Trains.com

Newbie to O Gauge; BIG Question ~~~

16733 views
43 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2007
  • 928 posts
Posted by bfskinner on Saturday, January 2, 2010 1:37 PM

GN_mountain_goat

Thanks, Brianel027, for the information and explanation. At first, I thought this would be simple; go out and buy a train set , set it up, and let'er go!  (How naive) Blush  Then, once I started checking out catalogs, talking to shop keepers, and this forum over the past few days, I realized I opened up a BIG can of worms - but one that I KNOW I am happyI did! This will be fun.. (and like previoulsy stated in an ealier reply).. a fun addiction.

I never realized the factor of the circuitry and the boards going bad; is this common?

GN_mountain_goat
addiction

You can still go out and buy a simple train set. In fact, I'd recommend it. You might read about track brands and styles, so you can select a style of track that you can continue to expand as your interest and money-supply grow. If you're already as rich as Croesus, by all means go out and buy all that fancy stuff and spend the rest of your life trying to make sense out of the instruction books, tapes and CDs.

If you don't protect the electronic (as opposed to mere electrical) circuits against voltage spikes with transient voltage suppressor diodes (TVS diodes) or their equivalents, you are very likely to blow a circuit board. Contrary to one of the biggest myths in all of three-rail traindom, fast-acting fuses or circuit breakers alone will give little or no protection. Some equipment already has such protection built in, but you need to know which.

Fuses and circuit breakers protect the transformer and associated wiring against High Currents. TVS protects against High Voltages, a.k.a. spikes. With modern "solid state" (circuit boards, etc.) equipment you need both. Others may tell you different. Ignore my advice at your own risk.

"Gee, my new modern train just died For No Reason. Really? That's too bad. Did you have TVS protection? No. Well, I'm not surprised."

 

bf
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: New Jersey
  • 34 posts
Posted by GN_mountain_goat on Saturday, January 2, 2010 11:59 AM

Thanks, Brianel027, for the information and explanation. At first, I thought this would be simple; go out and buy a train set , set it up, and let'er go!  (How naive) Blush  Then, once I started checking out catalogs, talking to shop keepers, and this forum over the past few days, I realized I opened up a BIG can of worms - but one that I KNOW I am happyI did! This will be fun.. (and like previoulsy stated in an ealier reply).. a fun addiction.

I never realized the factor of the circuitry and the boards going bad; is this common?

  • Member since
    February 2009
  • 42 posts
Posted by Doofus on Saturday, January 2, 2010 11:57 AM

Don't use MTH track or switchs.They are junk. As others have said the MTH PS-1 locos are bad news. TMCC/Legacy is very easy to use. DCS is hard and there are people who have written books on how to use DCS. Evidently MTH does not support their system that well. You can operate PS-2 engines with Cab-1.

 

I had nothing but bad experiences with MTH and only buy and operate Lionel, Williams, Weaver and Atlas. And you can get them with TMCC. 

 

Yes PS-2 requires a battery too. 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: New Jersey
  • 34 posts
Posted by GN_mountain_goat on Saturday, January 2, 2010 11:22 AM

Thanks, Laz!! 

Proto sound 2 - got it! Thanks!n  Does the Protosound 2 require a battery, too?

 

Matt

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Sunny So. Cal.
  • 3,784 posts
Posted by dbaker48 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 9:58 AM

 

Ole Timer

Only 2 opinions ... steer away from mth track and switches .... and older model MTH engines . As far as track ... fastrack or cargraves ..... My 2 cents 

The above quote pretty much sums it up.  I have all 3 systems, running on one layout, and have them running concurrently.  DCS will run anything on the layout, Conventional, TMCC, DCS, and Legacy.  (Does require the TMCC Command Base).  I have a ball.  Don't feel you may a wrong decision with anyone of the systems.  AND there will always be room for expansion.  You may also want to get a video on Dcs originaly put out by OGR, it is very good.

Welcome Aboard, and there are a lot of guys here with a LOT of information!  Don't be bashful about asking questions!

Don

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: MICH
  • 8,153 posts
Posted by sir james I on Saturday, January 2, 2010 9:24 AM

All brands of Remote Control engines will run on TMCC or Legacy EXCEPT MTH. They require their DCS system. Many modelers have both, me I am very happy just having the TMCC system. The newer Lionel Legacy system will also run TMCC and TMCC will run a Legacy engine but you will not get all the newer frills.

"IT's GOOD TO BE THE KING",by Mel Brooks 

  Charter Member- Tardis Train Crew (TTC)   - Detroit3railers-  Detroit Historical society Glancy Modular trains- Charter member BTTS

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: USA
  • 1,247 posts
Posted by Ole Timer on Saturday, January 2, 2010 9:11 AM

 Goat / Matt .... I think Laz and Brianl027 pretty much explained in more detail what I meant . Protosound 2 in mth only .... it is a bit costly and sometimes a real pain in da *** to try to modify ps1 engines and not worth the time and expense to me . I started out with tmcc and all the bells and whistles .... but now have switched over 90% back to conventional engines ... Williams to say . 1 or 2 engines blarring out crew talk is enough for me ... in fact it kind of wears out after awhile and just a good steam chugging with smoke and whistle/horn is enough . If you're new especially ... you DO NOT want the headaches PS1 incurred ! As far as control systems ... TMCC - DCS - and Legacy are all great systems . That is a decision you will have to make as none except the tmcc are descently low priced . All I can say is you can pick up a tmcc control system pretty darn low priced now and they are as dependable and solid as a rock with alot of the bells and whistles and crew talk you may ever want as they say ... and can be merged with the other control systems later ! And get 1 good higher output transformer/power supply for now ....  I know you don't want to have to ship your engines and usually 100's of dollars off to some shop for modifications when you first start out .... it'll take alot of the fun out of the hobby FAST !

 One last remark .... watch out for any shorts on your track or access. ==== they'll blow a circuit board engine like quick sometimes Banged Head ... whereas a conventional engine can take the strain alot better if it happens . Now there are alot of cars with tmcc railsounds that work great and sound wonderful if you prefer not buying engines with it in and you can run them with any engine and a heck of alot cheaper to replace than disabling an engine because of a blown board ... remember when the board dies === the engine dies .... except on conventional engines . I'd rather have a disabled car than an expensive engine .... at least you can still haul the car aound .... Smile,Wink, & Grin

 As far as road names ... depends on what type of collecting you'll be doing .. some want all the same on cars and engines ... some want more realistic looks ... how many actual real trains do you see in real life with ALL THE SAME road names on every car and engine ? As far as collecting for your seperate collection ... all the same is the way to go .... if you then want realism ... mix and match them for your layout . You can do both .

       LIFETIME MEMBER === DAV === DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS STEAM ENGINES RULE ++++ CAB FORWARDS and SHAYS
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: The ROMAN Empire State
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by brianel027 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 8:44 AM

Welcome Matt!

Aas to choosing between TMCC and DCS, I can't help because I like the old fashioned conventional control. But even here, I'm an odd nut as my layout is set up to run off DC power whereas nearly all 3-rail operators use AC power.

TMCC versus DCS? The Beatles versus the Rolling Stones? Apples versus Pears? Ford versus Chevy? This is all really a matter of personal choice as to what is really better. And opinions WILL differ.

MAYBE if I had a large layout, I might be more intune to using a digital control system of some kind. BUt I have a small layout and find it isn't necessary. Plus I have done the hobby on a tight budget, so the lower cost and lower function trains suit this financial constraint.

Kooljock might consider me one of those "electronics nay-sayers." Smile,Wink, & Grin But he is right that everything is upgradable or replaceable as far as electronics and circuit boards go. But the thing I notice from reading the train forums is the cost of doing this. I've read many an unhappy post from guys who need to replace circuitry of a loco and find it can easily cost a couple or several hundred dollars. And sometimes you have to get creative as the specific boards you need are no longer available.

Circuit boards don't last forever, period. No one thinks twice about replacing low cost consumer electronic items like answering machines, portable CD players or cell phones, etc. Even computers, which are a little more expensive (but not as much so as years ago).

On the other hand, I have noticed this perception in the train world: Because the old Lionel trains have lasted so long and are so durable (with proper care), that it is automatically assumed that if it says "Lionel" on the box, that the new advanced trains are going to be just as durable and last just as long. You pay more... you get more, right?!

The reality seems to be quite the opposite. The options offered by the new electronics are awesome to say the least, but the high end train locomotive is subject to the same failure possibilities as many other electronic kinds of products... but more costly to fix or replace because the higher end trains are more complicated and also low production run items. Sometimes it is more cost effective, as Kooljock mentioned, to use an after-market brand of electronics.

Years ago I had some very top line stereo equipment. An Onkyo CD deck was giving me constant problems though and was serviced several times and still never worked right. I finally gave up spending more money on it and bought a used Magnavox CD deck for less than one single repair on the other deck. I got more than 10 years out of before it finally died.

As with everything in life, you make decisions what is important to YOU. If you spend a grand on a loco that is your baby, then adding a couple hundred dollars more might not be a big deal. But seems for many, it still is a big deal as their are many grumbles about the high costs of trains versus their durability.

As the old saying goes "you can't have everything." As a conventional operator, there are limitations for sure, but I'm not really bothered by them. But there's also a costs savings too. If you need to have more on your layout to be happy, it is not only going to cost more to have it, but it WILL cost more to maintain it too.

As far as roadnames, I've learned to repaint to get what I want. I like the Lehigh Valley as well as some of the current modern roads, like CSX, Norfolk Southern, Conrail, BNSF, CPA, CNA etc. and these are names that are often ignored on lower cost starter trains.

brianel, Agent 027

"Praise the Lord. I may not have everything I desire, but the Lord has come through for what I need."

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Millersburg, Pa.
  • 7,607 posts
Posted by laz 57 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 7:51 AM

Hi MATT and welcome to the forum. 

As far as MTH is concerned, they have two classes of engines, Premiere and Railking.  Premier have alot of detail and are all scale sized.  Where Railking is more your traditional or 0-27 size engines.  They are smaller scaled sized and don't have all the detailed work.  Stay with anything that has Protosound 2 labeled on it.  The older PS1 engines when the battery goes dead it will scramble your board.  I have both Legacy and DCS and run seperatly.  Both systems are great.  Get into the hobby but watch out it is addicting.  Have fun.

laz57

  There's a race of men that don't fit in, A race that can't stay still; Robert Service. TCA 03-55991
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Colchester, Vermont
  • 1,136 posts
Posted by Kooljock1 on Saturday, January 2, 2010 7:45 AM

 I think he means anything pre-PS-2.  With PS-1 engines, the memory would get scrambled if you let the battery die.  There are work-arounds to this and fixes available now.  For the prices you can get older MTH PS-1 engines, you could easily rip out their electronics and replace with a TMCC/Cruise/RailSound package from ERRCo.

Don't let the electronics nay-sayers scare you.  Everything is replaceable with usually something MUCH better!

Jon Cool

Now broadcasting world-wide at http://www.wkol.com Weekdays 5:00 AM-10:00AM!
  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: New Jersey
  • 34 posts
Posted by GN_mountain_goat on Saturday, January 2, 2010 7:41 AM

Thanks, Ole Timer.   Since I was looking at some MTH engines, what is considered "old"? I mean, is there a year cut off where the quality picked up?

Matt

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: New Jersey
  • 34 posts
Posted by GN_mountain_goat on Saturday, January 2, 2010 7:39 AM

Thanks, John.  I apreciate your feedback, and will look for that book.  The hobby has been itching at me for years, and it was a visit to a brother in law this holiday season that gave me the kick in the pants to begin. So, it seems that it may be best to use the DCC for MTH trains?  SInce you have so many engines, do they all differ so in quality?

Matt 

PS - I agree with your motto, and apply it all the time!

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: USA
  • 1,247 posts
Posted by Ole Timer on Friday, January 1, 2010 10:58 PM

Only 2 opinions ... steer away from mth track and switches .... and older model MTH engines . As far as track ... fastrack or cargraves ..... My 2 cents 

       LIFETIME MEMBER === DAV === DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS STEAM ENGINES RULE ++++ CAB FORWARDS and SHAYS
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Bayville, New Jersey
  • 1,296 posts
Posted by Hudson#685 on Friday, January 1, 2010 9:56 PM

GN Mountain Goat,

     Your questions are those that plague everyone now a days. Like you, I am new to this forum. I have been into model railroading since I received my first set for Christmas in 1953. To decide on what control system to use, I suggest that you purchase and read Classic Toy Trains book, "Command Control for Toy Trains". I bought and read this book and found it very helpful and I am not employed by the publisher.  Currently, I am running Lionel's TMCC and conventional transformer control. As to motive power, I have Lionel, MTH, Atlas O, K Line and Williams. I prefer Post War Lionel, #1 They are bullet proof and easy to repair if needed. #2 Simple operation. #3 It is what I grew up with. #4 People can't believe that it all still works as good as new. On my new layout I am probably going to go with a combo of conventional and DCC so that I can run my MTH engines to their potential. I have had no problems with my Lionel TMCC and will keep it and use it on the Holiday layout and maybe integrate it, for like you I am undecided. As to the Legacy System, I am undecided. Track: I have been using tubular track, but I am upgrading on my new layout. I am in the research stage also. A local hobby shop recomended MTH track, but after talking to people and reading comments about it I have my doubts. What I do when purchasing an engine, car or any addition, if I really like it I buy it. Then when I get home and I hear, "You bought another engine?" from my wife, I think of my motto, "It is better to beg for forgiveness than to plead for permission."

Good Luck,   John

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: New Jersey
  • 34 posts
Newbie to O Gauge; BIG Question ~~~
Posted by GN_mountain_goat on Friday, January 1, 2010 8:54 PM

Help!

I am a true newbie to O-gauge, ready to take the plunge.  HOWEVER - I guess I have a couple of questions before I buy my first engine. I am interested in the GN line. I have done LOTS of research online; checking both product lines, catalogs, and have some talks with a couple of dealers.  I see Lionel and MTH both have nice diesel engines, however, I do not know which brand is better to pursue. Any pros and cons on each?  I imagine this is an ongoing debate, but I appreciate honest feedback from both sides:

Also - I am very confused about the control sytems - - the DCC vs. Lionel Legacy:

  1. IF I buy a MTH engine, can it fully be controllled with a Lionel Legacy controller, or do I loose functions (and vice versa).
  2. Does it matter which track I use for either?
  3. Will swirches work on either?

Thanks in advance for those brave enough to answer.  I really want to dive in, but I need help first...Smile

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Get the Classic Toy Trains newsletter delivered to your inbox twice a month