Susquehanna river bridge replacement

3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December, 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 8,543 posts
Susquehanna river bridge replacement
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, March 11, 2017 1:11 PM

Enviromental assement is out quite some reading


  • Member since
    May, 2003
  • From: US
  • 13,515 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, March 11, 2017 2:05 PM

If you can't impress them with your briliance, baffle them with your BS.

Among the 33 parts of the report - there is more than enough BS to go around.


Never too old to have a happy childhood!

  • Member since
    August, 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 7,909 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, March 11, 2017 7:31 PM

Balt, you said it brother!

All that nonsense and Bovine Scat.  There's been a bridge there since 1907, and a railroad before then, and the planet hasn't disintegrated as a result. 

I used to think of environmental impact studies as a genuine effort to protect the natural world, now I can't help but think of them as a racket in their own right. Someone's making money off of them, don't you think?

I suppose it'll take several infrastructure disasters before people wake up and realize the red tape's gotten out of hand. 

  • Member since
    July, 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 1,522 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Saturday, March 11, 2017 9:30 PM

   I still think these guys get paid by the word.


   My mind's made up.   Don't confuse me with the facts.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy