Trains.com

cab signal locos

2796 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,834 posts
cab signal locos
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 11:32 AM
Anyone kinow approximate numbers of units and road number groups of each RR including Amtrak that are cab signaled equipped? 
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 166 posts
Posted by Cris_261 on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 4:55 PM
The D&H had ten GP39-2s equiped with cab signals. They were part of an order for 20 that were delivered in 1976 and numbered in the 7600 series out of sequence.
From here to there, and back again.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:29 PM
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Thursday, April 17, 2008 6:59 PM
Ive been told by certain road formans that any line amtrak runs on has to be signaled and in cab signal.
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Friday, April 18, 2008 1:04 AM

Most UP locomotives are equipped with cab signals.

RWM 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, April 18, 2008 6:08 AM

 blue streak 1 wrote:
Anyone kinow approximate numbers of units and road number groups of each RR including Amtrak that are cab signaled equipped? 

On NS, any road locomotive inherited from Conrail plus anything new since 1998 has cab signal.  (PRR style - 100Hz carried, 4 aspect)  You should be able to get a rough count from a current NS roster using this info. 

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, April 18, 2008 6:37 AM

 wabash1 wrote:
Ive been told by certain road formans that any line amtrak runs on has to be signaled and in cab signal.

Not true.  All Amtrak locomotives have cab signal, but Amtrak trains can even run on dark territory.  In fact most Amtrak route miles are non-ATC.

Here is the cab signal/ATC territory hosting Amtrak trains that I can think of off the top of my head:

NEC - Boston to Washington (Amtrak's PRR legacy plus goofy home-grown system) includes Metro North from New Rochelle to New Haven

Amtrak Harrisburg Line - Phila to Harrisburg

Amtrak NY State - CSX Boston line to Albany Rensselaer to CP 169 on CSX Chicago Line

CSX Boston Line - Boston to Post Road Connection

CSX Hudson Line - Poughkeepsie to Albany Rensselaer

CSX ex-RF&P - converted to PRR 100Hz carrier system post CR merger

BNSF ex-CB&Q from Chicago to Napierville?  (is there more? or less?)

BNSF ex ATSF train stop on some part of transcon line (not sure how much and where)

BNSF ex ATSF train stop LA to San Diego.

Amtrak Michigan ITCS  new installation

Amtrak/UP Chicago to St. Louis PTS new installation.

NS Harrisburg to Pittsburgh to Cleveland (via Alliance)  ex-PRR plus CR additions

Additions?  Corrections?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,480 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, April 18, 2008 10:26 AM

 trainfan1221 wrote:
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.

I was always under the assumption that a dark line was completely unsignaled, not just a lack of wayside signals.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,834 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Friday, April 18, 2008 2:31 PM
I've heard both NJ transit and SEPTA were required to add cab signals does anyone know more? Also I have observed some Amtrak locos without cab signaling.
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, April 19, 2008 12:52 PM
 CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:

 trainfan1221 wrote:
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.

I was always under the assumption that a dark line was completely unsignaled, not just a lack of wayside signals.

Your assumption is correct.  Dark means no wayside signals, no cab signals -- the Method of Operation is TWC, DTC, OCS, Form B, Track Lineup, Block Register, or Yard Limits.

RWM 

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Sunday, April 20, 2008 8:23 AM
 oltmannd wrote:

 blue streak 1 wrote:
Anyone kinow approximate numbers of units and road number groups of each RR including Amtrak that are cab signaled equipped? 

On NS, any road locomotive inherited from Conrail plus anything new since 1998 has cab signal.  (PRR style - 100Hz carried, 4 aspect)  You should be able to get a rough count from a current NS roster using this info. 

Oh  not true there is several  engines built after 1998 that the ns has that does not have cab signal. in fact its easier said that there is some engines that dont have signal in the cab. most being the ge engines in the 9400-9500-9600s several of the ex-conrail 2500 series .

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Sunday, April 20, 2008 8:28 AM
 oltmannd wrote:

 wabash1 wrote:
Ive been told by certain road formans that any line amtrak runs on has to be signaled and in cab signal.

Not true.  All Amtrak locomotives have cab signal, but Amtrak trains can even run on dark territory.  In fact most Amtrak route miles are non-ATC.

Here is the cab signal/ATC territory hosting Amtrak trains that I can think of off the top of my head:

NEC - Boston to Washington (Amtrak's PRR legacy plus goofy home-grown system) includes Metro North from New Rochelle to New Haven

Amtrak Harrisburg Line - Phila to Harrisburg

Amtrak NY State - CSX Boston line to Albany Rensselaer to CP 169 on CSX Chicago Line

CSX Boston Line - Boston to Post Road Connection

CSX Hudson Line - Poughkeepsie to Albany Rensselaer

CSX ex-RF&P - converted to PRR 100Hz carrier system post CR merger

BNSF ex-CB&Q from Chicago to Napierville?  (is there more? or less?)

BNSF ex ATSF train stop on some part of transcon line (not sure how much and where)

BNSF ex ATSF train stop LA to San Diego.

Amtrak Michigan ITCS  new installation

Amtrak/UP Chicago to St. Louis PTS new installation.

NS Harrisburg to Pittsburgh to Cleveland (via Alliance)  ex-PRR plus CR additions

Additions?  Corrections?

And the rest of the statement should have been to run high speed, they haft to have cab signals, high speed is anything over 80 mph, of course all yo listed was signaled territory, whats that to prove?

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Monday, April 21, 2008 3:43 PM
 Railway Man wrote:
 CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:

 trainfan1221 wrote:
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.

I was always under the assumption that a dark line was completely unsignaled, not just a lack of wayside signals.

Your assumption is correct.  Dark means no wayside signals, no cab signals -- the Method of Operation is TWC, DTC, OCS, Form B, Track Lineup, Block Register, or Yard Limits.

RWM 

I believe even an unsignaled line such as the Boston line can have them at certain areas, such as junctions and sidings.  I know there are routes where part of it is Dark and others have some signaling.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,518 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, April 21, 2008 7:08 PM
 wabash1 wrote:

Oh  not true there is several  engines built after 1998 that the ns has that does not have cab signal. in fact its easier said that there is some engines that dont have signal in the cab. most being the ge engines in the 9400-9500-9600s several of the ex-conrail 2500 series .

 

No, all the SD70s, 70Ms, 70M-2s have cab signals.  and all the GEs in the 92xx-somewhere and up have cab signals.   

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, April 21, 2008 9:25 PM
 wabash1 wrote:
 oltmannd wrote:

 blue streak 1 wrote:
Anyone kinow approximate numbers of units and road number groups of each RR including Amtrak that are cab signaled equipped? 

On NS, any road locomotive inherited from Conrail plus anything new since 1998 has cab signal.  (PRR style - 100Hz carried, 4 aspect)  You should be able to get a rough count from a current NS roster using this info. 

Oh  not true there is several  engines built after 1998 that the ns has that does not have cab signal. in fact its easier said that there is some engines that dont have signal in the cab. most being the ge engines in the 9400-9500-9600s several of the ex-conrail 2500 series .

Oh, yes true!  For example, all those ex-CR 2500's have Ultracab II in them.  Take a trip down the short hood next time you get one your way.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,968 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Monday, April 21, 2008 9:28 PM
 trainfan1221 wrote:
 Railway Man wrote:
 CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:

 trainfan1221 wrote:
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.

I was always under the assumption that a dark line was completely unsignaled, not just a lack of wayside signals.

Your assumption is correct.  Dark means no wayside signals, no cab signals -- the Method of Operation is TWC, DTC, OCS, Form B, Track Lineup, Block Register, or Yard Limits.

RWM 

I believe even an unsignaled line such as the Boston line can have them at certain areas, such as junctions and sidings.  I know there are routes where part of it is Dark and others have some signaling.

Railwayman has it right.  The Boston line is TCS (CTC for you non -ex Cons), cab signal w/o wayside.  It is bright, bright, bright!

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 5:32 PM
 oltmannd wrote:
 trainfan1221 wrote:
 Railway Man wrote:
 CSSHEGEWISCH wrote:

 trainfan1221 wrote:
I know Conrail had units with cab signals, don't know how many.  There are lines that are essentially Dark, that being unsignaled, where the crew relies on them.  I believe the Boston and Albany line is an example.

I was always under the assumption that a dark line was completely unsignaled, not just a lack of wayside signals.

Your assumption is correct.  Dark means no wayside signals, no cab signals -- the Method of Operation is TWC, DTC, OCS, Form B, Track Lineup, Block Register, or Yard Limits.

RWM 

I believe even an unsignaled line such as the Boston line can have them at certain areas, such as junctions and sidings.  I know there are routes where part of it is Dark and others have some signaling.

Railwayman has it right.  The Boston line is TCS (CTC for you non -ex Cons), cab signal w/o wayside.  It is bright, bright, bright!

Oh.  Guess I learned something.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,834 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Saturday, April 26, 2008 11:21 AM
Forgot to say also any automatic train stop equiped locos. ie any that are qualified for 80+ running even though in reality would not operate that fast.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy