Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Duluth Missabe & Iron Range Railroad

24056 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Friday, August 15, 2014 2:50 PM

My point was more about specialization, rather than location.  Though that is an interesting point.  There seems to be a kinda largeish interest in commuter railroads, and that is pretty specialized.  And then there's subways.  Still, multi-faceted railroads offer, uh, more facets--more varied kinds of cars going to a larger variety of places.  And it doesn't hurt to have had a nice looking streamlined passenger train on the route, either.

 

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: US
  • 973 posts
Posted by jmbjmb on Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:23 PM

I'm not sure I agree that location is what makes a railroad noteworthy.  Rather modelgenicness (??) and interesting equipment and ops makes a railroad something modelers would like.  For example the D&RG was and is in a pretty isolated part of the country, yet is highly modeled and supported by manufacturers.  Likewise the Clinchfield is very modelgenic in ops and location.  The DMIR is a very modelgenic railroad, with probably the biggest limitation for most modelers like me is the shear size of the docks, boats, and mines for a small room.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 7,500 posts
Posted by 7j43k on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:08 PM

Missabemodeler

Does anyone else wonder why this railroad is so under represented.

 

 

Well, I wasn't.  But if I were to do so, I would think it was because it was a specialty railroad, much like the BA&P.  Both were busy doing their own local thing, but had little to do with the outside world.  To me, the wonder is that N&W interest is so big, considering that it was mostly a coal road.

Myself, I'd rather have an NP Yellowstone than a DM&IR one.

 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 4:00 PM

richhotrain

For what it's worth, the cab number on my Spectrum is 508.

Rich

 

 

508 is also close, though the running boards and steps are a little different. A reasonable model. Not sure if this is a Bachmann bash or not -- but I think these were very good locos, very reasonably priced for what you get.

 

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 3:34 PM

tomikawaTT

While the DM&IR had some noteworthy locomotives and some interesting infrastructure, northeastern Minnesota is neither a major metropolitan area nor a major tourist destination.  To most people, it's rather like Antarctica - we know it's there, but we seldom think about it in general, never mind in detail.

Maybe so, but to model railroaders, the DM&IR should be of great interest.  In 1865, the nation's largest iron ore deposits were discovered in northern Minnesota, and the railroad was built to deliver massive quantities of iron ore to the ore docks on the shores of Lake Superior.  From there, huge ore ships crossed the Great Lakes with deliveries to the steel mills in Chicago, Gary, and Pittsburgh, just to name a few.  So, the region is much more than the possibility of a mere tourist attraction or the equivalent of Antarctica.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:56 PM

Going all the way back to the OP's original statement:

Imagine if you grew up with one picket fence between your back door and the Podunk and Northern, in an area where the entire population wouldn't fully fill the Rose Bowl.  Would it surprise you that models of P&N #10 (2-8-0, Baldwin catalog loco built 1896) are, to put it kindly, uncommon?

While the DM&IR had some noteworthy locomotives and some interesting infrastructure, northeastern Minnesota is neither a major metropolitan area nor a major tourist destination.  To most people, it's rather like Antarctica - we know it's there, but we seldom think about it in general, never mind in detail.

For that matter, I doubt that anyone notices that the Six Companies Railroad isn't modeled, even though it had some interesting infrastructure and rolling stock, and, for its rather brief existence, very heavy traffic.  Of course, it was located in the approximate heart of nowhere, and I doubt that the locals, all of whom were busy building Boulder (now Hoover) Dam, ever gave it much thought.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - not far from the heart of nowhere)

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:22 AM

For what it's worth, the cab number on my Spectrum is 508.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • From: Los Angeles
  • 283 posts
Posted by JOHN BRUCE III on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:28 AM

The Bachmann model is of DMIR 511. The DMIR 2-10-2s had many, many detail variations, and I believe the Bachmann 511 is at least reasonably close to the prototype 511 in the 1950s -- no air tanks on top of the boiler needed. It's worth pointing out that as far as I can tell, Bachmann made many individual detail changes to each of the USRA light 2-10-2 models they brought out. The KCS appears to be very good for the heavily modified KCS ex Wabash locos in the late 1940s, for instance. And they were available in the $100-150 range. Best to be informed when posting.

My blog: http://modelrrmisc.blogspot.com/
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 450 posts
Posted by Trynn_Allen2 on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 8:48 AM

richhotrain

Which raises the question, how close is the Bachmann Spectrum 2-10-2 that I own to the actual prototype?

Rich

 

 

As delievered pretty close.  As they ended up after the merger...there's some work to be to be done.  Three Air tanks to the top of the boiler is a start.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:50 AM

GDRMCo

 

 
wjstix
You'd have to paint it yourself, but the BLI model of the C&O's 2-10-4 is very close to the Missabe's ex-B&LE engines.

 

I thought this statement sounded bogus so I went searching....

 

 

I'll leave it to Stix to defend his statement, but "bogus" may be a little harsh.

After all, how many brass or plastic models totally reflect the prototype?  

Not many, if any, I suspect.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:25 AM

Which raises the question, how close is the Bachmann Spectrum 2-10-2 that I own to the actual prototype?

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by GDRMCo on Wednesday, August 13, 2014 6:13 AM

wjstix
You'd have to paint it yourself, but the BLI model of the C&O's 2-10-4 is very close to the Missabe's ex-B&LE engines.

I thought this statement sounded bogus so I went searching....

This is one of the DMIR 2-10-4s.

 

A shot of a C&O T1 2-10-4.

 

Now they're imo nothing alike and some stats to quantify:

Firstly the DMIR Texans.

Driver Wheelbase    22.30'
Engine Wheelbase    45.50'
Overall Wheelbase (engine & tender)    95.22'
Engine Weight    524440 lbs
Tender Light Weight    382550 lbs
Total Engine and Tender Weight    906990 lbs
Driver Diameter    64"
Cylinders (dia x stroke)    31" x 32"

 

And to compare, the C&O T1 as suggested.

Driver Wheelbase    24.30'
Engine Wheelbase    49.20'
Overall Wheelbase (engine & tender)    99.50'
Engine Weight    566000 lbs
Tender Light Weight    415000 lbs
Total Engine and Tender Weight    981000 lbs
Driver Diameter    69"
Cylinders (dia x stroke)    29" x 34"

 

So the T1 has bigger drivers, is longer in all metrics, weighs more, etc. And visually other than being a steam loco I would not think one could stand in for another. I thought maybe using the BLI ATSF 2-10-4 #3829 (2-10-2 with a 4 wheel trailling truck) as a starting point it may end up with a better result, the wheelbase, drivers, etc are within a foot of the DMIR 2-10-4s dimensions so would make a more reasonable model imo.

ML

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,892 posts
Posted by wjstix on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 11:05 PM

A great thing about the DMIR is it's 'transition era' was so short - bought it's first diesel switcher in 1953, first road diesel in 1955, and officially retired steam from general service in 1960.

As far as HO models, I was very surprised when Walthers came out with their wood DMIR caboose. I have two of them (so far). For diesels, Life-Like Proto (pre-Walthers) made a RTR Missabe SD-9, and Athearn and Kato have done Missabe SD-38s (and Athearn's done DMIR 'tunnel' diesels too). Plus you can get GN and B&LE F-units that were leased to the Missabe.

For steam, as noted the Spectrum 2-10-2 is a good DMIR model. You'd have to paint it yourself, but the BLI model of the C&O's 2-10-4 is very close to the Missabe's ex-B&LE engines. There are some 2-8-0 and 2-8-2 models that are good starting points for Missabe models. Plus as noted, Walthers has made both DMIR and DM&N "Minnesota" ore cars.

I was at the Missabe Road Historical Society's convention last weekend, by the way. Jeff Otto was there, his DMIR/GN iron ore railroad was on the cover of the 2013 Model Railroad Planning issue and is a great example of what can be done in the field.

http://mrr.trains.com/videos/layout-visits/2013/02/video-jeff-ottos-ho-scale-missabe-northern-ry

http://www.missabe.com/cms/

Stix
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Dearborn Station
  • 24,281 posts
Posted by richhotrain on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 6:27 PM

I have an HO scale Bachmann Spectrum DM&IR 2-10-2, 16 Walthers DM&IR ore cars, and a Walthers DM&IR wood caboose.  

So, there is at least some product available.

Rich

Alton Junction

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
  • 13,757 posts
Posted by cacole on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 6:00 PM

Fifty or more years ago, I drooled over pictures of the Duluth Missabe & Iron Range Yellowstone brass models that were advertised in Model Railroader; however, back then I was only earning $20 a week and could never hope to own one.

Now that I have the finances, they're no longer available.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 776 posts
Posted by wabash2800 on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 5:44 PM

I don't think enough people model the Massabe for model railroader manufacturers to recover their investment and make a profit. Having said that, there are pleny of brass models, including the Yellowstones and the cabooses. And didn't someone do a wood caboose in plastic? However, I think you will see a high-end plastic model of a Yellowstone one of these days soon by BLI or someone else. It's a beautiful engine that even those not modeling the Missabe will want.

Victor A. Baird

www.erstwhilepublications.com

  • Member since
    April 2012
  • 39 posts
Duluth Missabe & Iron Range Railroad
Posted by Missabemodeler on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:40 PM

I was raised on the Iron Range of Minnesota. Many of the DM&IR locos passed 50 yards behind my boyhood home. I wonder if any other modelers have noticed how under represented the DM&IR is both in Publications and models. The DM&IR Yellowstones (almost impossible to find) were on a par with the B&O EM1s, The N&W Y6Bs & As and the UP Big Boys. The DM&IR S6 and S7 switchers were some of the largest switch engines ever built. The DM&IR carried more iron ore than The Great Northern, Soo Line or any other railroad. On its last day of service one DM&IR Yellowstone hauled 190 loaded ore cars to the docks in Duluth. Does anyone else wonder why this railroad is so under represented.

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!