Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Backing up trains

10203 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, October 15, 2017 2:46 PM

restorator

Does the prototype back up mile long trains at all with power at only one end? What kind of distance and/or speed restrictions would it have? 

 

Last week I had to back up a big train.  Due to the lead engine's distributed power control becoming defective.  The integrated computer screen wouldn't give me access to the DP screens.  None of the other engines in the lead consist had operable DP, so we couldn't swap around units.  We were at our home terminal, with the head end in the middle of a power crossover between mains 1 and 2, also blocking access to the yard where there was some power laying over.

It was decided to have a mechanical employee "box car" the mid-train DP and shove back (only using the head end power) to clear another power crossover the rear end was occupying on the straight route.  We would cut off the train ahead of the mid-train DP, pull ahead, hang a new EOT and depart.  Later they would call another crew to take the rest of the train west.  This is what we ended up doing.

This meant shoving the train back a little over one mile.  The conductor was taken past the rear end to protect the shove from the ground.  The rear car was an autorack and he didn't want to ride the shove, especially with the new rules.  I shoved back to him (at a crossing) and he walked alongside the remaining distance until the DP unit was spotted up clear of the crossover.  Needless to say, the shove back was made at walking speed.  Even before the back reached him I kept the speed at walking speed.  The train before splitting it in two sections was 13947 feet long. 

Jeff

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, October 2, 2017 3:08 PM

jeffhergert
Our rules are also about to change, making it almost impossible to legally ride a shoving movement. Where available, you have to see if a utility person is available to protect the shove from the other end of the track. If not, call to see if a van is available to take the conductor to the other end of the track. If neither of those options are available, then you need to contact the company officer on duty to see if they can give the conductor a ride to the other end of the track. Only when all other options are exhausted will a conductor be allowed to ride a shove. Providing the lead car is safe to do so, there are some cars that aren't allowed by rule to be ridden anymore. Jeff

Holy smoke..Sheesh.

Jeff,Even when I worked as a brakeman there was cars that we wasn't allowed to ride because it was unsafe to do so..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, October 2, 2017 11:49 AM

One time I had a large head end setout at our home terminal.  (The custom is on trains that have work at the crew change yard, if they have HOS time, is for the inbound crew to make any setout.  The outbound crew makes any pickup.)  I forget how many cars but it was going to be over a mile long.  It wasn't going to fit on one yard track.  Most conductors would've taken it in one intial chunk and doubled over what didn't fit.  The conductor I had that day did it in two moves off the main.  I was glad for that.  The more cars you have, the more slack you have.  Plus, for some reason our portable radios aren't set to put out full power.  Combine that with the type of antenna on the portable and that some units are just not as good as others, and you start having communication problems with the guy protecting the shove and the head end.

Now, they try to make most of our setouts on through trains to be on the rear end.  You pull into the yard, cut off the setout (maybe having to double over some cars to another track) and move up the EOT.

Our rules are also about to change, making it almost impossible to legally ride a shoving movement.  Where available, you have to see if a utility person is available to protect the shove from the other end of the track.  If not, call to see if a van is available to take the conductor to the other end of the track.  If neither of those options are available, then you need to contact the company officer on duty to see if they can give the conductor a ride to the other end of the track.  Only when all other options are exhausted will a conductor be allowed to ride a shove.  Providing the lead car is safe to do so, there are some cars that aren't allowed by rule to be ridden anymore.

Jeff

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Monday, October 2, 2017 8:13 AM

On the DM&IR it was normal to split an incoming ore train, but for weighing rather than due to short or stub end yard tracks. The steam engine or diesel lashup pulling the train would bring the first say 70 cars over the weighing tracks and into the yard, and a yard engine would go out and pick up the other 70 cars and bring them in over the scales.

 

Stix
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, October 1, 2017 1:02 PM

wjstix
I would think if you have to put an arriving mile long freight train in a yard, and your longest yard tracks are less than a mile long, you'd need to break the train into two (or more) segments anyway, so it might be easier to break it at the start, rather than back a mile long train into a yard and then start breaking it up?

I've worked at yards were that was a normal move. Mostly due to lack of headroom to make the setovers (but not always).  Let's say you have 3 inbound tracks, each 40 cars long.  On the far end of those arrival tracks, you have headroom for maybe another 40 cars before the track runs out.   But the train arriving is 110 cars.  You can't pull the train through a track and make a cut, and back the rest off.  You have too much train, too little space.

So you make the first cut after 40 cars, fill up the first track, run lite down the second, grab the remaining, pull thru and fill up the second inbound track (another 40), then set over the remaining 30.  Easy, peasey.

If you run out of time?  That's when you put the yard crew on it.  No biggie.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Arizona
  • 14 posts
Posted by salty4568 on Thursday, September 28, 2017 8:48 PM

I have made long shoves many times.

Back around 1992 I was riding the Amtrak Seattle to Denver, and was pretty amazed because of a long reverse movement they made at night. ---- It was  Pocatello to Ogden, I think.. ---- I was on rear car and we ran in reverse at track speed for what must have been 30 miles or so ..... Temporary headlight attached to rear end and trainman with radio standing at the back door, watching ahead. The line had automatic blocks.  

Skip Luke
Retireded Railroader

 

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1 posts
Posted by MR BLAIR SMITH on Thursday, September 28, 2017 7:26 PM
Well, old CPR employee, Just wish we could connect. As an ACR fan, I'd like to know if you ever worked Franz;.
  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Thursday, September 28, 2017 1:08 PM

wjstix
I would think if you have to put an arriving mile long freight train in a yard, and your longest yard tracks are less than a mile long, you'd need to break the train into two (or more) segments anyway, so it might be easier to break it at the start, rather than back a mile long train into a yard and then start breaking it up?

Stix,First would the railroad management allow that seeing double the time to double into a yard especially if you leave cars elsewhere and you add the time it costs to set the hand brakes on the second half of the train and upon returning you need to release those handbrakes.. It cheaper and less time consuming to make two moves instead of four or more.

And like in most cases that crew may be approaching their outlaw time.

Would you care to explain why that crew outlawed and left half their train on a siding especially since they could have easily yarded their train before outlawing?

I don't think I would care to, not with today's management and FRA  wanting  to lay accountability on the crew.

 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Thursday, September 28, 2017 9:33 AM

It's actually been fairly common to have stations where passenger trains have to back in and or head in then back out. The Milwaukee Road depot in Minneapolis required Milwaukee Road trains to back up several miles from the mainline to the downtown depot.

But then, passenger trains aren't normally a mile long....

I would think if you have to put an arriving mile long freight train in a yard, and your longest yard tracks are less than a mile long, you'd need to break the train into two (or more) segments anyway, so it might be easier to break it at the start, rather than back a mile long train into a yard and then start breaking it up?

Historically, as steam engines grew more powerful, and the length therefore of trains increased, it wasn't unusual for railroads to build larger yards to handle the increase in train length and number of cars. Of course, before 'suburban sprawl', it was easier to find space to build on that was still relatively close to the urban area.

Stix
  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Heart of Georgia
  • 5,406 posts
Posted by Doughless on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 3:34 PM

NittanyLion

 

BRAKIE

Speed will depend on the railroad operating rules some may allow for track speed reverse moves while others will not.

 

 

 

I know that the Bessemer and Lake Erie and Buffalo and Pittsburgh both did so in Butler PA.  BPRR even has a pretty spiffy piece of equipment for doing it

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2041747

No humble shoving platform here!  Has more in common with a commuter cab car than anything else.

 

Ditch lights on a caboose.  Love it.

- Douglas

NDG
  • Member since
    December 2013
  • 1,620 posts
Posted by NDG on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 2:17 PM

Thank You.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,311 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 1:33 PM

Hello all,

In Denver, Colorado, the Amtrak train backs down the tracks into Union Station.

Last time we rode the train I believe the conductor said they back the train about a mile.

Hope this helps.

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • 416 posts
Posted by DSO17 on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 11:40 AM

wjstix
My guess would be if a real railroad had to back a mile long freight into a freight yard that they wouldn't do it as one unit. Maybe the engine(s) up front would take part of the train and back it in, then a switcher from the yard would come out to the main and bring the other part of the train in. Of course, if they had to do that a lot, they'd probably change the track arrangement to stop having to back in.

 

Used to back 100+car trains into yards fairly often in the 1960s and 1970s. Conductor would drop off at the beginning of the track (moving slow because you're in the yard). Flagman would ride the caboose (or cabin car) to protect the shove and stop with the air before the end of the track, then the conductor would make a cut in the clear and set whatever wouldn't fit in the first track into another track. No radios needed. I don't know what they do nowadays.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:22 AM

wjstix

My guess would be if a real railroad had to back a mile long freight into a freight yard that they wouldn't do it as one unit. Maybe the engine(s) up front would take part of the train and back it in, then a switcher from the yard would come out to the main and bring the other part of the train in. Of course, if they had to do that a lot, they'd probably change the track arrangement to stop having to back in.

 

Or they would add engines to the rear of the train and have the conductor to protect the shove and sound the bell or horn if there was a need.

That would be cheaper then adding a track-considering the NIMBY's protests and possible class action lawsuits from various animal right groups,tree huggers and those NIMBYs.. Then there's the EPA  that would need to make studies on the environmental impact of adding a track..

And why tie up  a yard job and add even more terminal dwell time? 

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, September 27, 2017 8:53 AM

My guess would be if a real railroad had to back a mile long freight into a freight yard that they wouldn't do it as one unit. Maybe the engine(s) up front would take part of the train and back it in, then a switcher from the yard would come out to the main and bring the other part of the train in. Of course, if they had to do that a lot, they'd probably change the track arrangement to stop having to back in.

Stix
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Monday, September 25, 2017 6:56 PM

On subdivisions with only one or two 6,000' sidings and 10,000' trains, a branch line junction was the saviour.  One train would back down the branch and wait for the opposing train.  Since the meets usually involved a considerable wait, it provided time for the conductor to walk back towards the head end for the eventual departure.  The alternative of heading down the branch, and later backing up, was less efficient but also happened.

We may pity the poor crewman having to walk two miles over rough terrain in miserable weather, but that was not something that senior management in their warm offices cared greatly about!

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, September 25, 2017 2:36 PM

ATSFGuy
Streamliners use wye tracks to turn around and face the direction from which they came.

All passenger trains in St.Louis backed into the station..IIRC some was wyed before they could reverse move into the station..The locomotives was removed for servicing and a switcher(TRRA?)  removed the REA,Baggage mail and diner. The diner had to be throughly cleaned and inspected by the FDA before it was allowed to be restocked.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by ATSFGuy on Monday, September 25, 2017 11:26 AM

Streamliners use wye tracks to turn around and face the direction from which they came. When a Streamliner entered the station and after everyone had gotton off, the locomotives that were pulling the train uncouple and move to a sidding, while a yard switcher pulls the train out of the station, takes it through the wye track to turn it around, mooves from the back end of the train to the front, and pushes it back into the track it came on so the observation car is facing the track bumper and the locomotives are also wyed around and recoupled to the front of the train, facing the direction away from the station.

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Sunday, September 17, 2017 11:23 PM

BRAKIE

Speed will depend on the railroad operating rules some may allow for track speed reverse moves while others will not.

 

I know that the Bessemer and Lake Erie and Buffalo and Pittsburgh both did so in Butler PA.  BPRR even has a pretty spiffy piece of equipment for doing it

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2041747

No humble shoving platform here!  Has more in common with a commuter cab car than anything else.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, September 17, 2017 10:29 PM

Thanks Jeff.. I have no  doubts that poor man had some stiff and sore muscles.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, September 17, 2017 9:02 PM

BRAKIE

 

 
jeffhergert

I know once they made a 8000 ft manifest back up about 7 miles to clear a crossover so they could go around a broken rail.

Jeff 

 

 

 

Did they place a engine on the rear or use a company truck for flag protection at crossings or did some poor sap have to ride the side of the end car or did this happen in the days of the caboose??

 

It happened a couple of years ago.  As far as I know, the conductor rode the rear car.  I don't think it had a distributed power unit on the rear. 

Jeff

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, September 17, 2017 8:26 PM

jeffhergert

I know once they made a 8000 ft manifest back up about 7 miles to clear a crossover so they could go around a broken rail.

Jeff 

 

Did they place a engine on the rear or use a company truck for flag protection at crossings or did some poor sap have to ride the side of the end car or did this happen in the days of the caboose??

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, September 17, 2017 8:01 PM

I know once they made a 8000 ft manifest back up about 7 miles to clear a crossover so they could go around a broken rail.

Jeff 

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Maryland
  • 12,897 posts
Posted by ATLANTIC CENTRAL on Sunday, September 17, 2017 3:29 PM

restorator

Since most of us have limited space, in general our trains are much shorter than prototype. Which leads me to a question of how long a real world train is too big to backup into a stub end yard or anywhere for that matter. Does the prototype back up mile long trains at all with power at only one end? What kind of distance and/or speed restrictions would it have? 

 

As explained above by others, yes long trains can back up......

And many commuter passenger trains operate as "push-pull" operations. They have a loco at one end, and commuter cars with a control stand on the other end.

They are coupled with tight lock couplers, and the loco pushes the train in one direction and pulls it in the other. The engineer can run the train from either end.

This goes all the way back to 1959.......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push%E2%80%93pull_train

Sheldon

    

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Hilliard, Ohio
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by chatanuga on Sunday, September 17, 2017 3:19 PM

In Marion, Ohio, the Erie (later Erie Lackawanna) had their main route going through town, which was shared with the New York Central (later Penn Central), and just west of the crossing with the C&O and N&W, the Erie had the Dayton branch heading southwest out of Marion.  The Erie's Marion yards were just to the west of the junction on the east-west main.  So, trains coming up from Dayton to Marion would pull past the junction and then back into the yard.  Likewise, trains from Marion to Dayton would back out of the yard and past the junction to then pull forward and down the Dayton branch.

Kevin

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Sunday, September 17, 2017 3:17 PM

The first thing you do during a shoe movement is bunch in the slack from the front of the train to the rear, then shove the cars to their destination.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Sunday, September 17, 2017 1:31 PM

 Western Pacific detour to SP rails at Binney Jct California when High Line temporarily shut down due to rock slide in the Canyon.  

The train I was watching derailed on the connecting track while backing.

 

 Detour by Donald Schmitt, on Flickr

 

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Sunday, September 17, 2017 11:11 AM

On the Chessie (C&O) we would back 80-90 empty coal hoppers around three miles to the load out three to four times a week.

 

I suppose NS still backing mile long empty hopper trains to a flood loader on the Pokey. I suppose CSX does to at some loadouts.

Speed will depend on the railroad operating rules some may allow for track speed reverse moves while others will not.

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Northeast
  • 746 posts
Posted by GraniteRailroader on Sunday, September 17, 2017 10:17 AM

Just outside of the yard limits about 3 miles in one of the terminals I worked there was a small lumber company that would get 2-3 cars a week. 

No passing siding in the nearby area so we'd ride the shove from the yard in order to service customer. Only other option was going 15 miles out of the way and then running around. 

This space reserved for SpaceMouse's future presidential candidacy advertisements

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!