Trains.com

CSX to reactivate Hulsey Yard, frustrating neighbors’ dreams for site

2699 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2008
  • 2,325 posts
CSX to reactivate Hulsey Yard, frustrating neighbors’ dreams for site
Posted by rdamon on Friday, February 21, 2020 4:40 PM

https://atlanta.curbed.com/2020/2/21/21147228/atlanta-csx-hulsey-yard-activation-masterplan-transit

“The type of operations that are going in there are going to be very different than folks were used to with the intermodal operations,” said CSX spokesman Bryan Tucker. “It will be what we call a TRANSFLO facility.”

 

  • Member since
    June 2019
  • 313 posts
Posted by Juniata Man on Friday, February 21, 2020 7:11 PM

This still leaves the former Tilford Yard as a big real estate development play.  There is a lot of development already taking place to the north and west of Tilford and I'd not be at all surprised if this area becomes the next "Atlantic Station" style development in Atlanta.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, March 3, 2020 6:19 PM

I say great for CSX.  Who are these people who think they can take someone else's property on a whim?

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, March 3, 2020 7:16 PM

How dare CSX use their own property for their own benefit. SoapBox Dripping with sarcasm.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, March 3, 2020 10:01 PM

More on Transflo operations here:

http://www.transflo.net/index.cfm/about-us/

IMHO it definitely makes sense to "outsource" this.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, March 3, 2020 10:21 PM

Overmod
More on Transflo operations here:

http://www.transflo.net/index.cfm/about-us/

IMHO it definitely makes sense to "outsource" this.

Transflo is a business unit of CSX - it is not outsourced.  Transflo employees ARE NOT covered by Railroad Retirement.  This is a business tactic the Class 1 carriers have been pursuing for over 30 years.  Set up 'side companies' that can be deemed as not being 'railroad' jobs and the carriers then don't have to pay RRB retirement amounts and can instead pay the lesser SSA amounts.

Similar tactics have been used with Payroll personnel, Real Estate Personnel, Computer personnel and every other department the can be configured OUTSIDE the RRB requirements.  Employees in their 20's think it is great, as they will get more take home - when they age into their 60's it will kick them right in their RETIREMENT.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:03 AM

BaltACD
Employees in their 20's think it is great, as they will get more take home - when they age into their 60's it will kick them right in their RETIREMENT.

You honestly think RRB is going to survive that long? Between outsourcing, PSR, and many guys that will have to go out on disability later in life(the easy retirement yard/local jobs are a thing of the past), etc.  

 

That's if some piece of crap politician doesn't get to it first. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:05 AM

zugmann
 
BaltACD
Employees in their 20's think it is great, as they will get more take home - when they age into their 60's it will kick them right in their RETIREMENT. 

You honestly think RRB is going to survive that long? Between outsourcing, PSR, and many guys that will have to go out on disability later in life(the easy retirement yard/local jobs are a thing of the past), etc.   

That's if some piece of crap politician doesn't get to it first. 

I only hope it lasts long enough to continue to pay me until they scatter my ashes.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Wednesday, March 4, 2020 10:21 AM

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage. 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Wednesday, March 4, 2020 8:45 PM

BaltACD

 

 
zugmann
 
BaltACD
Employees in their 20's think it is great, as they will get more take home - when they age into their 60's it will kick them right in their RETIREMENT. 

You honestly think RRB is going to survive that long? Between outsourcing, PSR, and many guys that will have to go out on disability later in life(the easy retirement yard/local jobs are a thing of the past), etc.   

That's if some piece of crap politician doesn't get to it first. 

 

I only hope it lasts long enough to continue to pay me until they scatter my ashes.

 

And I hope that's a long, long time from now.

Also don't forget the hit RRB will take when the T part of T, E & Y* takes a big hit in employment numbers. 

*Train, Engine & Yard employees.  The T being conductors and brakemen in road service.

Jeff

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Sunday, March 8, 2020 9:32 PM

CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?

charlie hebdo

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage. 

 

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Sunday, March 8, 2020 9:49 PM

rrnut282

CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?

 
charlie hebdo

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage. 

 

 

 

rrnut282

CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?

 
charlie hebdo

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage. 

 

 

 

rrnut282

CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?

 
charlie hebdo

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage. 

 

 

 

Somehow the NIMBYs and BANANAs will start a witchhunt with the noise and light police.

Placement in the center of town makes perfect sense. Most of the end users are nowhere near a rail spur. (and most of those that have spurs don't take care of those  spurs anyhow, ignoring the duties of a track owner connected to the interstate rail system.)

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, March 8, 2020 10:18 PM

rrnut282
CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?
charlie hebdo

"Only 20-25 trucks per day instead of hundreds"  That sounds like a minor use just to hold on the the acreage.

It is CSX property to use as THEY see fit.  If they didn't use the property for anything - IT IS STILL THEIR PROPERTY.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, March 9, 2020 2:27 AM

rrnut282
CSX making use of their property, however middling, seems to upset you, why?

Might be a ploy to get a higher price. 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, March 9, 2020 10:11 AM

It may be CSX did not want the property to be infil housing ?  A few weeks ago there was talk of using part of the property as a new Amtrak and possible HSR station.  That might work but only if enough land availale N - S for installing a  E - W ballon track . The station could have been 1 - 2 miles east of downtown close to the MARTA line stations.

That appears to be off the table ?

  • Member since
    December 2019
  • 292 posts
Posted by divebardave on Monday, March 9, 2020 5:47 PM

BaltACD
Yes it was a big incentive when NS opened a new Intermodal Yard in Maple Hts Ohio about 12 years ago. Many of the "Container Jockeys" are indeed Minorities who live nearby in a longtime declining suberb of Cleveland and come from the inner city. But as far as I know they work for "Container Port" and not NS. This was a problem that Railway Express Agency had when there workers were classified as railroad employees and not trucking employees. A series of strikes put them under as having higher labor costs then UPS. REA could have survived the containerisation that UPS and Fed Ex morphed into. REA in the 1970s was moving a lot of its stuff by air .

 

 
Overmod
More on Transflo operations here:

http://www.transflo.net/index.cfm/about-us/

IMHO it definitely makes sense to "outsource" this.

 

Transflo is a business unit of CSX - it is not outsourced.  Transflo employees ARE NOT covered by Railroad Retirement.  This is a business tactic the Class 1 carriers have been pursuing for over 30 years.  Set up 'side companies' that can be deemed as not being 'railroad' jobs and the carriers then don't have to pay RRB retirement amounts and can instead pay the lesser SSA amounts.

Similar tactics have been used with Payroll personnel, Real Estate Personnel, Computer personnel and every other department the can be configured OUTSIDE the RRB requirements.  Employees in their 20's think it is great, as they will get more take home - when they age into their 60's it will kick them right in their RETIREMENT.

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy