http://www.thestate.com/news/local/article198332739.html
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Very bad.
Appears to be a head-on judging by the relative position of the underailed part of the passenger train. Very substantial apparent damage to the power on the CSX freight, very little on the visible portion of the Amtrak power, which is a bit surprising considering what I'd expect from monocoque construction. Note the severe compression artifact visible in the shell of the leading passenger car.
This will be interesting to reconstruct, I think.
My thoughts are with those killed, who I'm afraid are likely to be enginemen, and the injured.
I noticed that myself, the lead CSX units are torn to shreds, while the Amtrak locomotive from appearances seems to be fairly intact. Very strange.
I suppose we'll just have to wait for the investigation to find out how this happened.
Prayers for the victims, and sincere sympathies for their families.
It looks as though the Amtrak engine overroad the tops of the freight engines. I wonder if the freight was standing still or nearly so. I have not seen any other photos. I wonder if the Amtrak train jacknifed in places.
Through back channels I have heard that there was a Signal Suspension in effect on the territory the previous day - it is not known if the Signal Suspension was STILL in effect when this incident happened.
Firelock76 I noticed that myself, the lead CSX units are torn to shreds, while the Amtrak locomotive from appearances seems to be fairly intact. Very strange. I suppose we'll just have to wait for the investigation to find out how this happened. Prayers for the victims, and sincere sympathies for their families.
P.S. Additional story and photos linked @http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/02/04/amtrak-csx-trains-collide-in-south-carolina-injuries-reported.html
The photos show exactly what Overmod indicated, as to the damage resulting to the CSX Power and the Amtrak #47 power . The photos indicate that the collision might have happened at a switch on the yard tracks or the head on was a glancing blow as the trains met (in area of restricted clearances (?)
Firelock76I suppose we'll just have to wait for the investigation to find out how this happened.
A little comic relief in the middle of this developing tragedy was a fine note to strike.
It looks like the entire cab of 47 is caved in from close ups now finding their way to the internet. I suspect the Amtrak crew are the fatalities here.
Based on the lack of derailment on the part of the freight, it looks like it might've been stopped.
The angle I have seen does not really show the front of the AMTK engine well, but it appears that there could be huge damage to me. It looks that the nose/cab section could be essentially flattened or sheared off. CNN now reporting both dead are AMTK employees.
BaltDC, what is a "signal suspension?"
Still in training.
Overmod Firelock76 I suppose we'll just have to wait for the investigation to find out how this happened. A little comic relief in the middle of this developing tragedy was a fine note to strike.
Firelock76 I suppose we'll just have to wait for the investigation to find out how this happened.
Don't misunderstand, (and maybe you don't) but I wasn't trying to be funny.
One thing that concerns me is when the investigation's done the news cycle will have moved on, and more than moved on, and if we get to hear about the results it'll only be if "Trains" reports it.
From that Fox News piece I get the impression the CSX train was partially fouling the main line.
Yes, CNN now reporting the freight was stationary.
I see photos showing that the Amtrak train did ineed jacknife in at least one location where two cars are displaced from the line of the train. That would tend to indicate a higher impact speed than what is evident at the head end.
Firelock76Don't misunderstand, (and maybe you don't) but I wasn't trying to be funny.
Nothing about the accident was funny. It was you saying we'd have to wait for the investigation to start being educated here about its causes. Did you really, seriously, think that would be the case?
2018 off to a wicked start..gremlins and demons.
Easy Overmod; pull in your talons!
Overmod Firelock76 Don't misunderstand, (and maybe you don't) but I wasn't trying to be funny. Nothing about the accident was funny. It was you saying we'd have to wait for the investigation to start being educated here about its causes. Did you really, seriously, think that would be the case?
Firelock76 Don't misunderstand, (and maybe you don't) but I wasn't trying to be funny.
When I say "...wait for the investigation..." that's strictly in the interest of fairness. Remember the old saying about how news reports are merely the "first draft" of history? While it seems pretty oblious to all at this time the cause of the accident may very well be a partially blocked mainline the "Who, what, when, where, why, and how" and apportionment of blame still has to be gotten into.
If you say it's a little ridiculous for an accident report to take two years to finalize I've got no argument with you there. I believe it was Don Phillips in one of his columns who said that air accident investigators get a little nervous if they don't have a good handle on an incident within 48 hours. I would think a rail accident would be a little easier to investigate, but what do I know? It's not my line of work.
LithoniaOperator BaltDC, what is a "signal suspension?"
It's when they take signals out of service for a variety of reasons. The size of the suspension depends on what they are doing. It could be as small as a control point or miles long involving multiple blocks. Within the suspension the block signals no longer govern or protect movements. (When we do it, temporary flagmen locations are established by bulletin and a type of manual absolute blocking is used. You can't pass a flagman without permission and the flagman can't grant it until the next flagman has verified any train or engine has cleared his location. The first and last signals in service are specified in the bulletin and trains are to approach the first in service/end of suspension prepared to stop.) Signals out of service may be dark, hooded, or just left on and disregarded. Signals protecting railroad crossings at grade and drawbridges are usually not part of any suspension and remain in service.
Jeff
Goodtiming Easy Overmod; pull in your talons!
It's OK, I've got a thick skin and don't claim to be a fount of wisdom, plus Overmod and I go back a ways so I don't take anything he says personally. Nor do I have to get the last word in.
We're all pretty angry about this, I've guessed that much. I mean, here we are well into the second decade of the 21st Century and with all the technology available to us why do things like this still happen? I was ready to cut loose with a "Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot" tirade myself this morning over this horror, but took a deep breath and got control of myself before I did.
Near as I can determine this is where it occurred.
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.9741687,-81.0508551,294m/data=!3m1!1e3
North end of the CSX Cayce yard. Freight was parked on the West track. I first suspected that the freight was fowling the switch from the single track north of here but looking at the view of the area, it appears to be a head on on the west track. If signals not working, bad news. Crew may not have known the freight was there. Wonder what orders they had. Waiting on STB.
Train had just left Columbia SC 25 minutes late.
https://asm.transitdocs.com/train/2018/2/3/91
Firelock76When I say "...wait for the investigation..." that's strictly in the interest of fairness. ... If you say it's a little ridiculous for an accident report to take two years to finalize I've got no argument with you there.
You mistake the gist of my comment, alas! I was merely pointing out that at least one poster in this thread will surely have the thing solved, right down to the engineers' thoughts, motivations, and perhaps alien interference, perhaps in mere days. With or without any we-don't-need-no-steenkin'-NTSB input.
IOW the comment was not directed at Wayne in any raptor sense whatsoever (nor would any comment of mine likely ever be). Perhaps I should be more liberal with the emoticons in future.
It is reported that the Amtrak train was on the wrong track, and the freight was standing with nobody on board. The track was referred to as a "side track." The Amtrak train collided at 59 mph impact speed.
A very great tragedy! The NTSB will do a very thorough investigation.
Ed Burns
Hey Overmod, at least no-one's blaming this on Islamic terrorists, or alt-right terrorists, or Code Pink, or what ever loon-of-the-week group may be running around loose out there.
At least not that we're aware of, anyway.
Firelock76At least not that we're aware of, anyway.
Don't look at facebook comments, then.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
Euclid It is reported that the Amtrak train was on the wrong track, and the freight was standing with nobody on board. The track was referred to as a "side track." The Amtrak train collided at 59 mph impact speed.
If the Amtrak train was on the wrong track, who most likely would have been at fault? Also, how likely is it that the engineer knew or should have known that he or she was on the wrong track?
Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII
zugmann Firelock76 At least not that we're aware of, anyway. Don't look at facebook comments, then.
Firelock76 At least not that we're aware of, anyway.
Don't worry, I never do. I don't do the Facebook. At all. Ever.
Firelock76 Hey Overmod, at least no-one's blaming this on Islamic terrorists, or alt-right terrorists, or Code Pink, or what ever loon-of-the-week group may be running around loose out there. At least not that we're aware of, anyway.
Wayne, Firelock76 , Those very facts, by themselves should lessen the hyper-ventilation by the MSM's, reportage by at least a week(?) The information provided bhy Jeff H. was pretty thorough on the potential aspects of a 'Signal Suspension' ( UPRR and CSX rules on that,one would suspect ,would possibly be similar(?).
Looking at the map of the Cayce(SC.) area, and yard seem to indicate possibly a place, maintained to 'yard' local freight traffic; or establish 'meets' between passing trains. The CSX train has been reported as 'parked' or 'standing without a crew'. Whichever it was, that, possibly saved some lives(?).
It would be interesting[IMHO] to know what kind of 'orders' from CSX Dispatch the AMTK #91 was operating under at that time of the morning. If the CSX train was fouling the tracks used by it, how long had it been 'standing' at that location. Did anyone "know' if the CSX train was at that location, if so for how long? Lots of questions and very few answers at this time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fp36W9L741E&feature=youtu.be
Sad to hear of the passing of the Amtrak employees. From the pics, I assumed it was CSX crewmen who had died.
Just curious, what CSX engine is now scrap metal after that collision? There doesn't appear to be enough left to read the number.
I am suprised they are still allowing road traffic over that bridge.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.