Trains.com

Minor CSX derailment

3339 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:59 PM

CShaveRR
BaltACD


Well, that explains the circumstances that led to the car's untimely departure.  Did the "thinking" involve duct tape?  I would think that any repairs that involved chains would scream out "Rear End Only!"

Repair did not involve chains - a lot of welding, but no chains.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:46 PM

BaltACD
The car department 'thought' they had applied repairs sufficient for the car to reach its owner's territory--obviously they were mistaken. 



Well, that explains the circumstances that led to the car's untimely departure.  Did the "thinking" involve duct tape?  I would think that any repairs that involved chains would scream out "Rear End Only!"

Your description of the circumstances of the pickup also says a bit.  Each of the three cuts no doubt was stretched before handbrakes were released, so our poor covered hopper had its defect exacerbated post-repair and post-inspection.  

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • 711 posts
Posted by SD70M-2Dude on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 3:57 PM

Ah!  So there was a pre-existing defect.  Makes sense, from what I have heard the knuckle is deliberately designed to be the weakest link so it will break first in case of an overstress, and is relatively easy to replace/fix compared to a pulled/broken drawbar or major failure like this. 

Train building seems to be getting worse and worse these days, out here CN likes to put autoracks and centrebeams on the head end of a loaded grain train for some reason... and then they act all surprised when it comes apart even when the Engineer does everything right.

Greetings from Alberta

-an Articulate Malcontent

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 2:49 PM

Mookie

Balt: That was very clear.  Thank you.  So - since it was to be home shopped and they knew that it had an underframe defect, this should have been place more toward the end of the train?  So there wouldn't be as much pull on the already defective car?  And I won't even ask anyone to speculate on why it pulled apart, until we get the "report"...  Shy

There will be no 'report'.  No HAZMAT or loss of life was involved, just another day of recovering from what reality throws at an operating Class 1 railroad, someplace or another.  There may be some revised local operating instructions, or not - the Car Dept. may get some revised instructions, or not.

The train was loaded within 74 tons of the 10800 ton limit for head end powered trains on Baltimore's Belt Line, through the Howard Street Tunnel.  Set off about 2K tons at Bayview and picked about 6K tons.  Car involved was in the pick up.  When train stopped at the East End of Bayview Yard to perform its work, the rear of the train fouled the West End.  The pickup consisted of 3 tracks off the yard - yard is downhill to the East and each track of the pickup was secured by 10% hand brakes + 3 as required by local rules.  Set off and remaining train on Main track also had to be secured by 10% hand brakes + 3.  The time to accomplish all this work was approximately 4 hours.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 2:33 PM

tree68
Mookie

With four to five trains daily, we don't have quite the potential for such mayhem as a busier route would...

Approximately 15 trains, including primere Intermodals had to be recrewed.  The car department 'thought' they had applied repairs sufficient for the car to reach it's owner's territory - obviously they were mistaken. 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 1:16 PM

There was enough of an underframe defect for a private industry to see.  What would that entail--a car off center?  or, more likely, a crack in the underframe or drawbar area?  This undrframe defect should not have been a surprise to anyone making up or inspecting a train in Baltimore.  So someone apparently inspected the car in the yard and either missed this defect in spite of the notation, or okayed it to be carried with about 10,000 trailing tons.  An inbound inspection should have revealed at least what caused the car to be rejected in the first place, and resulted in the car being bad-ordered.  Instead, probably after having been switched around a bit in Baltimore, it was placed in an outbound block for pickup by a Selkirk-bound train (or, alternatively, placed into a Baltimore-to-Selkirk train).  How did this defect miss an outbound inspection?  How was it handled from the plant to Baltimore?  Doesn't anyone communicate?

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 12:05 PM

BOB WITHORN
Bet the car dept. rethinks, (with some attention getting from somewhere higher up), their decision on restrictions.
 

Then again, there's a lot of older cars out there, and running these monster 12,000ton+ slop freights...Dots - Sign

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:39 AM

Mookie
Why?

With four to five trains daily, we don't have quite the potential for such mayhem as a busier route would...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:03 AM

tree68

That would have caused some excitement here in the north woods if it decided to let go here on the St Lawrence sub...

 

Why?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 8:02 AM

Balt: That was very clear.  Thank you.  So - since it was to be home shopped and they knew that it had an underframe defect, this should have been place more toward the end of the train?  So there wouldn't be as much pull on the already defective car?  And I won't even ask anyone to speculate on why it pulled apart, until we get the "report"...  Shy

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,021 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:18 AM

That would have caused some excitement here in the north woods if it decided to let go here on the St Lawrence sub...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:16 AM

Mookie

I understand over all what happened, but can someone explain to me in a little more detail?  Like placement; what was it used for (looks like a grain hopper to me); and how it may have been pulled apart?

Car was a empty covered hopper that was built in 1979 and has been used most recently hauling alumina ore from Hawkins Point pier in Baltimore to the Alcoa Aluminum refienry in Massena, NY.  When it was most recently spotted for loading at Hawkins Point, it was rejected account a underframe defect and was classified as a 'Home Shop' which caused it to be classified to return to Alcoa at Massena empty.  The car was picked up by at train at Bayview Yard in Baltimore in the Selkirk classification block to move to Selkirk Yard (near Albany, NY) where it would be switched into a train for Massena; the car was 28 from the engines of a total of 184 cars in the train departing Bayview.  One end of the car - truck, center plate, part of the center sill and end of the car itself separated from the balance of the car - the car was 'pulled in two'.  Off track equipment was summoned and about 10 hours after the happening, traffic was moving again on the single track line where the incident happened.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 7:00 AM

I understand over all what happened, but can someone explain to me in a little more detail?  Like placement; what was it used for (looks like a grain hopper to me); and how it may have been pulled apart?

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    October 2014
  • From: Flint or Grand Rapids, Mi or Elkhart, It Depends on the day
  • 573 posts
Posted by BOB WITHORN on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:06 AM
Bet the car dept. rethinks, (with some attention getting from somewhere higher up), their decision on restrictions.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:12 AM

The car had been picked up at Bayview yard in Baltimore after having been rejected for loading of alumina ore for Alcoa at Massena, NY.  Was the 28th car of 184 in train that was almost 15K tons.  Car Dept. did not place any restrictions on the car concerning it's placement in train.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:58 PM

mudchicken
Gee - the old rule about handling at the end of the train might have applied?

But on CSX, they might have handled it at the *wrong* end of the train.  Didn't they intentionally kill a couple of rusted MP54s with that stunt?

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:53 PM

Gee - the old rule about handling at the end of the train might have applied?

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:47 PM

Overmod
I'm still trying to figure out how they got both the draft gear AND the truck to come out like that. Musta been LOTS of rust all around in there...

Not the first hopper I've seen do that. 

 

When the good lord calls them to come home, it's time!

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:43 PM

zugmann
Can't shop a shop!

But you can sure have one-stop shopping... just watch that first stop, it's a Duesie... to paraphrase Daffy, they could only do it once.

I'm still trying to figure out how they got both the draft gear AND the truck to come out like that.  Musta been LOTS of rust all around in there...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:33 PM

zugmann
BaltACD

Private owner empty covered hopper that was moving as a 'Home Shop' for repairs in the middle of a 12000 foot 10600 ton train.  No wheels were off the rail.

Can't shop a shop!

Being scrpped in place.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:20 PM

BaltACD

Private owner empty covered hopper that was moving as a 'Home Shop' for repairs in the middle of a 12000 foot 10600 ton train.  No wheels were off the rail.

 

Can't shop a shop!

 

 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:13 PM

Private owner empty covered hopper that was moving as a 'Home Shop' for repairs in the middle of a 12000 foot 10600 ton train.  No wheels were off the rail.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:47 PM

Somebody gonna get yelled at for bad train handling. Oops

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Minor CSX derailment
Posted by blue streak 1 on Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:32 PM

CSX had what appears to be either a center sill failure.  First though it may be truck pivot but ?  Anyone know ?

http://delawarefreenews.org/2016/07/17/csx-train-derails-in-wilmington/

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy