Trains.com

Amtrak car arrangement...

2896 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Amtrak car arrangement...
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 6:21 PM
Does anyone out there know how Amtrak might arrange their cars in a passenger train ?. I recently purchased a P-42 engine, material handling car and four superliner coaches, but I'm not sure how they're supposed to be placed in a train. I've heard that the material handling cars are now pulled at the rear of the train for easy drop off. Otherwise I've been running them - engine, baggage, coach, diner, sleeper.

Any info on this would be greatly appreciated. Not knowing for sure bugs the ----out of me!...

trainluver1
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 7:14 PM
I just completed trips on train 51 and train 21.

Train 51 had the following - 3 coachs, diner, and sleeper. Our train also had a private car added at Cincinnati at the end of the train.

Train 21 had the following - baggage, sleeper, diner, lounge car, 3 coachs, and sleep. Note that the last coach and sleeper continue from the Texas Eagle to the Sunset Limited and continue to LA.

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 7:31 PM
So what you're telling me dldance is that there is no absolute arrangement ?.
How many engines were pulling your trains ?.

"Thanks"

trainluver1
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 7:34 PM
1 engine on each train. Amtrak motive power is getting spread quite thin so that trains that used to routinely have 2 engines now are operated with one - unless ruling grades absolutely require 2.

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 8:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

1 engine on each train. Amtrak motive power is getting spread quite thin so that trains that used to routinely have 2 engines now are operated with one - unless ruling grades absolutely require 2.

dd



I heard Amtrak had cut back to one engine per train. So how many passenger cars can a single engine pull I wonder ?.

trainluver1
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 8:48 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1

QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

1 engine on each train. Amtrak motive power is getting spread quite thin so that trains that used to routinely have 2 engines now are operated with one - unless ruling grades absolutely require 2.

dd



I heard Amtrak had cut back to one engine per train. So how many passenger cars can a single engine pull I wonder ?.

trainluver1

all they can afford to equip the train with!

dd
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 9:03 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

QUOTE: Originally posted by trainluver1

QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

1 engine on each train. Amtrak motive power is getting spread quite thin so that trains that used to routinely have 2 engines now are operated with one - unless ruling grades absolutely require 2.

dd



I heard Amtrak had cut back to one engine per train. So how many passenger cars can a single engine pull I wonder ?.

trainluver1

all they can afford to equip the train with!

dd


Wow !. Those P-42s must be pretty powerful...

trainluver1
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NE Oklahoma
  • 287 posts
Posted by richardy on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 10:29 PM
Generally Amtrak tries to position the diner next to the sleepers, the lounge next to the diner and the coaches next to the lounge. This arrangement keeps the foot traffic through the sleepers and the diner to a minimum. MHC were on the head end then on the rear.

I did say generally because on combined trains it will be different. It was really interesting when the CZ was three sections all the way from Chicago to Salt Lake!
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 11:14 PM
I think reducing the power to one unit where possible for operations had more to do with cost savings rather than a shortage issue.

Confirming richardy, for Superliner equiped trains it is engine(s), heritage baggage car, transition sleeper, regular sleepers, diner, lounge, coaches, express cars and/or Roadrailers.

Anybody know for sure? I thought the express cars did not have HEP lines and had to be on the rear. Also, they may be off now, but in November express cars could be seen on the Southwest Chief.

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,786 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 11:46 PM
The AmBoxes, prior to the Roadrailers, rode up front between the power and the baggage car..... No. 5 (zephyr) was thru here yesterday in that configuration as it passed Utah Junction.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Tuesday, April 5, 2005 11:59 PM
Well, wrong again. That's three.

The real reason for eliminating the express business was because it blocked the view from the back of the Beech Grove.

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NE Oklahoma
  • 287 posts
Posted by richardy on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 8:46 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jeaton



Confirming richardy, for Superliner equiped trains it is engine(s), heritage baggage car, transition sleeper, regular sleepers, diner, lounge, coaches, express cars and/or Roadrailers.

Anybody know for sure? I thought the express cars did not have HEP lines and had to be on the rear. Also, they may be off now, but in November express cars could be seen on the Southwest Chief.

Jay




Once in a while the Superliner consists were reversed, I rode the SW Chief twice with my sleeper on the rear.

I thought all of the Material Handling Cars (MHC) had HEP pass through, I'm not talking about the box cars and roadrailers. They always rode up front when I was riding western lines often.

The longest SW Chief I saw, which I was riding, was (4) F40PH, (10) MHC, baggage, transition/crew sleeper, (3) coaches, lounge, diner, (2) sleepers, diner (not in service). Being in the last sleeper I could see much of the train on the curves.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 9:10 AM
The one I saw pass thru Daggett had the MHC right behind the loco. If others have seen it in other places of the consist that would mean their is no real protocol where in the consist the car is placed. [:o)][:p][:D]

QUOTE: Originally posted by richardy

QUOTE: Originally posted by jeaton



Confirming richardy, for Superliner equiped trains it is engine(s), heritage baggage car, transition sleeper, regular sleepers, diner, lounge, coaches, express cars and/or Roadrailers.

Anybody know for sure? I thought the express cars did not have HEP lines and had to be on the rear. Also, they may be off now, but in November express cars could be seen on the Southwest Chief.

Jay




Once in a while the Superliner consists were reversed, I rode the SW Chief twice with my sleeper on the rear.

I thought all of the Material Handling Cars (MHC) had HEP pass through, I'm not talking about the box cars and roadrailers. They always rode up front when I was riding western lines often.

The longest SW Chief I saw, which I was riding, was (4) F40PH, (10) MHC, baggage, transition/crew sleeper, (3) coaches, lounge, diner, (2) sleepers, diner (not in service). Being in the last sleeper I could see much of the train on the curves.

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 7, 2005 12:25 PM
Hey guys. I had an Amtrak employee from California e-mail me out of the blue. He said that Amtrak usually limits one engine to every five passenger cars now a days, and maybe an express box or two. He said there's no certain way of making up a consist, and that it might be a diner, sleeper, coach or what ever depending on how they fall together as they pick them up.

Thanks for all of your help with this.

trainluver1
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Thursday, April 7, 2005 12:34 PM
Watch the Ft. Madison cam from 1000 hours CDT foward. There is a A/trak that floats by every day & you can see the makup for yourself. Also, todays train had 3 locos. If you do not have the link here it is [:D][:o)][:I][:p]

http://www.livetrains.com/plugins/cam/default.asp

Originally posted by trainluver1

Originally posted by dldance
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Canoga Park (Los Angeles)
  • 494 posts
Posted by TheS.P.caboose on Thursday, April 7, 2005 12:54 PM
On the Coast Starlight, the normal consist is:
2 units
2 baggage
1 coach/dorm
2 sleepers
1 diner
1 longe car
5 coach cars

Hope this helps.
Regards Gary
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Central Valley California
  • 2,841 posts
Posted by passengerfan on Thursday, April 7, 2005 5:40 PM
Remember back in the late 1930's and after WW II there were many so called seven car coach streamliners pulled by a single E-3 to E-7. The IC City of Miami, Sou Southerner, ACL Champions, SAL Silver Meteors, L&N/NC&STL Georgian, L&N Hummingbird, C&O Pere Marquettes,C&EI Whippoorwill, and CRI&P Rocky Mountain Rocket come immediatly to mind. So I guess the old E units were better than the new P42's operating today and the E units only developed 2,000 hp and ran on those long wheelbase A-1-A trucks.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
did they have HEP
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 7, 2005 6:17 PM
back then, that takes out a little bit of the power of the P42, plus I think they just do things to be careful.
Brad
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 7, 2005 8:14 PM
Someone e-mailed me a picture today of a current Amtrak with an engine, express car and a mixture of five passenger cars-though I don't know what cars they might be, it's a good picture. I wish I could get a larger train on my layout like the one TheS.P.caboose described, but I don't want to have to build a new layout to do so...

trainluver1
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Friday, April 8, 2005 11:25 AM
Todays A/trak right now is on the Ft. Madison cam waiting for the bridge to close. It has 3 locos & the MHC car is right behind the loco. [:D][:p][:o)]

Originally posted by trainluver1
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,483 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, April 8, 2005 2:21 PM
The MHC cars (1400 & 1500 series) were equipped with HEP cables but the express boxes (70000 and up series) were not.
The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy