Trains.com

Trolley's In Coprus Christi, Texas- I'm finding myself against them!!! Am I just Messugah?

1131 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Trolley's In Coprus Christi, Texas- I'm finding myself against them!!! Am I just Messugah?
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, March 31, 2005 5:35 PM
Recently the issue of Bringing a Trolley System to Corpus Christi, Texas came up. One would think that I would be happy, infact a good friend of mine...when I told him my stance and my well documented railfan-ism...said I was "messugah." (which I learned means crazy in Yiddish) Here is my post on a political forum.

Now, Brothers, tell me... Am I on the wrong sid eof the issue?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have been thinking about the Trolley system that is constantly being proposed for Corpus Christi. I am an avid railfan and know a bit about the issue.

Let me begin by proposing that to make, in my opinion, a sucessful rail system. I will use the Stock Issues I learned in debate in High School in Premont, the S-HITS (Significance, Harms, Inherency, Topicality and Solvency) to prove the point.

1)True Anchors (Significance)- Many have said that there is no anchor at the south end of the Bayfront. This is quite true, even if there was something at the Colosseum here would still be no true anchor. A true anchor is one that provides a point A to a point B of a destination. For instance, the point A of the Texas Mexican Railway is Laredo and the point be is Corpus. A place to go from another. If the rail system were going from a residential area to a commerical/industrial area, there would be two such points. People have to want to ride, or need to. A trolley going back and forth between two attractions will not have stead income. There is not a significant anchor in existance for the proposal.

2) Road constuction (Harms)- The maintenance of a rail line, and street car system, will interfer with the traffic in downtown. Anyone who currently is going "the wrong way" on Shoreline Drive because of seawall construction has already been proven this point. The resulting harm and constant blockage of the road will be more of a harm than a boon for traffic.


3) Public Busses (Inherency)- There are already transportation systems that are already in existance. Why replace it with a more cumbersome system? It's called spinning one's wheels!

4) Other more important issus(Topicality)- There are hundreds of topical transportation issues that need to be addressed ahead of the issue of a Trolley system.

2) Bottom lines (solvency)- A rail system has to turn a profit. Goods and passenegers, if there is no traffic en re the former there is no need for a line. Novelty doesn't pay the bills. Potential traffic would have to defer to the first point, a place to go...not a thing to see. Money pits have a tendency to be expensive.

That is the issue in a nut shell, the must Trolleys happen?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[?]
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Friday, April 1, 2005 4:51 PM
Meshugeh and Buses. One must find out just who will use the system, as it will cost millions and millions. The city of Calgary was told not to put in a Light Rail system as the city is under 1 million population,so they went ahead anyway, got very expensive trains from Germany and I'm sure this system will bury us in debt, it costs millions and millions per mile and maintenance is out of this world and STILL over 80% of the population still use their cars, great success eh?
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Saturday, April 2, 2005 8:17 AM
Ask Miami about their "people mover sysytem". It is a famous as one of our greatest boondoggles of all times. [:(][:(]

Originally posted by Capt Carrales
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Thank you
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, April 2, 2005 1:01 PM
Thank you,

While the rail facilities that approach the Port of Corpus Christi are in need of realignment, the trolly issue seems to be a moot waste of money.

Capt Carrales
  • Member since
    May 2014
  • 3,727 posts
Posted by trolleyboy on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 1:25 AM
On thing that may make it happen in your lifetime is the continuing rise in oil prices.At some point most major cities may well return to the good old days ie lite rail or streetcar systems.Buses are not imune to oil prices aand will at some point be almost as expensive to maintain and operate as literail. Of coarse electric trolley bus systems can be installed at a fraction of the cost of rail in the ground type systems and the lack of track work and switches will(would) make maintenance less of a head ache. trolley bus systems certainly would be more ecconomically sound for smaller comunities. Rob
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 6, 2005 10:08 PM
Trolley buses generally work economically only on very dense out-and-back routes. They are less economical than conventionally fueled vehicles on most routes and would certainly be so in a small community. The future there is most likely hybrid with a propane or similar engine in a small bus.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,029 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, April 7, 2005 3:07 AM
All three modes have their place. Trolleybuses make sense only if railroad rights of way or not available for higher speed trolley service away from other traffic. Otherwise the streetcar can use the rails in the street where appropriate and have most of its operations separate from street traffic. The revived Canal Street New Orleans lines are excellent examples, with ex-freight RR right-of-way shared with the Rivefront line, then "neutral ground" on Canal Street, and with the Carollton branch to the Art Museum having one track in the neutral ground and one shared with traffic. Above a certain traffic level, streetcars are cheaper to run than buses mostly because one operator can handle up to twice as many people. Maintenance, even including the track, can be a lot less.

I don't know the Corpus Christie situation. I do know the Calgary situation, and it is regarded as a successful system . If traffic into a city is so great that car commuting is a hassle, and 20% of the commuters switch to light rail (and in Calagary it does not share street space with private cars), then the remaining 80% can have a much better car commute, so the light rail system benefits both the riders and those staying with private cars. I am told this is pretty much what the Calgary situation is.

Lowell, MA has an expanding recreation of an oldtime streetcar system with period and restored cars, an operating trolley museum on the street. The people like it, use it, and want to expand it.

Portland, OR has a very fast and convenient suburban light rail system and a downtown modern street-based streetcar loop with smaller but modern cars, and it is expanding, having just opened an extension and planning another. Seattle has a waterfront heritage trolley line that was in danger of being shut down but is to extended instead.

I just don't know the Corpus Christie situtation. I can think of one city where an extensive light rail system is being designed and my own careful evaluation says that certain lines would be better as trolleybuses.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy