Trains.com

Wreck at Tennessee Crossing

6267 views
65 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,179 posts
Posted by mvlandsw on Thursday, December 22, 2022 11:32 PM

Wheeling, WVa. in the south end of town where the PRR crossed the B&O's Wheeling & Pittsburgh line. I think it was named after Zane Grey, the author.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,992 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 22, 2022 10:01 PM

mvlandsw
I encountered a steel beam suspended perpendicular to the track at the Zane interlocking in Wheeling, WVa. It was hanging by a cable about five feet above the rails with several people standing on it. This was during construction of the I-70 bypass. The construction company had a railroad flagman on site but he had told them that there would be no more trains that day and he left. The workers on the beam put on quite a show trying to get out of the way when I came around the bend and blew the horn. They were lucky that I was only going 10 MPH and stopped before hitting the beam.

  My train was called as a turn out of Glenwood and we usually returned there but switching some customers and loading coal at the Valley Camp mine left us short on time, so we were going to Benwood to tie up. Apparently the flagmen didn't know that.

 

Zane as in Zanesville, OH or some other location?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,179 posts
Posted by mvlandsw on Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:35 PM

I encountered a steel beam suspended perpendicular to the track at the Zane interlocking in Wheeling, WVa. It was hanging by a cable about five feet above the rails with several people standing on it. This was during construction of the I-70 bypass. The construction company had a railroad flagman on site but he had told them that there would be no more trains that day and he left. The workers on the beam put on quite a show trying to get out of the way when I came around the bend and blew the horn. They were lucky that I was only going 10 MPH and stopped before hitting the beam.

  My train was called as a turn out of Glenwood and we usually returned there but switching some customers and loading coal at the Valley Camp mine left us short on time, so we were going to Benwood to tie up. Apparently the flagmen didn't know that.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,992 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:24 PM

Lithonia Operator
Caution. Watch out for the moderators! All this talk of escort services ...

In my walks around my community, I notice one residence that has several SUV's parked on their property placarded for what I presume is their Pilot Car Service.

Baltimore is a seaport and gets many oversized shipments that need transportation from the port to inland destinations - a task the the B&O once specialized in but CSX has seemed to avoid with the closing of the Locust Point Marine Terminal as the destination for break bulk shipping.

I used to go to Hagerstown most every week to watch my Granddaughter's gymnastics practices.  On my return comng Eastbound on I-70 I would frequently see seriously Oversized shipments headed West.  Many of these shipments had a Pilot Car leading and following the shipment as well as a Maryland State Police vehicle following the trailing Pilot Car with the police emergency lights flashing.  On some of the shipments I have seen them exit the Interstate at an exit and then reenter the Interstate so as not to use the Interstate's bridge over the crossing road.

I have always thought Pilot Cars were 'clued in' on all the Clearance/Movement restrictions existing on the route being taken between Origin and Destination.

The Chattanooga incident would indicate that the Pilot/Escort service being used didn't have a clue as to their job function.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • 2,671 posts
Posted by Lithonia Operator on Thursday, December 22, 2022 7:45 PM

Caution. Watch out for the moderators! All this talk of escort services ...

Still in training.


  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 22, 2022 7:25 PM

Overmod

I live in Tennessee.  State law requires provision of an escort both before and behind any 'permitted' high-wide move.

An awful lot of these appear to be provided by squirrelly outfits that slap door stickers and light bars on SUVs or small pickups, and you may find them miles away from the move they're technically shepherding.

I was treated to one of the great examples of nitwittery when driving through Arkansas taking my son to a comics convention in Plano.  Someone being accompanied by a Texas "escort service" had been led down the cars-only ramp and was terribly stuck.  The woman flagging all the traffic down had utterly no clue how to get them out of there, although certainly possessed of enough attitude.  I could easily imagine that outfit leaving a rig in the straits the bridge=beam move 'found itself in'.  As I said, I'll be highly interested to learn the details of the escort...

 

Regarding that the video I referred to that seemed to blame the driver for crossing without knowing that his rig would be in the clear after he crossed:  I now find that it does say that two escort vehicles were hired, and one was placed ahead of the truck and other was placed behind it.   
 
It says this:
 
“The Collegedale Police Department says they were not notified of the truck carrying the oversized load that was struck by the Norfolk Southern train.
 
They say the company responsible for transporting the load hired two escort cars for the tractor trailer. One escort car was in front and another behind the oversized load when the train struck.”
 
Link to the article:
 
 
I can see your points about the escort service, and would really like to hear their story.  Usually, it is normal to blame the driver.  But in effect, the escort service should have the final say in the driver’s moves.
 

If they gave the driver the all clear to cross, they should have stopped all traffic that could have interfered with the truck if the traffic signal was not clear for the driver. 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,447 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, December 22, 2022 6:37 PM

I live in Tennessee.  State law requires provision of an escort both before and behind any 'permitted' high-wide move.

An awful lot of these appear to be provided by squirrelly outfits that slap door stickers and light bars on SUVs or small pickups, and you may find them miles away from the move they're technically shepherding.

I was treated to one of the great examples of nitwittery when driving through Arkansas taking my son to a comics convention in Plano.  Someone being accompanied by a Texas "escort service" had been led down the cars-only ramp and was terribly stuck.  The woman flagging all the traffic down had utterly no clue how to get them out of there, although certainly possessed of enough attitude.  I could easily imagine that outfit leaving a rig in the straits the bridge=beam move 'found itself in'.  As I said, I'll be highly interested to learn the details of the escort...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 22, 2022 5:34 PM

Overmod

 

 
Euclid
It also seems to establish that the rule to not to start across tracks if you don't have room to completely clear them was impossible to comply with in the case of such a long vehicle as there was in this collision.

 

What it actually establishes is that a rule not to start across tracks if you don't have room to clear them means that you ENSURE you have room to clear them -- flagging, vehicles with lights at the crossing, hand controls to lock the traffic lights.  All things an escort service either would have, or could provide, if they were professional.

 

 

Has there been any news that says whether there was any escort, flag protection, or awareness by the railroad that this crossing with the long beam would take place?  I have not seen anything reported on those points.  I did find one report that said the driver was at fault because he should not have crossed if there was not room for his truck and load to clear the track once he had crossed.  

That would suggest that there was no escort or flagging to assure there was room for the truck once he crossed the track.  But it would not surprise me if the news report was wrong, and there actually was an escort to make sure there was room for the truck once he crossed.  

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,447 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, December 22, 2022 2:02 PM

Euclid
It also seems to establish that the rule to not to start across tracks if you don't have room to completely clear them was impossible to comply with in the case of such a long vehicle as there was in this collision.

What it actually establishes is that a rule not to start across tracks if you don't have room to clear them means that you ENSURE you have room to clear them -- flagging, vehicles with lights at the crossing, hand controls to lock the traffic lights.  All things an escort service either would have, or could provide, if they were professional.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Collinwood, Ohio, USA
  • 16,256 posts
Posted by gmpullman on Thursday, December 22, 2022 10:37 AM

Another updated look:

I wonder why the trucks didn't fall off the bulkhead flat car nearest the camera. I wouldn't think these have locking center pins like a locomotive or passenger car?

Regards, Ed

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, December 22, 2022 10:06 AM

A few more numbers:  A reported 22 trains per day - 8 daytime (6A-6P), 14 night (6P-6A).  From the DOT crossing database.

Accounting for only the head end, that means overall a 1 in 65 chance (using minutes) of having a train arrive at the crossing.  Kind of a "what are the odds?" type of thing.  And given the fact that the 8 trains in 12 hours might involve periods of well more than an hour with zero trains.

During the day, it's 1 in 90...

While the transport folks should have coordinated with the railroad, consider that this may not have been the first such move of a beam over this crossing.  Clearly, any previous moves went off without incident - which would tend to create an air of complacency.

Speed limit over the crossing is 60 MPH.  Average reported speed is 34-45 MPH.

Clearly, heads will roll.  Fortunately, no lives were lost in the collision or the aftermath (ie, toxic hazmat).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 22, 2022 9:59 AM

Overmod
The driver is on record as saying he was surprised at being stopped by a traffic light.

I had not known about that statement by the truck driver.  That apparently explains why he hesitated. 
 
It also seems to establish that the rule to not to start across tracks if you don't have room to completely clear them was impossible to comply with in the case of such a long vehicle as there was in this collision. 
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,447 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:32 AM

Euclid
At some point, an escort ordered the driver to cross, and he proceeded to cross...   The escort attention was entirely focused on what was happening ahead of the truck as this crossing action was carried out. 

The driver is on record as saying he was surprised at being stopped by a traffic light.  Had there actually been a pilot car (with actual professionals doing what they should be doing) supervising the crossing, they would have made arrangements to flag traffic at the crossing, or timed things so the head end of the truck was 'in the intersection' while the light was green.

Usually, what I see the pilot cars concentrating on is making sure the clearances and traffic conditions are still as expected, and they can be up to several miles ahead of the actual move doing that, or whatever else they might need advance preparation to do.  It will be highly interesting to find out what company was providing the escort service, and where the two cars actually were during the crossing.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,447 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, December 22, 2022 8:25 AM

One of the news stories had an enlarged clip of video at the moment of collision.  It looked to me as if the rear of the combination actually had a bogie on the crossing at the time of collision, and was moving deliberately and without any sort of jerking that might indicate difficulty in getting traction or turning.  I would say that in no more than a few more seconds the rig might have cleared.

There is at least one YouTube video of a truck loaded with a wind-turbine blade negotiating right-angle farm turns, with what looks like a remotely-steered rear bogie set.  I think there are a number of modern heavy-haul systems that have 'all-wheel steering' that is computer-assisted.  That would not rule out a tillering station, but note that the visible portion of the rear end of this rig had six axles, all of which would have to be proportionally steerable.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, December 22, 2022 7:45 AM

blue streak 1
So a non specific length all told  =180 - 190 feet. So at 2 MPH over the crossing takes some 60  + seconds. Even 3 MPH not fast enough. Regular crossing timing is what 25 seconds.

The overall rate of speed to cross the track definitely was not fast enough.  But I doubt that the driver was intending to do, or was actually executing to cross at a constant 2-3 mph as seen on the video. 
 
In the video, I believe I am seeing that the truck load only had about 20 more feet to go in order to clear the track.  Here is what I see as a good possibility of what actually happened:
 
The one or more escorts assigned were staged 200 feet or so ahead of the truck when the truck was at stopped at the crossing and waiting to cross. No escort was staged right at the crossing to observe whether the truck had cleared it.
 
The railroad company had not been informed of this intent to cross with this special load.
 
At some point, an escort ordered the driver to cross, and he proceeded to cross.
 
The escort attention was entirely focused on what was happening ahead of the truck as this crossing action was carried out. 
 
For some reason, the truck slowed way down under the guidance of the escort. The reason may have been to begin maneuvering for making the turn, or to give time for traffic to clear. 
 
In any case, no attention was being paid to the rear end of the truck and its load.  All attention was on the area ahead of the truck.  
 
Had the driver seen the approaching train, he would have moved quickly to get into the clear, no matter what the consequence  would have been ahead of the truck. 
 
Had the railroad been notified, the crossing would not have been made so close to an approaching train that had not been made aware of it.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,992 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, December 22, 2022 7:38 AM

blue streak 1
Let us do some scrap piece of paper calculations.  The margins of errors may be over 100%.  At 1 mph speed is 88 ft per minute, 2 MPH 176 feet per minute,  3 MPH 264 feet per minute.  Length of this load 134 feet + length of tow truck = Probably at least 4 drive axels  = 32 + steers =  ?  ~ 20 feet.

So a non specific length all told  =180 - 190 feet. So at 2 MPH over the crossing takes some 60  + seconds. Even 3 MPH not fast enough. Regular crossing timing is what 25 seconds.  The train hit about mid point of the bridge beam.  Sound about right??  So to cross any RR must call to receive clearance to cross RR.  Otherwise a driver just throwing the dice and every once in a while will throw snake eyes,

IMO this driver must thank his stars that the load detached from the tow truck -- otherwise   #^*+"

One thing that has not been mentioned, to my knowledge.  Most of the 'extra long' shipments of beams and similar objects  have had steerable device on the rear of the object which, in those that I have personally seen, have had a individual on board doing the steering.

Recall driving North on I-95 through South Carolina in January one year when it was about 35 degrees and raining and passing four or five of these shipments with a steerable 'tillerman'.  The steering device had a seat, a windshield, a steering wheel and noting else - the tillerman was otherwise exposed to the elements.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,852 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:30 PM

Let us do some scrap piece of paper calculations.  The margins of errors may be over 100%.  At 1 mph speed is 88 ft per minute, 2 MPH 176 feet per minute,  3 MPH 264 feet per minute.  Length of this load 134 feet + length of tow truck = Probably at least 4 drive axels  = 32 + steers =  ?  ~ 20 feet.

So a non specific length all told  =180 - 190 feet. So at 2 MPH over the crossing takes some 60  + seconds. Even 3 MPH not fast enough. Regular crossing timing is what 25 seconds.  The train hit about mid point of the bridge beam.  Sound about right??  So to cross any RR must call to receive clearance to cross RR.  Otherwise a driver just throwing the dice and every once in a while will throw snake eyes,

IMO this driver must thank his stars that the load detached from the tow truck -- otherwise   #^*+"

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 5:45 PM
I doubt that the trucking company or escorts made any contact with the railroad to inform them of their intent to cross.  If they had, I don’t think the crossing would have been allowed until such a close train had passed. 
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 2:46 PM

rrnut282

Two things:

You don't see an escort vehicle in the first video.

The news "people" were more concerned about a few thousand gallons of spilled diesel fuel than the persons involved.  

Does anyone know the symbol of the train involved?  Those loco numbers look familiar, as in I saw them this week go by the house. 

 

Given the fact that someone was able to set up film with their phone lends it to the thought that the truck was fouling the tracks for some time.

The pilot cars are probably in Mexico by now :)

  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 310 posts
Posted by Cotton Belt MP104 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 2:03 PM

Oh, make that 4 "problems" with IT. Quick Reply feature does not seem to work. One thread commentor commented on all the legalities that are required for the transport of a big load.........no comment by him of the RR being contacted. Should police escort call RR? Should the transport permit issurer call RR?  Should pilot truck call RR?  Sad to say, I would venture to say NO ONE called the RR. Thus IMHO ......this is the cause of the accident.   endmrw2112221402

The ONE the ONLY/ Paragould, Arkansas/ Est. 1883 / formerly called The Crossing/ a portmanteau/ JW Paramore (Cotton Belt RR) Jay Gould (MoPac)/crossed at our town/ None other, NOWHERE in the world
  • Member since
    December 2012
  • 310 posts
Posted by Cotton Belt MP104 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:54 PM
I have found 3 failures of IT at Kalmbach as of late. At the News page each article has a comment section. One cannot comment unless logged in. It gave me the  opportunity to comment because I am a dues paying member and had logged in. I commented extensively to all previous 10 comments. Now this same subject is appearing on the discussion forum. Reference to my earlier comments on NEWS WIRE, I went there and my comment does not appear. 
 
3 IT weaknesses. Above mentioned BEING #1, New members cannot PM (#2), and the "SUBSCRIPTION TO a thread" (#3) seems not to work.  This is sad. As has been quoted by a frequent poster. They don't seem to be able to FIX, only BREAK more features.
My comment on the news wire about this accident was a reference to the long ago crash in Texas as a parade honoring war veterans saw the flat bed trailer truck being crashed into. Cause, retired policeman who ALWAYS called the RR when such events were going to happen. No one took his "unoffical job" that was just another job our first responders do for us and we take it for granted. God Bless the train crew that have to endure in their minds this mishap and due to NOT one bit their fault. Sad endmrw2112221354
 
 
 
The ONE the ONLY/ Paragould, Arkansas/ Est. 1883 / formerly called The Crossing/ a portmanteau/ JW Paramore (Cotton Belt RR) Jay Gould (MoPac)/crossed at our town/ None other, NOWHERE in the world
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,169 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:23 PM

BaltACD
Euclid
 
BaltACD

Totally uncalled for under any circumstance. 

Yes, of course.  My only thought was that it seems doubtfull that he was trying to beat the train with that ponderous special load and probably extra spotters driving before and behind him.  

What seems possible is that he was given the all-clear to cross and he saw it was clear.  Then he started to cross and something happened that prevented him from continuing until he had fully crossed.  

Oversized loads, such as a 134 foot long concrete I-beam need special permits to be moved - part of the permitting process is to map out the SPECIFIC route that the load will traverse and all the potential problems on that route.

In my experience, hundreds of these kinds of loads were transported at many locations that were my responsibility.  In most cases, the carrier hauling the item would notify the railroad of the road crossings involved and a preliminary ETA at the affected crossing(s).  Before making the crossing the railroad was contacted AGAIN to say the load was AT the crossing and in position to cross with the railroad holding trains until the load reported clear of the crossing(s).

In cases where the railroad WASN'T contacted there were catastrophic outcomes.

Balt is correct!  Oversized Loads (especially: Permitted Transport Loads)  require the prtocess he described (for sure, it was the rule in Tenn.)   The Precast Cncrete Beam being transported, may have only been 134' in length, but the total of vehicle, and load, would have probably added much more length to a total.  

Normally, an escort(s?) would be provided/demanded?, by the 'Permit' issued by the 'controling State agency. In many juristictions, a presence of some law enforcement, is also requested or provoded(?).. In each case the transport, size of cargo, and route tend to govern the specifics of 'escorts'...

From the looks of the videos, this incident will get $$$$$, and very ugly, before it gets 'settled'...IMHO.Sigh   Whistling

 

[ P.S. Not sure of current regs, for 'notifications', involving permits and processes. But it used to be an addendum to the issued permit; generally, was the 'senior'(?) escort/pilot-car operator's job to make the 'special notifications'.   In this discussed incident; if it was only a const. company move(?) it may get very merky.]

 

 


 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,146 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:05 PM

Two things:

You don't see an escort vehicle in the first video.

The news "people" were more concerned about a few thousand gallons of spilled diesel fuel than the persons involved.  

Does anyone know the symbol of the train involved?  Those loco numbers look familiar, as in I saw them this week go by the house. 

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Mpls/St.Paul
  • 13,807 posts
Posted by wjstix on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 1:00 PM

rixflix

The news accounts calling it a derailment is a spectacular understatement.

Rick

 

 
It's also a bit misleading, as 'derailment' makes one think the train was rolling along and just jumped the tracks on it's own, when in reality the truck was the cause of the accident.
Stix
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 24,992 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:48 AM

Euclid
 
BaltACD

Totally uncalled for under any circumstance. 

Yes, of course.  My only thought was that it seems doubtfull that he was trying to beat the train with that ponderous special load and probably extra spotters driving before and behind him.  

What seems possible is that he was given the all-clear to cross and he saw it was clear.  Then he started to cross and something happened that prevented him from continuing until he had fully crossed.  

Oversized loads, such as a 134 foot long concrete I-beam need special permits to be moved - part of the permitting process is to map out the SPECIFIC route that the load will traverse and all the potential problems on that route.

In my experience, hundreds of these kinds of loads were transported at many locations that were my responsibility.  In most cases, the carrier hauling the item would notify the railroad of the road crossings involved and a preliminary ETA at the affected crossing(s).  Before making the crossing the railroad was contacted AGAIN to say the load was AT the crossing and in position to cross with the railroad holding trains until the load reported clear of the crossing(s).

In cases where the railroad WASN'T contacted there were catastrophic outcomes.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
Posted by rdamon on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:34 AM

More footage.  Shows the truck without the TV logo

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 695 posts
Posted by rixflix on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:26 AM

The news accounts calling it a derailment is a spectacular understatement.

Rick

rixflix aka Captain Video. Blessed be Jean Shepherd and all His works!!! Hooray for 1939, the all time movie year!!! I took that ride on the Reading but my Baby caught the Katy and left me a mule to ride.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 24,888 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:11 AM

Aunt Myrtle was confused by all the flashing lights and people with flags, so she just sat there...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,157 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:31 AM

I see the truck was moving about 2 mph when it was struck.  It appeared just be drifting without acceleration or deceleration.  

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,790 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, December 21, 2022 10:26 AM

One of the trailer dollies became a fulcrum and lifted the tractor's driving wheels off the ground on the other end of the beam (no traction)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy