Help: Identify this EMD

[RailEagle]

I took this photo in Fort Stockton TX at the Texas Pacifico Yard and I could not identify it. As far as I know they do not own any locomotives. They lease a few from CIT and those are painted blue or in the colours of their former owner. Plus there is a Ferromex locomotive every now and then. Thanks to anybody who has any ideas.

[RailEagle]

Since the photo won’t post here are some basic details about the locomotive. 

Cab: Standard

Color: Black (White Lettering)

Air Conditioning: Yes

Number of Axles: Unknown

Tunnel Motor: No

Spotted: Fort Stockton Tx. 

[samfp1943]

Not sure if these will fit, but posting to see?  It would seem like not many black and white units would get out in that area; except posibly, as a transit point from, or to, an end user. or maintenance facility? 

Here is a link to a photo of a Motive Power unit, an MP20C-3 of PHL:

@ http://www.trainweb.org/greengoats/features/not_rp5_mp20c-3.jpg

Here is a linked photo of another PHL SD20 (ICRR Heritage)

@ http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=58796&nseq=111

[RailEagle]

No unfortunately not. It did not have the tiger stripes. The only lettering it had was the reporting marks and numbers and a white logo and/or graffiti. Thanks anyway.

[RailEagle]

I was able to get a link to my photo of the locomotive.

[RailEagle]

Here is a link to the photo: 

http://i1255.photobucket.com/albums/hh632/BlackandWhite_Train_Photos/JPEG%20image_zpsjyj2bp52.jpeg

[SSW9389]

Round up the usual suspects. It appears to be some type of GP40. See https://atsfinroswell.wordpress.com/tag/texas-pacifico/ 

[DSchmitt]

There are two locomotives back to back. Can see both cabs and stripes on the rear of one. 

The firt time I clicked the photo link it worked, but now am getting an error message saying "image linked incorrectly" 

[RailEagle]

Thank. I did a bit of research based off that article and found it is CIT Leasing (CBFX) GP40 and is Ex-PRLX,WP,CMNW, and WC. I had previously looked through CITXs roster but I did not no that they had multiple reporting marks. Thanks to everyone who contributed.