Trains.com

Has CTA ever considered bi-levels subway cars?

858 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 5,017 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:42 PM

The vertical clearance in the Logan Square subway section of the Blue Line is very tight. When the line was new in 1970 CTA assigned some former 4000 series cars there in work service, but had to remove the roof ventilators and trolley poles for them to fit. 

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:29 PM

CSSHEGEWISCH

CTA has an unusually tight clearance diagram.  Bi-level cars would never fit in either of their subways.

 

Actually CTA as three and possibly four subway line sections. The Blue Line section from Logan Square is more of a box section compared to the tubes of the State and Dearborn Subways. This required the installation of window guards on the 6000s assigned to the Blue Line. I assume the subway section approaching the airport station is the same cross section.

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Thursday, February 12, 2015 12:00 PM

CTA has an unusually tight clearance diagram.  Bi-level cars would never fit in either of their subways.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 202 posts
Has CTA ever considered bi-levels subway cars?
Posted by zkr123 on Thursday, February 12, 2015 11:53 AM

Has CTA ever considered bi-level subway cars? They seem to have the height clearance. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy