Trains.com

Super Bad News – Brace Yourselves! No More Forums Coming?

6558 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Super Bad News – Brace Yourselves! No More Forums Coming?
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Saturday, May 20, 2017 9:25 PM

Super Bad News – Brace Yourselves!  No More Forums Coming?

In checking my sole thread from a number of years ago at Kalmbach’s Astronomy Magazine, it was discovered those forums no longer exist!  Posting is a thing of the past and past posts are all gone! (When did that happen?)

http://www.astronomy.com/forums

Is Kalmbach’s TRAINS Magazine’s forums next?  Perhaps I should reevaluate how much time is spent posting here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, May 20, 2017 9:50 PM

Never expect anything you value on the net to be permanent.  Expect the things you never wanted to see again to last forever.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Saturday, May 20, 2017 9:55 PM

That would be truly tragic. Can you even begin to imagine the loss of information. 

What do we do? Publish a book Vol 1 to 2089?

Get everything on a disk? 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Sunday, May 21, 2017 12:29 PM

Yes I have seen this happen before.   These forums do not directly generate revenue despite the advertisements, any revenue they generate do not cover costs.   Additionally with public facing forums like this it is publicly embarrassing to the company when forum members argue heatedly.    So the fastest and cheapest solution is to just abandon them or charge a fee for entry.   Noticed that Kalmbach includes the enhanced content areas only for suscribers, they might just add an additional fee and move the discussion forums there vs discontinuance.   Or they can continue with this outlet as a public service but also at a financial loss.   There is no telling if they will maintain or continue but I can tell you from past experience if they decide to pull the plug you will be lucky if there is prior notice.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, May 21, 2017 12:45 PM

When did it happen? Perhaps around July 8, 2014.

http://www.astronomy.com/search?q=FORUMS

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, May 21, 2017 1:46 PM

K. P. Harrier

Super Bad News – Brace Yourselves!  No More Forums Coming?

In checking my sole thread from a number of years ago at Kalmbach’s Astronomy Magazine, it was discovered those forums no longer exist!  Posting is a thing of the past and past posts are all gone! (When did that happen?)

http://www.astronomy.com/forums

Is Kalmbach’s TRAINS Magazine’s forums next?  Perhaps I should reevaluate how much time is spent posting here.

 

Could it be that it disappeared because it had few members and those only made posts every couple of years?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:01 PM

Well, what Kalmbach giveth, Kalmbach can taketh away, so it behooves everyone to behave themselves here.

Thankfully, most do.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:23 PM
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:30 PM

Well all thats needed is an EHH wannabe, cut out the low or non revenue stuff and we are doomed. 

Hopefully this does not happen. I'm thinking there would be quite a howl of protest from the faithful, but as I've noticed in life, people do not vote the way they talk at the coffee shop. I would be willing to pay an annual  fee to be a "Forum Member" if it came down to that. 

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:42 PM

 

I do not believe that Kalmbach ever intended to operate the forum as public service.  Why would anyone do that?  They provide it with the intention of generating revenue in whatever way it can.  One of the ways is to promote their magazine by broadening its subject matter in this public discussion.  However, it may be quite difficult to quantify the contribution to the bottom line by the forums to the extent that they help sell magazines.  And there certainly is the possibility of a decision to close this down because of the mistaken belief that it contributes nothing to the revenue stream.    

 

RME
  • Member since
    March 2016
  • 2,073 posts
Posted by RME on Sunday, May 21, 2017 2:47 PM

Interestingly enough, when you follow one of those 2011 links to look at the 'community', you eventually get to the 'reasons to register' page, and this message:

"Register to become a member of Astronomy.com FOR FREE and get access to these great online features: ...

Share your thoughts on the latest science stories."

This is separate from the preceding item "post comments on blogs" ... so what else could it describe on astronomy.com but the [now-vanished] forum section? 

With that as a common theme, I can see a bunch of possible reasons why the whole schmear might 'have to go away' suddenly and with crApple-like silence for the reasons-why.  They only begin with the sort of user-comportment thing Mr. Sweeney was criticizing over on the Hunter medical thread.  Copyright infringement or hot-link violation for papers?  Religious zealots producing polemical diatribes?  The evolving choice of interpreting post text as something mods weren't supposed to edit - only to delete?  Dueling curmudgeonry escalating ever more from BEmail to O at double-digit magnitude?

K.P. might even remember what, if anything, was controversial at the last time he posted.

I for one would like to know precisely what situation arose, what official cause for termination Kalmbach found, and why the reasons aren't provided to us ... so that none of our forums slip into ther same fate.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 5:05 PM

Murphy Siding
Could it be that it disappeared because it had few members and those only made posts every couple of years?

That's pretty much my take.  Either that, or they made our worst day (behavior-wise) look good...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 6:35 PM

Suppose you had to make an either-or decision.  Your choice is that you can remain a subscriber to the magazine or have access to this forum.  Which would you choose?

I know the folks at Trains work hard to deliver a quality product, and I respect that.  Nevertheless, I'm not at all sure which I would choose.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 6:53 PM

Easy decision for me if it comes to that, I am a "Trains" subscriber and "Classic Trains" as well, so if the price of admission to the Forum is a Kalmbach subscription I'm already there.  I may just go for "Classic Toy Trains" as well but haven't made up my mind on that one yet, although I do enjoy the mag and usually purchase it at my local hobby shop.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, May 21, 2017 7:03 PM

RME

Interestingly enough, when you follow one of those 2011 links to look at the 'community', you eventually get to the 'reasons to register' page, and this message:

"Register to become a member of Astronomy.com FOR FREE and get access to these great online features: ...

Share your thoughts on the latest science stories."

This is separate from the preceding item "post comments on blogs" ... so what else could it describe on astronomy.com but the [now-vanished] forum section? 

With that as a common theme, I can see a bunch of possible reasons why the whole schmear might 'have to go away' suddenly and with crApple-like silence for the reasons-why.  They only begin with the sort of user-comportment thing Mr. Sweeney was criticizing over on the Hunter medical thread.  Copyright infringement or hot-link violation for papers?  Religious zealots producing polemical diatribes?  The evolving choice of interpreting post text as something mods weren't supposed to edit - only to delete?  Dueling curmudgeonry escalating ever more from BEmail to O at double-digit magnitude?

K.P. might even remember what, if anything, was controversial at the last time he posted.

I for one would like to know precisely what situation arose, what official cause for termination Kalmbach found, and why the reasons aren't provided to us ... so that none of our forums slip into ther same fate.

 

      Occam's Razor says, in essence, if there are a lot of theories about how or why something happened, the simplest one is most likely to be true. I doubt that the astronomy forum going away had as much to do with big issues and conspiracies as it probably had to do with lack of interest. Internet forums have been on a downhill path for quite a while.


     It's now more popular to go on Facebook and scream at people you disagree with and call them nasty names. That way you can cut out that bothersome middle part of the conversation where you try to listen to and understand someone else's viewpoint.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: California - moved to North Carolina 2018
  • 4,422 posts
Posted by DSchmitt on Sunday, May 21, 2017 7:11 PM

I think the Railroad/Model Railroad Forums will be around for a while.  While many of the discussions reflect what is in the magazines, they and  others that go further afield show the interests of the community and can influence future magazine content. The give quicker and more broad range feedback than letters, thus are a valuable tool for the editors if the care to use them.  

I tried to sell my two cents worth, but no one would give me a plug nickel for it.

I don't have a leg to stand on.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 7:51 PM

DSchmitt

I think the Railroad/Model Railroad Forums will be around for a while.  While many of the discussions reflect what is in the magazines, they and  others that go further afield show the interests of the community and can influence future magazine content. The give quicker and more broad range feedback than letters, thus are a valuable tool for the editors if the care to use them.  

 

and This as well:Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 6:53 PM

"...Easy decision for me if it comes to that, I am a "Trains" subscriber and "Classic Trains" as well, so if the price of admission to the Forum is a Kalmbach subscription I'm already there.  I may just go for "Classic Toy Trains" as well but haven't made up my mind on that one yet, although I do enjoy the mag and usually purchase it at my local hobby shop..."

Have to agree with both of these positions! 

  Hopefully. in K.P. Harrier's sounding the alarm, it might be a long term (mis-?) reading of the 'tea leaves"(?) 

  But as BaltACD SAID "...Never expect anything you value on the net to be permanent.  Expect the things you never wanted to see again to last forever..."

 After all, this Forum is a Free Service of a 'For Profit enterprise', and its' admission henges in-part on Subscriptions.  Kalmbach can give, and Kalmbach can take away.... Whistling        My 2 Cents

 

 


 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 8:01 PM

DSchmitt

I think the Railroad/Model Railroad Forums will be around for a while.  While many of the discussions reflect what is in the magazines, they and  others that go further afield show the interests of the community and can influence future magazine content. The give quicker and more broad range feedback than letters, thus are a valuable tool for the editors if the care to use them.  

 

Exponding a bit on what Dschmitt said, I'd hope the editors look in on the various Forums from time to time for the reasons Mr. Schmitt gave.  I know on the "Classic Toys Trains" Forum they do, sometimes to make sure everyone plays nice, and sometimes for the ideas and feedback.  I'm sure it's not easy, I mean if you spend all day chained to a computer do you want to be in front of one in the evening when most of the Forum action's happening?  Roger Carp and Bob Keller on "CTT" are to be commended for their interest.  I wish the "Trains" staff would do the same.  Maybe they do, but just don't care to join in.

And thanks for the compliment Sam!

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 8:18 PM

It does seem, on occasion, that something we discuss on the Forum turns up not much later in the magazine...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • 7,968 posts
Posted by K. P. Harrier on Sunday, May 21, 2017 10:32 PM

Florida!

A phenomenon being noted is more and more Florida addresses at this website.  Astronomy Magazine I believe has a Florida address.  Will TRAINS Magazine soon forsake Waukesha in the Milwaukee area of Wisconsin for Florida?  Possibly for cheaper Cuban labor?  Can you imagine someone answering the phone, “TRAINS Magazine … We love Fidel!”  Seriously, it has to be wondered if the whole Kalmbach outfit was sold to a bigger conglomerate in Florida.  Why else would a relatively new Waukesha building that houses Kalmbach move offices to Florida?

A new conglomerate owner may see getting rid of forums as a way of profiting.  And, saving money is the name of the game.

It sure would be enlightening if a TRAINS staffer in the know wrote some input here on all this.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- K.P.’s absolute “theorem” from early, early childhood that he has seen over and over and over again: Those that CAUSE a problem in the first place will act the most violently if questioned or exposed.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Sunday, May 21, 2017 11:04 PM

K.P., the answer could be state taxes.

Wisconsin is still a very high state income tax state.

Florida has no state income tax.

For the same salary a person in Florida will have 6.27% more take home pay.

Of course, there could be other reasons, also.

But that is one for the discussion hopper.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Sunday, May 21, 2017 11:14 PM

tree68

It does seem, on occasion, that something we discuss on the Forum turns up not much later in the magazine...

 

Same could be said of many newspaper discussion forums over the years. I know we had one locally the newspaper staff used to pry for content on a regular basis.  But many have been shut down, going to a Disqus/facebook commment type.  Of course many of those sites were plagued by bands of trolls that had no real lives and only existed to cause trouble, it seems.  I know we have our bad days on here - but this place is downright calm and civil compared ot those sites.

But all the RR discussion sites are ghosts of what they once were, whether it be here, TO, RR.net, etc.   And even if they are active, all it takes is a change of heart and *poof* it's gone.  (anyone remember the Atlas model RR forum?)

So, do we have a designated rallying point to go if we wake up tomorrow and the forum is no more?  Anyone want to create one? 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Sunday, May 21, 2017 11:22 PM

Good idea Zugmann...I'm sure that has entered everyones mind while reading this thread...that and some way to save what has been as there is a heck of a lot of stellar information accumulated. 

Some way to back up what we have and make it portable in case the worst happens. 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, May 21, 2017 11:43 PM

zugmann

 

So, do we have a designated rallying point to go if we wake up tomorrow and the forum is no more?  Anyone want to create one? 

 

Well..........I was going to suggest the astronomy forum, but perhaps not.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Somewhere in North Texas
  • 1,080 posts
Posted by desertdog on Monday, May 22, 2017 12:07 AM
Some readers may remember that at one time there was an Atlas model railroad forum. Every thread turned into a battle of some kind or another. Finally, Atlas got fed up with constantly having to moderate, suspend offenders, etc. and got back to their primary business of making model railroad equipment. Kalmbach is different in that they are in the media business and forums are media. Nonetheless, if they pull the plug on this forum, they can easily justify it based on the number of warnings and locked threads over time. John Timm
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Monday, May 22, 2017 1:00 AM

zugmann

(anyone remember the Atlas model RR forum?)

I remember it was easy to tell when it was offline because of all of the threads here asking about it and it seemed like an army of trolls would descend upon this forum.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, May 22, 2017 7:57 AM

 

    For fun, some enterprising person should start an internet forum for and about trolls. The entertainment value would be built into the forum and it wouldn’t require much in the way of moderation.

      It should be in the bylaws that no one can use their own name and each member has to have a two screen name minimum.

      I can think of an appropriate sponsor right out of the chute- Pissed Off! Energy Drink. (a real product)Mischief

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Vancouver Island, BC
  • 23,330 posts
Posted by selector on Monday, May 22, 2017 9:15 AM

Murphy Siding

 

    For fun, some enterprising person should start an internet forum for and about trolls. The entertainment value would be built into the forum and it wouldn’t require much in the way of moderation.

      It should be in the bylaws that no one can use their own name and each member has to have a two screen name minimum.

      I can think of an appropriate sponsor right out of the chute- Pissed Off! Energy Drink. (a real product)Mischief

 

 

And if it were accessible only by paid-up subscription, it could be an elite trolling site with a better class of troll.  I might even join out of idle curiousity. Stick out tongue

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, May 22, 2017 9:33 AM

selector

 

 
Murphy Siding

 

    For fun, some enterprising person should start an internet forum for and about trolls. The entertainment value would be built into the forum and it wouldn’t require much in the way of moderation.

      It should be in the bylaws that no one can use their own name and each member has to have a two screen name minimum.

      I can think of an appropriate sponsor right out of the chute- Pissed Off! Energy Drink. (a real product)Mischief

 

 

 

 

And it were accessible only by paid-up subscription, it could be an elite trolling site with a better class of troll.  I might even join out of idle curiousity. Stick out tongue

 

just one question!  I thought you both [Selector and Murphy Siding] had had enough of mediating "pig wresllin' matches", and "food fights"..

    Are these posts requests to be thrown back into the fire? Warm-ups for more abuse, and Masochism?  Y'all must have been bored, over this past week-end?

ROFL...!LaughLaugh   Mischief

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Monday, May 22, 2017 10:06 AM

Many (too many) years ago my family had an Atari computer and we were buying all sorts of oddball games for it... anything cheap... from a place known as "C.O.M.B" (a sort of surplus and production overrun store).  One of the games we found for 50 cents was named "Abuse".  This was an interactive text game similar to the game "Eliza", wherein the player typed in sentences and the computer would print something in response. 

I understood how "Eliza" worked in picking apart your input sentence and having standard replies that it could add your sentence to as a reply.  It could conjugate the verbs and such to produce some intelligence in the reply (such as "I am" in the input would become "you are" in the reply).  You might type in, "I want a million dollars" and it would respond with, "What would you do if you got a million dollars".  But if you typed nonsense in, it would reply with the same nonsense, such as, "I had I am I am I am for yesterday" it might reply with "What did you do with you are you are you are for yesterday".

But "Abuse" was much different in that it could come up with replies that were not part of what you typed in, yet were relavent to the subject.  It somehow scored what you typed based on how abusive your statement was.  It did not allow "profane" or "obscene" language, but really encouraged "Don Rickles" type insults.  If you typed, "Ah your mother wears combat boots!" it would respond with "Oh yeah, well your mother has to use both a belt and suspenders to keep her pants up."

My point in bringing this up is that my son played "Abuse" for most of one Saturday afternoon and when he came out of the study he commented,

"I really like 'Abuse'!" 

to which I replied,

"Well, then come over here you big dummy and I'll smack you upside your head."

He has never lived it down!

I have found several versions of "Eliza" on-line and I have the source code so I have executables that will run on a stand-alone PC.  Though I have found many different games on-line named "Abuse, the closest I have found for that original game is in the various on-line forums, but they are not nearly as much fun as that old computer game was.

 

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy