Trains.com

LORAM Rail Grinder vs. CSX

2960 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2021
  • 7 posts
Posted by taracer71 on Sunday, February 27, 2022 12:31 PM

They had an EC1 to operate at restricted speed with a train ahead, which is typical.   They werent grinding and hit the rear of Q426 at 20 MPH. Train was 7000 feet long so the head end felt noting.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Saturday, February 26, 2022 4:25 PM

Saw the thread title and first thought of the Rochelle incident a few years ago when the Loram equipment fouled the diamonds and peeled some containers on BNSF.

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Posted by SD70Dude on Friday, February 25, 2022 9:00 PM

Our CTC rules allow for a foreman to get a 'follow up TOP' (Track Occupancy Permit) and put on right behind a train.  

Our OCS (dark territory) rules do not let a foreman get a clearance if a train already has a clearance there.  But if the foreman gets a clearance first then a train can get a clearance through the same limits with a 'protect against' order.  Multiple trains can also have clearances over the same limits, again with 'protect againsts'.  

Grinders and test cars sometimes operate as track units under the protection of a foreman, and sometimes as trains with a conductor pilot.  

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,018 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, February 25, 2022 8:14 PM

The NORAC Form D has a line for "trains and track cars ahead."

We deal with rules for OOS track and two trains, but that wouldn't apply in this case.  What might apply is that the following train must operate at restricted speed as long as the leading train is within the OOS track.  

NORAC Rule 805 states that track cars following a train must operate at restricted speed.

Somebody wasn't paying attention...

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 25, 2022 6:01 PM

zugmann
 
BaltACD
CSX MofW Track Authorities CAN NOT be issued with a Train in a track segment, therefore no warnings should be required. 

Interesting.  Two rulebooks I run under allowed for MOW to follow a train.

Thanks for jogging my memory Zug -

A MofW Authority can be issued FOLLOWING a train that is moving in a SPECIFIED direction.  The MofW Authority that is issued will also be issued in the same SPECIFIED direction.  A part of the MofW Authority will also STATE 'A99125 'Specified Direction' ahead at Mile Post **.* where the asterisks represent the mile post that the Dispatcher as ascertained by asking the train their location at the time the authority is being issued.

As in all MofW Authorities - the person in the field must REPEAT the authority to the Dispatcher who checks it against the authority as issued on his CADS computer screen.  Once completed the Dispatcher will make the Authority Effective at the time he specifies from his computer displayed clock.

The MofW Authority cannot have its issued direction changed so long as a preceeeding train is within the limits of the Authority.  If there are NO trains within the limits of a MofW Authority the Authority may be authorized for movement in both directions or for the authority to be changed from one direction to its opposite direction.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, February 25, 2022 5:34 PM

BaltACD
CSX MofW Track Authorities CAN NOT be issued with a Train in a track segment, therefore no warnings should be required.

Interesting.  Two rulebooks I run under allowed for MOW to follow a train.

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 25, 2022 5:31 PM

caldreamer
Why did'nt the dispatcher warn the Loram train that they were approching a stooped train?

Not enough information has been presented to understand what ACTUALLY happened.

CSX MofW Track Authorities CAN NOT be issued with a Train in a track segment, therefore no warnings should be required.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Friday, February 25, 2022 1:42 PM

Why did'nt the dispatcher warn the Loram train that they were approching a stooped train?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 25, 2022 10:14 AM

mudchicken
Balt:

My first reaction....

(1) Where was the M/W EIC in all of this?

(2) Was there a conductor pilot involved and where were they?

(3) Who was outside of their limits? (and which end of the stopped train was involved?)

All questions I also have.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, February 25, 2022 10:00 AM

Balt:

My first reaction....

(1) Where was the M/W EIC in all of this?

(2) Was there a conductor pilot involved and where were they?

(3) Who was outside of their limits? (and which end of the stopped train was involved?)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, February 25, 2022 9:06 AM

Two fascinating things about this:

1) When the LORAM train is operating, the front is lit like a Christmas tree; it lights up everything around it like a fire or a steel-mill pour.  That tells me it was likely tramming at the time of the accident -- the question then suggesting why the CSX train was where it was.

2) Look at the displayed URL for the Trains story -- it can't possibly work, but it does.  I think I know how this happened... he typed a bit more into the displayed URL tag while leaving the functional URL intact... but it is amusing to see. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,218 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, February 25, 2022 8:51 AM

Do those rail grinders move from one location to another on rails without doing grinding operation?  If so, how fast do they travel during those moves?  When moving during grinding operations, it is hard to imagine that they would not be able to stop almost instantly  

  • Member since
    February 2018
  • 299 posts
Posted by adkrr64 on Friday, February 25, 2022 8:27 AM

Despite being a relatively large piece of equipment, am I correct in assuming that a rail grinder would NOT need to be equipped with PTC because it is considered MOW equipment? Does anyone know if equipment such as this can be detected by track circuits? Many high-rail and track maintenance machines are designed such they cannot be detected.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, February 25, 2022 7:23 AM

Lithonia Operator
How fast does a rail grinder go? I would have thought it could stop soon enough.

When grinding, a rail grinder will operate at less than 10 MPH, much less if a heavy grind is required on a particular segment of track.  In some cases the machine will back up and make multiple passes over specific segments if the segment's profile is bad enough.

When 'tramming' (not grinding) I believe the equipment is restricted to 30 MPH.  The equipment is required to have qualified MofW personnel for the territory on board that has knowledge of the physical characteristics and other MofW operating parameters for the specific territory.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2017
  • 2,671 posts
Posted by Lithonia Operator on Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:51 PM

How fast does a rail grinder go? I would have thought it could stop soon enough.

Still in training.


  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:41 PM

   At 1:30 AM.  Somebody dozed off?

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, February 24, 2022 10:14 PM

Don't understand how this could have happend with my knowledge of how CSX rules apply to trains and MofW Equipment.  The Rail Grinder would have been operating on a Track Car Authority which cannot be issued into a track segment that is occupied by a 'Train' - the CADS software will not permit a Train Dispatcher to issue such a authority.

The fact that it happened means there are any number of other critical details that we are not being advised of.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
LORAM Rail Grinder vs. CSX
Posted by samfp1943 on Thursday, February 24, 2022 8:36 PM

Linked @ https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/three-hurt-as-rail-gAt dinner tomightrinder-collides-with-stopped-csx-train/

Unusual! ~ At dinner tonight, the wife asked me if I had seen the above linked story on TRAINS wesite?   Nope, and apparently it had slid under their radar??

The accident happend early on Sunday AM in area of Spencer Ma. 

"

"Three hurt as rail grinder collides with stopped CSX train"

By | February 21, 2022

 

"Injuries in Massachusetts incident described as non-life-threatening"

FTA: "SPENCER, Mass. — Three people were injured when a Loram rail grinder collided with a stopped CSX freight train early Sunday morning, requiring some of the injured to be freed by first responders.

WCVB-TV reports a CSX statement indicated the accident occurred about 1:30 a.m. Spencer Fire and Emergency Services wrote on Facebook the three injured parties were transported to UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester, Mass., with non-life-threatening injuries..."

Apparently, this weekend was not as peaceful as it seemed? Whistling  This story was carried by a TRAINS Newswire by-line, but was not 'published' in the NEWSWIRE section?

 

 

 


 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy