Trains.com

Misleading Magazine Title

9996 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 31, 2005 8:26 PM
"The title of CLASSIC TOY TRAINS implied ALL gauges,"
-------------------------

Yep! And all gauges of toy trains is what it includes. Not every gauge or type of toy train is represented in every issue, of course, but who could realistically expect otherwise?

Not enough S gauge? Well, put your keyboard to more productive use than just coming on-board with a big chip on your shoulder, and write an article to submit, or at least send in a proposal for an article.

"S Gaugian" is a fine magazine. I read it myself from time to time and I've never owned any S gauge trains in my entire lifetime (although I would if I were starting over again). Stick with that publication if it's more to your liking, but I hope you do realize that's it's both rude and crude to knock on the door and enter someone else's home so you can proclaim what a dump it is.

Back when I was a boy, my friends and I went through the two-rail vs. three-rail thing a thousand times over in a good-natured way. There were no winners or losers; just some inspired dialog that never became heated, bitter, or nasty. I guess people--even young ones-- were generally more civil and mannerly back then.

Paul said you were being "unnecessarily offensive." I wouldn't be quite as polite in describing your behavior as a new kid on the block.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Culpeper, Va
  • 8,204 posts
Posted by IRONROOSTER on Monday, October 31, 2005 7:47 PM
indian river - I would have to say your are being unnecessarily offensive. I am into S on the scale side as opposed to the toy train side. I subscribe to CTT because most of the S products crossover into scale with the change of wheels and couplers, but I also enjoy reading about what's going on with Lionel, MTH, and the rest of 3 rail world. I've even got a loop of Lionel track on a table under my layout where I run Lionel's NYC Flyer, so I guess I am not a purist. If I had the room I would run a little standard gauge as well. I think CTT does a good job covering S. I also subscribe to S Gaugian, MR, and RMC as well as belonging to NMRA and NASG. I guess my point here is - it's all fun lighten up and enjoy the trains whatever the scale, gauge,etc.
Enjoy
Paul
If you're having fun, you're doing it the right way.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 2,877 posts
Posted by Bob Keller on Monday, October 31, 2005 7:18 PM
The largest share of our readership is interested in O gauge, S gauge falls in second.

We run nice S gauge layouts (we're in the middle of a two-part S gauge construction story), we have an S gauge locomotive repair story coming up in an issue or so, and whenever new S gauge locomotives come out, when we receive them, we review them. For example, I've got an S-Helper starter set coming up in the January issue.

But we can't be all things to all people, so S Gaugian, a terrific magazine, may better suit your interests.

Bob Keller

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: S.E. Ohio
  • 5,434 posts
Posted by Blueberryhill RR on Monday, October 31, 2005 7:15 PM
Indian River, welcome to the Forum.
Seeing as this was your first post, I am
curious...Did you come here to stir up a little dust with the guys
or to just vent your problems.
Why don't you write a letter to the CTT mag and complain.
I could give you a dozen things wrong with S gauge. But
that is my opinion and I would not be as rude as you.
Chuck
Chuck # 3 I found my thrill on Blueberryhill !!
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 3,176 posts
Posted by csxt30 on Monday, October 31, 2005 7:12 PM
It's not uncommon for a lot of our fellow O-gauge guys to mention how they get magazines like Model Railroader, an HO magazine, for great reading & ideas. If I was into S-gauge, I surely would be picking a copy of CTT & others now & then to see what I could build, or get ideas or help with mountain building, etc. Well Indian, It's good you came over & told us your problem, cause now we can counsel you on it . I've noticed a lot of very highly educated people here & not too many rivet counters ! I will continue to enjoy my clumsy, unrealistic Toy trains ! Thanks, John
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 31, 2005 7:01 PM
OBVIOUSLY, the majority who replied to my posting missed the train, so to speak. It is a matter of what the magazine should be correctly titled. Simple enough! Why did I subscribe in the first place? That is simple too. The title of CLASSIC TOY TRAINS implied ALL gauges, which as time went on proved to be an utter falsehood. Yes, I am aware of the S-Gaugian. IT is correctly titled and its topics appropriate. As to 3 rail being "toy" train territory, that is not correct as there are other "toy" trains out there which are correctly depicted as 2-rail.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Eastern Montana
  • 63 posts
Posted by MTsteamfan on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:56 PM
FWIW, indian river, Lionel has been really upgrading their realism lately along with the rest of the industry. I think you should take another look at their offerings over the past few years. Sure they still make plenty of "toy train" like items, but their scale engines and cars are very nice.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Frankfort, Kentucky
  • 1,758 posts
Posted by ben10ben on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:52 PM
Much of what a magazine prints depends on what they receive to print; aside from the regular columns, practically all of CTT's articles are submitted by people not on the staff. If you think tha there's a market for S gauge articles in the magazine, write some yourself, and be sure to let the magazine know how much you enjoy it when such articles do appear.

Ben TCA 09-63474
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Watkinsville, GA
  • 2,214 posts
Posted by Roger Bielen on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:49 PM
First, welcome to the forum, we aren't particular to any one gauge, we're a light hearted group out to enjoy toy trains no matter which gauge. As to your comments about CTT, I would guess that it is somewhat to do with the size of the market for the different gauges determining the focus. As there has been more new S gauge coming onto the market there has been an occasional mention in CTT. As, and if, S grows you will probably see more info. in the future.

Maybe the overlord will comment when he sees this.
Roger B.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Willoughby, Ohio
  • 5,231 posts
Posted by spankybird on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:49 PM
Gee - Here I thought the third rail is what put Toy in Classic Toy Trains.

I am a person with a very active inner child. This is why my wife loves me so. Willoughby, Ohio - the home of the CP & E RR. OTTS Founder www.spankybird.shutterfly.com 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,475 posts
Posted by overall on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:47 PM
Indian,
If you do not like the magazine, you are free to choose another one, maybe "S gaugian".
This is a free market we live in. I don't think your negative comments about Lionel products are necessary. Linn Westcott said, in one of his "at the throttle" editorials in MR years ago that criticizing another man's choice of scale invites a reaction similar to criticizing his choice of automobile, political party or church. Therefore, such remarks should be avoided. With all due respect, it is advice well worth taking. Perhaps, if you feel strongly that there is an unserved market for a purely AF magazine you could start one yourself. The magazines we have today all started somewhere.

George
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Upstate, NY
  • 104 posts
Posted by Munster518 on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:42 PM
Just an honest question but, why did you join this forum then if your into S gauge.[:)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Misleading Magazine Title
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 31, 2005 6:37 PM
I used to subscribe to Classic Toy Trains for several years, then quit. Want to know why? Simply this: I am a long time S-gauger. Classic Toy Trains treated my gauge as almost non-existant. Yes, an occasional article would appear in the magazine, but not enough to keep my interest and desire to subscribe. The focus of the magazine is almost pure Lionel, which as any true enthusiast of railroading can see is so far from being realistic with 3-rail track, clumsy looking locomotives, cars, and accessories. Therefore, the title ot the magazine is misleading. It should be titled, "CLASSIC LIONEL TRAINS".

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month