QUOTE: Originally posted by tangerine-jack Interesting point, Ben. I wonder how many garden RRs evolve in a prototypical manner ie. starting out sparse or "agricultural" then evolving as our personal finances increase into a more "industrial" flavor. Mine seems to be doing just that as my new addition is almost exclusively modern-urban, and the Old Line is very much a cheesy tourist trap (you should see how much I charge for drinks!). I'll check back on this topic after my short hiatus and see what got stirred up.[oX)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by bennysrr It started in the rural areas with the trains going through, to move the live stock , the stock yards started along the tracks, then grain elevators move their . so now you have industry and agricultural working together., and you still need trains to move the economy . [2c] Ben
QUOTE: Originally posted by tangerine-jack ARGHHH! Not another controversy! Well, not being one to miss an opportunity to shoot off my mouth, or stick my foot in it for that matter, I will weigh in with this: Rural is easier because it utilzes most of the natural environment we are in by virtue of being outdoors. Industrial requires a lot of structures which are subject to the depravations of that said environment. HOWEVER: a rural only RR has no purpose with out some industry to justify it's existance. My solution (and since this is to be another controversy I will say it's the correct and superior solution) is to have your RR a rural tourist line. You have industry (tourism) in a rural environment, with your choice of structures representing any industry you happen to want along the way that the tourist would enjoy looking at, and if desired, a town to provide the tourist a place to spend thier money. Ok, y'all, let's do it!!!![:D][:D][:D][oX)]
The Dixie D Short Line "Lux Lucet In Tenebris Nihil Igitur Mors Est Ad Nos 2001"
Get the Garden Railways newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month