Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Streamlining of steamers

4184 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 2,572 posts
Streamlining of steamers
Posted by John-NYBW on Saturday, April 22, 2023 9:59 AM

In the decade prior to WWII after the first streamlined road diesels appeared, railroads began putting streamlined shrouds over the steam locos on their premiere passenger trains. Was this done solely for cosmetic reasons or were there studies that indicated the streamlining had a significant effect on the speed of the locos? 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,280 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:41 AM

If you really want knowledgeable information on a subject like this, you would be far better off checking reliable sources on the Internet.

Streamlining of steam engines mostly took place between 1940 and 1950, so no one on this forum can address the issue with first hand knowledge.

I typed 'streamlining steam engines' on Google and found several credible sources that address this issue.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 2,572 posts
Posted by John-NYBW on Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:51 AM

NYC's three streamlined designs were all applied prior to WWII and much of it was removed as scrap iron was in demand during the war. I haven't studied other railroads but my guess is their streamlining was also done pre-war as doing it during the war would have been an unnecessary use of much needed metals during the war. Post war, railroads resumed dieselization that had been slowed by war demands. There wasn't much streamlining during that period although the N&W which clung to steam longer than any other class 1 railroad continued to streamline their steamers as late as 1950. 

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:57 AM

Two reasons: The Depression and the success & popularity of the Burlington Pioneer Zephyr.

The Depression hit the railroads hard - like everyone else.  They were looking for ways to boost revenue to their waning passenger services.  The Pioneer Zephyr was released by the Budd Co in May '34.  It proved both popular and successful for both it's speed, as well as it's unique and sleek art deco-style design.  The railroads saw this as a opportunity to cash in so they began streamlining their steam engines by the mid-30s.

The NYC came out with the Commador Vanderbilt, the Mercury, and then the icon Dreyfuss Hudson in '38.  Sales skyrocketed and it helped the railroads through the rest of the 30s, 40s, and into the early 50s.  Cars and planes were the ultimate demise to passenger service, as well as the more efficient diesel to the steam locomotive.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 2,572 posts
Posted by John-NYBW on Saturday, April 22, 2023 11:10 AM

I'd forgotten the Mercury which was similar in design to the 5344 for the Commodore Vanderbilt so NYC had four streamlined designs.

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Saturday, April 22, 2023 11:17 AM

Don't forget the role that the French played in streamlining steam, particularly their 4-6-2s.  And domestically the Milwaukee Road also needs to be mentioned particularly since both their 4-4-2 and one class of 4-6-4 were "factory streamlined" rather than retroactively.   Milwaukee Road would also be a good example where the retroactive streamlining they did to older locomotives was cosmetic in nature and closely mimicked their Hiawatha 4-4-2s.  

But as historian and architectural theoriest Sigfried Giedion pointed out in his epoch book "Mechanization Takes Command," so much streamlining (trains, automobiles, furniture, buildings, even househld appliances such as toasters) often just made things look bulky rather than sleek and aerodynamic.  It was he alleged a form of pseudo streamlining.  He did not mention them but I'd nominate the Union Pacific attempts at streamlining steam locomotives as Exhibit A.  

Dave Nelson

 

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • 1,057 posts
Posted by wrench567 on Saturday, April 22, 2023 1:31 PM

  To answer the OPs question. Purely aesthetic. The look of modernization and to compliment the all steel fluted or smooth side passenger cars. Streamlining really doesn't work for the under 100mph speeds of the times. Added weight and obstruction of maintenance quickly made it obsolete. Even on truly modern equipment like the PRR T1 and S1 saw a great reduction in shrouding and eventually scraping and the eventual end of steam using nearly forty year old two cylinder locomotives.

     Pete.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Saturday, April 22, 2023 2:10 PM

There were claims at the time that "scientific studies" showed streamlining engines and cars cut down resistance and made fuel savings, but in retrospect I think as Pete said that there was really no difference. Unlike it's Burlington and Milwaukee Road rivals, C&NW competed on the Twin Cities - Chicago run in the 1930s with upgraded but otherwise convential steam and heavyweight cars with their "400".

https://streamlinermemories.info/?p=211

 

Stix
DrW
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Lubbock, TX
  • 371 posts
Posted by DrW on Saturday, April 22, 2023 2:42 PM

wrench567

  To answer the OPs question. Purely aesthetic. The look of modernization and to compliment the all steel fluted or smooth side passenger cars. Streamlining really doesn't work for the under 100mph speeds of the times. Added weight and obstruction of maintenance quickly made it obsolete. Even on truly modern equipment like the PRR T1 and S1 saw a great reduction in shrouding and eventually scraping and the eventual end of steam using nearly forty year old two cylinder locomotives.

     Pete.

 

Of course, this is largely correct. However, it should be noted that the fastest steam locomotives ever built were all streamlined (officially measured, LNER's Mallard with 126 mph and the German 05 002 with 125 mph; inofficially, Pennsy's 6100 is rumored to have run at 141 mph). Also, the fastest steam engine currently still running, the former East German 18 201 (which reached 113 mph), has some streamlining. The driver diameter is more than 7 1/2 ft. Isn't she a beauty?

DR 18 201 - Wikipedia

 

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,233 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Saturday, April 22, 2023 4:25 PM
In addition to what has already been said, “Streamlined locomotives” were just part the aesthetics of the Art Deco movement, IMO.
 
While there may have been “scientific studies” they certainly weren’t carried out with the same rigor as was being carried out by aircraft designers of the same era, though I’ve never read of parasite drag being a problem for locomotives.
 
The proof of this lack of serious study is that some of the streamlined locomotives were not only down right ugly but had the aerodynamic qualities of a brick, the New Zealand Railways streamlined K class locomotives being a fine (?) example!
 
 
As I understand it, stream lining was gradually removed during WW2, not because of the scrap value of the metal, but because the lack of manpower made taking off and on streamlining for maintenance purposes a big and unnecessary waste of time. And I’ve also read that even with the best will in the world, soot etc could collect under the streamlining, hence more unnecessary maintenance. 
 
My 2 Cents Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Saturday, April 22, 2023 10:26 PM

A big cause of drag is the gap between cars. A few trains in the Thirties had full width diaphragms, but the vast majority didn't (plus there is drag caused by the undersides of the cars not being streamlined. Skirting and full width diapraghms were maintenance headaches, so they disappeared in WW2 and immediately after. Cars built with skirting (there were even skirted trucks) had it trimmed back or removed

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, April 23, 2023 6:28 AM

BEAUSABRE
A big cause of drag is the gap between cars. A few trains in the Thirties had full width diaphragms, but the vast majority didn't (plus there is drag caused by the undersides of the cars not being streamlined. Skirting and full width diapraghms were maintenance headaches, so they disappeared in WW2 and immediately after. Cars built with skirting (there were even skirted trucks) had it trimmed back or removed

See the Adams Windsplitter, from the age before air conditioning when dust was still a major issue.  Note the early invocation of the air-dam principle and reduction of turbulence under the cars, something most '30s 'Streamliners' didn't really do consistently, as noted.

Calthrop's patent of 1865, developed by analogy with a crew shell, was notably intended as functional.  (Turn down the hokey music while you watch this):

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ry54IG972LI

The Canadian NRC did sensible work in streamlining, nominally in large part to address smoke lifting and slipstream management, as early as 1930.  Kantola's shroud (as on the Commodore Vanderbilt) was supposed to be good for around 400hp worth of drag reduction (according IIRC to people at the Case School of Science in Cleveland that did part of the design and analysis) which begins to be significant if the engine is valve-limited.  (Note that the C&NW E-4b, with 84" drivers and neat streamlined appearance, couldn't even break 100 with the AAR test train in 1938...)

The 'poster child' of scientific application of streamlining was on the German BR 05s -- all the discussion you need on the pros and cons of true high-speed streamlining on working locomotives has probably been done, in one or another context, concerning them.)

Alfed Bruce of Alco noted in 1952 that the Milwaukee As were good for 128+mph, something I doubt they would reach without streamlining and frontal-area minimization.

A review of the Quadrant Press streamlined-steam book and the Trains article on the subject in the '70s will establish how much (most) "streamlining" was actually esthetic only.  The weight gain was not trivial.  In fact ATSF class leader 3765 was designed to be streamlined, likely as a West-end counterpart of the 3460-class Blue Goose, but the 17,000-odd lb. would have required significant compromise of the actual locomotive's design.  Ed will have pictures of 3765's tender which show the flush rivets where the stainless-steel band was supposed to go.)

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Sunday, April 23, 2023 6:42 AM

Bear noted

And I’ve also read that even with the best will in the world, soot etc could collect under the streamlining, hence more unnecessary maintenance.
Ironically enough, this problem plagued the 'normal' K locomotives more than the 'streamlined' one.  W.W. Stewart noted that the (substantial) headlight was recessed into the smokebox front -- see the Wikipedia account for one version of the 'reason' and some pictures:

 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NZR_K_class_(1932)

but the recess around the light became a sink for all sorts of cinders and trash that would blow out without warning when the engines came up to speed...

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • 2,572 posts
Posted by John-NYBW on Sunday, April 23, 2023 7:26 AM

As I understand it, stream lining was gradually removed during WW2, not because of the scrap value of the metal, but because the lack of manpower made taking off and on streamlining for maintenance purposes a big and unnecessary waste of time. And I’ve also read that even with the best will in the world, soot etc could collect under the streamlining, hence more unnecessary maintenance. 
 
My 2 Cents Cheers, the Bear.Smile
 

According to a book I have on the NYC, the skirting on the streamlined Hudsons was soon removed to make it easier to do routine lubing and other minor maintenance. The 20th Century Hudson streamlining was removed for WWII scrap iron. I believe at least some of the Empire State Express streamlining survived the war and those last saw service on the James Whitcomb Riley.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Sunday, April 23, 2023 12:28 PM

Seems every other month this past year I see a photo of a streamliner, fail to recognize it, and when I investigate it's a whole 'nuther road.  There were scads of 'em!  Is Bachmann the company that just issued the Penny's streamlined K4 or whatever?  That was news to me at the time. Canadian National made a stab at it for a while. 

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Sunday, April 23, 2023 6:33 PM

I believe BLI released a streamlined PRR K4, Crandell, with a Paragon3 decoder.  I know that Alco Models did one in brass.  There's one currently on eBay.

Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,367 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Sunday, April 23, 2023 7:35 PM

tstage
I believe BLI released a streamlined PRR K4, Crandell, with a Paragon3 decoder.

Bachmann did one, too:

https://www.trains.com/mrr/news-reviews/reviews/staff-reviews/product-review-bachmann-ho-scale-prr-streamlined-k4s/

What's good for the goose —

The Bachmann one represents a slightly different, and later, version of streamlining.

Cheers, Ed

  • Member since
    August 2011
  • From: A Comfy Cave, New Zealand
  • 6,233 posts
Posted by "JaBear" on Monday, April 24, 2023 4:31 AM
Came across this. I would have preferred more time spent on the photos and that the photos captioned, but have come to the conclusion that the maker has still done a pretty good job!
 
 

Overmod
Ironically enough, this problem plagued the 'normal' K locomotives more than the 'streamlined' one.  W.W. Stewart noted that the (substantial) headlight was recessed into the smokebox front -- see the Wikipedia account for one version of the 'reason'...

Off Topic

The announcement that K911 was to be restored but fitted with a KA style headlight, caused some conniptions with the purists, which further reinforced to me that some ffolkes just can’t be happy!!!
Apart from the 6 KBs that operated on the Midland Line which I hadn’t seen, no K or Ka locomotives operated in the South Island, and I was only familiar with the A and Ab class “Pacific’s” and my favourite Ja class “Mountains”, so I considered myself being very fortunate to see Ka942 and Ka945 double heading on the Raurimu Spiral in the mid 90s.
 
Cheers, the Bear.Smile

"One difference between pessimists and optimists is that while pessimists are more often right, optimists have far more fun."

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,314 posts
Posted by BEAUSABRE on Thursday, April 27, 2023 5:11 AM

Selector - It was a fad, call it Art Deco or Moderne (PRR's "Fleet of Modernism" was perfectly timed to come into being just as the movement/fad/whatever flamed out), where everything down to your stove and washing machine had to look like it was about to depart at a high velocity. Most lines had just one or two machines to try and capture the glamor of "being a streamliner" 

Moderator
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Northeast OH
  • 17,240 posts
Posted by tstage on Thursday, April 27, 2023 3:08 PM

And some art deco is just beautiful to look at, too:

 Tom

https://tstage9.wixsite.com/nyc-modeling

Time...It marches on...without ever turning around to see if anyone is even keeping in step.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!