Trains.com

Another Amtrak train separation

2150 views
20 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2017
  • From: I've been everywhere, man
  • 4,269 posts
Another Amtrak train separation
Posted by SD70Dude on Thursday, November 22, 2018 5:47 PM

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Thursday, November 22, 2018 9:26 PM

That very thing happened to me back in the early 80s, while I was running for Metra.  I brought a F7 light engine from the diesel ramp in Chicago (M19-A) to the California Avenue coach yard, where we backed on to our train. We coupled in, did the usual two stretches, and got everything connected (or so we thought). Everything was fine all the way downtown to the depot, and then all the way on welded rail to Waukegan.

North of Waukegan the rail is 39' jointed stick rail, and the F7's had a deserved reputation for really slamming the rails, especially with a side-to-side motion (made for a horrible ride).

Well, this one day something went awry. It was late fall, and we were due in Kenosha at 1930, so it was quite dark out. Just as we crossed the state line into Kenosha, and while going 70mph, bang went the air. When I looked back, I was rather surprised to see no train. Six coaches loaded with passengers behind the locomotive had disappeared into the darkness. Although even before I stopped I had begun to suspect the reason, due to the extremely long stopping distance of the lonely locomotive.

From the time the Conductor began walking up to the locomotve, then backed us down to the coaches, then checked that the rest of the train was unaffected (everything still on the rails, no passengers had gotten off), we tied on, and hooked up all the cables (M.U., 440V, communication) and the hoses. We ended up about an hour late into town, and the train crew were none too happy about having to do some of the reconnection work while still in uniform.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Thursday, November 22, 2018 9:27 PM

A "...mechanical issue?"  Yeah, I guess you could call it that...  Whistling

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, November 22, 2018 9:41 PM

Firelock76
A "...mechanical issue?"  Yeah, I guess you could call it that...  Whistling

Amtrak doesn't use the heavy duty 'safety' chains that once adorned heavyweight passenger cars.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • 2,515 posts
Posted by Electroliner 1935 on Thursday, November 22, 2018 9:58 PM

zardoz
and hooked up all the cables (M.U., 440V, communication) and the hoses.

Supprised that there was no damage to the cables/connectors.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, November 22, 2018 10:14 PM

Electroliner 1935
 
zardoz
and hooked up all the cables (M.U., 440V, communication) and the hoses. 

Supprised that there was no damage to the cables/connectors.

The connections are designed to come apart without damage when a separation happens.  More often than not, they do perform as intended.

It is not uncommon for some of those connections to come apart on their own without a train separation.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • 399 posts
Posted by seppburgh2 on Thursday, November 22, 2018 10:40 PM

It's those darn NMRA couplers, would never happen with Kadees.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Rhododendron, OR
  • 1,516 posts
Posted by challenger3980 on Friday, November 23, 2018 4:02 AM

seppburgh2

It's those darn NMRA couplers, would never happen with Kadees.

 

 

Ugly as they are, those X2F couplers stay coupled more reliably than Kadees, but remote uncoupling sure is a PITA.

 

Doug

May your flanges always stay BETWEEN the rails

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Friday, November 23, 2018 4:59 AM

I saw this happen on the Chessie Steam Special back when I was a kid riding in the Super Dome car.   Older cars, coupler breaks.    On the Chessie Steam Special the disconnected portion went into braking mode as it should but the first half of the Special stopped faster and both sections collided again in loud crash and jerk motion......some folks were knocked off their feet and we of course ended up with tossed salad for lunch.

They blamed it on uneven rail as we were going over a bridge over a river.   To this day I have absolutely no clue what that would have to do with an uncoupling.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, November 23, 2018 6:52 AM

CMStPnP
They blamed it on uneven rail as we were going over a bridge over a river.   To this day I have absolutely no clue what that would have to do with an uncoupling.

Unless the couplers are "tight lock," it's possible they could bypass each other vertically.  Particularly if they are already a little off. 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Friday, November 23, 2018 9:18 AM

seppburgh2

It's those darn NMRA couplers, would never happen with Kadees.

 

Good one!  Wish I'd thought of that!  Bow

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Friday, November 23, 2018 9:25 AM

BaltACD

 

 
Electroliner 1935
 
zardoz
and hooked up all the cables (M.U., 440V, communication) and the hoses. 

Supprised that there was no damage to the cables/connectors.

 

The connections are designed to come apart without damage when a separation happens.  More often than not, they do perform as intended.

It is not uncommon for some of those connections to come apart on their own without a train separation.

 

When those 440's come apart while under load they make quite an awesome electrical display, especially at night.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Friday, November 23, 2018 9:31 AM

tree68

 

 
CMStPnP
They blamed it on uneven rail as we were going over a bridge over a river.   To this day I have absolutely no clue what that would have to do with an uncoupling.

 

Unless the couplers are "tight lock," it's possible they could bypass each other vertically.  Particularly if they are already a little off. 

 

Had that happen to me a few times also, mostly when there is little or no 'stretch' to the slack, such as drifting along in lower throttle positions, or when transitioning from power to dynamics, on relatively poor track with lots of high/low spots that gets the cars to 'bounce'.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, November 23, 2018 11:26 AM

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25349181/rensselaer-polytechnic-institute-lineman-reuben-clarke-lauded-stopping-detached-train-cars

So, they added a couple cars in Albany-Rensselaer and it was those cars that separated.  Did the pin not drop or was the pin locking feature of the coupler not working right.  It keeps the pin from working it's way toward "uncouple"?

The whole train should have gone into emergency, but the guy's description doesn't match.  They HAD to do and apply and release on the train...didn't they?

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 23, 2018 11:36 AM

oltmannd

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25349181/rensselaer-polytechnic-institute-lineman-reuben-clarke-lauded-stopping-detached-train-cars

So, they added a couple cars in Albany-Rensselaer and it was those cars that separated.  Did the pin not drop or was the pin locking feature of the coupler not working right.  It keeps the pin from working it's way toward "uncouple"?

The whole train should have gone into emergency, but the guy's description doesn't match.  They HAD to do and apply and release on the train...didn't they?

The different segments of the separated train have diffent mass.  Despite going into emergency at the same time - the segment with the larger mass will move further before coming to a stop than will the smaller segment.

The UP's Tornado derailment from 2008 is the best representation of this.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, November 23, 2018 1:45 PM

oltmannd
The whole train should have gone into emergency, but the guy's description doesn't match. They HAD to do and apply and release on the train...didn't they?

I'm sure it went into the hole.  Just those first few seconds until the brakes become effective can seem like a lot.  Either way, good for the guy dumping it anyhow (even if there was nothing left to dump).

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, November 23, 2018 6:33 PM

zugmann
Either way, good for the guy dumping it anyhow (even if there was nothing left to dump).

+1 Agree.

 

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Friday, November 23, 2018 6:36 PM

BaltACD

 

 
oltmannd

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25349181/rensselaer-polytechnic-institute-lineman-reuben-clarke-lauded-stopping-detached-train-cars

So, they added a couple cars in Albany-Rensselaer and it was those cars that separated.  Did the pin not drop or was the pin locking feature of the coupler not working right.  It keeps the pin from working it's way toward "uncouple"?

The whole train should have gone into emergency, but the guy's description doesn't match.  They HAD to do and apply and release on the train...didn't they?

 

The different segments of the separated train have diffent mass.  Despite going into emergency at the same time - the segment with the larger mass will move further before coming to a stop than will the smaller segment.

The UP's Tornado derailment from 2008 is the best representation of this.

 

Not quite the same thing with a passenger train because all the equipment has the same braking ratio.  

On freight trains, locomotives and empty cars have high ratios, loaded ones, low.  So it's not uncommon to see what that UP tornado split train shows...

Freight locos can have different types of power knockout for train-caused emergencies.  Often, the engineer retains some power so that he can try to run away from the rear of the train.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 23, 2018 8:26 PM

oltmannd
 
BaltACD
 
oltmannd

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/25349181/rensselaer-polytechnic-institute-lineman-reuben-clarke-lauded-stopping-detached-train-cars

So, they added a couple cars in Albany-Rensselaer and it was those cars that separated.  Did the pin not drop or was the pin locking feature of the coupler not working right.  It keeps the pin from working it's way toward "uncouple"?

The whole train should have gone into emergency, but the guy's description doesn't match.  They HAD to do and apply and release on the train...didn't they? 

The different segments of the separated train have diffent mass.  Despite going into emergency at the same time - the segment with the larger mass will move further before coming to a stop than will the smaller segment.

The UP's Tornado derailment from 2008 is the best representation of this.

 

Not quite the same thing with a passenger train because all the equipment has the same braking ratio.  

On freight trains, locomotives and empty cars have high ratios, loaded ones, low.  So it's not uncommon to see what that UP tornado split train shows...

Freight locos can have different types of power knockout for train-caused emergencies.  Often, the engineer retains some power so that he can try to run away from the rear of the train.

My understanding is that the PC switch on locomotives keep the engines operating and pulling for 30 seconds (or there abouts) after a train initiated UDE - in the attempt to 'out run' the balance of the train.  Not always successful.  Even with the same braking ratios - the greater the mass, the greater the distance to stop.  In passenger service, the above discriped PC Switch operation will normally allow both segments of the train to stop without impacting each other.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,190 posts
Posted by mvlandsw on Friday, November 23, 2018 10:08 PM

Keeping power on after an UDE is useful for keeping the train stretched when using power or bunched when using dynamic braking more than trying to run away from part of the train. You don't usually know if the train has separated or just an air hose has popped.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,190 posts
Posted by mvlandsw on Friday, November 23, 2018 10:13 PM

I used to run the PAT Train in Pittsburgh with a GP9 on each end. One day the rear unit cut itself off while going through a rough interlocking on the P&LE. The coupler pin on the engine worked its way up bouncing over the rough track.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy