Trains.com

A crazy day, but at least it was short!!!

3066 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Friday, December 10, 2004 7:18 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sterling1

QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

QUOTE: Originally posted by Sterling1

QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

No, railroads do not. Neither do fishing vessels, steel mills, coal mines, metal mines, construction firms, logging outfits, drilling rigs, or any similar occupation that requires skills, teamwork, independent decision-making ability, maturity, and risk-management, and is usually conducted in harsh conditions. They expect you to act like an adult. Adults walk away and allow tempers to cool. Only children and criminals think that life should be like the OK Corral.

Alan is right. Any train crew member who allows themselves to get provoked into a fight isn't fit for the service. It's way too serious and dangerous a business to treat it like a playground.

If someone is doing something dangerous, and doesn't stop, you pull the air. You walk away. You let the trainmaster or RFE sort it out.


Thanks Mark for the advice, I needed it badly.


Yes, you did. Until you made this comment I hadn't bothered to read your bio. Now that I have I see why your responses reflected a lack of maturity. Now I understand. Good luck in high school...

LC


Thanks LC I have always welcomed a friendly boost from fellow railfans and railroaders in a non-rail friendly household and community. It's very little supprt from people who just don't understand and know about RR.


I'm still at the station of life where immaturity is overly common. It'll burn off the top when I get older and more aged . . .
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Friday, December 10, 2004 7:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear

QUOTE: Originally posted by Sterling1

QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

No, railroads do not. Neither do fishing vessels, steel mills, coal mines, metal mines, construction firms, logging outfits, drilling rigs, or any similar occupation that requires skills, teamwork, independent decision-making ability, maturity, and risk-management, and is usually conducted in harsh conditions. They expect you to act like an adult. Adults walk away and allow tempers to cool. Only children and criminals think that life should be like the OK Corral.

Alan is right. Any train crew member who allows themselves to get provoked into a fight isn't fit for the service. It's way too serious and dangerous a business to treat it like a playground.

If someone is doing something dangerous, and doesn't stop, you pull the air. You walk away. You let the trainmaster or RFE sort it out.


Thanks Mark for the advice, I needed it badly.


Yes, you did. Until you made this comment I hadn't bothered to read your bio. Now that I have I see why your responses reflected a lack of maturity. Now I understand. Good luck in high school...

LC


Thanks LC I have always welcomed a friendly boost from fellow railfans and railroaders in a non-rail friendly household and community. It's very little supprt from people who just don't understand and know about RR.
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 4, 2004 8:27 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Nathan and Ed, thanks.

The engineer did not say "set and centered", I am sure I would have asked him what this meant. I wonder if the engineer saying "red zone" on this shortline is considered acceptable.


Depends upon what that short line's safety and operating rules provide.

LC
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Saturday, December 4, 2004 7:44 PM
Nathan and Ed, thanks.

The engineer did not say "set and centered", I am sure I would have asked him what this meant. I wonder if the engineer saying "red zone" on this shortline is considered acceptable.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 4, 2004 6:12 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sterling1

QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

No, railroads do not. Neither do fishing vessels, steel mills, coal mines, metal mines, construction firms, logging outfits, drilling rigs, or any similar occupation that requires skills, teamwork, independent decision-making ability, maturity, and risk-management, and is usually conducted in harsh conditions. They expect you to act like an adult. Adults walk away and allow tempers to cool. Only children and criminals think that life should be like the OK Corral.

Alan is right. Any train crew member who allows themselves to get provoked into a fight isn't fit for the service. It's way too serious and dangerous a business to treat it like a playground.

If someone is doing something dangerous, and doesn't stop, you pull the air. You walk away. You let the trainmaster or RFE sort it out.


Thanks Mark for the advice, I needed it badly.


Yes, you did. Until you made this comment I hadn't bothered to read your bio. Now that I have I see why your responses reflected a lack of maturity. Now I understand. Good luck in high school...

LC
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Saturday, December 4, 2004 6:03 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by M.W. Hemphill

No, railroads do not. Neither do fishing vessels, steel mills, coal mines, metal mines, construction firms, logging outfits, drilling rigs, or any similar occupation that requires skills, teamwork, independent decision-making ability, maturity, and risk-management, and is usually conducted in harsh conditions. They expect you to act like an adult. Adults walk away and allow tempers to cool. Only children and criminals think that life should be like the OK Corral.

Alan is right. Any train crew member who allows themselves to get provoked into a fight isn't fit for the service. It's way too serious and dangerous a business to treat it like a playground.

If someone is doing something dangerous, and doesn't stop, you pull the air. You walk away. You let the trainmaster or RFE sort it out.


Thanks Mark for the advice, I needed it badly.
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 4, 2004 12:53 PM
N_s-

I always stop if I even think I have gone much past half the distance my Conductor gives. Too many times Engineers don't watch the ground or the cars on an adjacent track to estimate distance and it gets them in BIG trouble. Look at the UP crew that shoved a car through a warehouse wall or the incident I described in a prior post where a student engineer shoved a cut of haz mats out over a derail on to the main bercause the Conductor's last instruction was "just keep shoving". It just isn't worth my job. I'd rather stop and have someone ask me why...

LC
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, December 4, 2004 9:05 AM
Working up in one of the Chicago yards there is so much radio chatter that sometimes I get walked on while doubling my train together. Most engineers follow the rules in this situation, but some have suprised me. If an engineer does not hear from me within half the shoving distance he must stop and wait for me to talk to him. I must continue to let him/her know that my eyes are on the move. In the Chicago yards I tend to get walked on a lot by other crews, so my engineers don't know I'm talking to them. I usually try to stay several tracks away from my tie because sometimes engineers will just keep going even though I'm telling them THAT'LL DO!!!!!!!!!! But, they can't hear me! Most engineers who don't hear from me just stop and wait for the chatter to subside, then the call me and ask if I'm ready to start up again; that's definitely the way i prefer and now I brief the engineer to PLEASE stop if they don't hear from me!!!
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Saturday, December 4, 2004 5:25 AM
Michael,

It really dosn't add that much chatter...

Example would be, if I had pulled a cut out of a track, and needed to release the last handbrake, when the movement had stopped I would call the engineer.

"Port Job 152, mobile One(me) will be in the red zone"

engineer replies, "Port Job 152, set and centered"

Two quick, easy to understand sentances.

Now, until the engineer hears, "Port Job 152, mobile One is clear of the red zone", the engineer can not move the train.

Before the red zone or three step protection, we relied on the engineer reconizing our voices.

As a courtsey, we would tell him we were "going in between", but it wasnt required,

The problem is that, in yards especially, there are several jobs using the same channel, and quite a few people didnt bother to id their jobs when giving instructions.

So, the engineer might hear a voice say "shove 'em back ten times", and assume its his foreman giving the instructions, and away he goes, while you are still in between.

This has happened to me a few time, the top end foreman has the same, twangy west texas accent I have, and on the radio, we sound the same.

The red zone/three step protection came into being about two/three years ago, based on the SOFA recomendations.
(SOFA, switching operations fatalitites analysis)

Proper radio procedures require the ground crew to use the train ID anytime they need a movement, be it shoving, dragging, or kicking cars.

The red zone/three step has re-enforced that.

Take it from someone who has already been on a ride down a yard track, in between cars, holding on to a brake wheel, with the other hand holding me up on the next cars end platform, hoping there is a lot more room in the track than the engineer thinks....
Red Zone/Three step protection was a much needed safety rule, and one which should be drummed into the heads of all new engineers and ground crews!

Ed

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: L A County, CA, US
  • 1,009 posts
Posted by MP57313 on Saturday, December 4, 2004 1:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by espeefoamer
That brakeman should be reported to both the trainmaster and the union.The railroad doesn't need employees who work dangerously

Are there situations where the difficult employee is a brother/nephew/other relative to, say, a big wheel in the union, so reporting him would get you in trouble?
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Saturday, December 4, 2004 12:12 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by arbfbe

Sterling1,

You are so fired. End of career.

If you get into an argument you are suspect. If you get hit by another person even if you did nothing to provoke it, you will be withheld from service pending the investigation. The carrier's position will be that since you decided to stay in the confrontational situation you are as guilty as the person delivering the blow. You might be allowed to return to work after a time but in order to make a point the railroad will probably dismiss the both of you and let the neutral at the NLRB sort it out after 12 - 18 months if you get expedited handling. If you do hit back and strike the other individual after being struck by him, you are gone. No neutral will likely put you back. That is the harsh reality. You hear stories of blows going unpunished but they are rare any more.


Do the railroads also include how control one's temper against a situation such as that? I don't want to go in and find out that they don't teach anger management. Seriously!!!
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • 910 posts
Posted by arbfbe on Friday, December 3, 2004 11:46 PM
Sterling1,

You are so fired. End of career.

If you get into an argument you are suspect. If you get hit by another person even if you did nothing to provoke it, you will be withheld from service pending the investigation. The carrier's position will be that since you decided to stay in the confrontational situation you are as guilty as the person delivering the blow. You might be allowed to return to work after a time but in order to make a point the railroad will probably dismiss the both of you and let the neutral at the NLRB sort it out after 12 - 18 months if you get expedited handling. If you do hit back and strike the other individual after being struck by him, you are gone. No neutral will likely put you back. That is the harsh reality. You hear stories of blows going unpunished but they are rare any more.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 2, 2004 8:58 PM
Ed, funny you talk about three step in my training. When I was remote training in October the superintendant of the Chicago Division came down for a visit. I was the controlling operator and I was opening a knuckle while switching and I didn't walk at least 25 ft away when I crossed behind the cut of cars. The "super" made a bet with my trainmaster that I didn't have three-step when I made that move. Later that day both of them came up to me and my instructor and asked if I had three step, and I said: "What? Do you think I'm crazy!, Of course I had three step!" My trainmaster turned to the "super" and said: "See? I told you!" Then I was asked why I crossed behind the cut of cars from a distance then if I had three step. I told them that even if I have three step I still am always going to try to leave a way out for myself. You just never know what can happen.
So, yes three-step is a huge part of training and so is proper radio procedure. When shoving cars I must declare three things before the engineer moves. 1) the position of switches in our move, and that they are lined for our movement 2) that I'm in the clear 3) the distance in the shove in fifty foot car lengths.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Thursday, December 2, 2004 5:49 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by n_stephenson

LC,

Thanks for the previous ancedote. Wow, we don't have anybody threatening the lives of others verbally, but there is one engineer qualified conductor that scares everyone to death. Many people lay off if they get called to work with this person. Recently this "person" was called as an engineer to take a piggy back to Chicago because there were no available engineers. On the return trip the chief road foreman rode back with this person and the word is he called up our road foreman and told him it was the scariest ride of his life. The "person" had no idea what signals to follow, what track they were on half the time, and had to rely on using that little yellow ball on the computer screen to keep speed, and had all their timetables and rule books out in front of them!!! I'm fine with referencing your rule books and timetable to make certain of something, but this person relies on these books the entire trip every time! I'm no engineer, but I believe the lay of the land is a much better indicator as well as trailing tonnage and what you have pulling the train. To say the least the chicago road foreman had a talk with our road foreman, but I don't know if anything will be done. This "person" as a conductor sleeps all the time and when they have to get on the ground they are a lost cause. One time this individual had to pull out of a yard track with 55 cars. The movement was stopped at about 30 cars and then the engineer was told to back up. In the meantime the conductor had thrown the switch underneath the train. Soon enough there were cars on the ground. The reply of the conductor was: "the switch didn't look right, so I threw it." [V] How this person still works for the RR, I don't know. This individual is capable of devastating things due to their own ingnorance or just plain "wacked" state of mind. The terrible thing for those of who are called to work with this individual must make a choice; do I risk working with this individual at great personal danger or the risk of getting time on the street or do I call off sick and risk disciplinary action??? A no win situation.


Wasn't there something like that in the Trains magazine?
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Thursday, December 2, 2004 5:40 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kolechovski

The experienced/smart engineer was right, the haughty brakeman was an *** and was clearly wrong. You did what you had to, but at least you could have had them reply sooner to the call than leave the guy on the other end wondering why nobody's responding.


Jeeezzz!!!
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Traveling in Middle Earth
  • 795 posts
Posted by Sterling1 on Thursday, December 2, 2004 5:38 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Randy Stahl

Older locomotives have removable automatic airbrake handles specificly designed to deal with brake men.
Stopping your little local was fine, I would have tossed the brakeman out at that point, let the trainmaster pick him up.
Randy


Would've whacked(beat) him there and cleaned up the mess later for the poor next crew and trainmaster . . .
"There is nothing in life that compares with running a locomotive at 80-plus mph with the windows open, the traction motors screaming, the air horns fighting the rush of incoming air to make any sound at all, automobiles on adjacent highways trying and failing to catch up with you, and the unmistakable presence of raw power. You ride with fear in the pit of your stomach knowing you do not really have control of this beast." - D.C. Battle [Trains 10/2002 issue, p74.]
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 437 posts
Posted by mloik on Thursday, December 2, 2004 2:58 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by edblysard

Eric,
Red Zone, Three step, in between...all mean the same thing when used in this manner.

The Red Zone is that area of the end plane of the car body, formerly know as the dead zone, where, if your body is in there, and the car moves, your dead.

On my railroad, we use the term red zone instead of three step.

When a conductor or switchman calls red zone, he must indentify what job, who he is, and state that he is going in the red zone,(see Nate's exxcellent explaination of what we do in the zone)

To this, the engineer must follow the steps mentioned, and announce that he has "set and centered" the controls.

No one can piggyback themselves into the zone, each individule must call for his or her own protection, and the engineer must acknowledge each one, and can not move the train until all crew members who called for the zone protection, have cleared themselves.

I cant call for, or clear my helper, nor can he do the same for me, period.

When clearing, or releasing protection, each crew member must, again, identify what job, who he is, and tell the engineer he is clear.

There are hand signals for this also, and lantren signals.

Again, because the engineer sees the hand or light signal, and acknowledges it, he can not move the train until he sees each crew member, and gets the clear signal from each one in the same manner they requested protection.

If you use hand signals to ask for protection, you have to used hand signals to clear.

If you use the radio to request protection, you must use radio to clear, hand signal or light signals, you must make yourself visible to the engineer to clear, so he can be certain everyone is clear.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, will scare you like having the car you are lacing the air hoses up on, or adjusting a knuckle on move while your in the zone.

I would bet that when Nate was training, the three step protection was the single most emphasized form of self protection he was taught, for good reason.

Ed
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Last summer I got to "ride" along in the cab of a locomotive while they did some switching. I noticed that when the conductor went between the locomotive and car to connect them the engineer called out "red zone" on the radio, I do not remember if the conductor said anything before this. I assumed this meant that the engineer could not see the conductor. Do you think it meant this or that the conductor had three step protection?



Ed,

This must result in a lot of back-and-forth on the radio? I don't have a reciever like some railfans (but Christmas is coming...)

Also, I saw the map of Houston in a recent issue of Trains. I'm sure you must have told the Forum many times, but what part do you work? I'd be interested to go back to the map and have a look at your "territory" (don't know if that's the correct term.)

Many thanks in advance,
Michael
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Thursday, December 2, 2004 8:56 AM
When was the Three Step rule established?. I know that in the days before radios, when the engineer received a handle signal to stop, brakes were set, and the engine wasn't moved until the engineer received a hand signal to move, and was certain that the crew was in the clear.

However, I don't remember that centering the reverser and opening the generator field was part of the process. I understand that those steps add another level of safety to the activity, but were there incidents that that compelled the rule change? Anybody know the story?

Jay

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Thursday, December 2, 2004 8:11 AM
Eric,
Red Zone, Three step, in between...all mean the same thing when used in this manner.

The Red Zone is that area of the end plane of the car body, formerly know as the dead zone, where, if your body is in there, and the car moves, your dead.

On my railroad, we use the term red zone instead of three step.

When a conductor or switchman calls red zone, he must indentify what job, who he is, and state that he is going in the red zone,(see Nate's exxcellent explaination of what we do in the zone)

To this, the engineer must follow the steps mentioned, and announce that he has "set and centered" the controls.

No one can piggyback themselves into the zone, each individule must call for his or her own protection, and the engineer must acknowledge each one, and can not move the train until all crew members who called for the zone protection, have cleared themselves.

I cant call for, or clear my helper, nor can he do the same for me, period.

When clearing, or releasing protection, each crew member must, again, identify what job, who he is, and tell the engineer he is clear.

There are hand signals for this also, and lantren signals.

Again, because the engineer sees the hand or light signal, and acknowledges it, he can not move the train until he sees each crew member, and gets the clear signal from each one in the same manner they requested protection.

If you use hand signals to ask for protection, you have to used hand signals to clear.

If you use the radio to request protection, you must use radio to clear, hand signal or light signals, you must make yourself visible to the engineer to clear, so he can be certain everyone is clear.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, will scare you like having the car you are lacing the air hoses up on, or adjusting a knuckle on move while your in the zone.

I would bet that when Nate was training, the three step protection was the single most emphasized form of self protection he was taught, for good reason.

Ed
QUOTE: Originally posted by ericsp

Last summer I got to "ride" along in the cab of a locomotive while they did some switching. I noticed that when the conductor went between the locomotive and car to connect them the engineer called out "red zone" on the radio, I do not remember if the conductor said anything before this. I assumed this meant that the engineer could not see the conductor. Do you think it meant this or that the conductor had three step protection?

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 2, 2004 7:54 AM
It wouldn't have been funny when the engineer got fired. You can do a lot of stupid stuff on the railroad and they'll still let you come back, but fighting and stealing get you cannedd for good.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Colorado Springs
  • 728 posts
Posted by FThunder11 on Thursday, December 2, 2004 7:40 AM
I think it would have been pretty funny if the engineer hit the brakeman!!!
Kevin Farlow Colorado Springs
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 9:33 PM
ericsp,

If you are a crew that works together every day you tend to take shortcuts because you make your own system. The engineer knows the conductor will ask for three step every time, so he saves a step by letting the conductor know he already has it.
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 8:33 PM
Last summer I got to "ride" along in the cab of a locomotive while they did some switching. I noticed that when the conductor went between the locomotive and car to connect them the engineer called out "red zone" on the radio, I do not remember if the conductor said anything before this. I assumed this meant that the engineer could not see the conductor. Do you think it meant this or that the conductor had three step protection?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 1:13 PM
Michael,

Three-step, red zone, three-point are the same thing. Different railroads have different ways of saying the same thing basically. A person on the ground, such as a conductor, brakeman, switchman, carman, utility man, etc will ask for three-step protection when they need to go between, under, or within 25ft of rail equipment with controlled locomotive power attached. The engineer or Remote operator performs a few basic functions to ensure that the requesting employee receives the protoection desired. Engineers must: 1) put the reverser in neutral 2) open the generator field circuit 3) set the indepenent brakes?? (I forgot the last one). Once the engineer does this they report to the requesting employee that they have three-step protection. Most commonly I use three-step to couple air hoses and turn angle cocks, and of course to apply or release hand brakes. Three-step ensures me that the engineer cannot accidentally move, or that the cars will not move while I am in between them. The other rule is that the person who asks for three-step protection also has to be the one that releases it. If there's anything I missed, feel free to fill in my fellow forum members.[:D]
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 437 posts
Posted by mloik on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 12:21 PM
LC et al.,

Thanks for all your insights. For those of us like me that are not professional railroaders, could you please explain "three step"?

Thanks,
Michael
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 11:54 AM
n_s - That sounds like a pretty scary trip alright. Glad I wasn't there. Even as a trainee I usually seldom found the need to open the books except in complicated terminal areas. I did always keep a cheat sheet of current speeds I typed up and kept with me at all times, making necessary changes from the daily bulletins. I'd change it on the computer when I got done each day. Now, with the laptop, I don't even wait that long.

LC
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Harrisburg PA / Dover AFB DE
  • 1,482 posts
Posted by adrianspeeder on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 11:36 AM
"whacked" state of mind. I laughed at that one for some reason. There are morons everywhere, and i try to avoid them when they would impact my safety. Otherwise, they make great entertainment.

Adrianspeeder

USAF TSgt C-17 Aircraft Maintenance Flying Crew Chief & Flightline Avionics Craftsman

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 11:10 AM
LC,

Thanks for the previous ancedote. Wow, we don't have anybody threatening the lives of others verbally, but there is one engineer qualified conductor that scares everyone to death. Many people lay off if they get called to work with this person. Recently this "person" was called as an engineer to take a piggy back to Chicago because there were no available engineers. On the return trip the chief road foreman rode back with this person and the word is he called up our road foreman and told him it was the scariest ride of his life. The "person" had no idea what signals to follow, what track they were on half the time, and had to rely on using that little yellow ball on the computer screen to keep speed, and had all their timetables and rule books out in front of them!!! I'm fine with referencing your rule books and timetable to make certain of something, but this person relies on these books the entire trip every time! I'm no engineer, but I believe the lay of the land is a much better indicator as well as trailing tonnage and what you have pulling the train. To say the least the chicago road foreman had a talk with our road foreman, but I don't know if anything will be done. This "person" as a conductor sleeps all the time and when they have to get on the ground they are a lost cause. One time this individual had to pull out of a yard track with 55 cars. The movement was stopped at about 30 cars and then the engineer was told to back up. In the meantime the conductor had thrown the switch underneath the train. Soon enough there were cars on the ground. The reply of the conductor was: "the switch didn't look right, so I threw it." [V] How this person still works for the RR, I don't know. This individual is capable of devastating things due to their own ingnorance or just plain "wacked" state of mind. The terrible thing for those of who are called to work with this individual must make a choice; do I risk working with this individual at great personal danger or the risk of getting time on the street or do I call off sick and risk disciplinary action??? A no win situation.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 1, 2004 10:20 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ValleyX

You get the three step, you release the three step. If the three step is on the entire crew, then it has to be released by the entire crew. NO EXCEPTIONS, NO SHORTCUTS.

If someone dumps the air on the train, they'd better have a good reason, a very explainable reason.

As far as turning someone in, boy, that's a tough one. I'm probably from the old school where you just don't hardly do that, bad as you might want to. I've seen more than one case where, when it was done, it took unexpected directions when the powers-that-be started looking into the entire situation. Since there weren't blows exchanged, I'd probably let it go but I can appreciate how you feel about it.

Sounds like he might be the most miserable individual you have in the terminal, I hope there aren't any others like him.


I agree, it is difficult to know when someone crosses the line and becomes a liability so great as to warrant turning him in. In the circumstances mentioned by n_stephenson, it is a close call indeed. I had a similar experience when I was working as a brakeman having to break up a confrontation between the Engineer and Conductor over the conductor's smoking. Needless to say the two insisted in having this confrontation as we were running down the main at 40 mph.

One thing many of us have done is to simply refuse a call to work with a person who we know is dangerous or likely to create unreasonable tensions. We had a brand new engineer who had a foul temper and I believe had organic psychological issues. Both the unions and management were aware of this as this individual was known to threaten to kill his conductor and/or brakeman on a fairly regular basis. Many of us drew the line there as we had to go between cars and rely upon this individual to provide protection (three step). Despite these complaints no real action was taken. In the end he solved the problem for us. One night he got into a dispute at a bar with his girlfriend and assaulted her with his car in the parking lot resulting in serious injuries. Needless to say he was charged and convicted and sentenced to years in state prison.

BTW, that was the anecdote I referred to earlier.

LC

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy