Trains.com

News Wire: CSX board set to adopt proposal on CEO physical exam requirement

4214 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Monday, January 29, 2018 11:45 AM

 

From the twelfth post from the top by Murphy Siding, I quoted myself as I was quoted there by Murphy Siding.  In combination with the quote of myself, I quoted Murphy Siding.  Then the system displayed the two quotes as one quote by me.  I did not notice that it had done that, and don’t understand why it would combine two quotes into one.  I any case, I will delete the post where it was displayed.  I don’t want anything to be unclear.    

 

Moderator
  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 217 posts
Posted by Angela Pusztai-Pasternak on Monday, January 29, 2018 11:18 AM

PLEASE NOTE: If you quote someone, be sure the attribution is accurate. Make changes as necessary to posts above. 

 

Thanks,

Ang

Angela Pusztai-Pasternak, Production Editor, Trains Magazine

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 27, 2018 1:19 PM

Overmod
I do not quite see why a 'common-sense' assumption would be the $84M was not paid, when it was very clear that EHH demanded payment before he would take up the position (I do not remember the exact wording, but the sense was very clear). The EHH I knew, being no fool, would ensure the transaction was 'done', and not just promised in dribs and drabs, before agreeing to serve. The only real common-sense assertion is that he banked the payment, and it is now 'to his family's account' beyond the reach of any foreseeable recapture. Which is as it should be in this situation. And, not importantly but incidentally, just what I would have done in this situation. In the world's second oldest form of professional business it's just as much a principle to lock down getting the money first... not any kind of promise instead.

 

You can lock down getting the money as a condition of accepting the job.  But the money does not necessarily have to be paid out with no conditions at the onset.  What if the prospective employee just takes the money and says he changed his mind and now resigns a day layer?  What if he dies a day after accepting the job?

All of these one-sentence characterizations of how Harrison demanded $84-million before he would take the job mean nothing more than what people want to believe.  I suspect the actual transaction is accompanied with about 75 pages of contract language.  That is what I mean by common sense.  

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, January 27, 2018 12:02 PM

I do not quite see why a 'common-sense' assumption would be the $84M was not paid, when it was very clear that EHH demanded payment before he would take up the position (I do not remember the exact wording, but the sense was very clear).  The EHH I knew, being no fool, would ensure the transaction was 'done', and not just promised in dribs and drabs, before agreeing to serve.  The only real common-sense assertion is that he banked the payment, and it is now 'to his family's account' beyond the reach of any foreseeable recapture.

Which is as it should be in this situation.  And, not importantly but incidentally, just what I would have done in this situation.  In the world's second oldest form of professional business it's just as much a principle to lock down getting the money first... not any kind of promise instead.

What I am waiting for is this: do stockholders at the next annual meeting have the right to see the formal text of EHH's contract, "privacy" not applying as presumably CSX or its stockholder-accountable management was a signatory?  And, if the text were available to activist stockholders for more than, say, about 50 minutes, will at least one copy appear 'for promulgation' on Wikileaks or some other Net resource?

I have the popcorn paraphernalia ready.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 27, 2018 11:48 AM

.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 27, 2018 11:21 AM

.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 27, 2018 11:18 AM

Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

 
Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
 

It is my assumption based on common sense.  It could be wrong.  Where did you learn tha the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

 

 

 
I suggest you read page 9 of CSX's form 10Q for the third quarter of 2017.  It turns out that CSX actually paid Mantle Ridge as reimbursement for payments to EHH. 
 

Can you provide a link? 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Saturday, January 27, 2018 11:09 AM

Euclid

 

 
Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
 

It is my assumption based on common sense.  It could be wrong.  Where did you learn tha the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

 

 
I suggest you read page 9 of CSX's form 10Q for the third quarter of 2017.  It turns out that CSX actually paid Mantle Ridge as reimbursement for payments to EHH. 
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 27, 2018 10:59 AM

zugmann
 
Euclid
It is my assumption based on common sense. It could be wrong. Where did you learn that the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

 

I heard he got the $84 million in pennies.

 

Cool! Cool

     At 145 pennies to the pound, that's about 57,931,034#, or about 28,966 tons. That equals something around 315 carloads. I wonder if they shipped them in gondolas or covered hoppers?

     When I sell out for $84 million I'm going to ask for it all in one dollar bills. I think I can get all of those in one boxcar.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 27, 2018 10:48 AM

Euclid
 
Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 

 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
 

 

 

It is my assumption based on common sense.  It could be wrong.  Where did you learn that the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

 

Where did you learn it didn't?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,546 posts
Posted by zugmann on Saturday, January 27, 2018 10:12 AM

Euclid
It is my assumption based on common sense. It could be wrong. Where did you learn that the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

I heard he got the $84 million in pennies.

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 27, 2018 10:11 AM

Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 

 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
 

It is my assumption based on common sense.  It could be wrong.  Where did you learn that the $84-million has been paid out and is lost to CSX?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 27, 2018 9:53 AM

Dakguy201
 
Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 

 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
 

We didn't. euclid made it up. It seems obvious to him that Harrison had a bucket list and got paid the $84 million in increments as each item was marked off.
Item 14: Distribute tinfoil hats...... check

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Saturday, January 27, 2018 9:38 AM

Euclid

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  The $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

 

 
Where did we learn that EHH did not get all of the money on day 1?  That is new information, and considering it was compensation for what he left behind, I have my doubts it is correct.
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 27, 2018 9:25 AM

Murphy Siding
 
Euclid
..................I think we need to see the contract before we jump to conclusions. 
 

 

 

    Laugh Laugh LaughLaugh Laugh Laugh

      Who are you, and what have you done with euclid?

 

 

Well if you think I should be jumping to a conclusion, I will jump to one.  I will assume that the $84-million has not been completely paid out by CSX.  It has only been paid out in some proportion equal to the work that Harrison did before he died.  So there is no financial injustice here.  Nothing to see here except another anti-EHH conspiracy. 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, January 27, 2018 8:38 AM

Euclid
..................I think we need to see the contract before we jump to conclusions. 
 

    Laugh Laugh LaughLaugh Laugh Laugh

      Who are you, and what have you done with euclid?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, January 26, 2018 9:41 PM

Murphy Siding
 
Euclid

 

You can’t really go by innuendo.  I doubt that this call for CEO physical exams is related to the alleged premise that Harrison collected an $84-million cash payment for work promised, and then died before fulfilling his promise.  That sounds like anti-EHH spin. 

 

 

 

 

Gee wiz! What do you think is behind this call for CEO physical exams?

Apparently, John P. Fishwick, Jr. is behind it. It sounds like he has some ideological issues with CEO pay in general.  Obviously he did not think Harrison deserved the money.  Maybe he is in the anti-Harrison camp.   

This issue of Harrison suddenly dying would not be an issue if it were not for the allegation that Harrison took the money without finishing what he was paid to do. 

Anybody can die.  No physical exam will guarantee that a person won’t die before completing a job.  So what is the complaint here?  It is that Harrison took the $84-million payment without finishing the job.  That is the grievance.     

It is being made to sound as if Harrison refused to reveal his medical condition in order to trick CSX into paying him $84-million for something he knew he could not finish because he was dying. 

Harrison may have insisted on the $84-million, but that does not mean it was handed over with no strings attached. Nobody is going to hand over that much money just because someone agrees to come to work and is free to disappear once they get the cash.  I think we need to see the contract before we jump to conclusions. 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Friday, January 26, 2018 8:51 PM

Murphy Siding

 

 
Euclid

 

You can’t really go by innuendo.  I doubt that this call for CEO physical exams is related to the alleged premise that Harrison collected an $84-million cash payment for work promised, and then died before fulfilling his promise.  That sounds like anti-EHH spin. 

 

 

 

 

Gee wiz! What do you think is behind this call for CEO physical exams?

 

 

I have the impression that the Board is putting a good belt, and suspenders as well, on their pants. That he was to be hired without having a physical exam should have put a smell in the air, especially since it was known that he had health problems.

That the proposal to hire him stated that there was to be no physical exam does not sound right to me. But, nobody involved asked me.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, January 26, 2018 8:40 PM

Euclid

 

You can’t really go by innuendo.  I doubt that this call for CEO physical exams is related to the alleged premise that Harrison collected an $84-million cash payment for work promised, and then died before fulfilling his promise.  That sounds like anti-EHH spin. 

 

 

Gee wiz! What do you think is behind this call for CEO physical exams?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,546 posts
Posted by Overmod on Friday, January 26, 2018 7:42 PM

The premise has nothing to do with any 'promise'.  Hunter made it clear that an unconditional $84 million was to be paid with no medical 'conditions' and within a short timeframe or he would not take the reins.  The argument is solely that the approval of this was done without effective 'due diligence' into the key man's health or expected longevity  part of the pig-in-a-poke arrangement.

This is not a Hunter-bashing exercise, except insofar as concerns some moral obligation to observe the no-compete agreement.  As that appears to be financial-incentive based, I don't really blame EHH for seeking to be made whole for the $84 million he gave up to take the position.  (Although I thought then, and still do, that as the primary benefit from the Hunterizations was to Mantle Ridge, that company should have provided most of the 'enablement' to get their golden boy on staff, as it were.)

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Friday, January 26, 2018 6:17 PM

 

You can’t really go by innuendo.  I doubt that this call for CEO physical exams is related to the alleged premise that Harrison collected an $84-million cash payment for work promised, and then died before fulfilling his promise.  That sounds like anti-EHH spin. 

 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:47 AM

Norm,

You are always a stickler for people providing the facts.  I think this is a great example of missing facts.  So I am surprised at your indifference.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Thursday, January 25, 2018 9:28 AM

When you find the facts please let us know.  Criminals are a dime-a-dozen whether they wear coats and ties or hoodies.

Norm


  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:42 AM

The Newswire piece insinuates that Harrison misrepresented his health, collected an $84-million payment for a term of contract, and then died before completing his obligations under the contract.  It almost makes it seem like a crime was committed. What are the actual facts here?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,567 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:08 AM

JPS1
 
The notion that the board members - individually and collectively - knew about Harrison's health is a bit of a stretch.  Unless you were privy to any board discussions regarding the employment of Harrison, all you have in your corner is speculation.
 
 

From the CSX article linked above:

Harrison had refused to submit to a company physical or provide his medical records to the board before he was hired in March.

It was later revealed that Harrison had an undisclosed medical condition that required him to use supplemental oxygen.


       This suggests that at least some on the board had been asking about his health prior to hiring him. It also suggests he was hiding his health issues. When the details were later revealed, at least one board member had to pipe up and say "See!  I told you so!" I think it's hard to say that it's all 20/20 hindsight when CSX gives these clues that they knew his health might have been an issue.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,085 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, January 24, 2018 9:17 PM

JPS1
 
BaltACD
 JPS1 I am not a lawyer, but I believe the plaintiffs would have to show that the board knew Harrison was in poor health and, therefore, probably would not be able to fulfill his duties.  That would be a very steep hill to climb.  

Anyone that drags around a oxygen bottle to do their daily duties is in poor health!  Not much of a hill.  

I know several people in the retirement community where I live who take periodic hits on supplemental oxygen and have lived a long time.

Living in a Retirement community and running a Forbes 500 company are worlds apart in the meaning of being healthy.

Ackman cashed out of CP in August 2016 and EHH left (or was shown the door) shortly thereafter.  Was CP telling EHH he was not physically fit enough to continue - without making the news public and without allowing him to rake in his various bonus payments.  Hilal, Ackman's protege taps the invalid to spearhead his play for CSX.  Two sick individuals.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,180 posts
Posted by Euclid on Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:45 PM

Thanks JPS1.  I will read the link, but your comments are what I was getting at.  I can't believe they just handed over 84 million to someone who only promised to come to work the first day. 

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Texas
  • 1,544 posts
Posted by PJS1 on Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:33 PM

Euclid

Can sombody cite some documentation that shows how the payment of this $84 million has been paid out, or if it is due to be paid out in full? 

Here is a link to a starter:  http://fortune.com/2017/03/24/csx-hunter-harrison-pay/

Without access to Harrison's employment agreement, it is impossible to know the exact terms of his employment contract.

Folks seem to be worked up about the $84 million paid to Harrison to compensate him for the deferred CP compensation that he left on the table when he left CP.

It needs to be put into perspective.  Assuming it is being or was to be amortized over four years, the money paid to get Harrison to join CSX would be equal to 70/100s of one percent of the companys 2016 cash flows from operations.  It is not much in the scheme of things.  More importantly, if Harrison or his legacy brings about the improvements anticipated by the board, the $84 million plus his compensation package will have been well worth the investment. 

Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII

  • Member since
    February 2016
  • From: Texas
  • 1,544 posts
Posted by PJS1 on Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:28 PM

BaltACD
 JPS1 I am not a lawyer, but I believe the plaintiffs would have to show that the board knew Harrison was in poor health and, therefore, probably would not be able to fulfill his duties.  That would be a very steep hill to climb.  

Anyone that drags around a oxygen bottle to do their daily duties is in poor health!  Not much of a hill. 

I know several people in the retirement community where I live who take periodic hits on supplemental oxygen and have lived a long time.  Equally important they have not been mentally impaired by their need for oxygen.
 
I have not been able to find any definitive information on the exact cause of Harrison's death.  Most of the news articles attribute it to complications associated with a recent illness.  He could have been carried away by any number of micro-organisms due to a moderate condition that had weakened his ability to fend off bacterial infections. 
 
This year in Texas more than 2,300 people have been killed by the flu.  It can kill a person in a matter of hours.  It tends to take young people and old people who have other issues, but the medical community does not know in advance who will be taken down by the flu.
 
The notion that the board members - individually and collectively - knew about Harrison's health is a bit of a stretch.  Unless you were privy to any board discussions regarding the employment of Harrison, all you have in your corner is speculation.
 
I began my business career with a Wall Street Bank in 1964.  Physical exames were required for new and existing key employees, i.e. professional employees, managers, executives, etc.  Moreover, most key employees were required to have an annual physical examination, which was paid for by the company.   

Many if not most companies have stopped employment and annual physical exams, other than for drug testing, for two reasons.  They are not very effective,  as all of my doctors have admitted, and they run afoul of privacy laws.  

Rio Grande Valley, CFI,CFII

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy