Trains.com

A new 'Standard' engineer's console for Europe

4515 views
14 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 464 posts
A new 'Standard' engineer's console for Europe
Posted by Mario_v on Monday, June 27, 2016 9:35 AM

Hello all ;

In case you don't have already realised, here in Europe, up untill now, there wasn't a single standartized engineer's desk (altough in modern times all the desks being used are pretty similar). this project will not only allow some economies of scale, but will also simplify the task of driving a d train, and will aloww for a better interoperabity between contigues countries. It will also put an end to a plethora of designs and concepts of 'train driving procedures', but some discrepancies will still remain, such as different voltages, different signalling and circulation rules.

Maby for some select few will notice also some similarities with the driving consoles of ACS64's

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:59 AM

Great!  We should too, since we are one nation, not 27.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2013
  • 1,097 posts
Posted by Buslist on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 12:41 PM

schlimm

Great!  We should too, since we are one nation, not 27.

 

we pretty much have a couple of decades ago.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,324 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 2:21 PM

For those interested in further reading about EUDDplus, here is the CORDIS summary of the project (be sure to rename the .pdf file when you download it as it has a typically cryptic CORDIS filename) and the "official" final report on the project development (it concluded in 2010).

There are a couple of things that make me nervous watching the video.  The left-hand screen is visibly subject to washout and surface reflection if bright light is incident on it, I believe a common issue with contemporary backlit and non-transreflective LCDs.  It may be likely that the other two screens are, too.  The eye-tracking demo looks cool and technical as all get-out, but when we actually see what the tracking camera is resolving, the precision of that version of corneal spot tracking is nowhere near good enough to resolve items in the interfaces on the touch screens, which is one of the critical functionalities of the 'universality' of the system (it adapts controls on various types of locomotive to the 'fly-by-wire' inputs and displays in the new UI).

Will be highly interesting to see how they standardized on control movement and haptic feedback (of which there doesn't appear to be much), and how they intend to implement blended braking on locomotives not equipped 'from the factory' to feature it.

Donning the devil horns: it'll be fun to see how well those control levers and the pots or whatever they move hold up in service after a few years, and what gets evolved to deal with the situations when they start to fail...  reminds me of a cautionary tale involving me, white duck trousers, and a well-greased but poorly-inspected Edson steerer that I'd prefer to remember more at arm's length.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:54 PM

You darwinites might like those desktop controls, but, you didn't have to operate them. This dinosaur hated them! Most uncomfortable things to operate and left you glad to get off of the engine at the end of the run. No way to stretch out the legs and they were hard on the back. 

.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:42 PM

Buslist

 

 
schlimm

Great!  We should too, since we are one nation, not 27.

 

 

 

we pretty much have a couple of decades ago.

 

There seemed to be some questions on here about the throw direction for acceleration/deceleration on throttles on various locomotives.

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06 PM

Big Jim the Europeans don't allow anywhere near the number of hours at the throttle that is American practice. IIRC four hours is the maximum, followed by a half-hour break before a final 4 hours.

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: Roanoke, VA
  • 2,015 posts
Posted by BigJim on Friday, July 1, 2016 7:46 AM

Thanks, I did not know that. Four hours, eh! Lucky rascals! 

I still don't like desktops.

.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,513 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, July 1, 2016 1:32 PM

BigJim

Thanks, I did not know that. Four hours, eh! Lucky rascals! 

I still don't like desktops.

 

Be lucky to get off the pit.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,931 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, July 1, 2016 2:24 PM

beaulieu

Big Jim the Europeans don't allow anywhere near the number of hours at the throttle that is American practice. IIRC four hours is the maximum, followed by a half-hour break before a final 4 hours.

While US HOS regulations permit T&E crews to be on duty for 12 hours, virtually none of them, especially in freight service, will be actively operating the controls while on the move for anywhere near the 12 allowed hours.  The length of most runs in passenger and/or freight are set so that, without troubles, the runs can be accomplished in under 8 hours.  Amtrak work rules, I believe, require a 2nd engine service employee in the cab for runs that are scheduled to take over 8 hours.  The cushion between the 'normal' run time and the allowed HOS time permits trains to experience trouble, correct it and still make the complete run without exceeding their allow working time.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, July 1, 2016 10:17 PM

I checked the Swiss Rail forum and the answer I received was " Ten hours is possible for any one day but must include a one hour break near the middle of the trip, and their average scheduled time must not exceed 7 hours" So the Driver's scheduled time must not be more than 7 hours, but in the case of disruptions can be as long as 10 hours, but he must get a 1 hour break.

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:14 PM

I agree. Desktops suck! For my money, the best layout was the AAR standard control stand, applied to everything (as far as I know) from the 60's through the early 80's. Easy to reach everything, while still being close enough to the window to allow you to stick your head out and take hand signals. Try that with a desktop! To add insult to injury, when they put the control stand back in it's proper format, they stuck it so far from the window, you'd have to have 5 foot arms to reach the brake valve if you stick your head out the window!

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • 487 posts
Posted by rfpjohn on Sunday, August 7, 2016 9:18 PM

BaltACD: I don't know, 12 hours in the cab seems pretty normal these days, especially if the Philly sub is anywhere in the mix. Oh, that's right, you said actively operating the controls, not sitting at a stop signal!

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Sunday, August 7, 2016 11:56 PM

Unfortunately, I doubt that the new console solves the problem of which side the driver sits on-which varies from country to country. Italy had to deal with this when purchasing their electrics originally destined for Poland.

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 177 posts
Posted by nfotis on Friday, August 12, 2016 7:37 PM

NorthWest

Unfortunately, I doubt that the new console solves the problem of which side the driver sits on-which varies from country to country. Italy had to deal with this when purchasing their electrics originally destined for Poland.

 

Locomotives like the Euro 4000 have solved this, with a center position for the train driver. Hence, left running or right running, it makes no difference.

N.F.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy