Trains.com

large transformers

9479 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:59 PM
There were many mentions of adding fast acting circuit breakers. What size / type / brand should I look for if I wanted to use an older transformer?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:59 PM
There were many mentions of adding fast acting circuit breakers. What size / type / brand should I look for if I wanted to use an older transformer?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:09 AM
I like to use self-resetting automotive circuit breakers, which are small, inexpensive, and available in various current ratings at any parts store.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:09 AM
I like to use self-resetting automotive circuit breakers, which are small, inexpensive, and available in various current ratings at any parts store.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 390 posts
Posted by SPFan on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:09 AM
Bob, Are the automotive breakers you are using a "fast acting" type or thermal? Its my understanding most inexpensive breakers are thermal types. A lot of these require at least a 135% over current to trip immediately. Probably OK for conventional engines but maybe too slow for electronic types? If they do act immediately is there a specific brand or application to look for?
Pete
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 390 posts
Posted by SPFan on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:09 AM
Bob, Are the automotive breakers you are using a "fast acting" type or thermal? Its my understanding most inexpensive breakers are thermal types. A lot of these require at least a 135% over current to trip immediately. Probably OK for conventional engines but maybe too slow for electronic types? If they do act immediately is there a specific brand or application to look for?
Pete
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:22 PM
I think you're right that they're thermal. However, I have my doubts that any locomotive, modern or ancient, benefits from faster circuit opening, since the overcurrents are almost always due to short circuits between the transformer and the locomotive, usually derailment, and so pose no danger to the locomotive, which sees only reduced or no voltage. The only situation I can think of in which the circuit breaker would protect the locomotive is when it is overloaded, in which case the overheating that would cause the damage comes on gradually, so that the speed of the breaker is unimportant. Even then, one would have to be very lucky to have a breaker whose characteristics so exquisitely matched the locomotive's as to trip at the right time, neither too early nor too late.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin, TX
  • 10,096 posts
Posted by lionelsoni on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 12:22 PM
I think you're right that they're thermal. However, I have my doubts that any locomotive, modern or ancient, benefits from faster circuit opening, since the overcurrents are almost always due to short circuits between the transformer and the locomotive, usually derailment, and so pose no danger to the locomotive, which sees only reduced or no voltage. The only situation I can think of in which the circuit breaker would protect the locomotive is when it is overloaded, in which case the overheating that would cause the damage comes on gradually, so that the speed of the breaker is unimportant. Even then, one would have to be very lucky to have a breaker whose characteristics so exquisitely matched the locomotive's as to trip at the right time, neither too early nor too late.

Bob Nelson

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 150 posts
Posted by pennsy_fan on Friday, March 12, 2004 11:23 PM
Hi guys, Im in a bit of a quandry, here
I have two KW's powering my layout. (one for trains, one for accesories)
The whistle/horn rectifier went out again, (second time). & I had the idea of just going ahead & buying a command set & a tpc400. It solved the whistle rectifier problem & everything is just peachy now :-).Now I mostly run conventional engines.(Have 1 command geep),Now, Ive read that the newer power sources are best for train operation & postwar xfrmrs are best relegated to acc. control. Im wondering if its best to get a powerhouse (180 watt) to operate my 12 x 9 ft. layout. relegating my kws to acc. power only. Any thoughts?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • 150 posts
Posted by pennsy_fan on Friday, March 12, 2004 11:23 PM
Hi guys, Im in a bit of a quandry, here
I have two KW's powering my layout. (one for trains, one for accesories)
The whistle/horn rectifier went out again, (second time). & I had the idea of just going ahead & buying a command set & a tpc400. It solved the whistle rectifier problem & everything is just peachy now :-).Now I mostly run conventional engines.(Have 1 command geep),Now, Ive read that the newer power sources are best for train operation & postwar xfrmrs are best relegated to acc. control. Im wondering if its best to get a powerhouse (180 watt) to operate my 12 x 9 ft. layout. relegating my kws to acc. power only. Any thoughts?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month