Susquehanna river bridge replacement

3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,552 posts
Susquehanna river bridge replacement
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, March 11, 2017 1:11 PM

Enviromental assement is out quite some reading


  • Member since
    May, 2003
  • From: US
  • 13,728 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, March 11, 2017 2:05 PM

If you can't impress them with your briliance, baffle them with your BS.

Among the 33 parts of the report - there is more than enough BS to go around.


Never too old to have a happy childhood!

  • Member since
    August, 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,085 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:31 PM

Balt, you said it brother!

All that nonsense and Bovine Scat.  There's been a bridge there since 1907, and a railroad before then, and the planet hasn't disintegrated as a result. 

I used to think of environmental impact studies as a genuine effort to protect the natural world, now I can't help but think of them as a racket in their own right. Someone's making money off of them, don't you think?

I suppose it'll take several infrastructure disasters before people wake up and realize the red tape's gotten out of hand. 

  • Member since
    July, 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 1,533 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:30 PM

   I still think these guys get paid by the word.


   "A stranger is just a friend you ain't met yet."  ___ Dave Gardner

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy