Trains.com

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

realistically modeling a coal mine

10654 views
24 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,677 posts
realistically modeling a coal mine
Posted by gregc on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:23 PM

While i realize the mine picture below of a Pennsylvania mine is perhaps not typical and  is of a larger mine than typically modeled, the scenery surrounding the colliery is piles of mine waste and any trees appear dead or at least leafless.

I think many model railroad mine scenes are either too green or too clean. where is the waste?

how accurate is the picture?

is the best way to model this slopes covered with materials similar to ballast with more variation in size and color?

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    July 2013
  • From: Stagecoach Nevada
  • 496 posts
Posted by crhostler61 on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:11 PM

Hi Greg, 

I remember the PA coal fields very well from Sunday family drives into that area and a few train trips (I'm a native of Reading, PA) The photo immediately brought to mind the Glen Burn Colliery in Shamokin when I was there in 1973. The mountain of waste was/is known as the Cameron Culm bank. I remember the culm banks being distinctly black and appearing to be a finer grain (from a distance). Maybe a mix of black and dark gray would work. Do a Google on the Glen Burn Colliery Cameron Culm Bank and take a look at the images. Every mining scene I have ever looked at on layouts...they were...too green and clean.

Mark H

Modeling in HO...Reading and Conrail together in an alternate history. 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Wednesday, September 30, 2015 11:05 PM

This isn't exactly apples to apples.

I remember going through Sudbury, Ontario in 1965 on the CP Canadian. All you could see for miles was pink granite stained almost black with soot from the nickel operation. Trees? What trees? None. Nada. It was commonly reffered to as a 'moon scape'. I was only 11 years old but I understood the incredible environmental damage that had been done. Then we saw the huge slag piles.

Anyhow, I think that if you are modelling an active mine with a smelter then greenery in the immediate vicinity would be minimal. However, if the mine had been closed for several years or more modern environmental controls had been installed then there would be lots of new growth trees and shrubs. Sudbury has recovered fairly well thanks to the taller smoke stacks and scrubbers although the bush around it is still a bit stunted.

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 10,582 posts
Posted by mlehman on Thursday, October 1, 2015 1:46 AM

There are several reasons why vegetation could be impacted around coal mines. Slag or culm piles are one. The smelting that Dave mentions is actually associated with hard rock mining, but coal used in the process can add to the pollution generated by the release of sulforous and chlorine compounds from the metal ores, also.

Around coals mines, the slag piles are subject to leaching from rain or othere water passing through them, so vegetation downhill from them would be affected to some degree, while areas uphill might be fine.

In older pics, surrounding trees were often gone because they were cut for mine props.

Remember that trees return. A long-lived mine might see a big impact from mining at first, but a couple of decade later things are growing back rapidly.

Mike Lehman

Urbana, IL

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Thursday, October 1, 2015 5:27 AM

Mike:

Your mention of rain brings up another aspect of the deleterious effects of smelting. In the 50s and 60s, and likely before, the area south west of Sudbury was renowned for its crystal clear lakes. You could literally see down 50 or 60 feet into the water and there was almost no algae or weed growth. The waters were considered to be amongst the most beautiful places on the planet. Then, in the last half of the 60s, researchers (from Trent University I believe - my almamater) discovered why the waters were so clear. It was because of the acid in the rain coming from the smelter exhaust in Sudbury. The area immediately around Sudbury was starting to recover because of the new taller smoke stacks, but all that had changed was that the pollution had been put higher into the atmosphere and was therefore moved further south west following the normal direction of easterly winds during wet weather. 

My family had the good fortune of having a cottage in the area south west of Sudbury and I can personally testify to the beauty of the clear lakes. Little did we know. There were other symptoms too. The deer population crashed by almost 90% in the span of a couple of years due to the damage done to new vegetation. The crayfish disappeared, and those lakes that had been renowned for great fishing were now totally devoid of fish. The fishing still hasn't come back.

Anyhow, I'm ranting!!!

Sorry

We humans are a rather stupid lot in some respects.

My 2 Cents

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Thursday, October 1, 2015 9:21 AM

Coincidentally, I was discussing this very subject with someone very recently.  My own observations are based on coal mining in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania.  Coal was usually accompanied by a lot of other, less marketable, stuff including slate and various other kinds of rock.  When the coal came out of the ground, this material had to be cleaned out, and something had to be done with it.  Since it had no signficant commercial value, it was disposed of in the cheapest manner, which means it was usually just dumped near the mine to avoid transportation costs.  In my region, the material was usually called "boney", although I guess other names may have been used.  The boney pile was often massive, and often required earthmoving equipment to keep its size and shape manageable.  These were the days before OSHA and EPA, so there wasn't much --- if any --- regulation.  Impurities would leach out of the base of the boney pile and into local streams in a reddish liquid flow called "red dog".  Since there was a significant amount of sulfur in the boney, the red dog was actually a dilute form of sulfuric acid, so you can imagine its destructive environmental effects.  

The miners usually lived very close to the mine, and walked to work.  It would not be at all surprising if their drinking water was tainted.   As often as not, the houses lacked indoor restrooms.  The miners' houses, usually a fairly consistent, uniform design provided by the Company, were within sight of the mine and should probably be visible in the model scene.  Other Community buildings such as the mine offices, a school, Company Store, church, Post office, etc. were located there too.  Miners' families often tried to individualize and beautify their meager homes as much as possible.  I remember passing a miner's house in Widen, West Virginia in 1962, where there was a sign saying the residents had won First Place in a garden club contest.

Roads were usually dirt.  Gravel was a luxury.  Drainage was via open ditches along the sides of the roads, with simple bridges from the property to the road.  I have a book called "Night Comes To The Cumberlands" (I don't remember the author's name) which has a chapter called "The Alabaster Cities", which describes the typical Appalachian company town.  By the way, once you get south of the Mason-Dixon Line, it's rare to hear anybody putting a long A in the word "Appalachia".

Most model railroaders tend to focus on the tipple itself, which makes sense since that's where the railroad interfaced with the mine, and there isn't always room to add much else.  However, the surrounding area is just as rich in modelable features. 

It's also worth noting that most model mines do not take into account the actual loading process and the need to have a track arrangement with a tail track, etc.  But that's another subject. 

Tom

(edited)

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, October 1, 2015 2:56 PM
In a different vein many years ago there was an actual coal mine casting that consisted of a vertical shaft and three or four horizontal shafts over each other. They were all three sided so they could be mounted in the fascia. Guess it didn't sell too well. Think that may have been early 70s.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Westcentral Pennsylvania (Johnstown)
  • 1,496 posts
Posted by tgindy on Thursday, October 1, 2015 10:16 PM

gregc

how accurate is the picture?

Bethlehem Mines was a part of our local scene including 20+ miles of mills (bar, rod, coke, etc.), industrial railroads, car shops (i.e. Bethgons), and a couple major dams.  The hallmark of the mines, including the (company) coal towns, were darkish and cinderish surroundings.  Don't forget the red steel mill smokestack particles that only added to the gritty coal ambience.

Also see http://coalcampusa.com/

Conemaugh Road & Traction circa 1956

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, October 2, 2015 7:24 AM

 Those big waste piles were all over in Northeast PA. These days, many of them are disappearing as modern technology enables extracting the usable coal from what in the 50's was just junk that was not economically usable. There are several power plants in the region that actually burn the stuff. Reading and Northern has some lucrative completely on-line business loading up car loads from these culm banks and transporting to the power plants.

 Other areas had stripe mines in addition to the deep mines, and many of those have been covered over and planted, making things look much better than they did back whenthe mines were a going concern. This change takes years  - not a coal mine, but just north of Allentown is Palmerton, which was the home of a huge zinc mine. The hills surrounding the area were all completely devoid of trees from the fumes and poisonous gasses given off by the smelting process. This all shut down some 40 years ago - just now are trees starting to come back. You can still tell something is different in this area, but it looks far better than what I remember driving through the area in the early 70's.

                   --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 1,890 posts
Posted by carl425 on Friday, October 2, 2015 7:52 AM

The era you are modeling would also have an impact on how nasty the surrounding environment is.  Photo's from 75-100 years ago mostly look like the photo you posted.  More recent operations don't indicate as much collateral damage to the surrounding area.  Search on "mine" in WV over at railpictures.net and you'll see lots of pictures with undamaged greenery surrounding the mine.

Another thing to keep in mind is that effects like this as well as weathering need to be toned down a little.  You see a lot of weathering on models that while a fairly precise representation of real life, when scaled down ends up looking more like a caricature than a model.

I have the right to remain silent.  By posting here I have given up that right and accept that anything I say can and will be used as evidence to critique me.

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Shenandoah Valley The Home Of Patsy Cline
  • 1,842 posts
Posted by superbe on Friday, October 2, 2015 9:14 AM

My wife was born and grew up in Richlands, Va and she told how the the water in the streams was black. 

Bob

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, October 2, 2015 10:20 AM

I'm not very familiar with North American practice, but I did spend a couple of years (1958-1960) minefanning the area around Itazuke AB (now Fukuoka International Airport.)  No question that the area was impacted - the ground nearest the mine tended to look like a well-used ash tray. The two largest mines had culm mountains fed by skip cars - conical heaps of grey(mostly) rock/gravel/sand/mud.  the skips ran up tracks sloped about 20 degrees to level, while the waste dumped wherever the trips were and dropped down to its angle of repose.  Frequent rains caused the stuff to slide, making more room closer to the skip tracks.

One thing that I notice about modeled mine scenes, apart from their unrealistic cleanliness, is the absence of minor structures.  The biggest mine had a whole avenue of open-front shops for mine car and motor repair, machinery repair (drills, pumps, winches) and one that fabricated special props out of used rail and otherwise scrap steel.  There should be an office, showers and a locker room, possibly all in one building.  Even the 'three couples and a dog' mine had a couple of shacks with tracks leading into them.

One thing I saw in Japan that may or may not have an American counterpart.  All the water used to wash coal dust off things went to a settling pond.  The precipitate was mixed with a little clay, molded to shape and baked into bricquettes (like the ones used in backyard grills) or hibachi fuel (cylinders about six inches in diameter and six inches tall, with holes parallel to the axis, burned in something like a flower pot.)  I once saw a locomotive with its tender full of those little pillow shapes.  The closed building where they were baked wasn't airtight, and smoke poured out of every seam.

Chuck (Modeling Central Japan in September, 1964 - with collieries from Northern Kyushu)

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Canada
  • 1,820 posts
Posted by cv_acr on Friday, October 2, 2015 1:29 PM

hon30critter

This isn't exactly apples to apples.

I remember going through Sudbury, Ontario in 1965 on the CP Canadian. All you could see for miles was pink granite stained almost black with soot from the nickel operation. Trees? What trees? None. Nada. It was commonly reffered to as a 'moon scape'. I was only 11 years old but I understood the incredible environmental damage that had been done. Then we saw the huge slag piles.

Anyhow, I think that if you are modelling an active mine with a smelter then greenery in the immediate vicinity would be minimal. However, if the mine had been closed for several years or more modern environmental controls had been installed then there would be lots of new growth trees and shrubs. Sudbury has recovered fairly well thanks to the taller smoke stacks and scrubbers although the bush around it is still a bit stunted.

Dave

 

The original question was about coal mining though... there's no coal within a thousand miles of Sudbury.

Sudbury's issues were from the *smelting* of various metals mined in the area particularly nickel and copper. Not the mining itself.

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Reading, PA
  • 30,002 posts
Posted by rrinker on Friday, October 2, 2015 6:36 PM

 Hmm, I don't recall hearing any mention of the side business of making the briquettes, at least at the anthracite breakers. In the PA anthracite fields, the coal was mainly delivered to centralized breakers where it was sorted, washed, and sized. In the later years, from the 30's on, this consolidation reached fairly extreme levels - and a huge shame that they just tore down the last of the big breakers - probably put a shopping mall there or something. A small mine would take coal by the truckload to a truck dump and load hopper cars, bigger mines would load up the hoppers directly, those trains would haul the mine run coal to the breaker and unload it, the breaker would do its thing, and then other rail cars would be loaded with sorted product per customer order.

 I don't know that they even bothered with any sort of settling basins for the dirty water - mostly it all flowed downhill to Pottsville where it gave Yeungling beer its distinct flavor. With less mining and stricter environmental controls, the beer tastes different. (mostly just kidding there - but there are old pictures where the water is black, no in many of the rivers and streams you can see the bottom)

              --Randy

 


Modeling the Reading Railroad in the 1950's

 

Visit my web site at www.readingeastpenn.com for construction updates, DCC Info, and more.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Bradford, Ontario
  • 15,797 posts
Posted by hon30critter on Friday, October 2, 2015 7:33 PM

Hi Chris:

I think I indicated

cv_acr
This isn't exactly apples to apples.
that my post wasn't spot on the OP's topic in my first sentence.

And oh ya, what did they use to fire the smelters? Couldn't have been coal could it? I wonder where all that sulphur dioxide came from?Smile, Wink & Grin

Dave

I'm just a dude with a bad back having a lot of fun with model trains, and finally building a layout!

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Shenandoah Valley The Home Of Patsy Cline
  • 1,842 posts
Posted by superbe on Friday, October 2, 2015 7:35 PM

In an earlier post I mentioned my wife describing the water running black in the streams but I forgot the coke ovens. On a pitch dark night we were driving along when we came upona long row of blood red large oval shaped lights. They were the coke ovens.  I never saw them during the day so I have no idea of what they looked like, but they were very impressive at night.

Bob

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Nashville, TN area
  • 713 posts
Posted by hardcoalcase on Saturday, October 3, 2015 3:57 PM

Since anthracite has been my modeling theme for some time, I've accumulated a small library of TOC period coal mine and colliery photos.  Leafing through them for the purpose of this response, I did not find a single photo of a working colliery that was not in a wasteland setting.  The photo in your IP is typical for both large and small anthracite mining operations from the late 1800's to the early-mid 1900's.

Jim

  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: lavale, md
  • 4,677 posts
Posted by gregc on Saturday, October 3, 2015 5:57 PM

it's been hard for me to find photos of mines or collieries smaller than that in the original photo and similar in size to modeling kits other than small operations that are simple holes in the side of hills or tipples probably handle with trucks.   So i have a hard time imagining real mines similar to modeling kits. 

 

greg - Philadelphia & Reading / Reading

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Nashville, TN area
  • 713 posts
Posted by hardcoalcase on Saturday, October 3, 2015 9:10 PM

Oh yeah!  That's the typical MRing challenge of putting a 10+ pound industry in a 2 pound space.  

Mines could be of any size since they typically deal with extraction only; so one could be represented by as little as a truck dump or a modest building. Collieries did extraction, cleaning and grade separation which required a lot more infrastructure. Google and eBay images will show many examples but obviously both grew larger as the industrial age matured.   

The common MRing wisdom would be to choose the type of industry you need, then, apply the usual bag of tricks of selective compression, building flats and "just-behind-the-hill-operations" to create the illusion to justify the rail traffic you need.

Jim  

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Sunday, October 4, 2015 4:32 PM

Hello All,

Coal mining here in Colorado has occurred in several regions.

The south-east of the state near Trinidad (site of the Ludlow massacre), the west-central, south-western and on the north-eastern plains.

I have visited the south-east and west-central coal producing regions.

My wife's family worked the mines in Berwin, Colorado, near Trinidad. When asked about what age the "boys" went to work in the mines? Her father's response was, "When they were big enough to carry the 'Growler' lunch buckets."

The topography in this area; near the New Mexico border (Raton Pass), is high-plains dessert with Arroyo cut canyons. The photos from her family's album shows company towns built at the Adits.

Railroads ran through these canyons to transport the coal to either the Coke ovens at Cokedale, Colorado, or the smelters in Pueblo, Colorado.

Company towns in this area had "Beautification" contests for the miners homes along with YMCA's and the typical company stores. Because of the lack of naturally occurring trees in the surrounding areas there was little noticeable dessication of the surrounding landscape. 

In the central-west part of Colorado, that I have visited, the mines seem to be more of the "drift" or "slope" type, compared to the "strip" or "open pit" mines of the north-eastern plains. 

The processing facilities that I have seen in the central-west region have a small footprint and little impact on the surrounding area. Lots of trees and vegetation.

Contrasting the coal producing areas of Colorado to the town we live in; which was founded on hard-rock mines seeking gold but resulted in huge silver strikes, the landscape was shaped by not the ditritus of the mines but the clear-cutting of trees to provide timbers for this type of mining. 

There is a photograph in the National Mining Hall of Fame and Museum, in Leadville, Colorado, that shows our town at the height of the mining boom (1870's). Our house had not been built at that time but it does depict the bare slopes from the denuding of the trees for timbers in the mines.

There is another photo of the same area (after our house was built in the 1930's) that shows the area had been "reclaimed" by Aspen trees.

Viewing these two photos what struck me about this area was not the mine waste that you talk of from the eastern mines, but the denuding of the trees to provide timbers for the mining operations and how the Aspens exploited this barren area in less than 50 years.

I agree that modeling eastern coal producing regions with an over abundance of vegetation might not represent prototypical scenes for that area.

In my experience, traveling through the coal producing regions of the Colorado Rocky Mountains, provide a different opportunity for modeling then that of the eastern coal fields.

Hope this helps. 

 

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Potomac Yard
  • 2,767 posts
Posted by NittanyLion on Sunday, October 4, 2015 11:42 PM

We have lots of photos of western PA coal country in the family (part of it was busy farming on top of the overburden) and judging from the pictures, there wasn't a tree in the whole dang state before 1965.

I made an animation from three images I got off Penn Pilot.  There's a prep plant about a third of the way from the top on the centerline of the image.  They're late 30s, mid 50s, and late 60s.  The 30s-50s were the heyday there and by the 70s it was out of service.

Changes every 3.5 seconds (and the images weren't taken on the exact same heading!).  Look how much the area just southeast of the mine changes.  Its also fun to see all the post-war housing going up!  But, really, look how many places regain trees or thicken in density, even as the spill area southwest of the mine grew.

This is a picture (http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=398184&nseq=2) of the same site in the late 80s.  Look how wooded that pile became in 20 years.  Twenty-five years later, its not even there (https://goo.gl/maps/dS3xL57KFv72) and there's new trees too.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • From: 10,430’ (3,179 m)
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by jjdamnit on Monday, October 5, 2015 2:49 PM

Hello All,

Wow! Great stuff!!!

Hope this helps.

"Uhh...I didn’t know it was 'impossible' I just made it work...sorry"

  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 2,360 posts
Posted by kasskaboose on Thursday, October 8, 2015 8:00 AM

Thanks to all for this thread!  Even though I don't model coal in PA (but do in SW VA) good to read how this industry formed from people with first-hand experience.  

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Pa.
  • 3,361 posts
Posted by DigitalGriffin on Thursday, October 8, 2015 8:44 AM

superbe

In an earlier post I mentioned my wife describing the water running black in the streams but I forgot the coke ovens. On a pitch dark night we were driving along when we came upona long row of blood red large oval shaped lights. They were the coke ovens.  I never saw them during the day so I have no idea of what they looked like, but they were very impressive at night.

Bob

 



Coke ovens were notorious for their pollution.  They release Toululene, Xylene, Cynide, Sulfur and goodness knows what else.  It's the main reason steel mills no longer produce their own coke.  (It became too expensive to produce coke with EPA regs)

With the new sulfur requirements by the EPA, Coal fires plants are being shut down left and right.  One has to wonder what will become of all these areas, their workers, and our past.

 

Don - Specializing in layout DC->DCC conversions

Modeling C&O transition era and steel industries There's Nothing Like Big Steam!

  • Member since
    August 2013
  • 3,006 posts
Posted by ACY Tom on Thursday, October 8, 2015 3:08 PM

DigitalG:

Nobody with any sense wants to go back to the old days of silicosis, backbreaking and dangerous work, low pay, environmental destruction, and social inequity.  It's important that modern society lose these negative things. But the history is intriguing, the potential modeling subjects are challenging and fascinating, and it's always good to know where we came from.  There are places where coke ovens are preserved, and the lore of deep coal mining is kept alive.  One of my favorites is the Broad Top Area Coal Miners' Museum in Robertsdale, PA.  There are also preserved Coke ovens in Riddlesburg, PA and other places.  It's true that a lot of the old infrastructure has disappeared, but there are places where you can find it if you look.

Tom 

Subscriber & Member Login

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

Users Online

There are no community member online

Search the Community

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Model Railroader Newsletter See all
Sign up for our FREE e-newsletter and get model railroad news in your inbox!