it is anything related to programming. Remember, that tiny decoder and its micro-sized output transistor is taking the place of the bulk of that MRC powerpack.

Good Luck, Ed

 

I have meters on the motor measuring both voltage and current as mentioned above.
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:33 AM

cuyama

 

But yes, once it's determined that there's enough DCC voltage on the rails, the next step would be to look at the otuputs of the individual problem decoders and/or adjust CVs as necessary to create a higher top voltage.

 

 

I have checked the DCC voltage at the decoder input using a Tektronix 454 scope at slightly under 16 volts and the square wave isn’t pretty but not bad either.
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:40 AM

If I get sluggish or sound a bit out of it please bear with me, my younger brother passed on last evening.
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:45 AM

 This continues to be the most baffling thing I've seen. I've had no problems with locos acting like thay have less power when using DCC  - not when they can move over 100 (over)weighted hoppers. Your voltage to the track is fine, the scope is probably the best way to tell - the 'new' old Fluke 8060 I recently aquired should give a good acount on DCC since the True RMS converter on that one goes up to 20KHz. What about track current under load? Because iof an unladen loco can run at sufficient speed but a loaded down one can't, and the voltage is at a good value, that leaves only current.

 Do you have any locos that haven't been modified with your extra weight and remotoring? How do they run? My locos are all pretty much stock except for the installation of a decoder and changing light bulbs for LEDs.

 The only other thing that could cause lack of power with a decoder would be the motor drive not being suitable for the type of m,otor being used. High frequency PWM does reduce the torque of the motor, especially at lower speeds, but most decent decoders include torque compensation or a similarly named feature that provides an extra boost at low throttle speeds. Some decoders offer adjustment of the motor drive to suit various types of motors - the defaults are usually fine with the typical flat sided can motor found in locos like Proto 2000 or newer Athearns. The Digitrax decoders I know default to having the torque compensation enabled. Those two you have do not have BEMF though. The TCS WOW should have their BEMF which I've always found works quite well. Dunno about MRC, their decoder instruction manuals barely tell you the basics, let alone any extra features. The Digitrax decoders also have CV9 which adjust the motor drive frequency. The default is 0, which is the highest frequency, and goes up to 225 which is the lowest (and may make an audible 'buzz'). You may want to adjust this to see if it works better with the motors you use. The other thing on the Digitrax decoders is CV61 for transponding, which should be either 0 or 1 so Transponding is off. Only on the newer DH126 does it really matter if it's 0 or 1, 0 is for LEDs being used for function effects like flashers or mars lights, 1 is for lamps. Transponding can affect the loco power since it has to effectively shut off the motor for the time it takes it to generate the Transponding pulse in the rails - Railcomm is similar. Of the decoders you listed, I think only the Wowsound has support for Railcomm, which should be turned off. Transponding is only in Digitrax decoders.

                             --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,678 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:40 PM

RR_Mel
I have checked the DCC voltage at the decoder input using a Tektronix 454 scope at slightly under 16 volts and the square wave isn’t pretty but not bad either.

can you check the voltage across the motor at full speed?

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:44 PM

RR_Mel
If I get sluggish or sound a bit out of it please bear with me, my younger brother passed on last evening.

You have my sincere condolences, Mel. 

Regards, Ed

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 12:56 PM

Randy
 
Most of my locomotives have added weight for traction on my steep grade. 
 
I need to clarify “Install” on my steam locomotives, the decoders are actually installed in the tenders.  I have three Cab Forward oil tenders with sound decoders that I can put behind any one of my 16 Rivarossi articulateds.  I swap them around often depending on which locomotive I want to run.  Any one of the three tenders will operate great behind any locomotive.  The rest of the tenders have DCC to DC adapters and are used for DC only.
 
Another thing I need to mention is my entire steam fleet is gutless compared to a pair of 2½ pound E7s when it come down to drawbar pull and that has nothing to do with DCC.  A weighted Cab Forward has 3.8 to 4 ounces and a single E7 has 6.7 ounces of drawbar to wheel slip.
 
I have 6 Rivarossi articulateds with Faulhaber 2224 motors, 8 with Canon EN22s and two with dual EN22s that run perfect on DC.  All are wired for DCC operation with NMRA 8 pin connectors.
 
Two of my DCC equipped tenders have ten year old MRC 1630 decoders at factory settings that I can put behind any locomotive and they work great!  They worked by just Plug and Play, all I did was program the four digit DCC address.
 
About three years ago I bought a Soundtraxx TSU 1000 because of their distinct Cab Forward sound.  I finally had to call Soundtraxx and a tech walked me through the programming and works pretty good, not quite the same power as the 1630 decoders but very close.
 
When I couldn’t get the Digitrax DH 123 and 126 to work in a diesel I tried them in a tender and they’re pitiful compared to the MRC 1630s.
 
I bought a TCS 101 mainly because of the good reviews on the forum and it’s the pits too, no power.  And that leaves me with my current problem, programming my two new MRC 1730s for my Cream of the Crop E7A & B diesels.
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
 
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:52 PM

Well guys, I don’t know what I did but I have one decoder working.  When I dinged the decoder last weekend I ordered a new one fearing MRC wouldn’t replace it.  The first thing I did was to read the new decoder on JMRI and saved it to a file as the original.
 
Then I reprogrammed the other decoder back to factory default because I’d probably twisted it inside out with the JMRI earlier.  Then I did some testing to answer questions from the forum.  After confirming all of my measurements I blew the new factory default program into the older decoder, again no change.
 
Then because I wanted to see where I was I put both locomotives on my mainline and again no change.  Then I did some tinkering around on the JMRI and did several experimental changes then blew in the program.  When I checked the motor voltage it was much higher.  I ran the throttle up and the voltage increased higher than I’d seen it on DCC.  I applied slight friction to a flywheel and the current soared higher than I’ve ever seen it on DCC.  The highest current on DCC had been in the 300ma range, now it was approaching 1 amp at 11 volts.
 
I still have a problem because I have no idea what I changed to get it to work.  I saved the file on the JMRI so my next procedure will be to program a second decoder to see if it works.  
 
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
 
I'm beginning to realize that aging is not for wimps.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Saturday, February 27, 2016 7:08 PM

 If you are seeing such massive differences - either there is something miswired, which installing a new decoder fixed, or it has something programmed which is reducing the full throttle output - a limit in CV5 which is the max voltage, or a setting for a speed curve. Factory reset on the Digitrax decoders is to set CV8=8 (don;t worry, it will not read back, CV8 is a read only CV for manufacturer ID and will always read back the manufacturer ID, not what you program in it). The TCS decoder it's CV30=2. I don't think MRC decoders have a reset. AFter a reset the loco should run as address 3. It will most definitely not have any speed tables or other speed control options configured.

 Something is really really odd here. Like Byron, I've never heard of anyone having this type of issue, and we have all types in the club, including a whole bunch whose only exposure to DCC is when they come out for one of the dozen or so shows we set up for each year, at home they just run DC. Never have I see someone's loco not have enough power to move a train, at least not stall out. Spin the wheels with too many cars, sure. But just die slike it had a 100HP motor and really needed 200HP, never seen anything like that. If you're stalling a DCC loco and seeing 300ma wheras the same loco on DC stalled is more like 1A, there is something REALLY messed up with the DCC system or the decoder.

                --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Bakersfield, CA 93308
  • 6,526 posts
Posted by RR_Mel on Sunday, February 28, 2016 12:05 AM

I finally have both MRC 1730 decoders working.  I’m still way behind the learning curve with the JMRI software.  I spent 5 hours today learning and I’m still dumb as a brick!
 
I have no idea what CVs made the first one work.  I had to dink around with the second decoder for a couple of hours to get it to work mainly because of my lack of knowledge using JMRI.  I still can’t dup a program file to a second decoder, I had to program the second one manually from a printout then save the file to the roster.  I repeat “I’m still dumb as a brick” when it comes to the JMRI software.
 
The MRC reset does not reset all the CVs, none of the sound settings.  It does reset the DCC address back to 03.
 
How close do DCC controlled locomotives have to be speed matched to put them into a consist?  I use wire wound resistors to speed match the motors on DC.  I bypassed the resistor (.32Ω) in the E7B that I installed for DC operation, the E7B gains about 3 inches in 10’ on DCC.  I use a 10 ohm wire wound pot to adjust the motor speed on 12 volt operation.  When I have them speed matched (1 inch in 80') I measure the pot and wind my own resistors using #31 Nichrome wire.  I couldn’t tell any difference with the resistor in or out on DCC.
 
 
Mel
 
Modeling the early to mid 1950s SP in HO scale since 1951
 
My Model Railroad   
 
Bakersfield, California
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:24 AM

 Wait, on some of these locos you have a wirewound pot or a resistor in circuit with the motor? None of them have capacitors for noise supression, do they? You need ot bypass that stuff with DCC (or a DC throttle that uses PWM - the MRC 2500 does not) because you are distorting the drive signal from the decoder, and in the case of the ones with BEMF, distorting the feedback as well. This sort of thing will cause erractic operation.

 Locos should be close, but they don;t have to be perfectly in lock step to MU. Better decoders support CVs 2, 6, and 5 for simple speed matching. This is pretty easy to do. CV2 is the start speed - so set both locos to the same address but not coupled, and just crack the throttle. The one that runs slower - increase CV2 until it runs the same or close to the faster one. If they are both already the same, no adjustment needed. Next crank the thing to full throttle. CV5 controls top speed. The default is "as fast as it will go" so on the FASTER one, you need to adjust CV5 to slow it down to match the other one. 0 and 255 in CV5 generally mean the same thing - as fast as it can go. So you want to start at 255 and work down. Finally, put the throttle to the mid point, and see if they are still running close to the same speed. If not, CV6 adjusts this. If the range of CV2 and 5 are 0-255, so is CV6, and setting it to 127 is exactly halfway between 0 and 255, so adjust up or down from there to increase or decrease the speed at half throttle. That should be more than good enough, that's the most I've evr done to any of my locos, but all of mine support all 3 of those CVs (Tsunami does not, I don't have any Tsunamis).

 This is really easier to do from the throttle using ops mode. Just remember that if you only want to change one loco, you have to take the other one off the rails. You can use JMRI throttles on screen and access ops mode programming there as well - in which case you don;t have to have them on the same address, just use two throttle panes and run each loco at the same speed step. This is where Digitrax is handy with two throttle knobs on the big throttle, I can run two locos at the same time and quickly use Ops Mode to adjust either one as needed to match speeds. Generally, adjustments to CVs 2, 6, and 5 take place immediately, which is why doing it in ops mode while the locos are moving makes sense.

                           --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!