Trains.com

New layout plans - what do you think?

6715 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Friday, June 29, 2007 10:03 PM

Good idea!  I'll pitch that one later and see how it flies!

Wink [;)]

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Friday, June 29, 2007 9:58 PM

Rather nice for TEMPORARY!  Maybe you could just move the TV and the Couch to the basement, then wouldn't have so much work.

 

Don

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Friday, June 29, 2007 9:57 PM
 rogruth wrote:

I like the last one.You got in every thing needed to not be frustrated and in SIX by SIX feet.

Bargain with "She who must be obeyed" for the space.Have fun. 

Disapprove [V]SWMBO won't let me move the China Hutch.  It's not like we ever use that stuff, either - it's just a show piece.  Oh well, I'm getting a couple hundred bucks worth of switches, track and wood out of the deal so I can't complain toooo much Whistling [:-^]

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Friday, June 29, 2007 9:49 PM

HA!  Good one! Blush [:I]

Well, I'm trying to stick to one side of the room as much as possible to prevent people from having to go around through the living/family room to take food and water to Chewy's bowl etc.  This is going to be a table that I can keep together after it's time for a more permanent layout in the basement, with wings added on to fit the space now.  I hope to actually have the basement done this year still - at least walls up and maybe get some flooring done, so probably within a year from now I'll be able to move to the basement.  I'm taking advantage of my wife's desire for me to move my current layout out of the way to pay for this one!  When I finally do the basement, I'll try and have some wider turns as well, but this is just a temporary one.

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 8,048 posts
Posted by fifedog on Friday, June 29, 2007 3:24 PM
My goodness, Mr Fortner, it's growing...Blush [:I]
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Friday, June 29, 2007 8:21 AM

Jim, What is the largest size you can run 31, 42, 54?  You might want to try and look ahead at that possibility, is there a favorite engine on your wish list, and will it fit?  Or, accept the fact that OK this will accomodate 42, if I ever go bigger I WILL have to redo the layout.

Just a thought.

The double reversing capability is a must!!!

Oh yeah have you noticed the number of viewers on this thread?

Good job!!!! 

Don

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, June 29, 2007 4:55 AM
looks nicee jim. cant wait to see your progress!
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 281 posts
Posted by rogruth on Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:51 PM

I like the last one.You got in every thing needed to not be frustrated and in SIX by SIX feet.

Bargain with "She who must be obeyed" for the space.Have fun. 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Thursday, June 28, 2007 10:35 PM

This should fit nicely and I'll put wheels on it so I can pull it out and scenic the back side.

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 18, 2007 8:41 AM
 Jim Fortner wrote:

Hey Jim, this one looks great, what's more is that now you can access the whole track without touching the train, plus it gives you plenty of switching options.  My vote is for this one.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 18, 2007 5:38 AM

alot of good info brianel...i am just starting a 027 layout, go tubular, and am finding some issues with design of the track..

jim i like a few of your plans i may steal an idea...if thats ok....

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
Posted by Birds on Friday, June 15, 2007 9:35 AM

Jim,

The layout looks great!  Lots of running options in a small space.

Chris 

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:04 PM
Thanks guys - lots of good info.  I'm trying to decide if I can fit some kind of hatch or two in there.  I'm also thinking of putting the whole thing on some kind of wheels so I could pull it out from the back wall when needed...

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: The ROMAN Empire State
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by brianel027 on Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:29 PM

Jim, what's neat about this hobby is the creativity factor and how we all take similar components everyone uses and use them differently.

I think you'll select the plan and idea that suits you most. But as someone who has become something of an expert at small layouts, here's some general observations:

-Unless all sides (or at least 3) are accessible I tend to go with a narrower layout. It's a drag to not be able to reach on to the layout to fix, repair, clean or just have access.

-Keep your operating accessories up front or within easy access. Non-operating structures could go towards the back or less accessible areas.

-As a cost savings, utilize manual switches for yards or up front within easy reach. The Lionel postwar 1024 manual switch has a slightly smaller base, which may allow for some more scenery options. I use switches of many vintages, but chop the base down in size to literally just the track alone. On small layouts, this opens so many other options. Manual swtiches can also be made to operate from the front of a layout using nylon fish line or bicycle brake cables. Making your own track end bumpers out of scraps of pine can also make for a few more inches of space on a siding. I've installed a flashing red light into mine like the Lionel or K-Line one, so I get the effect of another flashing light on the layout without taking up the space of the Lionel bumper on the track.

-Put monuntains, bridges towards the back or inner less accessible parts of the layout, but make sure you can always have access. Putting a tunnel toward the back with the backside of the mountain "open" will allow you access for cleaning track and unplanned derailments.

-Unless you are using TMCC, having insulated blocks will make operation more fun and vaired. An easy solution to cut down on under-the-table wiring is to make some kind of railside power box (like the style used for the Lionel/MTH infared controllers) and have a small slide switch on the top of this. You'd place this right at the point of the insultated block, and then run the wires from each section of track to this box elimating longer wires leads running to a control panel.

-Try to find the newer style K-Line 027 switches if you are using 027 track. They are greatly improved with a small switch box housing - even though they do still have the large footprint.

-Utlilize the edges of the layout. For example, I have uncoupling tracks on track running along side the edge of the layout. I've used Rubbermaid Kitchen Divider Trays spray painted black as dump trays on the edge of the layout board. I can dump loads into these without taking space for a dump tray on the main layout.

-Ulilize smaller buildings to have more space. For example Lionel has their operating smoking diner, but K-Line also has a plastic kit diner which is much smaller - but easily improved. I completly re-did mine my custom window treatments and an added smoke unit inside. The K-Line Police Station is a somewhat small building even for 027. But I added a base to mine to raise it up (like a concrete foundation), added a loading dock, and painted mine to be a small factory. I took my MTH opertating loading platform and cut off part of the roof and base on each side to make it smaller so it fit into the space where I wanted it. There was some wasted space on this accessory with nothing on those parts anyways. The Plasticville Fire Station can easily be modifed into a small industrial building.

-If you have kids, or just want to entertain company, it's a nice idea to have a few buttons for operating accessories not on the main control panel (where you are likely standing) but on the edge of the layout board at other locations where vistors may be standing. This way they do can operate something.

-Many accessories have large bases that take up extra space. I made new bases for my K-Line Bubbling Water Tower and Operating Beacon Tower out of basswood that insert into the layout surface. I took my K-Line operating Junction Tower and modified the lower section stairway so it leads into the structure instead of away from it - which made it easier to place on my layout.

Also on my layout I have only one cut-across reverse loop. To change the direction of the train back, I just run the train backwards through the loop. But to each his own: some like straight out running and some like to do yard switching. I like to to both and tried to make my layout accomdate both.

brianel, Agent 027

"Praise the Lord. I may not have everything I desire, but the Lord has come through for what I need."

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Millersburg, Pa.
  • 7,607 posts
Posted by laz 57 on Thursday, June 14, 2007 8:05 AM

Nice JIM.

laz57

  There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still; Robert Service. TCA 03-55991
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • 8,048 posts
Posted by fifedog on Thursday, June 14, 2007 7:32 AM
Looks great, Jim.  This plan has a certain flow to it the others didn't.  You have now the ability to run 2 trains simultaneously, or park one in the "passing siding" all the way to the right.  The only thing I would change is to place the sawmill at lower left inside the inner loop as well (kinda back to back - not side by side) to the other oone.  I like the angle in which the spur (inner loop) comes in to that saw mill.  This kinda gives you an industrial area ( I can just imagine some bulkhead flats loaded down with Georgia Pacific goodies parked there now).  In the area (lower left) that the sawmill used to be, I'd find myself a handsome one story station, placing it between the track and layout edge.  And, WEAVER makes an elevated crossing shanty that would look perfect "guarding" your 45 degree diamond.
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: New Jersey
  • 201 posts
Posted by lionel2986 on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10:58 PM
 Jim Fortner wrote:

Okay, If I move a little furniture, I think this will fit in the space I have.  What do you guys think?  I wish I had more room for sidings, but can't figure it out without losing most area for accessories and scenery....

 

Looks good. If you take out the siding with the saw mill, you could add two sidings off the inner oval from the top of the oval and the bottom (intersecting where the saw mill used to me). In other words, the sawmill siding goes right to left. You could remove that and add a siding that goes top to bottom and bottom to top using either two left hand switches, or two right hand switches.

By the way, looks like negotiations are going well :)
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:56 PM

Okay, If I move a little furniture, I think this will fit in the space I have.  What do you guys think?  I wish I had more room for sidings, but can't figure it out without losing most area for accessories and scenery....

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 2, 2007 10:22 PM

 Jim Fortner wrote:
Gotcha - what I'm running into is trying to have basically two layouts in one.  My original idea was just to have two separate layouts, one for a switcher and stuff and then one outer loop layout. ...Basically, I'm going to take all this advice and alternate ideas and see what I can come up with.  Thanks man!

Yeah, I can see the two seperate lines working, for me its not the ideal because in my mind I like to have access to all of the track in a fluid manner, but with what you are planning to run, it may work out better while still leaving space for something other than track.

To be honest I probably wouldn't have caught the dilemma that I pointed out had I not been working on my son's $15 plastic Thomas Train set from Wal-Mart, which suffers from the same problem in that by track design once the train starts in one direction and turns around it can never reach a certain portion of the track again, which is kind of irritating to my 5 year old.  Frankly, I believe it was engineered this way to get me to purchase more track, but that's another issue.  As for your track I doubt you really want a layout where you have to literally pick up your train to turn it around in order to reach the middle space that would otherwise go unused, IMO that would get annoying really fast.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Saturday, June 2, 2007 9:46 PM
Gotcha - what I'm running into is trying to have basically two layouts in one.  My original idea was just to have two separate layouts, one for a switcher and stuff and then one outer loop layout. This sort of evolved to thinking that I would want to occasionally move the trains back and forth, at least those that would run on O27.  I think that I'm getting too complicated for such a small space.  Especially since I now have done some measurements and will have to have at least a couple feet of fold-down table.  This might work to my advantage, since I'll be able to fold down on 2 sides and this might allow a slightly bigger layout, but I'll be limited on scenery for the fold-down sections to mostly just track and grass I guess.  I'll definitely have to put an access hatch in the middle, so that will have to be scenery of some kind.  Basically, I'm going to take all this advice and alternate ideas and see what I can come up with.  Thanks man!

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 2, 2007 6:43 PM

 Jim Fortner wrote:

I like what you're doing here, but unless I'm missing something then you'll have to start the train in counter clockwise motion in order access the inner loops, the only problem is that once you're finally turned around and back on the outter main, you're now going the wrong direction and now the inner loops are inaccessible.  Personally, I'd want to be able to access the inner portion from either direction on the main.  And honestly, I'm not seeing this ability on any of the plans that you've laid out so far, but that's just my 2 cents.

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Saturday, June 2, 2007 6:18 PM
Cool, Chris!  Hey, that other structure is the AF Sawmill (MTH version).  The red one is a barn (object drawing). I'll work on this some more tonight and see what I can figure out, thx!

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
Posted by Birds on Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:16 PM

Here's one with a wye and reversing loop:

Can't wait to see what you finally come up with!

Chris 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Mid Atlantic
  • 614 posts
Posted by Birds on Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:09 PM

 Jim Fortner wrote:
Does anyone make a O27 wye?  I know how to make one using 3 switches, but it seems like it would take up too much realestate.  I'll mess around with the idea, though, thanks!

I don't know of any pre-made O-27 wyes (wise?).

Here are a couple layouts I did using a wye.  I couldn't find the second operating accessory you have when looking through the list of accessories on RR-Track.

You came up with some great layouts!

Chris 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: US
  • 1,304 posts
Posted by mitchelr on Saturday, June 2, 2007 4:48 AM

Jim,

Neat plans.  I think I prefer # 3.

Mitch 

Bob Mitchell Gettysburg, PA TCA # 98-47956 LCCA# RM22839

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Kansas City
  • 413 posts
Posted by mickey4479 on Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:26 AM

IMHO I would not go for the double reversing loop for the size of layout that you are considering.  I think that one reversing loop can work but it involves working it, which is what real railroads did.  The double loop eats up so much space you have no room for structures and scenic opportunities.  The wye option in the real world worked because railroads could by enough real estate to put whole trains on it if they wanted.  In your situation, it would eat up valuable space.  A fella who had a pretty good size layout once told me that he ended up reducing his track plan on the same table by 1/2 because it looked like spaghetti and he was happier with a simpler plan that provided opportunites for structures.  But there is no right or wrong answer here, just opinion.  Whatever you do I hope it will work out for you.  I would like to see photos.    Smile [:)]

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: St. Louis, MO
  • 4,913 posts
Posted by Brutus on Friday, June 1, 2007 10:07 PM

Thanks guys!  We're negotiating - apparently 6x6 requires new furniture in the living room???

 Birds wrote:

Jim,

The plans all look very nice with quite a bit of running options for the space!

One thought came to me.

In plans 2, 3, 4, instead of using a reversing loop with a siding off of it, what about using a wye that ends in a siding?

Chris

Does anyone make a O27 wye?  I know how to make one using 3 switches, but it seems like it would take up too much realestate.  I'll mess around with the idea, though, thanks!

RIP Chewy - best dog I ever had.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Central PA
  • 2,536 posts
Posted by jefelectric on Friday, June 1, 2007 8:55 PM
 Blueberryhill RR wrote:
 csxt30 wrote:

  

I like it too !! 

Thanks, John 

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]Very good, Jim.  Lots of play value.

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]

And don't go less than 6 X 6.

John Fullerton Home of the BUBB&A  http://www.jeanandjohn.net/trains.html
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Friday, June 1, 2007 8:00 PM
 csxt30 wrote:

  

I like it too !! 

Thanks, John 

Sign - Ditto [#ditto]Very good, Jim.  Lots of play value.

Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month