Trains.com

John mica for the head of the usdot.

7285 views
34 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Monday, November 21, 2016 10:57 PM

The Orlando Sentinel endorsed Hillary, and probably doesn’t get read much at Trump Tower, but

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/editorials/os-ed-mica-for-transportation-20161122-story.html

Mica for U.S. Transportation secretary: Where We Stand

President-elect Donald Trump has made some controversial early picks for top jobs in his new administration. But there's at least one name in the running for his Cabinet who has the qualifications to be a consensus choice: just-defeated Congressman John Mica of Winter Park for transportation secretary.

Mica, a 12-term Republican, was ousted this month by Democrat Stephanie Murphy, a first-time candidate from Winter Park, in a district that lost its advantage for GOP candidates after a court-ordered redrawing of the state's congressional boundaries. Soon after the election, he confirmed he would be interested in serving as transportation secretary. Though 73, he's not quite ready to retire yet.

There are certainly parochial reasons for Central Floridians to hope Trump would choose Mica. As a chairman and senior member of the House Transportation Committee, Mica succeeded in steering billions of federal dollars to an array of transformative projects in this region, including the ongoing Interstate 4 makeover, SunRail and the expansion of Orlando International Airport. These projects have leveraged billions more in state, local and private investments. They've created thousands of jobs. They will boost the region's economy and enhance its quality of life for decades to come.

As U.S. transportation chief, Mica would need to weigh fairly competing demands from all 50 states. Yet he would be in a strong position to keep funds flowing from Washington, D.C., to worthy priorities in Central Florida, and build on his earlier accomplishments. Ironically, his elevation would ease some of the pressure on Murphy to maintain the region's momentum on transportation.

Mica's qualifications for this Cabinet post go beyond his success in lining up funding for projects in and around his district. As Transportation chairman, he also directed federal dollars to complete other major projects around the country, including expanded commuter rail service in New York City and improvements to Seattle's main airport.

Mica's experience and judgment in identifying good, strategic investments for taxpayers would be invaluable if Trump follows through with his campaign promise to launch a massive program to build or upgrade roads, bridges, airports, railways and other transportation infrastructure across the nation. Through his relationships in Congress, Mica could help the program secure crucial support from skeptical Republican leaders.

Mica has other experience from his time on Capitol Hill that would be ideal for the next transportation secretary. During his tenure as Transportation chairman, while the rest of Congress was often gridlocked, he brokered bipartisan deals. His panel passed major bills to renew and streamline highway and transit funding, modernize aviation regulations and programs, improve pipeline safety, and revamp oversight for the Coast Guard.

Mica is cut from the same cloth as other respected transportation secretaries who came from the U.S. House: President Barack Obama's first transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, a Republican from Illinois; and President George W. Bush's first transportation secretary, Norm Mineta, a Democrat from California. Both LaHood and Mineta, like Mica, earned reputations for bipartisan legislating before they took over the Transportation Department.

Trump won the White House as an outsider, but to succeed he'll need the help of appointees who know policy inside and out, and don't need a map to find their way around Washington. Mica as transportation secretary is a good pick for Trump, for Central Florida, and for the rest of the country.

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Saturday, November 19, 2016 7:52 PM

BaltACD

 

 
wanswheel

 

From the picture that leads the video - a new toupee should be the next thing he does/gets.

 

Our vanity and self-deception know no bounds. Not even our eyes will tell us the truth when we look in the mirror. (For the truth, we need a photograph.) I can't fault the rug -- the impulse to cover up -- so much as the color, as if the wearer expects us to buy a 19-year-old head of hair on a gray, 75-year-old face.

Colors not found in nature we have learned to indulge in old women. Maybe we old men just need a little more time for credibility.  

  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Saturday, November 19, 2016 5:18 PM

zugmann

 

 
wanswheel
I won’t be surprised if Mica is appointed Secretary of something, if not transportation.

 

Once again, someone who speaks out against gov't spending will keep sucking at the government teat.  Have to love those hypocrites and the fools who believe them.

 

The government spending is only bad if it isn't going into THEIR pocket.  Devil

Mica has some weird obsession with Amtrak's food-service and amenity costs and should be banished into obscurity.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:33 PM
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:02 PM

wanswheel

From the picture that leads the video - a new toupee should be the next thing he does/gets.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Saturday, November 19, 2016 12:48 PM

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:16 AM

ROBERT WILLISON

 I think Trump will improve the North East corridor. He a life time new yorker and knows the importance of the corridor is to the region. The infrastructure is largely in place with perhaps some track realignments. Alot of the upgrading is close to being shovel ready.

 Trump might also be supportive of the nation's commuter railroads. He is a Northeasterner  and again see how many areas of country depend on them.

I also think the long distant trains could be in trouble. Even thinking about putting mica in the dot, might be an indication of how Trump might want to impact the rest of the Amtrak system. John mica simply is not an big fan of Amtrak. It one  thing to be critical of Amtrak for its long term improvements, another to try to make it disappear.

 

 
The problem with shrinking Amtrak to just the NE Corridor plus the state supported trains is that the Corridor benefits just a handful of states.  Why should those states not be forced to form a compact to fund and operate Amtrak?  Despite being high tax enviroments those states by and large have difficulties meeting their current obligations; the idea that collectively they could provide for Amtrak is a non-starter.  
 
The recent election should have taught us a lesson about the limits of influence of the Corridor states.
 
In short, perhaps the long distance trains are needed by the Corridor at least as much as the states they serve as they insure that widespread political support of Amtrak continues.
  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, November 19, 2016 11:12 AM

Well, there's one thing we can all agree on.  Love him or hate him or be indifferent to him, Mr. Trump's got four years to deliver or he's history.  Matter of fact, the now Republican controlled House of Representatives has two years to start getting it done or a lot of them will be history.

It's going to be interesting.

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • 1,447 posts
Posted by Shadow the Cats owner on Saturday, November 19, 2016 10:51 AM

Actually Trump is more of a Reform Conservative with Some Liberal lean.  He knows that getting Government out of the way is the right thing to do for a lot of industry.  Yet he knows that improving our nations infastructure and increasing our manufactoring base is huge.  He knows that we can not keep being dependant on forgien sources of energy.  He has seen being from the Northeast what can happen with overregulation to industry and how it does effect everyone. 

 

Here is something to remember about him.  He is not from Manhatten he is from Queens he doen't drink smoke do any kind of illegal drug and never has.  Why those items he has seen what it did to his late brother Fred Jr.  He tried and failed to run an airline in the Northeast with Trump Shuttle.  When he does take on a project he does get it done take his overhaul of the old Washington DC post office over 1 year ahead of Schedule and under Budget.  He does not tolerate incompetance and will not allow people that are to rise to the top in his organization.  He expects results if not your gone.  For those that think he is unfair he tackled the toughest real estate market in the USA being Manhatten and he sure has had a lot of success in a city that spits out more people than make it in that city.

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Saturday, November 19, 2016 10:39 AM

Miningman

Heard 2 speeches during the campaign where your President-elect referred to railroad infrastructure and high speed rail in the US needing improvements and to become world class. Would not surprise me in the least if he can do twice as much with half the $'s. He will be good for railroads in general and a high speed rail showpiece or two with a Made in America solution. 

 

I think Trump will improve the North East corridor. He a life time new yorker and knows the importance of the corridor is to the region. The infrastructure is largely in place with perhaps some track realignments. Alot of the upgrading is close to being shovel ready.

Trump might also be supportive of the nation's commuter railroads. He is a Northeasterner  and again see how many areas of country depend on them.

I also think the long distant trains could be in trouble. Even thinking about putting mica in the dot, might be an indication of how Trump might want to impact the rest of the Amtrak system. John mica simply is not an big fan of Amtrak. It one  thing to be critical of Amtrak for its long term improvements, another to try to make it disappear.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,217 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, November 19, 2016 9:17 AM

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/11/schumer-identifies-common-ground-with-trump.php

Trump, being more liberal-progressive than conservative, could easily turn out to be a robust continuation of the last eight years.  The country needs an economic comeback, not an economic "stimulus package."

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 6,199 posts
Posted by Miningman on Friday, November 18, 2016 10:58 PM

Heard 2 speeches during the campaign where your President-elect referred to railroad infrastructure and high speed rail in the US needing improvements and to become world class. Would not surprise me in the least if he can do twice as much with half the $'s. He will be good for railroads in general and a high speed rail showpiece or two with a Made in America solution. 

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Dallas, TX
  • 6,952 posts
Posted by CMStPnP on Friday, November 18, 2016 8:28 PM

So the rumor is that Mr. Trump has called Senator Charles Shumer several times already and is closing in on a deal on passage of a Economic Stimulus package that includes Passenger Rail funding but so far only rumor........stay tuned.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Friday, November 18, 2016 7:09 PM

dakotafred
Sure, that was for Florida. Being a good homeboy doesn't get him off the hook for the war he has made on passenger service for everybody else.

Seems like the only passenger services you care about are the heavily-subsidized LD sleepers and diners, especially the EB..

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:24 PM

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Posted by dakotafred on Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:05 PM

n012944

 

 
ROBERT WILLISON

Fire lock, John mica had one achievement. He found away to destroy food service on Amtrak.

 

 

 

 

Mica was one of the main forces in getting Sunrail, Orlando's commuter rail service, built.  Please though, don't permit those facts from getting in the way of your Mica bash fest.   

 

Sure, that was for Florida. Being a good homeboy doesn't get him off the hook for the war he has made on passenger service for everybody else.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, November 17, 2016 7:41 PM

schlimm
n012944
ROBERT WILLISON

Fire lock, John mica had one achievement. He found away to destroy food service on Amtrak.

Mica was one of the main forces in getting Sunrail, Orlando's commuter rail service, built.  Please though, don't permit those facts from getting in the way of your Mica bash fest.

n012944:  Very true.  Demonizing supposed enemies and all or nothing thinking are not helpful.  Seems to me the main thing Mica did was try to push Amtrak into obeying the law on LD food services.  Not sure how that makes him the enemy of modern passenger rail.

all a part of 21st Century politics - trash the demon

Anybody you are not for is the demon.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 9,610 posts
Posted by schlimm on Thursday, November 17, 2016 7:36 PM

n012944

 

 
ROBERT WILLISON

Fire lock, John mica had one achievement. He found away to destroy food service on Amtrak.

 

 

 

 

Mica was one of the main forces in getting Sunrail, Orlando's commuter rail service, built.  Please though, don't permit those facts from getting in the way of your Mica bash fest.   

 

n012944:  Very true.  Demonizing supposed enemies and all or nothing thinking are not helpful.  Seems to me the main thing Mica did was try to push Amtrak into obeying the law on LD food services.  Not sure how that makes him the enemy of modern passenger rail.

 

C&NW, CA&E, MILW, CGW and IC fan

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:55 PM

ROBERT WILLISON

Fire lock, John mica had one achievement. He found away to destroy food service on Amtrak.

 

 

Mica was one of the main forces in getting Sunrail, Orlando's commuter rail service, built.  Please though, don't permit those facts from getting in the way of your Mica bash fest.   

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Thursday, November 17, 2016 12:35 PM

Fire lock, John mica had one achievement. He found away to destroy food service on Amtrak.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:14 AM

wanswheel
I won’t be surprised if Mica is appointed Secretary of something, if not transportation.

Once again, someone who speaks out against gov't spending will keep sucking at the government teat.  Have to love those hypocrites and the fools who believe them.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • 4,190 posts
Posted by wanswheel on Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:14 AM

I won’t be surprised if Mica is appointed Secretary of something, if not transportation.

Trump’s daughter Ivanka says,

“When this property was put out to bid, Congressman John Mica, Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, held a press conference in the vacant building; it was without heat, and in the freezing cold, he admonished the crowd about government excess and noted that the Old Post Office was losing the United States Government between $6-8-million a year. At a committee hearing following our soft opening last month, Congressman Mica said that Trump International Hotel, Washington D.C., is now creating hundreds of jobs and is a stellar example of turning underutilized properties around with the help of the private sector.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9LKS-nwxhQ&t=5m18s

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Monday, November 14, 2016 6:50 PM

John Mica at DOT?  I don't know, The Trumpster likes achievers, and has Mr. Mica actually achieved anything?  Just asking here, not being a wise guy.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Monday, November 14, 2016 6:31 PM

PNWRMNM

 

 
samfp1943
It does seem that in his 'fight' against AMTRAK, freight rail comanies could suffer as collateral damage. Just

 

Sam,

I do not understand your logic. If ATK goes away the freight carriers get back the capacity they are forced to give ATK at far less than market value.

That seems like a win for freight carriers, and the economy, to me. How do you see the freight carriers loosing?

Mac

 

      Mac:  Agree that IF Rep. Mica succeeds in somehow putting a 'legislative javalin'  in AMTRAK. The freight railroad would gain that capacity that AMTRAK is currently utilizing. IF it is killed, and simply goes away, that capacity would be theirs, but no value received. The issues seem to be that it is a " Hatfield and McCoy's" situation. Potentially, no winner and either party winds up spilling blood.

Particularly, in the areas of the East Coast; and Chicago, (West Coast,as well); where there is 'capacity' being used to support the many origins and destinations that AMTRAK traffic supports.     Even with the mix of 'various regional services' municipal and state supported survices. I know that where AMTRAK 'operates ( or 'subsisizes'(?) those services.     The railroads that 'host' those passenger services get funds to increase issues of traffic density and volume.   Take out AMTRAK and the railroads still get benefits of improvements made to their capacity. 

  It seems that a majority of politicians and citizens agree that AMTRAK performs a needed service with its various operations around the country. The loss of those 'services' would cripple the economies in the areas where those 'services' are provided; workers would not be able to get to their jobs, and all the arrendant problems that go along with those issues. 

True, the freight railroads would still haul and deliver the goods needed to make the American economy function; possibly, with AMTRAK removed the railroads would do that without the impediments of AMTRAK's timed, and scheduled trains 'interfering' with those operations(?)

 My point about Cong. Mica, is in his twenty years in Congress, has been a voice that sought to interrupt the building of a national passenger rail network.He has consistantly, been a negative voice in Congress, attempting to stop the 'construction' of a passenger rail network.  I would suspect that IF, he had ridden the Train between his home constituancy in Florida, and Washington,D.C.  Those trips would be counted on the finger of one hand.

   His role has been more destructive than constructive of the process of the goal of a national passenger carrier.    In 1970 the Congressional goal was to take 20 railroads [in May of 1971] offering services in over thirty states, and create one carrier operated as an adjunct corporation of the Federal Government, Similarly, (?) to the Post Office.  Congress finally killed the Railway Post Office Service in 1977.  It had been dying a slow death since WWII, and the discontinuance of its subsisized routes, also signaled the death of many railroad passenger trains.  Those subsidies were the funding that kept passenger trains on the railroads, and the withdrawal of those mail subsidies were parallel to the decline of the passenger trains. 

Removing those 'mail subsidies' and then throttling the 'then new' AMTRAK with a budget process that stunted long term plans, and goals with a yearly budget process that created an environment of an uncertain future. Forcing AMTRAK management to make regular trips back to Congress to request more funding,created an uncertain future; both for AMTRAK and its hosting railroads.  No wonder the railroads view AMTRAK as a tenant they do not want, and some one they are forced by legislation to live with.  Not a good situation at ant level.

and it is as you stated else where, in the linked Thread:"...Be careful what you wish for. Mica may go from ATK's foremost critic to ATK's executioner..."

Mac

Yep! Congressman Mica may be the Luddite who thrws his sabot into the works on his way out the door...Bang Head

  

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 1,180 posts
Posted by ROBERT WILLISON on Monday, November 14, 2016 3:20 PM

We and Amtrak have been fixing choke holds for a while. Amtrak on time performance improves very little for the dollar s it had paid. I think the case of how BNSF treated the empire builder is a case in point. The millions the class one railroads want so Amtrak can add one daily train is some times outrageous.

Mica joining the Trump team the swamp one, Amtrak zero.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Monday, November 14, 2016 2:46 PM

daveklepper

Becaiuse fixing choke points so Amtrak can perform better means that freight will also perform better.

The choke points that I know of are choke points because of ATK, either at current volume or because ATK wants more trains as in CHI-MKW case. If those ATK moves go away so do the choke points.

If you have an example of ATK or the state fixing a freight choke point other than to run more trains, please advise.

Mac

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, November 14, 2016 1:43 PM

Becaiuse fixing choke points so Amtrak can perform better means that freight will also perform better.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Monday, November 14, 2016 1:33 PM

samfp1943
It does seem that in his 'fight' against AMTRAK, freight rail comanies could suffer as collateral damage. Just

Sam,

I do not understand your logic. If ATK goes away the freight carriers get back the capacity they are forced to give ATK at far less than market value.

That seems like a win for freight carriers, and the economy, to me. How do you see the freight carriers loosing?

Mac

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy