Trains.com

New layout plans - what do you think?

6715 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Friday, June 1, 2007 7:46 PM

  

I like it too !! 

Thanks, John 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Friday, June 1, 2007 4:36 PM
Jim - I like it !!!

Don

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
Posted by Birds on Friday, June 1, 2007 4:14 PM

Jim,

The plans all look very nice with quite a bit of running options for the space!

One thought came to me.

In plans 2, 3, 4, instead of using a reversing loop with a siding off of it, what about using a wye that ends in a siding?

Chris

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: usa
  • 687 posts
Posted by thatboy37 on Friday, June 1, 2007 1:35 AM
i like all of them but if i had to pick it would be 3.
LIVE LIFE AS IF YOU ONLY HAVE ONE LIFE TO LIVE ! UNTIL NEXT TIME PEACE !!! REGGIE thatboy37@hotmail.com
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:29 PM

Okay, here I've tried to incorporate some of the points above - connected interior and exterior tracks (mainline and industrial) and a double reversing loop and a long area for buildings with a (hidden?) siding.

I was showing to Char and she indicated she thinks 6x6 is too big, so more negotiating is requird....

Thanks for any ideas guys!

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Central PA
  • 2,536 posts
Posted by jefelectric on Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:15 PM

Jim,

I like #1 best because I am not a fan of single reversing loops.  I do like the passing siding in #2.  Keep us posted on what you decide.

John Fullerton Home of the BUBB&A  http://www.jeanandjohn.net/trains.html
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Kansas City
  • 413 posts
Posted by mickey4479 on Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:34 PM
I like #3 because it has space for buildings on the topside as pictured.  Because of the switch machines it may not be possible to do but in one of the layouts it appears that one of the switches for the outside loop might fit on the left side as depicted so it would provide a longer siding.  Just a thought.  Good luck and please report back. 
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Thursday, May 31, 2007 7:15 PM

 zeke wrote:
 what program did you use to design them? im using pencil and paper but i like the pc method actually...

Zeke - it's RR Track.  I bought the version with all the Lionel and MTH track and accessories as well as Gargraves (just in case I change to flex track in the future).  http://www.rrtrack.com/

Thanks for any ideas guys.  I'm basically looking at 6x6 max I think.  I might be able to incorporate a fold-down extension/wing or two, for reverse loops, will have to look into it.  If I do, I can guarantee I'll wire it to only allow access if the wing is in the locked and upright position!

Right now I have some hobo stuff I can put in the corner/s and also some two sawmills and a barn with cows.  I also have a mining set and I'm thinking of having a lower level that would reveal the mining handcars moving through some kind of crevasse or tunnel(s)?  I can't go too low, as Chewy would be delighted to play with my toys while I'm away! 

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • 2,306 posts
Posted by kpolak on Thursday, May 31, 2007 6:09 PM

I like the main and branch combination, No. 1.

Kurt

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 8,048 posts
Posted by fifedog on Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:19 PM

Fortner - I'ma big fan of passing/industrial sidings, so I like what's behind CURTAIN #3.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:48 AM
 Frank53 wrote:

Jim:

I think you would regret having only one reversing loop, as you will need to back into it to change direction once you make the first direction change.

I agree, having the ability to reverse both directions gives for longer runs, and sessions.  You might be able to incorporate a Y using the outer O track, also being able to have that added versatility will certainly be rewarding.

What space constraints do you have?

I found it very beneficial to make a listing of goals, I wanted to achieve;

- Running 2 trains simultaneously

- Reverse mainline train in both directions

- Incorporate Saw Mill, Log loader, on dedicated siding, etc.

Hope you don't mind my opinions, the 4 designs you  show are full of fun, but one of the craxy things about this hobby is you never get it perfect.  You will always find ways of improving something.  Try not to get stuck in "analysis paralysis".  (You know all this already Smile [:)]

  

Don

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Millersburg, Pa.
  • 7,607 posts
Posted by laz 57 on Thursday, May 31, 2007 7:06 AM

NICE JIMBO, try it out first about a week or two  before making anything permanent.  Thats what I did and changed things about three times till I like it.

laz57

  There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still; Robert Service. TCA 03-55991
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • 1,991 posts
Posted by Frank53 on Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:56 AM

Jim:

I think you would regret having only one reversing loop, as you will need to back into it to change direction once you make the first direction change.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:27 AM

 darianj wrote:
Nice Plans!  I would enjoy having any of them as my layout.Thumbs Up [tup]

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

i liked the last one....good job jim Thumbs Up [tup]

 

 what program did you use to design them? im using pencil and paper but i like the pc method actually...

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:36 PM

Jim....They are all good plans. If I had to choose one, I would pick # 2.

That's just my opinion. Good luck.

Chuck

Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Long Island, NY
  • 456 posts
Posted by darianj on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:53 PM
Nice Plans!  I would enjoy having any of them as my layout.Thumbs Up [tup]
There's light at the end of the tunnel.... It's a Train! http://www.tmbmodeltrainclub.com
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
New layout plans - what do you think?
Posted by Brutus on Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:34 PM

Outer loop would be O gauge and inner stuff O27... 

 

 

 

I think I'll be able to reach to the middle area on each of these and on the 6x6 versions I would put a lake or something there...  On the 4th one, I could have a couple small bridges on the left side with a river underneath and/or a road with double crossings.  Also, could put a mountain in the upper left corner?  Maybe have a lake as a cover for a small access hatch on the last 6x6?

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month