Trains.com

N. Indiana train delays

7500 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Tuesday, October 28, 2014 8:24 AM

The above route sounds plausible as a detour but it doesn't look like it would make up any lost time.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 47 posts
Posted by nickelplaterick on Monday, October 27, 2014 6:16 PM

Well Amtrak could run South Bend/GTW to Griffith, IN entering the former EJ&E there(it's a straight thru route) thence to Matteson around the new connector loop to the IC thence downtown to the St. Charles Air Line into CUS. They could add stops at Valpo and possibly Dyer or even Chicago Heights IL.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,959 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:48 PM

blue streak 1

STB issues another call for service metrics of NS's Amtrak performance.

 

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/10/feds_ask_norfolk_southern_to_e.html

 

  

 

 

Metrics - schmetrics.  Everybody and their brother knows the numbers are bad.  The question is WHY?  Bad numbers don't explain themselves and give a path to fix the problem(s).

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:15 PM

STB issues another call for service metrics of NS's Amtrak performance.

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2014/10/feds_ask_norfolk_southern_to_e.html

  

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:30 AM

Network Rail is essentially a government corporation, unlike the private Railtrack, and seems to have a much better record than its private predecessor.  According to the European Rail Agency, in 2013 Britain had the safest railway based on number of train safety incidents.  For the US, I suggested basically the same thing, which is essentally what Germany and France have as well.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Tuesday, October 14, 2014 9:14 AM

[quote]

 

schlimm

If the infrastructure (RoW) were owned and maintained by a quasi-governmental agency with safe funding sources (ten-year appropriations and user-fees from operators), these questions and problems would not exist.

 

 What you are advocating is essentially the British (and to a certain extent the European) model. This is only partially jokingly referred to as vertical disintegration. My former team and I (I am now retired) have worked in and about the British Railway business  as consultants since 2000. In fact I was brought over to London to help deal with the post Hatfield meltdown in October 2000. During the ensuing years we worked for Railtrack, something then known as "the company limited by guarantee" (which later became Network Rail), Network Rail, RSSB ORR and  Virgin West Coast so I can say I've seen this system in action up close and personal. And arguably this sort of setup might solve these relatively minor local issues discussed here, but it would replace them with far more serious issues nationwide.

I won't drone on and on about the topic but will tell you that establishing something like this in North America would be something of a disaster and is not going to get any support from these quarters. 

 

BTW the root cause finding committee for the Hatfield derailment blamed the structure of the privatization of BR for about 50%  of the related issues.

 

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Monday, October 13, 2014 1:55 PM

rcdrye

Went back to my maps.  The CN/GTW crosses the UP's ex C&EI/C&WI route used by the Cardinal and Hoosier State at Thornton Jct - a better route.  In fact CN is used from the former Monon to Thornton Jct.

 

 

The UP from Thornton Junction is a better route? That segment of the Cardinal/Hoosier State is the source of the long running time and delays that those trains encounter. They virtually creep through Yard Center and also have slow operating speeds at 75th St. Note that they take almost a hour and 15 minutes to go the 30 miles between Union Station and Dyer on the outbound trip and an hour 30 on the inbound. That is the reason Amtrak is considering operating them via the IC.  Sometimes it takes more than a map to understand things.

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,260 posts
Posted by n012944 on Sunday, October 12, 2014 10:42 PM

rcdrye

Went back to my maps.  The CN/GTW crosses the UP's ex C&EI/C&WI route used by the Cardinal and Hoosier State at Thornton Jct - a better route.  In fact CN is used from the former Monon to Thornton Jct.

 

 

It is no longer owned by the CN, it has been in CSX's hands since June 2013.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Sunday, October 12, 2014 10:34 AM

Buslist

 

 
rcdrye

An easier reroute than South Shore would be CN(GTW) from South Bend to Harvey IL, then CN(IC) to the St Charles Air Line.  The stop at South Bend would be a casualty, as NS and CN connect east of the station.  

 

 

 

 

Two problems I see here. One is that the connection at Harvey is not very good particularly on the IC end. Amtrak has occasionally operated the Cardinal/Hoosier this way. They have indicated to me that they have considered funding improvements to this connection to avoid Yard Center permanently. But the second problem might be how receptive the CN would be to this. They are not exactly Amtrak friendly. 

 

BTW on a recent Hoosier trip the short GTW segment was the best riding track on the trip.

 

If the infrastructure (RoW) were owned and maintained by a quasi-governmental agency with safe funding sources (ten-year appropriations and user-fees from operators), these questions and problems would not exist.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,984 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, October 12, 2014 7:00 AM

Went back to my maps.  The CN/GTW crosses the UP's ex C&EI/C&WI route used by the Cardinal and Hoosier State at Thornton Jct - a better route.  In fact CN is used from the former Monon to Thornton Jct.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, October 10, 2014 10:01 AM

rcdrye

An easier reroute than South Shore would be CN(GTW) from South Bend to Harvey IL, then CN(IC) to the St Charles Air Line.  The stop at South Bend would be a casualty, as NS and CN connect east of the station.  

 

 

Two problems I see here. One is that the connection at Harvey is not very good particularly on the IC end. Amtrak has occasionally operated the Cardinal/Hoosier this way. They have indicated to me that they have considered funding improvements to this connection to avoid Yard Center permanently. But the second problem might be how receptive the CN would be to this. They are not exactly Amtrak friendly. 

 

BTW on a recent Hoosier trip the short GTW segment was the best riding track on the trip.

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Friday, October 10, 2014 9:45 AM

blue streak 1

Question ?

Since Amtrak is chartering these buses is someone from the Thruway bus division setting up these buses and monitoring them for proper maintenance ?  

 

 

I would be surprised if Amtrak doesn't already have standing arrangements with reliable charter bus operators around the country for those emergencies when a train can not operate. Maintenance should be monitored by FMCSA.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Friday, October 10, 2014 8:43 AM

daveklepper
isn't riding a bus better than another four hour delay?

 
Perhaps, depending on the individual traveler's schedule. But what a comedown! -- also bruising to whatever's left of the illusion of the relevance of intercity passenger rail. The message: When the chips are down, it's not the railroad that soldiers on, but the highway. Ugh!
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,025 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Friday, October 10, 2014 3:42 AM
isn't riding a bus better than another four hour delay?
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:41 PM

Question ?

Since Amtrak is chartering these buses is someone from the Thruway bus division setting up these buses and monitoring them for proper maintenance ?  Also a 5-1/2 hr each way for a driver would seem to violate HOS rules if any delay at all ?  That is not even counting waiting time at rail stations ?

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • 6,408 posts
Posted by MidlandMike on Sunday, October 5, 2014 8:45 PM

rcdrye

An easier reroute than South Shore would be CN(GTW) from South Bend to Harvey IL, then CN(IC) to the St Charles Air Line.  The stop at South Bend would be a casualty, as NS and CN connect east of the station.  Amtrak HAS run Michigan trains on the South Shore, but Superliners on the Capitol might be an issue.

 

I presume the Amtrak Michigan trains were off the Wolverine line, as the Pere Marquette service (CSX) connection in Michigan City appears severed on Google Earth.  The Wolverines could connect to the South Shore line using the freight line in Michigan City, and avoid street trackage running and the "S" curve.  This could potentially remove 8 of the 14 ATK trains per day that use the NS bottleneck.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, October 5, 2014 1:04 PM

oltmannd

No work at Porter today...let's see what happens.

 
Don:  getting worse.  Passenger on 29 repors he is riding on a bus from TOL  --  CHI.  No report about 49 ?  Anyone ? 
  • Member since
    May 2012
  • 4,984 posts
Posted by rcdrye on Sunday, October 5, 2014 12:53 PM

An easier reroute than South Shore would be CN(GTW) from South Bend to Harvey IL, then CN(IC) to the St Charles Air Line.  The stop at South Bend would be a casualty, as NS and CN connect east of the station.  Amtrak HAS run Michigan trains on the South Shore, but Superliners on the Capitol might be an issue.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, October 4, 2014 4:00 PM

oltmannd

No work at Porter today...let's see what happens.

 
Both lost  4 hours CLE  --  SOB.  Capitol lost 3 HRS Pitt -- CLE
 
Must be disappointing DON.  Both lost a lot of time CLE - SOB.  Capitol running on LSL markers west of SOB.
 
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Saturday, October 4, 2014 7:10 AM

No work at Porter today...let's see what happens.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, October 3, 2014 11:16 PM

It may be that NS is winding down work for 2014 on this route.  However if there is going to be much scheduled work in 2015 SOB - CHI then Amtrak and NS should work out the logistics now to detour on SS when necessary.  That way all could be very competetive timing ? Note previous item about this routing. 

 

blue streak 1

South Bend to Chicago on the south shore might work very well.  Amtrak schedules on NS is ~ 1:30 both ways.  The South Shore schedules are  1 :45.  Add  :15 to get to / from Union station over the St. Charles line will give only a half hour longer.   If the connection just west of South Bend  station can be used  ( or restored ) ?.  If NS can notify Amtrak and SS that there will be delays then route the Amtraks onto the SS.

How much single track is on the SS now so Amtrak could follow one of their commuter trains ?  Weekends should not be a problem for pilots but weekdays might be a problem ?  To prevent SS balking a directed service order from the STB & FRA would speed re route ?

Amtak crews might be able to qualify quickly since there should be at least some extra board crews ?

 

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Friday, October 3, 2014 8:44 PM

aricat

Amtrak is broke and can't be repaired. Anyone who is serious about passengers trains between Chicago and the East Coast should support something along the lines of TGV built from scratch with private capital.

We can dream ... but investors, unfortunately, aren't lining up to take on that project.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, October 3, 2014 5:43 PM

Dakguy201

Another problem with these large delays in the cascade effect.  Yesterday, the Builder left Chicago at 4:25 (2:10 late), the  Zephyr at 4:27 (2:27 late) and the Chief left at 4:23 (1:23 late).  The close spacing of the departures indicates they were being held for the arrival of one or both of the eastern trains.   

 

Quite true. I left Chicago day before yesterday on the California Zephyr, and we had to wait two hours for both the Lake Shore Limited and the Capitol Limited. There were about fifty passengers for just our train; I have no idea as to how many there were for the other trains that were held. For various reasons, we were almost eight hours late arriving in Salt Lake City.

Johnny

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, October 3, 2014 12:04 PM

aricat

I vowed in 2000 that I would never ride Amtrak's Capitol Limited or any other Amtrak train east of Chicago again. You would think after 44 years Amtrak could get this right. I would have been better off getting off at Elkhart,

 
Have to disagree with the premise of your statement. 
1.  The East coast travel at this time has service that is reliable.  There are the natural delays due to idiot grade crossing collisions, freight train derailments, weather, etc. 
2.  A thumb nail look at the NEC showed only one train more than 30 minutes late.
3.  The long distance trains on the east coast are running close to OT as well except for the above spot delays especially NS.
4.  Our whippping boy CSX is doing fairly well even on the Capitol.  Only the CSX NY empire corridor is still taking hits.
5.  NYP - Albany is good  It is being run by Amtrak however. 
6,  Pan Am has let the downeaster route deterioriate but that may be because the undergrade is very substandard ?
7.  The OTP of the Cardinal and its child the Hoosier is running very much close to on time these days except for the above ites.
 Western trains are another matter. 
8.  BNSF & CP delays are well known.
9.  The Cal Z appears to be taking hits dues to landslides, rocks weathe , etc
10. City of NO, doing well. 
 
 
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 455 posts
Posted by aricat on Friday, October 3, 2014 10:26 AM

I vowed in 2000 that I would never ride Amtrak's Capitol Limited or any other Amtrak train east of Chicago again. You would think after 44 years Amtrak could get this right. I would have been better off getting off at Elkhart, renting a car and driving to Chicago than crawl into Chicago's Union Station on the Capitol Limited from Elkhart. I paid a lot of money for a sleeper. This is a train that operates between our Nation's Capital and our third largest city. Could you imagine SNCF operating a train like the Capitol Limited between Paris and Lyon? I can't. Amtrak is broke and can't be repaired. Anyone who is serious about passengers trains between Chicago and the East Coast should support something along the lines of TGV built from scratch with private capital. Let NS haul freight and the South Shore transport commuters. Do we have to read about the same old problems with Amtrak 20 years from now. I think not!

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, October 3, 2014 9:15 AM

The Capitol is in the conga line four deep at Porter.  The LSL made it through the mess at CP412 and is approaching Elkhart.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,485 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, October 3, 2014 6:46 AM

South Shore is single track east of Gary with long sidings with spring switches.  The junction with the Illinois Central is partially single track. 

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:17 PM

Today was much better.  Porter was more fluid.  Apparently, not as much track was under the control of the work gang.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,836 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:04 PM

South Bend to Chicago on the south shore might work very well.  Amtrak schedules on NS is ~ 1:30 both ways.  The South Shore schedules are  1 :45.  Add  :15 to get to / from Union station over the St. Charles line will give only a half hour longer.   If the connection just west of South Bend  station can be used  ( or restored ) ?.  If NS can notify Amtrak and SS that there will be delays then route the Amtraks onto the SS.

How much single track is on the SS now so Amtrak could follow one of their commuter trains ?  Weekends should not be a problem for pilots but weekdays might be a problem ?  To prevent SS balking a directed service order from the STB & FRA would speed re route ?

Amtak crews might be able to qualify quickly since there should be at least some extra board crews ?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy