Trains.com

Classic Railroad Quiz (at least 50 years old).

741911 views
7952 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, September 19, 2016 12:36 PM

RC has most of the answer, but a small supplement is that I am pretty sure the Burlington's way cars were painted silver, and that one of the other three had black or nearly black cabeese. 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Monday, September 19, 2016 4:00 PM

I did forget the colors - Burlington's were silver, NP's nearly black, GN's and SP&S's were red.

PRR's 100 and the other Z74 series office cars appear to have been purpose-built by Altoona, and possibly Pullman or other builders to PRR plans.  120 (built at Altoona) was one of the few that kept its 100 series number.  Chicagoan was either renumbered 7502 or car 100 was renamed "New Yorker".  Since PRR was still building P70s at the time 120 was built it was probably built new on the same line.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 12:32 PM

Rob:

I have a phone call into Gary Nelson, X-GN-BN-BNSFf Conductor regarding the shop that built the GN cabooses. I do know that one was built at Hillyard, but always thought the others were built at St. Cloud.

The NP caboose (before the pre-merger green) was painted mineral red. The steel cabooses for the NP and SPS were built at Brainerd, Minnesota, however the cabooses that were re-built (for pool service) at Como Shops. Prior to 1967, each conductor had his "own" caboose. As example, 1021, 1023, 1025, 1028, 1029, 1041, 1045, and 1048 were assigned to the Northtown to Staples freight runs. Conductor Costello had the 1028. Prior to the 1967 pool agreement, St. Paul's Como Shop upgraded and renumbered cabooses. I believe that cushion underframes (and others that I don't remember) were required.

I'm still looking for the difference between one batch of NP-SPS cabooses versus the second batch. As information, non of the NP steel cabooses had bay windows. The GN and BN had bay window cabooses due to clearance restrictions on the taconite load out facilities. 

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:00 PM

Is "mineral red" nearly black like the PRR's locomotive "Brunswick green" is nearly black?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:30 PM

It's hard to tell from internet photos, but it looks like SP&S had both plywood- and steel-sheathed versions of the standard NP caboose.   The bay-window cars seem to have come later.

I took Hillyard (Spokane) at a guess.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 5:38 PM

Dave and Rob:

Mineral red is a dull red. The paint on most BNSF freight equipment is mineral red. I am led to believe that the ATSF used that color along with the NP.

I can try to send you some photos off list.

 

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • 1,002 posts
Posted by NP Eddie on Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:05 PM

Rob:

Per Gary Nelson (GN-BN-BNSF Conductor & GNRHS member) said that the GN Steel cabooses were built at St. Cloud, MN Car Shops. However, one GN steel caboose was built at Hillyard--I can't come up with that number now. In 1991 the GNRHS published a reference sheet on GN cabooses. The NPRHS also published on steel cabooses.

The NP/SPS steel cabooses were built in two batches in the 1950's. The first fifty had a higher cupola than the balance of them.

Del Grosso's "Cabooses of the Burlington Northern is an excellent reference work. I regret not having a camera to record the many things I saw in 38 years.

Next question to you Rob.

Ed Burns

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:24 PM

Recall now, the almost black or black cabeese were on my favorite railroad, or one of two, the D&RGW.   Is my memory correct?

Guess I should look at pix.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 23, 2016 8:37 AM

I'll have a new question posted by tonight after I fact-check my memory...

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 23, 2016 3:55 PM

This railroad started to replace its aged wooden cabooses by buying two brand new wide-vision Internationals. It never got to use them.  Name the railroad and (optionally) where the cabooses ended up.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 27, 2016 5:10 AM

The two wide vision cabooses were apparently delivered just a short time before a strike that ended operations.  No photos of them in service have been found, but it's just possible they may have been used.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, September 27, 2016 1:20 PM

The Rutland?

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Tuesday, September 27, 2016 1:33 PM

To start the process of replacing its ragged collection of New York Central style cabooses, Rutland got two wide-vision cabooses from International.  Listed as built in 1959, they didn't arrive in Rutland until 1961, coming along with a bunch of nearly identical D&H cabooses.  The Rutland strike started almost as soon as they were on the property, so they sat until leased by the D&H.  On abandonment, they were returned to International, from where they ended up on the Santa Maria Valley in California.  One of them is still in existence, in Santa Maria.

Rutland Van 50

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 10:16 AM

The PCC car in North America had one rival only.  What was it?  Who and where built it?  What features and equipment were identacle to PCCs and what was different?  Which systems purchased and operated these cars and how many did each have?  Was there a derivitive car that operated for a longer time on one system and what and where was it?   What interurban line shared tracks with one streetcar line that operated these cars, and what was unusual about both the streetcar line and the interurban line? 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Wednesday, September 28, 2016 2:37 PM

The Brilliner (J.G. Brill, Philadelphia PA) was used by Capital Transit (10 cars) and Atlantic City (24 cars).  A few cars each went to Philadelphia, Baltimore and Cincinnati. Red Arrow Lines got 10 double-ended versions. 

Trucks were outside frame but shared the longitudinal motor design of PCC trucks.  As far as I know all Brilliners were air-electric like prewar PCCs.  The two systems with the largest fleets both had interurbans with strange characteristics - Capital Transit's shared conduit operation with Washington Baltimore and Annapolis interurbans for a matter of a few weeks before the WB&A was abandoned, and Atlantic City shared tracks with the third rail Shore Fast Line (to Ocean City).

Chicago Surface Lines had a 1934 Brill experimental (7001) that had a lot of similarity to the Brilliner, but was never called one.  It had different trucks than the "real" Brilliners.

Capital Transit also had 10 St. Louis Car pre-PCC cars similar to the Brilliner.

Some of the Red Arrow cars survived a long way into the SEPTA era (1980s?).  Capital Transit's were retired in 1953, Atlantic City's in 1955.  One of the Capital Transit cars was preserved, only to be lost to a fire at the NCTM in 2003.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:03 AM

You are correct except for one point:   The ten 1939 Red Arrow cars were not truly Brilliners.  The body design was a double-end version, but trucks and all electricals were identacle to the Red Arrow Master-Unit style cars of 1931.  They did not use the rotary acceleration control from both Westinghouse and GE that was typical of both Brilliners and PCC's, but the older automatic acceleration through relay cut-out of resistors pretty much the same as the Hudson and Manhattan "black cars" if 1905, then used on Cambgidge - Dorchester, IRT "Low-V's," BMT steels and so forth thru the IND`R-1-9.  Possibly CTA and North Shore?  As far as I know, these were the last railcars Brill bult, afterward just trolleybuses and war work. The 1950 Harvard - Massachusetts Station line of the MTA trolleybuses were Brills, also used on Watertown - Central Square Cambridge. 

The Capitol Transit 1934 Brill cars could be called pre-Brilliners the way the CT St. Louis cars and the Magic Carpet cars in San F\rancisco could be called pre-PCCs.  I do not know if they used the PCC-type and Brilliner acceleration and dynamic braking control system.

There is something else unusual about the Miss America Fleet of Atlantic City Brilliners.   It has to do with a Class I and nomenclature.  I hope you can figure out what it is.  Ask the next quesiton in any case.

As far as I know Baltimore and Philalphia (PTC) each had only one Brilliner each.  I got to see both laid up in carhouses, but did not get to ride one.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:10 PM

The PST double enders used Westinghouse AB control, which was Automatic acceleration Battery (as compared to Line.  It may actually have been the ABPC variant, which would interoperate with GE's Pneumatic Cam PC10 controllers, used in other PST cars.  Chicago's 4000 series L cars used ABLFM which could operate on battery or line power, had Field control, and could interoperate with GE type M (or PC10).  North Shore used the HLF (Hand, Line, Field) Unit Switches, which required the operator to notch up like a K controller.  Chicago's St. Louis version (CCRy 7001) had commutator control similar to PCC control with 127 full field steps and 20 weakened field steps.  The DC cars were very similar to 7001, with dynamic braking with hydraulic final brakes (prewar PCCs used air for final braking) and magnetic track brakes.  CSL (CRy) 4001 had four 300v motored paired together in series, with what sound like a variant of Westinghouse ABF control.

My understanding is that the Atlantic City and Shore company was owned by PRR, and used PRR dulux gold paint for stripes and lettering on its Brilliners. The rest of the car was two shades of green, the lighter green (upper carbody) also used on CSL 7001.  It's possible, given the four digit numbers on the cars (6891), that they were carried on PRR's books. Did they have a PRR class code MPxx (where xx is the length)?

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, September 30, 2016 12:51 AM

Exactly. I recall seeing a complete list of then operating PRR car types and boh the H&M compatible Newark red cars (MP41) and the Atlantic city Brilliners were listed.  Possilby another reader can supply the classification. 

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 30, 2016 10:01 AM

These two systems that competed for travellers on their streamlined trains cooperated in two different locations.  In one, trains carrying the trademark names of both systems operated on the same tracks and were carried in both system's timetables, in the other, they ran a joint train serving points served by both systems, but without either one having a direct path between the endpoints.  Name the two endpoint pairs and the two systems, and at least one of the train names.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, September 30, 2016 11:07 AM

This sounds like the cooperation between the Rock Island and the Burlington.

The Sam Houston Zephyr and the Texas Rocket ran between Fort Worth and Houston on the RI between Dallas and Teague, and on the BRI between Teague and Houston in 1943.

The Zephyr Rocket ran between Minneapolis and Burlington on the RI, and between Burlington and St. Louis on the Q.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 30, 2016 11:47 AM

Way to go! The Twin Star Rocket was also involved after it was extended to Houston. Both carriers assigned some of their earliest streamliners to Texas service to compeat with SP's Sunbeam.

For most of its life the Zephyr Rocket ran with one mostly CB&Q, one mostly CRI&P set, but cars of both carriers were mixed, with engines (originally E5s and E6s, later E7s) running through.  The normally assigned Pullmans were rebuilt heavyweights Zephyr Tower and Rocket Tower, both plan 4090C 8 section, 3 DBR, 1 DR cars. In the Pullman breakup, one each assigned to CB&Q and RI.  An extra 10 sec 3DBR car was assigned as needed, with ex-Golden State 6 sec, 6 rmt, 6DBR cars used in later years. CRI&P supplied the dining-parlor-observations (432 St. Louis and 433 St. Paul) for both trains.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, September 30, 2016 1:44 PM

We are all probably familiar with the UP's City of ---- trains. There was, in the thirties, another City of --- train, which was all-Pullman and all heavy-weight cars. It ran weekly between A & B, and it traveled over three systems.

Name the train, its terminii, and the roads which carried it.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Friday, September 30, 2016 4:48 PM

The train I come up with is the "City of Mexico" between St. Louis and Mexico City via Laredo.  The Mexican portion seems to be entirely NdeM, with the U.S. Portion on various parts of the Missouri Pacific and Texas & Pacific systems.  If MP/T&P are counted as one system (Yes if you're MP, no if you're T&P) than I can't find a third sytem in my reference material, though I would suspect cars assigned to the train also ran on the Chicago and Alton from Chicago, or on the PRR from New York).  One of the cars came from Memphis on the Sunshine Special connection.

The train ran about 12 hours faster than the daily Sunshine Special, leaving St. Louis at the same time on Sunday, returning on Thursday.  It operated between 1937 and 1940, when it was dropped from the timetable. Pullman supplied the equipment except for diners and the "Spanish Observation Lounge", supplied by MP.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, September 30, 2016 7:42 PM

I was considering the T&P to be a different railroad (it had its own listing in the Guide). The IGN (which was in the MP section of the Guide) took it between Longview and Laredo.

Fast work.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Saturday, October 1, 2016 12:47 PM

Of the three western cities that retained their cable cars' narrow gauge into the electric era, only one had a narrow-gauge interurban line.  Name the city.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 2, 2016 1:09 AM

Is Denver a Western City?   If it is not Denver, I would suggest Portland, OR.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, October 2, 2016 7:50 AM

Denver had a 3' 6" interurban line to Golden - at least partially to serve a coal mine. There was also a standard gauge line on another route.  An interesting footnote is that Denver and Intermountain (the interurban) numbered its standard gauge cars normally, its narrow ones with decimal numbers (.03).

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, October 2, 2016 8:38 AM

And the local streetcars in Denver were also narrow-gauge, possibly a holdover from cable-car days, as well as horsecars.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, October 2, 2016 7:55 PM

3' 6" was probably the most common non-standard cable gauge, with systems in Denver, LA, San Diego, Oakland, San Francisco, Portland, Tacoma and Seattle (and maybe others).  Of those, Denver, LA and Portland retained it after electrification.  There were a few broad gauge cable lines but, except for Pittsburgh and Philadelphia where the gauge was required by state law, only Baltimore kept its 5' 4 1/2" to the end of the electric era.

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Tuesday, October 4, 2016 1:29 PM
In picking Denver, I get to ask the next question.  But first, I knew Denver had both standard and narrow-gauge interurbans, with local narrow-gauge streetcars and a cable-car history.  Did Portland ever have narrow-gauge interurbans?  They had narrow-gauge streetcars and standard-gauge interurbans that I know of.  LA had standard-gauge interurbans sharing rails with narrow-gauge streetcars, but no narrow-gauge interurbans.
 

 

Name the New York City streetcar company that in its history had five different modes of delivering power, starting of course with horse-cars.  In the post WWII era only two were in use and final operations only used one, but its history included five.  What were the other four, and generally where and when?  Neglect name changes of the same company and temporary (as in turned out) lease to a larger organization that went bankrupt, but the company itself did not.

SUBSCRIBER & MEMBER LOGIN

Login, or register today to interact in our online community, comment on articles, receive our newsletter, manage your account online and more!

FREE NEWSLETTER SIGNUP

Get the Classic Trains twice-monthly newsletter